Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Podcasts
    • Subject Collections
    • Archives
    • ASN Meeting Abstracts
    • Saved Searches
  • Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Resources
    • Reprint Information
  • Trainees
    • Peer Review Program
    • Prize Competition
  • About CJASN
    • About CJASN
    • Editorial Team
    • CJASN Impact
    • CJASN Recognitions
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Advertising
    • Reprint Information
    • Subscriptions
    • Feedback
  • ASN Kidney News
  • Other
    • JASN
    • Kidney360
    • Kidney News Online
    • American Society of Nephrology

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
American Society of Nephrology
  • Other
    • JASN
    • Kidney360
    • Kidney News Online
    • American Society of Nephrology
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Advertisement
American Society of Nephrology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Podcasts
    • Subject Collections
    • Archives
    • ASN Meeting Abstracts
    • Saved Searches
  • Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Resources
    • Reprint Information
  • Trainees
    • Peer Review Program
    • Prize Competition
  • About CJASN
    • About CJASN
    • Editorial Team
    • CJASN Impact
    • CJASN Recognitions
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Advertising
    • Reprint Information
    • Subscriptions
    • Feedback
  • ASN Kidney News
  • Visit ASN on Facebook
  • Follow CJASN on Twitter
  • CJASN RSS
  • Community Forum
Mini-Review
You have accessRestricted Access

Vascular Effects of Exercise Training in CKD: Current Evidence and Pathophysiological Mechanisms

Amaryllis H. Van Craenenbroeck, Emeline M. Van Craenenbroeck, Evangelia Kouidi, Christiaan J. Vrints, Marie M. Couttenye and Viviane M. Conraads
CJASN July 2014, 9 (7) 1305-1318; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2215/CJN.13031213
Amaryllis H. Van Craenenbroeck
Departments of *Nephrology and
†Laboratory for Molecular and Cellular Cardiology, University of Antwerp, Edegem, Belgium; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Emeline M. Van Craenenbroeck
†Laboratory for Molecular and Cellular Cardiology, University of Antwerp, Edegem, Belgium; and
‡Cardiology, Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Evangelia Kouidi
§School of Physical Education and Sports Sciences, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christiaan J. Vrints
†Laboratory for Molecular and Cellular Cardiology, University of Antwerp, Edegem, Belgium; and
‡Cardiology, Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marie M. Couttenye
Departments of *Nephrology and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Viviane M. Conraads
†Laboratory for Molecular and Cellular Cardiology, University of Antwerp, Edegem, Belgium; and
‡Cardiology, Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data Supps
  • Info & Metrics
  • View PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Training-induced increase in NO bioavailability in CKD. (A) NO is synthesized from l-arginine by eNOS after agonist occupation (merely calcium-dependent) or shear stress (merely calcium-independent). Other than its role as a relaxing factor, NO inhibits leukocyte adhesion, platelet aggregation, and inflammation and acts as an important liberator of stem and progenitor cells in the vascular zone of the bone marrow (35). eNOS is predominantly present in caveolae, which are flask-shape invaginations of the luminal endothelial plasma membrane (36). In basal conditions, eNOS is maintained in an inactive state in caveolae by interaction with caveolins. Increase in intracellular calcium in response to agonist stimulation leads to the disruption of the caveolin–eNOS interaction by calcium-bound calmodulin; hsp90 consecutively binds eNOS and favors the recruitment of PKB/Akt, leading to eNOS phosphorylation. Activation of Akt results from the activation of signaling pathways, including the stimulation of PI3K in response to a variety of agonists and shear stress (mechanotransducers), the latter being the most potent stimulus for continuous eNOS activity (37). (B) NO bioavailability in CKD is reduced because of a number of mechanisms. First, eNOS activity can be reduced as a result of increased inhibition (increased ADMA levels) and decreased activation (less PKB/Akt expression and increase in caveolin-1 expression) (38–41). Second, there is an increase in ROS-mediated breakdown of NO as a result of increased oxidative stress. The latter results from increased activation of ROS-generating enzymes, such as xanthine oxidase, NAD(P)H-oxidase, and eNOS uncoupling, for example, as a result of BH4 deficiency or increased ADMA levels as well as a lack of efficient antioxidative defense mechanisms. After interaction with NO, superoxide anion forms highly toxic nitrogen derivatives, such as peroxynitrite (which is cytotoxic) and increases platelet aggregation and vasoconstriction. (C) Green-shaded areas represent evidence from animal and human studies in cardiovascular disease. When framed, evidence is available for patients in CKD. As we know from studies in patients with stable coronary artery disease, most ET effects on the vascular endothelium are mediated by increases in shear stress, which results in higher NO production. An increase in eNOS activity occurs within seconds and implicates cytosolic calcium and eNOS phosphorylation. Later increases in transcription and eNOS mRNA stability allow maintenance of an increased NO production when the stimulus is prolonged. In addition to eNOS activation, ET results in more efficient antioxidative defense mechanisms (e.g., by reducing ROS production [reduction in NAD(P)H expression, less eNOS uncoupling, etc.] and increasing the expression of antioxidative enzymes and ROS scavengers [e.g., glutathione]) (9,55,56). As such, ROS-mediated breakdown of NO is prevented. A decrease in ADMA levels could contribute to both an increase in eNOS activity and prevention of eNOS uncoupling (44). ADMA, asymmetric dimethylarginine; BH4, (6R)-5,6,7,8-tetrahydro-L-biopterin; CaM, calmodulin; cav, caveolin; cGMP, cyclic guanosine monophosphate; DDAH, dimethylarginine dimethylaminohydrolase; EC, endothelial cell; eNOS, endothelial nitric oxide synthase; GC, guanylyl cyclase; GTP, guanosine triphosphate; hsp90, heat shock protein 90; NO, nitric oxide; O2°, superoxide anion; ONOO°, peroxynitrite; P, phosphorus; PI3K, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase; PKB/Akt, protein kinase B; ROS, reactive oxygen species; VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor; VSMC, vascular smooth muscle cells.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Exercise intervention studies in hemodialysis patients and predialysis patients

