Special Features

American Society of Nephrology Clinical Pathological Conference

Kevin E. Meyers, Helen Liapis and Mohamed G. Atta
CJASN April 2014, 9 (4) 818-828; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2215/CJN.12481213

Abstract

A 13-year-old girl presented with proteinuria and acute kidney failure. She was born at full term via cesarean delivery (due to nuchal cord), but there were no other prenatal or perinatal complications. In early childhood the patient had two hospitalizations at ages 4.5 and 9 years, respectively, the latter for pneumonia. She had no history of symptoms of kidney disease. She came to the hospital at age 12 years for routine bilateral molar extractions. She was treated with oral antibiotics and discharged after the procedure without complications. At age 13 years, 10 months after the molar extraction, she was seen by a pediatrician because of puffiness and increased BP. She had had respiratory symptoms 2 weeks before presentation. The pediatrician prescribed furosemide and amlodipine. A few days later, the patient returned to the pediatrician’s office because of hand, ankle, and facial swelling and malaise. The pediatrician recommended hospitalization and the patient was admitted at this time.

Introduction

A 13-year-old girl presented with proteinuria and acute kidney failure. She was born at full term via cesarean delivery (due to nuchal cord), but there were no other prenatal or perinatal complications. In early childhood, the patient had two hospitalizations at ages 4.5 and 9 years, respectively, the latter for pneumonia. She had no history of symptoms of kidney disease. She came to the hospital at age 12 years for routine bilateral molar extractions. She was treated with oral antibiotics and discharged after the procedure without complications. At age 13 years, 10 months after the molar extraction, she was seen by a pediatrician because of puffiness and increased BP. She had had respiratory symptoms 2 weeks before presentation. The pediatrician prescribed furosemide and amlodipine. A few days later she returned to the pediatrician’s office because of hand, ankle, and facial swelling and malaise. The pediatrician recommended hospitalization and the patient was admitted at this time.

The patient reported no recent infections, including pharyngitis and skin infection. She had no family history of renal disease, although a sibling has type 1 diabetes, and no personal history of hematuria or proteinuria noted previously. Physical examination revealed a well developed, well-nourished female. On admission, her temperature was 36.8°C, heart rate of 84 beats/min, respiratory rate of 14 breaths/min, and BP of 128/84 mmHg. Her weight was 61.4 kg (25th percentile), and her height was 149 cm (25th percentile). She had erythema of the oropharynx, but no exudate. Auscultation revealed decreased breath sounds at the lung bases. Cardiac examination showed regular rate and rhythm without murmur or S4. The abdomen was soft, with no fluid detected. Extremities were remarkable for 2–3+ pretibial pitting edema to the knee.

Her urinalysis revealed 3+ protein, 4+ blood, and 2+ leukocyte esterase but was negative for glucose, bilirubin, nitrite, and ketones. Urine specific gravity was 1.030 with a pH of 5.0. Microscopic examination revealed 21–50 red blood cells/high-power field (hpf), 21–50 white blood cells/hpf, 2+ bacteria, <5 epithelial cells/hpf, and 1–5 hyaline casts; no cellular casts were seen. Initial laboratory studies are summarized in Table 1. The first eGFR, calculated using the Schwartz equation (1), was 102 ml/min per 1.73 m2. Chest radiography revealed a small bilateral pleural effusion but no focal or diffuse parenchymal infiltrates.

View this table:
Table 1.

Laboratory test results and normal values

The patient was restarted on diuretic therapy with 30 mg of furosemide given intravenously twice daily, and she was prescribed a low-sodium diet; normal BP was maintained with 5 mg amlodipine per day. During her hospitalization, her creatinine rose to 1.5 mg/dl and her BUN to 37 mg/dl. By day 4 after admission, the patient was hypertensive, necessitating an increase of amlodipine to 10 mg/d. Her creatinine increased to 2.5 mg/dl, her white blood cell count rose to 10,000 cells/ml, and her temperature increased to 38.4°C. Blood and urine cultures were performed. Systolic BP continued to rise to >140 mmHg, and creatinine peaked at 3.3 mg/dl.

A kidney biopsy was performed, which was well tolerated, and the patient was followed in the outpatient setting pending the results.

Clinical Discussant: Dr. Kevin E. Meyers

In summary, this 13-year-old girl presented with nephritic-nephrotic syndrome and a fairly rapid rise in the serum creatinine concentration. Two to three weeks before clinical presentation, she had an upper respiratory tract infection. She seems to have no systemic findings other than those related to renal dysfunction. She is hypertensive with azotemia and has a low serum C3 concentration. The red blood cell morphology is normal.

Differential Diagnosis

Several disorders can be considered in a young girl presenting with proteinuria, a rapid decline in renal function, and isolated hypocomplementemia. The history of an upper respiratory tract infection is compatible with her having had pharyngitis caused by Lancefield group A Streptococcus and may suggest an underlying acute postinfectious GN. Of note, “strep” throat infections may be subclinical or even silent. However, the antistreptolysin o titer done at the time of the sore throat was normal, suggesting that she has not had recent exposure to Streptococcus. To be certain, however, one would like to know about the streptozyme test results and throat swab rapid strep antigen test or throat culture results. There is growing recognition that upper respiratory tract infection that includes “strep” throat infection may act as a trigger or second hit precipitating a more chronic glomerulopathy (2,3).

