Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Podcasts
    • Subject Collections
    • Archives
    • ASN Meeting Abstracts
    • Saved Searches
  • Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Resources
    • Reprint Information
  • Trainees
    • Peer Review Program
    • Prize Competition
  • About CJASN
    • About CJASN
    • Editorial Team
    • CJASN Impact
    • CJASN Recognitions
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Advertising
    • Reprint Information
    • Subscriptions
    • Feedback
  • ASN Kidney News
  • Other
    • JASN
    • Kidney360
    • Kidney News Online
    • American Society of Nephrology

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
American Society of Nephrology
  • Other
    • JASN
    • Kidney360
    • Kidney News Online
    • American Society of Nephrology
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Advertisement
American Society of Nephrology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Podcasts
    • Subject Collections
    • Archives
    • ASN Meeting Abstracts
    • Saved Searches
  • Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Resources
    • Reprint Information
  • Trainees
    • Peer Review Program
    • Prize Competition
  • About CJASN
    • About CJASN
    • Editorial Team
    • CJASN Impact
    • CJASN Recognitions
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Advertising
    • Reprint Information
    • Subscriptions
    • Feedback
  • ASN Kidney News
  • Visit ASN on Facebook
  • Follow CJASN on Twitter
  • CJASN RSS
  • Community Forum
Original ArticlesEpidemiology and Outcomes
You have accessRestricted Access

Comparison of Serum Concentrations of β-Trace Protein, β2-Microglobulin, Cystatin C, and Creatinine in the US Population

Stephen P. Juraschek, Josef Coresh, Lesley A. Inker, Andrew S. Levey, Anna Köttgen, Meredith C. Foster, Brad C. Astor, John H. Eckfeldt and Elizabeth Selvin
CJASN April 2013, 8 (4) 584-592; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2215/CJN.08700812
Stephen P. Juraschek
*Departments of Epidemiology and
†Welch Center for Prevention, Epidemiology, and Clinical Research, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland;
‡Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Josef Coresh
*Departments of Epidemiology and
†Welch Center for Prevention, Epidemiology, and Clinical Research, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland;
‡Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland;
§Biostatistics, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lesley A. Inker
‖Division of Nephrology, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andrew S. Levey
‖Division of Nephrology, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anna Köttgen
*Departments of Epidemiology and
¶Renal Division, University Hospital, Freiburg, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Meredith C. Foster
*Departments of Epidemiology and
†Welch Center for Prevention, Epidemiology, and Clinical Research, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Brad C. Astor
**Departments of Medicine and
††Population Health Sciences, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
John H. Eckfeldt
‡‡Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Elizabeth Selvin
*Departments of Epidemiology and
†Welch Center for Prevention, Epidemiology, and Clinical Research, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland;
‡Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data Supps
  • Info & Metrics
  • View PDF
Loading

Summary

Background and objectives β-trace protein (βTP), β2-microglobulin (β2M), and cystatin C (CysC) have advantages over creatinine for estimating GFR and prognosis. This study compares the distribution of all four markers in the general population and their associations with possible determinants of GFR.

Design, setting, participants, & measurements βTP and β2M were measured in 7596 participants (aged ≥12 years) of the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (1988–1994). βTP and β2M concentrations and the proportion of persons with elevated (≥99th percentile for young healthy participants) βTP (≥0.81 mg/L), β2M (≥2.80 mg/L), standardized CysC (≥1.03 mg/L), and creatinine (≥1.2 mg/dl for men and ≥1.0 mg/dl for women) were compared across demographic and clinical factors.

Results Elevated βTP, β2M, and CysC showed stronger associations with age than elevated serum creatinine, the prevalence of elevated levels reaching 47%, 44%, 58%, and 26%, respectively, by age 80 years. βTP, CysC, and creatinine were higher in men but β2M was not associated with sex. Mexican Americans had lower βTP, β2M, CysC, and creatinine compared with non-Hispanic whites. Hypertension and higher C-reactive protein were associated with elevations in all markers, whereas non-Hispanic black race, body mass index, diabetes, smoking status, triglycerides, HDL cholesterol, and education were not associated in a consistent manner across the different markers.