    StudyDesignNo. of Patients (Mean Age [yr]±SD or Median)Type of TrainingIntensitySessions Duration (min)Frequency (times/wk)Duration (mo)Outcome
    Within GroupBetween Group%
    Hemodialysis
     Arterial stiffness
    AIx
      Mustata et al. (27)Uncontrolled11 EX (55±4)Aerobic60%–80% heart rate peak602317±3 to 12.2±3aN/A−28
    PWV (m/s)
      Toussaint et al. (28)Randomized crossover Bias risk: BGroup A n=10 (median age=70)ID cyclingNo target3033 EX versusGroup A: baseline versus EX9.04±0.59 versus 10.16±0.74b−11
    Group B n=9 (median age=67)c3 non-EX10.4±3.1 versus 8.7±2.7 (NS)
    Group B: EX versus non-EX
    9.33±2.3 versus 10.5±3.6 (NS)
      Koh et al. (29)RCT15 ID EX (52±11)ID EX: ID cyclingRPE=12–1312036ID EX: 9.1±2.8 to 8.8±2.9 (P=NR)NS
    Bias risk: A15 HB EX (52±14)HB EX: interdialytic walkingRPE=12–13453HB EX: 9.7±3.2 to 9.5±3.4 (P=NR)
    16 untrained CON (51±14)CON: no specific interventionCON:8.7±2.5 to 9.2±3.5 (P=NR)
     Oxidative stress
      Wilund et al. (56)RCT8 EX (61±3)ID cyclingRPE=12–144534TBARS (µmol/L)
    9 CON (59±5)EX: 9.5±1.55 to 5.9±1.05aa−38
    CON: 7.2±0.7 to 6.9±1.31 (NS)
    CRP (mg/L)
    EX: 6.2±0.22 to 6.0±0.67 (NS)NS
    CON:5.2±0.78 to 4.9±0.69 (NS)
    IL-6 (pg/ml)
    EX: 2.2±0.71 to 1.8±0.6 (NS)NS
    CON: 2.9±0.93 to 2.5±0.44 (NS)
     Inflammation
      Afshar et al. (64)RCT14 EX (51±21)ID cyclingRPE=12–1410–3032CRP (mg/L)
    14 CON (53±19)EX: 5.5±2.5 to 0.9±0.7bNR−83
    CON: 4.05±3.97 to 4.10±3.90 (NS)
      Cheema et al. (66)RCT24 EX (60±15)ID resistanceRPE=15–1733Log CRP (effect size)
    25 CON (65±13)EX: −0.08±0.37 (P=NR)aN/A
    CON: +0.24±0.37 (P=NR)
      Kopple et al. (65)RCT10 END EX (46±4)END EX: ID cycling50% VO2peak4034.5CRP (mg/L)
    Bias risk: C15 STR EX (46±3)STR EX: NDT resistance80% 5 RMEND EX: 4.5±1.5 to 2.5±0.6 (NS)NS
    STR EX: 3.5±0.8 to 4.2±1.3 (NS)
    COM EX: 4.6±1.4 to 5.8±2.1 (NS)
    CON: 2.1±0.4 to 2.8±0.8 (NS)
    Healthy CON: 2.5±0.7 to 3.6±1.4 (NS)
    12 COM EX (43±4)COM EX: combined END/STRIL-6 (pg/ml)
    14 CON (41±3)
    20 healthy CON (42±3)END EX: 6.6±1.7 to 3.9±0.7 (NS)NS
    STR EX: 5.7±1.3 to 4.7±1.2 (NS)
    COM EX: 4.5±0.9 to 4.3±0.5 (NS)
    CON: 3.8±0.8 to 3.6±0.8 (NS)
     EPCe-CFU (colonies/ml)
      Manfredini et al. (50)Nonrandomized control group14 EX (62±9)Walking two times per day50% maximum treadmill speed1076EX: 0.14±0.36 to 1.93±3.52ad+1278
    8 CON (66±15)CON: 0.75±1.75 to 0.0±0.0 (NS)