The onset of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) should always be a consideration in a peripubertal girl. The presentation is compatible with that of SLE nephritis because there may be no extrarenal manifestations (4). Two factors arguing against the diagnosis of SLE as presented in the above case are the negative antinuclear antibody result and the normal C4 level. Activation of SLE nephritis usually occurs through the classic pathway unless pure membranous nephropathy is present; this is an unusual presentation for a child (5). As presented, then, a diagnosis of SLE nephritis is unlikely but still a possibility.

Subacute bacterial endocarditis and shunt nephritis with associated proliferative GN are rarely seen in children (6,7). When present, they occur in the specific context of a child with underlying cardiac disease or in the presence of cerebral ventricle-to-atrium shunt placement. Activation is through the classic pathway, and the serum C4 and C3 concentrations are usually decreased.

Viral nephropathies can present with proteinuria and acute kidney failure. In the United States, there is almost universal coverage of children with hepatitis B vaccine, resulting in greatly decreased incidence and prevalence of hepatitis B–associated disease. Hepatitis B causes disease in the context of chronic antigenemia and most often presents with nephrotic syndrome, with histology showing a secondary membranous picture (8,9). Although we are not told about liver enzyme concentrations, this is an unlikely diagnosis, specifically because results of serologic testing for hepatitis B were negative (presumably s and e antigens).

Similarly, the patient has history of drug abuse, sexual intercourse, or blood transfusion to suggest hepatitis C. In the absence of these risk factors, hepatitis C is exceedingly unlikely in this patient. On the whole, it is most uncommon to see a proliferative GN in children with hepatitis C. When it does occur, it is usually in the context of readily identifiable chronic liver disease (10).

As for possible HIV-associated kidney disease, her age, absence of history of early sexual contact, and lack of recurrent severe infection make this an unlikely diagnosis. Parvovirus has been associated with collapsing glomerulopathy (normal complement), and a proliferative form of GN (low complement) can present with a nephritic-nephrotic picture. However, activation of the complement cascade, when present, is through the classic pathway and is associated with a decrease in the serum C4 and C3 concentrations (11,12).

Another cause of isolated low C3 with proteinuria and AKI that needs to be strongly considered is membranoproliferative GN (MPGN), including MPGN II (also known as dense deposit disease [DDD]) (Figure 1). The classification and understanding of what was called MPGN types I, II, and III have changed rapidly (13–16). As found on immunofluorescence staining of the biopsy, we now think of “Ig-positive MPGN” where there is classic pathway activation and in which context a concerted effort should be made to identify the underlying cause of antigenemia. This includes evaluation for infections, autoimmune diseases, and monoclonal gammopathies (in adults) (Figure 2). This patient has no evidence for classic pathway activation, making this diagnosis unlikely. Ig-negative C3-positive MPGN is due to dysregulation of the alternative pathway and terminal complement complex. Depending on the relative degree of dysregulation, the electron microscopic picture can resemble DDD or C3 glomerulopathy (C3GN). Ig-negative MPGN I and MPGN III are well recognized; they fall under the umbrella of C3GN and are often called C3GN. DDD is now the preferred name for MPGN II and is another type of C3G. Extrarenal manifestations that may suggest DDD include partial lipodystrophy, both acquired and familial, as well as Drusen (17). Acquired partial lipodystrophy is associated with loss of subcutaneous fat in the upper half of the body in a cephalo-caudal sequence, with sparing of the legs (18). Drusen are whitish-yellow deposits within the Bruch membrane of the retina that develop from the second decade of life; about one tenth of affected persons later have visual problems through formation of subretinal neovascular membranes, macular detachment, and central serous retinopathy (19).

Figure 1.
Figure 1.

Differential diagnosis of acute glomerulopathy (AGN) based on complement levels. aHUS, atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome; APIGN, acute postinfectious glomerulonephritis; C3GN, complement 3–associated glomerulonephritis; DDD, dense deposit disease; HEP B, hepatitis B; HEP C, hepatitis C; HIVICK, HIV-associated immune complex disease; IC, immune complex; SBE, subacute bacterial endocarditis; SLE, systemic lupus nephritis.

Figure 2.
Figure 2.

Differential diagnosis of glomerular disease based on complement system pathway activation. APIGN, acute postinfectious glomerulonephritis; HEP B, hepatitis B; HEP C, hepatitis C; HIVICK, HIV-associated immune complex disease; IC, immune complex; SBE, subacute bacterial endocarditis; SLE, systemic lupus nephritis.

On the basis of immunofluorescence findings, MPGN is then broadly divided into Ig-positive, complement-positive MPGN and Ig-negative, complement-positive MPGN. Ig-negative, complement-positive MPGN is further divided into DDD and C3GN. This division is somewhat artificial and depends on electron microscopic findings. It is very likely that this patient has a C3GN. In light of the rapid increase in the serum creatinine concentration, she might well have the more unusual form of MPGN/C3GN that is associated with presence of crescents (20–22). The C3GNs are associated with disorders of the alternate complement regulatory pathway (13). The presentation is consistent with that of a rapidly progressive GN with glomerular crescent formation, which can be seen with many forms of glomerular disease, including MPGN. Atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS) associated with complement abnormalities can have an MPGN-like picture by light microscopy. However, microthrombi in the capillary loops and endothelial damage with subendothelial accumulation are expected. There should be a hemolytic anemia in association with a thrombocytopenia and evidence for intravascular hemolysis. We are not told about any of the hematologic measures except that the red blood cell morphology was normal. In other words, there were no schistocytes on the peripheral blood smear, which argues against an intravascular hemolytic process. Of note, complement factor H protein mutations that have given rise to C3GN and to aHUS in the same patient have been reported (23).