Conclusions βTP, β2M, CysC, and creatinine differ in their associations with demographic and clinical factors, suggesting variation in their non-GFR determinants. Future studies should examine these markers with measured GFR to determine their diagnostic and prognostic utility.

Introduction

β-trace protein (βTP) and β2-microglobulin (β2M) are low molecular mass serum proteins that are increasingly viewed as useful for estimating GFR and predicting prognosis in kidney disease, cardiovascular outcomes, and death, independently of GFR (1–3). Recent studies have shown that βTP and β2M are better predictors of adverse health outcomes than creatinine and are potentially as good as cystatin C (CysC) (4). It is now appreciated that the use of a combination of filtration markers leads to more accurate estimates of GFR than single markers (5), and as in other fields, it is expected that a combination of markers will lead to more accurate predictions of prognosis (6). However, as we have learned from creatinine and CysC, knowledge of their non-GFR determinants in the general population will be necessary for optimal use.

Determinants of the serum concentrations in βTP and β2M have not yet been studied in the general population. βTP, a 168 amino acid glycoprotein (7), originates from the choroid plexus of the central nervous system (8). β2M, a subunit of the major histocompatibility class I molecule, is produced by all nucleated cells (9). Like CysC, βTP and β2M are considered candidates for the assessment of GFR because they are produced at a constant rate, are freely filtered by the glomerulus, and are then reabsorbed and almost completely metabolized by the proximal tubule with no appreciable entry into the circulation (10–12). There is some evidence that cerebrospinal fluid leaks (13) and corticosteroid use (14) affect βTP, whereas rare inflammatory conditions affect β2M (15–18).

The challenge of measuring GFR in large population studies and the almost complete absence of urinary excretion of these markers make it difficult to study the relative contributions of GFR and non-GFR determinants to their serum concentrations. As such, examining four filtration markers in the general population presents an opportunity to infer demographic and clinical factors that may be associated with variation in underlying GFR. Thus, the objectives of this study were to describe the distributions of βTP and β2M in the US population, to identify factors associated with elevations in βTP and β2M, to compare these distributions and associations with those of standardized creatinine and CysC, and to distinguish factors that may be associated with GFR versus non-GFR determinants of all four filtration markers.

Materials and Methods

Study Population

Data for this study were derived from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III), a large, cross-sectional study conducted by the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) using a complex multistage sampling design. Interviews, physical examinations, and laboratory measurements were obtained from 18,722 individuals aged ≥12 years (19). Stored serum samples from a subset of NHANES III participants were used for the measurement of nontraditional markers of GFR. Details of this study design were previously described (20,21). Briefly, we selected the following: all participants aged ≥60 years because decreased GFR is common in this group (n=5248), all participants with elevated creatinine >1.189 mg/dl in men and >0.997 mg/dl in women (n=305), and a 25% random sample of participants aged 12–59 years (n=3293). This design minimized costs while retaining power and generalizability. Sample weights were re-calculated based on the total number of samples that were not missing CysC (86%; n=7596). Among the original CysC subsample, there were 7529 (99.1%) participants with a βTP measurement and 7534 (99.2%) participants with a β2M measurement.

Primary Outcome Measurements

In 2009, we measured βTP and β2M in stored serum samples collected in 1988–1994, using particle-enhanced immunonephelometric assays (N Latex β-trace protein assay and N Latex β-2 microglobulin assay; Dade Behring, Deerfield, IL). Both βTP and β2M are reported to be robust to freeze-thaw cycles (22). Interassay coefficients of variation (CVs) for the βTP assay and the β2M assay were 5.7% (mean 0.594 mg/L) and 2.7% (mean 1.757 mg/L), respectively. Creatinine was measured using a modified kinetic Jaffe reaction, traceable to higher-order isotope dilution mass spectrometry methods, and the CV ranged from 1.2% (mean 1.00 mg/dl) to 1.6% (mean 3.84 mg/dl) (23). CysC was measured using a particle-enhanced immunonephelometric assay (20) and was calibrated to standardized CysC (5). Its CV ranged from 4.9% (mean 1.90 mg/L) to 5.1% (mean 0.97 mg/L) (20,21). All serum specimens underwent at least one thaw cycle.