    EPC (cells/µl)
    EX: 0.05±0.10 to 0.06±0.21 (NS)NS
    CON: 0.0±0.0 to 0.04±0.08 (NS)
    Predialysis
     Arterial stiffness
    AIx (%)
      Mustata et al. (30)RCT10 EX (median age=64)Aerobic training40%–60% of VO2peak; RPE=12–155–60212EX: 29 to 27.5 (NR)b−11
      Stages 3–410 CON (median age=73)CON: 28.5 to 28 (NR)
     Oxidative stress
      Pechter et al. (55)Nonrandomized, self-selecting control group17 EX (52; range=31–72)Vertical aerobic aquatic exercise3023LPO (ng/ml)
      Stages 2–39 CON (48; range=35–65)EX: 1.51±0.23 to 0.99±0.11aNR−34
    CON: 0.99±0.06 to 1.35±0.15 (NS)
    Reduced glutathione (µM)
    EX: 751.2±46.8 to 864.2±44.5aNR+15
    CON: 869.1±44.3 to 607.9±123.6 (NS)
     Inflammation
    CRP (mg/L)
      Leehey et al. (63)RCT7 EXAerobic trainingGuided by VO2peak30–4036EX: 5.5±7.2 to 8.9±9.2 (NS)NS
      Stages 2–4Bias risk: B4 CON (all subjects: mean age=66)CON: 17±24 to 11.7±7.1 (NS)
      Castaneda et al. (61)RCT14 EX (65±9)Resistance training80% 1 RM4533EX: 7.8 to 6.1 (NR)a−21
    CON: 6.2 to 7.7 (NR)
      Stages 3–4Bias risk: A12 CON (64±12)IL-6 (pg/ml)
    EX: 11.3 to 6.9a−39
    CON: 7.7 to 10.0
      Headly et al. (62)RCT10 EX (58±12)Combined aerobic and resistance50%–60% VO2peak45312EX: 4.93±1.4 to 4.40±2.01 (NS)NS
    CON: 5.05±2.1 to 5.42±1.84 (NS)
      Stages 2–411 CON (53±11)hs-CRP (mg/L)
    EX: 1.74±1.61 to 1.58±1.85 (NS)NS
    CON: 3.35±2.82 to 3.17±3.69 (NS)
    • Outcome is presented as within-group (pre- to postintervention unless stated otherwise) or between-group differences (EX versus CON, P value for interaction). Significant changes are presented as percentage changes versus baseline or control. For RCTs, estimations of total bias risk are presented as published in the meta-analysis by the Cochrane Collaboration (34): A, low risk; B, moderate/unclear risk; C, high risk. AIx, augmentation index; EX, exercise; N/A, not applicable; PWV, pulse wave velocity; ID, intradialytic; NS, not significant; RCT, randomized controlled trial; RPE, rating of perceived exertion; NR, not reported; HB, home based; CON, control; TBARS, thiobarbituric acid reactive substances; CRP, C-reactive protein; END, endurance; VO2peak, peak oxygen consumption; STR, strength; NDT, nondialysis time; RM, repetition maximum; COM, combined; EPC, endothelial progenitor cell; e-CFU, endothelial colony-forming unit; LPO, lipid peroxidation; hs-CRP, high-sensitivity CRP.