Acute interstitial nephritis or acute tubular necrosis with an underlying chronic GN is unlikely given the negative patient history, negative family history, normal growth, and absence of an immediate proximate cause.

Clinical Diagnosis

The most likely diagnosis is a C3GN, possibly DDD with crescents. aHUS is possible but unlikely in the absence of schistocytes.

Pathology Discussant: Dr. Helen Liapis

The kidney biopsy specimen contained 20 glomeruli, 18 of which had cellular crescents (90%); crescents were composed of epithelial cells and focal lymphocytes, but there were no fibrin deposits (Figure 3). The noncrescentic glomeruli showed mild mesangial hypercellularity and irregular thickening of the capillary loops. On hematoxylin and eosin staining, the capillary loops appeared glassy and hypereosinophilic; they were strongly positive with periodic acid–Schiff staining (Figure 4), but did not stain with Jones silver stain (Figure 5). No globally sclerosed glomeruli were seen. The tubules were back to back, with minimal epithelial injury and no evidence of acute tubular necrosis. The interstitium contained mild, focal chronic inflammation, but there was no significant fibrosis. Small arteries and arterioles were intact, without wall thickening or luminal thrombi.

Figure 3.
Figure 3.

Kidney biopsy specimen showed epithelial crescents in most glomeruli (90%). Also present within the crescents were inflammatory cells but no fibrin deposits (hematoxylin and eosin; original magnification, ×200).

Figure 4.
Figure 4.

The glomerular capillary loops were thickened, with glassy-appearing deposits (periodic acid–Schiff; original magnification, ×400).

Figure 5.
Figure 5.

On silver stain, capillary loop deposits were nonangyrophilic (Jones silver; original magnification, ×400).

Immunofluorescence was negative for IgG, IgA, C1q, and κ and λ chains in the glomeruli and tubules. Strong C3 (3+ on a scale of 0–4) granular deposits were present in the capillary loops and focally in the mesangium (Figure 6); mild IgM+ (1+) was present; fibrinogen and albumin were equivocal.

Figure 6.
Figure 6.

Isolated and strong granular C3 deposits were present in the capillary loops and the mesangium (immunofluorescence; original magnification, ×400).

The findings on light microscopy and immunofluorescence raised the differential diagnosis of (1) vasculitis, because of the presence of crescents in >50% of the glomeruli; (2) postinfectious GN, because of the predominance of granular C3 deposits; (3) C3GN; and (4) rare disease presenting as crescentic GN.

Electron microscopy revealed linear osmiophilic (ink black) intramembranous deposits and small granular mesangial deposits (Figure 7, A and B). The deposits were focally interrupted with a “sausage string” appearance. There were no deposits in the Bowman capsule; subepithelial, hump-like deposits were not seen. Taken together, the findings were diagnostic of DDD presenting as crescentic GN.

Figure 7.
Figure 7.

Electron microscopy revealed linear, osmiophilic deposits in (A) the capillary loops (white arrow) and (B) the mesangium (black arrow). The deposits were discontinuous and focally were “sausage” shaped (electron microscopy; original magnification, ×8000).

What Are the Pathologic Findings of DDD?

DDD is a rare disease affecting two to three children and adults per 1 million of population. Because of its rarity, histopathologic studies in large patient cohorts were not available in the literature until recently. Older studies considered DDD a type of MPGN and classified it as type II. However, an MPGN pattern is found in <50% of DDD cases (21,24). The light microscopic findings of DDD vary, ranging from minimal glomerular hypercellularity to mesangial proliferation in 25% of cases (24), and acute proliferative GN with or without exudative lesions (neutrophil infiltrates) in some cases. Crescentic DDD is less frequent, occurring in 4%–10% of cases. Furthermore, DDD may mimic postinfectious GN both clinically and histopathologically, with some patients reported to have bell-shaped subepithelial glomerular deposits on electron microscopy. Histopathologic findings are the same in both children and adults, and no correlation is found with age, sex, ethnicity, or the level of C3 depression; degree of proteinuria; or creatinine level. MPGN pattern and crescents correlate with progressive disease but not with the percentage of global or segmental sclerosis. In children, girls are more frequently affected than boys, while in adults the reverse was reported (occurrence more frequent in men than in women) (21).

Immunofluorescence findings are consistently predominant C3 deposits, found in 100% of cases. Typically, Igs are absent. C3 deposits without Igs suggest activation of complement by antibody-independent pathways, typically the alternative pathway. The pattern of C3 deposits ranges from linear to granular, the latter mimicking postinfectious GN. Both glomerular and tubular staining may be present. The predominance of C3 deposits has prompted investigators to currently classify DDD under C3 glomerulopathy, an entity defined by exclusive C3 deposits without other Ig and without dense intramembranous glomerular or tubular deposits. The term “C3 glomerulopathy” is gaining popularity because of the unraveled mechanisms underscoring both MPGN and DDD, which implicate abnormalities in the alternative complement cascade. Therefore, DDD is currently viewed in the spectrum of C3GN. Furthermore, the electron-dense deposits that characterize DDD are shown to contain components of the alternative pathway, including C3b and its breakdown products iC3b, C3dg, or C3c, and terminal complement complex. Glomeruli of DDD contain components of the alternative and terminal complement (25).