Definition of Elevated Filtration Markers and Decreased GFR

Cutoffs for elevated βTP (≥0.81 mg/L), β2M (≥2.80 mg/L), and CysC (≥1.03 mg/L) were defined as the 99th percentile in participants aged 20–39 years who did not have hypertension or diabetes (diagnosed or undiagnosed) (20). Creatinine cutoffs were sex specific, corresponding to the study design, with cutoffs of ≥1.2 mg/dl for men and ≥1.0 mg/dl for women. This is approximately equal to the 99th percentile in either sex in participants aged 20–39 years without diabetes and hypertension. The cutoff for decreased estimated GFR using creatinine was <60 ml/min per 1.73m2, computed from the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation (24).

Determination of Potential Risk Factors

We examined covariates associated with CKD. Race and ethnicity were grouped as non-Hispanic white, non-Hispanic black, Mexican American, and other, although the “other” category was not presented due to inherent heterogeneity and small sample size (25). Education (<12 years, ≥12 years), current smoking status (yes/no), and obesity (body mass index [BMI] <30 kg/m2, ≥30 kg/m2) were dichotomized. BMI was also analyzed as a continuous variable (scaled to per 5 kg/m2). Hypertensive status (yes/no) was defined as a physician-diagnosis of hypertension, hypertension medication use, or a mean systolic or diastolic BP ≥140 mmHg or ≥90 mmHg, respectively. Diabetes status (yes/no) was based on a fasting plasma glucose of ≥126 mg/dl (≥7.0 mmol/L) or a nonfasting glucose of ≥200 mg/dl (≥11.0 mmol/L) or self-reported diagnosis by a physician (independent of pregnancy), use of insulin, or use of diabetes medication. HDL cholesterol was defined as a continuous variable (per 10-mg/dl increase) for logistic regression, and as a dichotomous variable (<40 mg/dl for men and <50 mg/dl for women) to estimate study population prevalence. Triglycerides were log-transformed to normalize its distribution. C-reactive protein (CRP) was divided into three categories (<0.22 mg/dl, 0.22–1 mg/dl, >1 mg/dl). The lower limit of detection for CRP was 0.22 mg/dl. Urine albumin was measured by a solid-phase fluorescent immunoassay, and urine creatinine was measured using the modified kinetic rate Jaffe method. Urinary albumin/creatinine ratio (ACR) was expressed in milligrams per gram (26,27). Additional data collection details, including assay precision estimates, are available in the NHANES field manual published online (19).

Statistical Analyses

The method used to generate sample weights was described in detail elsewhere (20). Briefly, the original sampling weights were modified to account for both missing creatinine and CysC using standard methods approved by the NCHS. These weights were utilized in all of our analyses and SEMs for estimates were obtained using the Taylor series (linearization) method (28). Analyses were performed using Stata11.1 software (StataCorp LP, College Station, TX).

Means and proportions were estimated by age group, and weighted percentiles of βTP and β2M were estimated using the subset of healthy individuals aged 20–39 years. Filtration markers were transformed (−1/βTP and −1/β2M) to model GFR. We used logistic regression models to examine the associations of demographic and clinical factors with elevated βTP and β2M concentrations, overall (≥20 years) and stratified by age group (20–59 years, ≥60 years). These models were applied to CysC and creatinine for comparison. This analysis was performed in participants aged ≥60 years, reflecting subsample design as well as a population with decreased GFR. The analysis was also conducted in participants aged 20–59 years. Participants aged <20 years were excluded due to differences in NHANES III covariate definitions among youth as well as lack of data on education. Our models were adjusted for age, sex, race/ethnicity, BMI, hypertension, diabetes, smoking, CRP, log-transformed triglycerides, HDL cholesterol, and education. We also repeated this analysis adjusting for estimated GFR using creatinine both in place of and in addition to age, sex, and race/ethnicity. The weighted median and 5th and 95th percentiles of 1/βTP and 1/β2M were evaluated by age, sex, and race/ethnicity to model GFR across subgroups and to normalize their distributions. Continuous associations between markers and age were evaluated using linear splines with knots every 10 years. Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated between βTP, β2M, CysC, and creatinine. The proportion of the US population aged ≥12 years with an elevated serum concentration of each filtration marker was plotted by age along with the proportion of decreased estimated GFR using creatinine to observe age-related trends.