    • ↵a P<0.05.

    • ↵b P<0.01.

    • ↵c Group A: exercise for 3 months, 1-month washout, and then no exercise for 3 months. Group B: no exercise for 3 months, 1-month washout, and then exercise for 3 months.

    • ↵d P<0.001.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology: 9 (7)
Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
Vol. 9, Issue 7
July 07, 2014
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
View Selected Citations (0)
Print
Download PDF
Sign up for Alerts
Email Article
Thank you for your help in sharing the high-quality science in CJASN.
Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Vascular Effects of Exercise Training in CKD: Current Evidence and Pathophysiological Mechanisms
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Society of Nephrology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Society of Nephrology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Vascular Effects of Exercise Training in CKD: Current Evidence and Pathophysiological Mechanisms
Amaryllis H. Van Craenenbroeck, Emeline M. Van Craenenbroeck, Evangelia Kouidi, Christiaan J. Vrints, Marie M. Couttenye, Viviane M. Conraads
CJASN Jul 2014, 9 (7) 1305-1318; DOI: 10.2215/CJN.13031213

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Vascular Effects of Exercise Training in CKD: Current Evidence and Pathophysiological Mechanisms
Amaryllis H. Van Craenenbroeck, Emeline M. Van Craenenbroeck, Evangelia Kouidi, Christiaan J. Vrints, Marie M. Couttenye, Viviane M. Conraads
CJASN Jul 2014, 9 (7) 1305-1318; DOI: 10.2215/CJN.13031213
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Vascular Disease in CKD
    • ET in CKD: Current Clinical Evidence
    • ET in CKD: Effects on Key Mechanisms in Vascular Disease
    • ET in CKD: Practical Considerations
    • Conclusion and Future Directions
    • Disclosures
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data Supps
  • Info & Metrics
  • View PDF

More in this TOC Section

  • Renal Toxicities of Novel Agents Used for Treatment of Multiple Myeloma
  • Anxiety in Patients Treated with Hemodialysis
  • Ultrafiltration Therapy for Heart Failure: Balancing Likely Benefits against Possible Risks
Show more Mini-Review

Cited By...

  • Misclassification of Obesity in CKD: Appearances Are Deceptive
  • Google Scholar

Similar Articles

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Keywords

  • renal physiology
  • glomerulus
  • glomerular filtration

Articles

  • Current Issue
  • Early Access
  • Subject Collections
  • Article Archive
  • ASN Meeting Abstracts

Information for Authors

  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Trainee of the Year
  • Author Resources
  • ASN Journal Policies
  • Reuse/Reprint Policy

About

  • CJASN
  • ASN
  • ASN Journals
  • ASN Kidney News

Journal Information

  • About CJASN
  • CJASN Email Alerts
  • CJASN Key Impact Information
  • CJASN Podcasts
  • CJASN RSS Feeds
  • Editorial Board

More Information

  • Advertise
  • ASN Podcasts
  • ASN Publications
  • Become an ASN Member
  • Feedback
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Password/Email Address Changes
  • Subscribe

© 2021 American Society of Nephrology

Print ISSN - 1555-9041 Online ISSN - 1555-905X

Powered by HighWire