Abnormalities in the Alternative Complement Pathway in DDD

Following the kidney biopsy diagnosis of DDD, C3Nef, an autoantibody that stabilizes the alternative complement pathway C3 convertase, was ordered. The result was positive, confirming the diagnosis of DDD. C3Nef and depressed C3 serum levels, while characteristic and more frequently found in patients with DDD, are not exclusive; they are also found in 45% of C3 glomerulopathy cases. This patient underwent genetic analysis and was found to carry three copies of DDD-associated CFH allele variants in addition to C3Nef activity. No mutations were found in CFH, CFI, MCP, or CFH-CFHR5 genes (Table 2). Abnormalities in the alternative complement pathway are identified in as many as 80% of patients with DDD (26) and include the following: autoantibodies (C3Nef, CFB, C3b); allele variants (17%); homozygous loss-of-function CFH mutations; heterozygous CFH mutations; and mutations in CFI, CFB, and MCP.

View this table:
Table 2.

Genetic analysis results

C3Nef is present in most cases of DDD (80%) (27). However, other autoantibodies against CFB or specifically against C3b are also reported. Homozygous, loss-of-function CFH mutations are rare. Heterozygous CFH mutations are also infrequent, but CFH allele variants are detected in 17% of DDD cases. Particular variants of CFH (H402Y) and of CFHR5 may preferentially be associated with DDD (28–30). Similar abnormalities are detected in patients diagnosed with MPGN type I and C3 glomerulopathy defined by the pathologic findings as described above. Therefore, these entities are increasingly found to have overlapping abnormalities in the alternative complement pathway and are considered C3-mediated diseases (Tables 3 and 4).

View this table:
Table 3.

Mutations in the complement genes and C3Nef in C3-mediated diseases by histologic type in adults and children

View this table:
Table 4.

C3-mediated diseases

The histopathologic spectrum of diseases due to alternative complement pathway abnormalities was recently expanded to include entities beyond MPGN and C3 glomerulopathy. For example, FSGS was found in a 60-year-old woman with a novel polymorphism (SCR) 12 of CFH (CFH; c.2195C>T, p.Thr732Met and factor C3 (c.463A>C, p.Lys155Gln) (31). Furthermore, the incidence of concurrent aHUS with DDD or aHUS preceding or following DDD is recognized (26). In adults, age-related macular degeneration is linked to CFH mutations. Other entities include mutations in CFH-related proteins (CFHR) 5 and 3.

The CFH gene structure has been studied in detail, and some understanding of how specific mutations in the same gene may cause a histopathologically and clinically different disease is emerging. For example, mutations in DDD are near the CFH N terminus; in aHUS, mutations tend to localize in the C terminus (32).

However, the question of how the same CFH mutation may lead to two different renal diseases in the same patient (e.g., DDD and aHUS) is not currently clear.

DDD Is Frequently Associated with Infection: Is Infection a Cause or Coincidence?

The relationship between infection and kidney disease, particularly C3-mediated entities, is well documented. This patient had a remote history of pneumonia and a vague history of respiratory infection 2 weeks before symptoms that lead to hospitalization. Others have reported urinary tract infections in association with symptomatic DDD (21). MPGN is well known to be secondary to infectious microorganisms, such as hepatitis C virus. Classic HUS associated with Shiga toxin–producing bacteria is another example of infection causing direct kidney injury. Atypical HUS is associated with genetic mutations coding for complement factors H and I, MCP, C3, and factor B (33) and is linked to genetic mutations and an autoimmune form, including a special form, (deficiency of CFHR plasma proteins and autoantibody-positive form of HUS) (34–37). Recently, aHUS due to mutations or variants of noncomplement-related genes was also reported (38,39). Therefore, both DDD and aHUS are now understood as complement-mediated diseases resulting from abnormalities in the alternative pathway.

Complement Dysregulation in DDD, MPGN, and Mesangioproliferative and Crescentic GN

The alternative pathway is constantly activated at low levels physiologically and plays a central role in immune surveillance as a first line of defense. This suggests that C5b-9 is activated and deposited in a constitutive manner at a low level even in normal kidney tissue by a “tick-over” mechanism, which leads to C5 recruitment in the fluid phase (40). Activation is tightly regulated by factor H and complement factor I, the two most important inhibitory proteins of the alternative pathway. Soluble as well as membrane-bound complement regulators control complement activation at the cell surface at different activation phases and sites of action (41). Complement dysregulation is frequent in kidney disease, and peripheral markers of complement activation (e.g., serum levels of C3 and C4) are routinely tested in acquired glomerular diseases, including postinfectious GN, lupus nephritis, cryoglobulinemia, and cholesterol embolism. Bacteria are known to use complement to their advantage. Therefore, infection may trigger complement consumption and precipitate symptoms in a preexisting disease, but most investigators believe that infection is not a cause of DDD.

As mentioned under the clinical discussion, both DDD and Ig-negative MPGN are characterized by isolated C3 deposits on immunofluorescence, and both are categorized under the umbrella of C3 glomerulopathies. Subclassification of DDD as MPGN II has created unnecessary confusion. DDD is a better term instead of MPGN II simply because in about 50% of cases DDD has no MPGN pattern but may present as mesangial proliferative GN or crescentic GN, exemplified by the case under discussion. DDD and C3 glomerulopathies, including Ig-negative MPGN, have common pathogenic alternative pathway protein abnormalities, as shown in Figure 8.

Figure 8.
Figure 8.

Membranoproliferative GN (MPGN) has common pathogenic alternative pathway protein abnormalities. DDD, dense deposit disease; EM, electron microscopy; IF, immunofluorescence; MCP, membrane cofactor protein.