Informed consent was obtained from all participants. Protocols for the conduct and implementation of this study were approved by the institutional review boards of both the NCHS and the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health.

Results

Population characteristics are shown in Table 1. The mean βTP and β2M concentrations in the overall US population were 0.58 mg/L (95% confidence interval, 0.57, 0.59) and 1.88 mg/L (95% confidence interval, 1.85, 1.92). Percentiles by age and sex showed βTP levels being higher in men than women (P<0.01), with details by age, marker, and ethnicity shown in Supplemental Figures 1–3. The correlation between βTP and β2M was high (0.85), as were the correlations with CysC (0.73 and 0.82), whereas correlations with creatinine were lower (0.65 and 0.68).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Characteristics overall and by age group, US population (NHANES III 1988–1994)

We compared the prevalence of elevated serum concentrations of each of the filtration markers and estimated GFR, using creatinine <60 ml/min per 1.73 m2 across all ages (Figure 1). CysC showed the sharpest incline in prevalence starting at about age 50 years, with βTP and β2M demonstrating a comparable rise but starting at around age 60 years. Although creatinine elevation also became more common starting at about age 50 years, its incline was far more gradual than for the other three markers. Estimated GFR from creatinine showed an intermediate behavior. At age 80 years, the proportions of the population with an elevated βTP, β2M, CysC, and creatinine were 47%, 44%, 58%, and 26% compared with 0.4%, 0.5%, 1.3%, and 1.7% at age 20 years.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Proportion of the US population aged ≥12 years with an elevated filtration marker or CKD stage 3 by age. Elevated markers were β-trace protein (≥0.81 mg/L), β2-microglobulin (≥2.80 mg/L), standardized creatinine (men, ≥1.2 mg/dl; women, ≥1.0 mg/dl), or standardized cystatin C (≥1.03 mg/L). CKD stage 3 is defined as an estimated GFR <60 ml/min per 1.73 m2, estimated using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation (24). The elevated markers or CKD stage 3 are independent definitions determined solely by the markers themselves or the estimated GFR (eGFR).

We performed multivariable logistic regression of factors associated with elevated levels of βTP, β2M, CysC, and creatinine (Table 2 and Figure 2). Among persons aged ≥20 years, after adjustment for all other factors examined, age, hypertension, and CRP were associated with elevated levels of all filtration markers. Consistent associations with all markers except creatinine were seen for HDL cholesterol and education, both in a protective direction. Other associations were less consistent across markers. Female sex and Mexican race/ethnicity were associated with a lower prevalence of elevations in βTP and creatinine but not significant associations with β2M and CysC. In contrast, triglycerides were associated with a higher prevalence of elevations in CysC and creatinine. Current smoking status was uniquely associated with a lower prevalence of creatinine elevations and diabetes was not associated with prevalence of elevations in any of the four markers. Two factors were associated in reverse directions with two markers. Non-Hispanic black race/ethnicity was associated with elevated concentrations of creatinine, but lower concentrations of βTP, and BMI was associated with lower concentrations of β2M, but elevations in CysC. Some differences in the patterns in strata of age 20–59 years versus ≥60 years are shown in Supplemental Tables 1–5 and Supplemental Figures 2–5. In general, adjustment for estimated GFR rather than age, sex, and race/ethnicity did not alter the above patterns (Table 3). The two exceptions were that both BMI and triglycerides were significantly associated with βTP and no longer associated with CysC after adjustment for estimated GFR. Similarly, adjustment for estimated GFR in addition to age, sex, and race/ethnicity yielded virtually the same results (Supplemental Table 6).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2.