DDD Progression to ESRD and Recurrence After Transplantation

Approximately 50% of patients with DDD progress to ESRD and require dialysis within 10 years of diagnosis. Factors predictive of progression to renal failure include younger age at diagnosis, increased serum creatinine concentrations, and proteinuria at the time of diagnosis, initial presentation with nephrotic and nephritic syndromes, and >20% chronic renal damage. Crescents are also a bad prognostic finding. Servais et al. reported a 63.5% 10-year survival rate in patients with DDD (26). Renal survival was similar to that seen with MPGN I and C3GN and somewhat worse than that in DDD (Table 5).

View this table:
Table 5.

Summary of dense deposit disease

Final Pathologic Diagnosis

Crescentic DDD with presence of C3Nef autoantibody.

Treatment

This patient, who initially presented >10 years ago, was treated with pulsed intravenous methylprednisolone and intravenous cyclophosphamide without good effect. She became dialysis dependent within 3 weeks of presentation and failed to recover renal function. She ultimately underwent cadaveric kidney transplantation without complications and has been stable with normal kidney function without recurrence of the DDD.

Previous treatment of DDD has traditionally included immune suppression targeting T cells and/or B cells (glucocorticoids, cyclophosphamide, mycophenolate mofetil, rituximab) and plasma therapy or plasmapheresis (42). There is no good evidence that any of these therapies reliably alters renal survival in most patients with DDD, even when used for prolonged periods (26,43,44). The Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes clinical guidelines to treat children and adults with idiopathic MPGN accompanied by nephritis and progression of disease with “oral cyclophosphamide or MMF [mycophenolate mofetil] plus low dose daily or alternate day corticosteroids with initial therapy limited to less than 6 months” is based on insubstantial evidence and is not supported by recent experience (45–47).

Treatment Today and into the Future

A growing number of case reports have detailed the use of anti–complement C5 therapy, specifically eculizumab, as treatment for DDD both before and after transplantation (44,47–50).

Bomback et al. performed a trial of eculizumab in C3 glomerulopathy (46). This open-label, proof-of-concept, efficacy, and safety study evaluated three patients with DDD (one with a renal transplant) and three patients with C3GN (two with a renal transplant). The patients received eculizumab every other week for 1 year. Genetic testing revealed a mutation in CFH and CD46 in one patient each. Complement function testing revealed C3NeF in three patients. There was a mixed response after 12 months of therapy: Two patients (one with DDD and one with C3GN) showed significantly reduced serum creatinine, one patient (with DDD) had marked reduction in proteinuria, and one (with C3GN) had only histologic improvement without biochemical change. The response to eculizumab varied. The authors suggested that an elevation of sC5b-9 was potentially a marker of responsiveness to eculizumab. A recent case published by Gurkan et al. details the temporary response of a child with DDD whose disease progressed during eculizumab treatment (51).

On the basis of our current understanding of the pathogenesis of DDD, targeted anticomplement therapy warrants further consideration. This could be directed at C3 convertase inhibition to limit C3 breakdown product deposition on basement membranes and/or C5 or terminal complement pathway inhibition. The evidence to date, combined with our current understanding of the pathophysiology of C3GN, suggests that a formal trial of eculizumab in many well characterized patients is indicated.

Disclosures

None.