Adjusted ORs and 95% CIs of elevated serum β-trace protein (≥0.81 mg/L), elevated serum β2-microglobulin (≥2.80 mg/L), elevated standard cystatin C (≥1.03 mg/L), and elevated standard creatinine (men, ≥1.0 mg/dl; women, ≥1.2 mg/dl) in persons aged ≥20 years

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Odds of elevated filtration markers in participants aged ≥20 years. Odds ratios (95% CIs) of an elevated concentration of β-trace protein (≥0.81 mg/L), β2-microglobulin (≥2.80 mg/L), cystatin C (≥1.03 mg/L), and creatinine (men, ≥1.2 mg/dl; women, ≥1.0 mg/dl) after adjusting for age (per 1-year increase), female sex, non-Hispanic black race/ethnicity, Mexican American race/ethnicity, BMI per 5-kg/m2 increase, hypertension, diabetes, current smoking status, CRP from 0.22 to 1.0 mg/dl, CRP >1.0 mg/dl, triglycerides (mg/dl), HDL cholesterol (per 10-mg/dl increase), and education (≥12 years). Reference groups for categorical variables include male sex, non-Hispanic whites, no hypertension, no diabetes, no current smoking status, and an education <12 years. β-trace protein is depicted by a circle, β2-microglobulin is depicted by a triangle, cystatin C is depicted by a diamond, and creatinine is depicted by a square. The age covariate is not shown. BMI, body mass index; CRP, C-reactive protein; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 3.

ORs and 95% CIs of elevated serum β-trace protein (≥0.81 mg/L), elevated serum β2-microglobulin (≥2.80 mg/L), and elevated serum cystatin C (≥1.03 mg/L) in persons aged ≥20 years adjusted for eGFR

Distributions of βTP and β2M in a young, healthy subgroup of participants aged 20–39 years without hypertension or diabetes are shown in Table 4. The differences in concentrations of βTP varied significantly by sex and by race/ethnicity, with βTP being greater among men versus women (P<0.01) and non-Hispanic whites versus non-Hispanic blacks and Mexican Americans, respectively (P<0.001 for both non-Hispanic blacks and Mexican Americans). Similar trends were noted for β2M concentrations. Median values were significantly greater among men than women (P of difference <0.001), and among non-Hispanic whites compared with non-Hispanic blacks (P of difference <0.01) and Mexican Americans (P of difference = 0.03).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 4.

Percentiles of β-trace protein and β2-microglobulin distribution in persons aged 20–39 years without hypertension or diabetes mellitus overall, by sex, and by race/ethnicity, US population (1988–1994)

Discussion

This article is the first description of the distribution of serum concentrations of βTP and β2M in the US population and expands our understanding of their determinants. The comparisons with creatinine and CysC allow for inferences about factors that may be associated with GFR and non-GFR determinants of their serum concentrations, which cannot be evaluated directly in large population studies. In our study, older age, hypertension, and higher CRP were associated with elevations in all four filtration markers, consistent with lower GFR. In contrast, inconsistent associations across markers were observed for sex, black race/ethnicity, Mexican Americans, BMI, current smoking, triglycerides, HDL cholesterol, and education, suggesting more complex relationships, including associations with non-GFR determinants as well as with GFR.

In our study, serum concentrations of βTP and β2M began to rise in the fifth to sixth decade. This is consistent with prior reports that demonstrated minimal effects of age on βTP (29,30) or β2M (29) in younger adults (aged <22 years), but significant associations with age, particularly for β2M, in older adults (31–33). The positive associations of βTP and β2M with age were also seen with CysC and creatinine, which likely reflect a higher prevalence of decreased GFR with age (27). However, the proportions of older participants with elevations in CysC, βTP, and β2M were more pronounced than creatinine, possibly reflecting that the effects of muscle atrophy on creatinine generation in elderly individuals may be even more pronounced among individuals with CKD than among populations used to estimate the average age association for estimating GFR (34).