Footnotes

  • Published online ahead of print. Publication date available at www.cjasn.org.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Schwartz GJ,
    2. Brion LP,
    3. Spitzer A
    : The use of plasma creatinine concentration for estimating glomerular filtration rate in infants, children, and adolescents. Pediatr Clin North Am 34: 571–590, 1987pmid:3588043
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Lai KN
    : Pathogenesis of IgA nephropathy. Nat Rev Nephrol 8: 275–283, 2012pmid:22430056
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Sethi S,
    2. Fervenza FC,
    3. Zhang Y,
    4. Zand L,
    5. Meyer NC,
    6. Borsa N,
    7. Nasr SH,
    8. Smith RJ
    : Atypical postinfectious glomerulonephritis is associated with abnormalities in the alternative pathway of complement. Kidney Int 83: 293–299, 2013pmid:23235567
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Hobbs DJ,
    2. Barletta GM,
    3. Rajpal JS,
    4. Rajpal MN,
    5. Weismantel DP,
    6. Birmingham JD,
    7. Bunchman TE
    : Severe paediatric systemic lupus erythematosus nephritis—a single-centre experience. Nephrol Dial Transplant 25: 457–463, 2010pmid:19755473
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Nathanson S,
    2. Salomon R,
    3. Ranchin B,
    4. Macher MA,
    5. Lavocat MP,
    6. Krier MJ,
    7. Baudouin V,
    8. Azéma C,
    9. Bader-Meunier B,
    10. Deschênes G
    : Prognosis of lupus membranous nephropathy in children. Pediatr Nephrol 21: 1113–1116, 2006pmid:16810516
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Fukuda Y,
    2. Ohtomo Y,
    3. Kaneko K,
    4. Yabuta K
    : Pathologic and laboratory dynamics following the removal of the shunt in shunt nephritis. Am J Nephrol 13: 78–82, 1993pmid:8322846
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Sadikoglu B,
    2. Bilge I,
    3. Kilicaslan I,
    4. Gokce MG,
    5. Emre S,
    6. Ertugrul T
    : Crescentic glomerulonephritis in a child with infective endocarditis. Pediatr Nephrol 21: 867–869, 2006pmid:16703379
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Igarashi T,
    2. Shimizu A,
    3. Igarashi T,
    4. Hanaoka K,
    5. Yoshizaki K,
    6. Shigemori T,
    7. Shimizu S,
    8. Komeichi H,
    9. Itoh Y
    : Seroconversion of hepatitis B envelope antigen by entecavir in a child with hepatitis B virus-related membranous nephropathy. J Nippon Med Sch 80: 387–395, 2013pmid:24189358
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Liao MT,
    2. Chang MH,
    3. Lin FG,
    4. Tsai IJ,
    5. Chang YW,
    6. Tsau YK
    : Universal hepatitis B vaccination reduces childhood hepatitis B virus-associated membranous nephropathy. Pediatrics 128: e600–e604, 2011pmid:21859911
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    1. Ruebner RL,
    2. Reese PP,
    3. Denburg MR,
    4. Rand EB,
    5. Abt PL,
    6. Furth SL
    : Risk factors for end-stage kidney disease after pediatric liver transplantation. Am J Transplant 12: 3398–3405, 2012
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Ieiri N,
    2. Hotta O,
    3. Taguma Y
    : Characteristics of acute glomerulonephritis associated with human parvovirus B19 infection. Clin Nephrol 64: 249–257, 2005pmid:16240895
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Waldman M,
    2. Kopp JB
    : Parvovirus B19 and the kidney. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2[Suppl 1]: S47–S56, 2007pmid:17699510
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    1. Bomback AS,
    2. Appel GB
    : Pathogenesis of the C3 glomerulopathies and reclassification of MPGN. Nat Rev Nephrol 8: 634–642, 2012pmid:23026947
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Sethi S,
    2. Fervenza FC
    : Membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis—a new look at an old entity. N Engl J Med 366: 1119–1131, 2012pmid:22435371
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Sethi S,
    2. Fervenza FC,
    3. Zhang Y,
    4. Zand L,
    5. Vrana JA,
    6. Nasr SH,
    7. Theis JD,
    8. Dogan A,
    9. Smith RJ
    : C3 glomerulonephritis: Clinicopathological findings, complement abnormalities, glomerular proteomic profile, treatment, and follow-up. Kidney Int 82: 465–473, 2012pmid:22673887
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Sethi S,
    2. Nester CM,
    3. Smith RJ
    : Membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis and C3 glomerulopathy: Resolving the confusion. Kidney Int 81: 434–441, 2012pmid:22157657
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Owen KR,
    2. Donohoe M,
    3. Ellard S,
    4. Clarke TJ,
    5. Nicholls AJ,
    6. Hattersley AT,
    7. Bingham C
    : Mesangiocapillary glomerulonephritis type 2 associated with familial partial lipodystrophy (Dunnigan-Kobberling syndrome). Nephron Clin Pract 96: c35–c38, 2004pmid:14988595
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Misra A,
    2. Peethambaram A,
    3. Garg A
    : Clinical features and metabolic and autoimmune derangements in acquired partial lipodystrophy: Report of 35 cases and review of the literature. Medicine (Baltimore) 83: 18–34, 2004pmid:14747765
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Colville D,
    2. Guymer R,
    3. Sinclair RA,
    4. Savige J
    : Visual impairment caused by retinal abnormalities in mesangiocapillary (membranoproliferative) glomerulonephritis type II (“dense deposit disease”). Am J Kidney Dis 42: E2–5, 2003
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Medjeral-Thomas NR,
    2. O'Shaughnessy MM,
    3. O'Regan JA,
    4. Traynor C,
    5. Flanagan M,
    6. Wong L,
    7. Teoh CW,
    8. Awan A,
    9. Waldron M,
    10. Cairns T,
    11. O'Kelly P,
    12. Dorman AM,
    13. Pickering MC,
    14. Conlon PJ,
    15. Cook HT
    : C3 glomerulopathy: clinicopathologic features and predictors of outcome. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 9: 46–53, 2014pmid:24178974