There is disagreement in the literature regarding the association of sex with βTP and β2M. Whereas some studies describe higher βTP concentrations in adult men compared with women (35), most studies have shown no sex differences in children (29,30). β2M has not been shown to differ by sex in youth (29), but some studies have reported higher β2M concentrations in adult men compared with women (33), whereas others report no sex differences (31,32). Our data suggest that men have higher concentrations of βTP than women aged <30 years and >50 years, whereas serum concentrations of β2M were generally greater in men aged <40 years. In contrast, we found that CysC and creatinine were greater in men at all ages. Although previous reports have also reported higher creatinine (36) and CysC in men (20), these findings have been inconsistent with measured GFR, which is known to be greater in men versus women (37). This illustrates the utility of a multi-marker approach to estimating GFR, in that one of the markers, β2M, seems to be less affected by sex-based, physiologic differences in marker generation that could be masking underlying differences in GFR. It also suggests the benefits of GFR estimating equations that remove known large non-GFR effects in order to produce an estimate that more specifically reflects kidney function. Estimates based on multiple markers can be combined or averaged to increase precision and can be compared to highlight similarities that are more likely to reflect GFR and differences that are more likely to reflect effects of the non-GFR determinants of the specific filtration markers.

Our data show inconsistent patterns for the relationship between race/ethnicity and βTP and β2M across ages. Non-Hispanic blacks had lower βTP and β2M at younger ages (<30 years), followed by increases during ages 50–70 years, and subsequent declines later in life. A similar trend was described previously for CysC (20) and may reflect incident low GFR at age 50 years before a decrease in survivorship at age ≥70 years. A similar pattern was not observed for creatinine, which exhibited higher values for non-Hispanic blacks versus whites regardless of age. This inconsistency reflects prior reports of higher muscle mass and creatinine production in non-Hispanic blacks (26,38–40). Our data also show that being Mexican American was associated with lower serum concentrations of βTP and β2M across all ages. Similar patterns have been described by others for CysC and creatinine (20,26,38), and may imply a higher level of GFR.

This study represents the largest comparison of βTP, β2M, CysC, and creatinine to date. Furthermore, it was conducted in a well characterized, nationally representative sample of the US population, enabling us to determine normal levels of these markers. The major limitation is that we do not have measured GFR. Nevertheless, although NHANES III does not include measurements of GFR, the availability of questionnaires, physical examination measures, and laboratory specimens allows us to examine associations with a variety of factors that are generally not available in studies with measured GFR. In addition, due to its cross-sectional design, we cannot examine the temporal nature of the observed associations and differential mortality can distort associations. For example, not finding a higher prevalence of elevations of any of the filtration markers among patients with diabetes may reflect the high mortality among diabetic individuals, as well as possible canceling effects of hyperfiltration early in the course of diabetic kidney disease. Finally, we had only single measurements of βTP, β2M, CysC, and creatinine, and these measurements are known to vary within participants, which may contribute to differences in the observed risk factor associations (20,41).

In conclusion, this study describes the distributions of βTP and β2M in the general US population and provides a valuable comparison with creatinine and CysC. Knowledge of the demographic and clinical characteristics associated with these markers suggests that they have different non-GFR determinants. Consideration of these differences will be important for the appropriate interpretation of estimates of GFR or prognosis based on their serum concentration. Future studies should directly examine the relationship between βTP, β2M, and measured GFR, integrating them with CysC and creatinine to optimize estimation of GFR and their use in determining prognosis.

Disclosures

J.C. has consulted for Amgen and Merck and has an investigator-initiated grant from Amgen. L.A.I. has an investigator grant from Pharmalink and Gilead Inc.

Acknowledgments

This project was partially funded by Siemens and by a grant from the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) (U01 DK067651). S.P.J. is supported in part by a National Heart Lung and Blood Institute cardiovascular epidemiology training grant (T32HL007024). L.A.I. is supported in part by an NIDDK grant (K23DK081017). Siemens had no role in the study design, data collection, analysis, interpretation of data, or report writing.

Footnotes

  • Published online ahead of print. Publication date available at www.cjasn.org.

  • This article contains supplemental material online at http://cjasn.asnjournals.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.2215/CJN.08700812/-/DCSupplemental.

  • Received August 26, 2012.
  • Accepted December 3, 2012.
  • Copyright © 2013 by the American Society of Nephrology

References

  1. ↵
    Aksun SA, Ozmen D, Ozmen B, Parildar Z, Mutaf I, Turgan N, Habif S, Kumanlioğluc K, Bayindir O: Beta2-microglobulin and cystatin C in type 2 diabetes: Assessment of diabetic nephropathy. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes 112: 195–200, 2004
    1. Viberti GC,
    2. Keen H,
    3. Mackintosh D
    : Beta 2-microglobulinaemia: A sensitive index of diminishing renal function in diabetics. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 282: 95–98, 1981pmid:6161671
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    1. Tangri N,
    2. Inker LA,
    3. Tighiouart H,
    4. Sorensen E,
    5. Menon V,
    6. Beck G,
    7. Shlipak M,
    8. Coresh J,
    9. Levey AS,
    10. Sarnak MJ
    : Filtration markers may have prognostic value independent of glomerular filtration rate. J Am Soc Nephrol 23: 351–359, 2012pmid:22173699
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    1. Astor BC,
    2. Shafi T,
    3. Hoogeveen RC,
    4. Matsushita K,
    5. Ballantyne CM,
    6. Inker LA,
    7. Coresh J
    : Novel markers of kidney function as predictors of ESRD, cardiovascular disease, and mortality in the general population. Am J Kidney Dis 59: 653–662, 2012pmid:22305758
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Inker LA,
    2. Schmid CH,
    3. Tighiouart H,
    4. Eckfeldt JH,
    5. Feldman HI,
    6. Greene T,
    7. Kusek JW,
    8. Manzi J,
    9. Van Lente F,
    10. Zhang YL,
    11. Coresh J,
    12. Levey AS,
    13. CKD-EPI Investigators
    : Estimating glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine and cystatin C. N Engl J Med 367: 20–29, 2012pmid:22762315
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Ridker PM,
    2. Rifai N,
    3. Rose L,
    4. Buring JE,
    5. Cook NR
    : Comparison of C-reactive protein and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels in the prediction of first cardiovascular events. N Engl J Med 347: 1557–1565, 2002pmid:12432042
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Hoffmann A,
    2. Nimtz M,
    3. Conradt HS
    : Molecular characterization of beta-trace protein in human serum and urine: A potential diagnostic marker for renal diseases. Glycobiology 7: 499–506, 1997pmid:9184830
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Olsson JE,
    2. Link H,
    3. Nosslin B
    : Metabolic studies on 125I-labelled beta-trace protein, with special reference to synthesis within the central nervous system. J Neurochem 21: 1153–1159, 1973pmid:4128374
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Ploegh HL,
    2. Orr HT,
    3. Strominger JL
    : Major histocompatibility antigens: The human (HLA-A, -B, -C) and murine (H-2K, H-2D) class I molecules. Cell 24: 287–299, 1981pmid:7016338
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Li W,
    2. Mase M,
    3. Inui T,
    4. Shimoda M,
    5. Isomura K,
    6. Oda H,
    7. Yamada K,
    8. Urade Y
    : Pharmacokinetics of recombinant human lipocalin-type prostaglandin D synthase/beta-trace in canine. Neurosci Res 61: 289–293, 2008pmid:18471915
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Vincent C,
    2. Revillard JP
    : Beta-2-microglobulin and HLA-related glycoproteins in human urine and serum. Contrib Nephrol 26: 66–88, 1981pmid:6169488
    OpenUrlPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Filler G,
    2. Bökenkamp A,
    3. Hofmann W,
    4. Le Bricon T,
    5. Martínez-Brú C,
    6. Grubb A
    : Cystatin C as a marker of GFR—history, indications, and future research. Clin Biochem 38: 1–8, 2005pmid:15607309
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Sampaio MH,
    2. de Barros-Mazon S,
    3. Sakano E,
    4. Chone CT
    : Predictability of quantification of beta-trace protein for diagnosis of cerebrospinal fluid leak: Cutoff determination in nasal fluids with two control groups. Am J Rhinol Allergy 23: 585–590, 2009pmid:19958607
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Abbink FC,
    2. Laarman CA,
    3. Braam KI,
    4. van Wijk JA,
    5. Kors WA,
    6. Bouman AA,
    7. Spreeuwenberg MD,
    8. Stoffel-Wagner B,
    9. Bökenkamp A