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. ↵
    1. Nasr SH,
    2. Valeri AM,
    3. Appel GB,
    4. Sherwinter J,
    5. Stokes MB,
    6. Said SM,
    7. Markowitz GS,
    8. D’Agati VD
    : Dense deposit disease: clinicopathologic study of 32 pediatric and adult patients. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 4: 22–32, 2009pmid:18971369
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. ↵
    1. Sharma A,
    2. Gupta R,
    3. Lal C,
    4. Agarwal SK,
    5. Dinda AK
    : Crescentic glomerulonephritis developing in the course of idiopathic membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis. Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl 24: 333–337, 2013pmid:23538361
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Gnappi E,
    2. Allinovi M,
    3. Vaglio A,
    4. Bresin E,
    5. Sorosina A,
    6. Pilato FP,
    7. Allegri L,
    8. Manenti L
    : Membrano-proliferative glomerulonephritis, atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome, and a new complement factor H mutation: report of a case. Pediatr Nephrol 27: 1995–1999, 2012pmid:22669321
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    1. Walker PD,
    2. Ferrario F,
    3. Joh K,
    4. Bonsib SM
    : Dense deposit disease is not a membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis. Mod Pathol 20: 605–616, 2007pmid:17396142
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    1. Sethi S,
    2. Gamez JD,
    3. Vrana JA,
    4. Theis JD,
    5. Bergen HR 3rd.,
    6. Zipfel PF,
    7. Dogan A,
    8. Smith RJ
    : Glomeruli of dense deposit disease contain components of the alternative and terminal complement pathway. Kidney Int 75: 952–960, 2009pmid:19177158
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    1. Servais A,
    2. Noël LH,
    3. Roumenina LT,
    4. Le Quintrec M,
    5. Ngo S,
    6. Dragon-Durey MA,
    7. Macher MA,
    8. Zuber J,
    9. Karras A,
    10. Provot F,
    11. Moulin B,
    12. Grünfeld JP,
    13. Niaudet P,
    14. Lesavre P,
    15. Frémeaux-Bacchi V
    : Acquired and genetic complement abnormalities play a critical role in dense deposit disease and other C3 glomerulopathies. Kidney Int 82: 454–464, 2012pmid:22456601
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. ↵
    1. Heeringa SF,
    2. Cohen CD
    : Kidney diseases caused by complement dysregulation: Acquired, inherited, and still more to come. Clin Dev Immunol 2012: 695131, 2012pmid:23227086
    OpenUrlPubMed
  28. ↵
    1. Abrera-Abeleda MA,
    2. Nishimura C,
    3. Smith JL,
    4. Sethi S,
    5. McRae JL,
    6. Murphy BF,
    7. Silvestri G,
    8. Skerka C,
    9. Józsi M,
    10. Zipfel PF,
    11. Hageman GS,
    12. Smith RJ
    : Variations in the complement regulatory genes factor H (CFH) and factor H related 5 (CFHR5) are associated with membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis type II (dense deposit disease). J Med Genet 43: 582–589, 2006pmid:16299065
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Licht C,
    2. Schlötzer-Schrehardt U,
    3. Kirschfink M,
    4. Zipfel PF,
    5. Hoppe B
    : MPGN II—genetically determined by defective complement regulation? Pediatr Nephrol 22: 2–9, 2007pmid:17024390
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. ↵
    1. Pickering MC,
    2. de Jorge EG,
    3. Martinez-Barricarte R,
    4. Recalde S,
    5. Garcia-Layana A,
    6. Rose KL,
    7. Moss J,
    8. Walport MJ,
    9. Cook HT,
    10. de Córdoba SR,
    11. Botto M
    : Spontaneous hemolytic uremic syndrome triggered by complement factor H lacking surface recognition domains. J Exp Med 204: 1249–1256, 2007pmid:17517971
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  31. ↵
    1. Sethi S,
    2. Fervenza FC,
    3. Zhang Y,
    4. Smith RJ
    : Secondary focal and segmental glomerulosclerosis associated with single-nucleotide polymorphisms in the genes encoding complement factor H and C3. Am J Kidney Dis 60: 316–321, 2012
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. ↵
    1. Makou E,
    2. Mertens HD,
    3. Maciejewski M,
    4. Soares DC,
    5. Matis I,
    6. Schmidt CQ,
    7. Herbert AP,
    8. Svergun DI,
    9. Barlow PN
    : Solution structure of CCP modules 10-12 illuminates functional architecture of the complement regulator, factor H. J Mol Biol 424: 295–312, 2012pmid:23017427
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. ↵
    1. Roumenina LT,
    2. Loirat C,
    3. Dragon-Durey MA,
    4. Halbwachs-Mecarelli L,
    5. Sautes-Fridman C,
    6. Fremeaux-Bacchi V
    : Alternative complement pathway assessment in patients with atypical HUS. J Immunol Methods 365: 8–26, 2011pmid:21215749
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. ↵
    1. Dragon-Durey MA,
    2. Frémeaux-Bacchi V
    : Atypical haemolytic uraemic syndrome and mutations in complement regulator genes. Springer Semin Immunopathol 27: 359–374, 2005pmid:16189652
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Noris M,
    2. Remuzzi G
    : Atypical hemolytic-uremic syndrome. N Engl J Med 361: 1676–1687, 2009pmid:19846853
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Zipfel PF,
    2. Skerka C
    : Complement regulators and inhibitory proteins. Nat Rev Immunol 9: 729–740, 2009pmid:19730437
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. ↵
    1. Zipfel PF,
    2. Würzner R,
    3. Skerka C
    : Complement evasion of pathogens: Common strategies are shared by diverse organisms. Mol Immunol 44: 3850–3857, 2007pmid:17768102
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. ↵
    1. Delvaeye M,
    2. Noris M,
    3. De Vriese A,
    4. Esmon CT,
    5. Esmon NL,
    6. Ferrell G,
    7. Del-Favero J,
    8. Plaisance S,
    9. Claes B,
    10. Lambrechts D,
    11. Zoja C,
    12. Remuzzi G,
    13. Conway EM
    : Thrombomodulin mutations in atypical hemolytic-uremic syndrome. N Engl J Med 361: 345–357, 2009pmid:19625716
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. ↵
    1. Lemaire M,
    2. Frémeaux-Bacchi V,
    3. Schaefer F,
    4. Choi M,
    5. Tang WH,
    6. Le Quintrec M,
    7. Fakhouri F,
    8. Taque S,
    9. Nobili F,
    10. Martinez F,
    11. Ji W,
    12. Overton JD,
    13. Mane SM,
    14. Nürnberg G,
    15. Altmüller J,
    16. Thiele H,
    17. Morin D,
    18. Deschenes G,
    19. Baudouin V,
    20. Llanas B,
    21. Collard L,
    22. Majid MA,
    23. Simkova E,
    24. Nürnberg P,
    25. Rioux-Leclerc N,
    26. Moeckel GW,
    27. Gubler MC,
    28. Hwa J,
    29. Loirat C,
    30. Lifton RP
    : Recessive mutations in DGKE cause atypical hemolytic-uremic syndrome. Nat Genet 45: 531–536, 2013pmid:23542698
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  40. ↵
    1. Appel GB
    : Membranoprolferative glomerulonephritis—mechanisms and treatment. Contrib Nephrol 181: 163–174, 2013pmid:23689578
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  41. ↵
    1. Skerka C,
    2. Chen Q,
    3. Fremeaux-Bacchi V,
    4. Roumenina LT
    : Complement factor H related proteins (CFHRs). Mol Immunol 56: 170–180, 2013pmid:23830046
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  42. ↵
    1. Nester CM,
    2. Smith RJ
    : Treatment options for C3 glomerulopathy. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens 22: 231–237, 2013pmid:23318699
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  43. ↵
    1. Appel GB,
    2. Cook HT,
    3. Hageman G,
    4. Jennette JC,
    5. Kashgarian M,
    6. Kirschfink M,
    7. Lambris JD,
    8. Lanning L,
    9. Lutz HU,
    10. Meri S,
    11. Rose NR,
    12. Salant DJ,
    13. Sethi S,
    14. Smith RJ,
    15. Smoyer W,
    16. Tully HF,
    17. Tully SP,
    18. Walker P,
    19. Welsh M,
    20. Würzner R,
    21. Zipfel PF
    : Membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis type II (dense deposit disease): An update. J Am Soc Nephrol 16: 1392–1403, 2005pmid:15800116
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  44. ↵
    1. Daina E,
    2. Noris M,
    3. Remuzzi G
    : Eculizumab in a patient with dense-deposit disease. N Engl J Med 366: 1161–1163, 2012pmid:22435382
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  45. ↵
    Chapter 8: Idiopathic membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis. Kidney Int Suppl 2: 198–199, 2012
  46. ↵
    1. Bomback AS,
    2. Smith RJ,
    3. Barile GR,
    4. Zhang Y,
    5. Heher EC,
    6. Herlitz L,
    7. Stokes MB,
    8. Markowitz GS,
    9. D’Agati VD,
    10. Canetta PA,
    11. Radhakrishnan J,
    12. Appel GB
    : Eculizumab for dense deposit disease and C3 glomerulonephritis. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 7: 748–756, 2012pmid:22403278
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  47. ↵
    1. McCaughan JA,
    2. O'Rourke DM,
    3. Courtney AE
    : Recurrent dense deposit disease after renal transplantation: an emerging role for complementary therapies. Am J Transplant 12: 1046–1051, 2012
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Ozkaya O,
    2. Nalcacioglu H,
    3. Tekcan D,
    4. Genc G,
    5. Meydan BC,
    6. Ozdemir BH,
    7. Baysal MK,
    8. Keceligil HT
    : Eculizumab therapy in a patient with dense-deposit disease associated with partial lipodystropy. Pediatr Nephrol : 2014pmid:24464478
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Rousset-Rouvière C,
    2. Cailliez M,
    3. Garaix F,
    4. Bruno D,
    5. Laurent D,
    6. Tsimaratos M
    : Rituximab fails where eculizumab restores renal function in C3nef-related DDD [published online ahead of print January 26, 2014]. Pediatr Nephrol doi:10.1007/s00467-013-2748-5
  50. ↵
    1. Vivarelli M,
    2. Pasini A,
    3. Emma F
    : Eculizumab for the treatment of dense-deposit disease. N Engl J Med 366: 1163–1165, 2012pmid:22435383
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  51. ↵
    1. Gurkan S,
    2. Fyfe B,
    3. Weiss L,
    4. Xiao X,
    5. Zhang Y,
    6. Smith RJ
    : Eculizumab and recurrent C3 glomerulonephritis. Pediatr Nephrol 28: 1975–1981, 2013pmid:23689905
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Malik TH,
    2. Lavin PJ,
    3. Goicoechea de Jorge E,
    4. Vernon KA,
    5. Rose KL,
    6. Patel MP,
    7. de Leeuw M,
    8. Neary JJ,
    9. Conlon PJ,
    10. Winn MP,
    11. Pickering MC
    : A hybrid CFHR3-1 gene causes familial C3 glomerulopathy. J Am Soc Nephrol 23: 1155–1160, 2012pmid:22626820
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Medjeral-Thomas N,
    2. Malik TH,
    3. Patel MP,
    4. Toth T,
    5. Terence Cook H,
    6. Tomson C,
    7. Pickering MC
    : A novel CFHR5 fusion protein causes C3 glomerulopathy in a family without Cypriot ancestry [published online ahead of print September 25, 2013]. Kidney Int doi:10.1038/ki.2013.348pmid:24067434
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Yates JRW,
    2. Sepp T,
    3. Matharu BK,
    4. Khan JC,
    5. Thurlby DA,
    6. Shahid H,
    7. Clayton DG,
    8. Hayward C,
    9. Morgan J,
    10. Wright AF,
    11. Armbrecht AM,
    12. Dhillon B,
    13. Deary IJ,
    14. Redmond E,
    15. Bird AC,
    16. Moore AT,
    17. Genetic Factors in AMD Study Group
    : Complement C3 variant and the risk of age-related macular degeneration. N Engl J Med 357: 553–561, 2007pmid:17634448
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
Back to top

In this issue

View Selected Citations (0)
Print
Download PDF
Email Article
Citation Tools
Request Permissions
American Society of Nephrology Clinical Pathological Conference
Kevin E. Meyers, Helen Liapis, Mohamed G. Atta
CJASN Apr 2014, 9 (4) 818-828; DOI: 10.2215/CJN.12481213
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo

Jump to section

Keywords