    : Beta-trace protein is not superior to cystatin C for the estimation of GFR in patients receiving corticosteroids. Clin Biochem 41: 299–305, 2008pmid:18082138
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    Evrin PE, Wibell L: Serum 2-microglobulin in various disorders. Clin Chim Acta 43: 183–186, 1973
    1. Michalski JP,
    2. Daniels TE,
    3. Talal N,
    4. Grey HM
    : Beta2 microglobulin and lymphocytic infiltration in Sjögren’s syndrome. N Engl J Med 293: 1228–1231, 1975pmid:52841
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Bataille R,
    2. Magub M,
    3. Grenier J,
    4. Donnadio D,
    5. Sany J
    : Serum beta-2-microglobulin in multiple myeloma: Relation to presenting features and clinical status. Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol 18: 59–66, 1982pmid:6177535
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Maury CP,
    2. Helve T,
    3. Sjöblom C
    : Serum beta 2-microglobulin, sialic acid, and C-reactive protein in systemic lupus erythematosus. Rheumatol Int 2: 145–149, 1982pmid:6189175
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey III data files, documentation, and codebooks. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/about/major/nhanes/nh3data.htm. Accessed August 13, 2011
  16. ↵
    1. Köttgen A,
    2. Selvin E,
    3. Stevens LA,
    4. Levey AS,
    5. Van Lente F,
    6. Coresh J
    : Serum cystatin C in the United States: The Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III). Am J Kidney Dis 51: 385–394, 2008pmid:18295054
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey III Surplus Sera Laboratory Component: Cystatin C (Surplus Sera), 2007. Available at: ftp://ftp.cdc.gov/pub/Health_Statistics/NCHS/nhanes/nhanes3/27a/SSCYSTAT.pdf. Accessed October 24, 2011
  18. ↵
    Juraschek SP, Coresh J, Inker LA, Rynders GP, Eckfeldt JH, Selvin E: The effects of freeze-thaw on β-trace protein and β2-microglobulin assays after long-term sample storage. Clin Biochem 45: 694–696, 2012
  19. ↵
    1. Selvin E,
    2. Manzi J,
    3. Stevens LA,
    4. Van Lente F,
    5. Lacher DA,
    6. Levey AS,
    7. Coresh J
    : Calibration of serum creatinine in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys (NHANES) 1988-1994, 1999-2004. Am J Kidney Dis 50: 918–926, 2007pmid:18037092
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Levey AS,
    2. Stevens LA,
    3. Schmid CH,
    4. Zhang YL,
    5. Castro AF 3rd.,
    6. Feldman HI,
    7. Kusek JW,
    8. Eggers P,
    9. Van Lente F,
    10. Greene T,
    11. Coresh J,
    12. CKD-EPI (Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration)
    : A new equation to estimate glomerular filtration rate. Ann Intern Med 150: 604–612, 2009pmid:19414839
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. National Center for Health Statistics
    : Plan and operations of the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988-94 Series 1: Programs and collection procedures. Vital Health Stat 32: 1–407, 1994
    OpenUrlPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. Coresh J,
    2. Astor BC,
    3. Greene T,
    4. Eknoyan G,
    5. Levey AS
    : Prevalence of chronic kidney disease and decreased kidney function in the adult US population: Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Am J Kidney Dis 41: 1–12, 2003pmid:12500213
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Coresh J,
    2. Selvin E,
    3. Stevens LA,
    4. Manzi J,
    5. Kusek JW,
    6. Eggers P,
    7. Van Lente F,
    8. Levey AS
    : Prevalence of chronic kidney disease in the United States. JAMA 298: 2038–2047, 2007pmid:17986697
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    1. National Center for Health Statistics
    : Analytic and Reporting Guidelines: The Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, NHANES III (1988-94), Hyattsville, MD, National Center for Health Statistics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1996
  25. ↵
    1. Bökenkamp A,
    2. Franke I,
    3. Schlieber M,
    4. Düker G,
    5. Schmitt J,
    6. Buderus S,
    7. Lentze MJ,
    8. Stoffel-Wagner B
    : Beta-trace protein—a marker of kidney function in children: “Original research communication-clinical investigation”. Clin Biochem 40: 969–975, 2007pmid:17588556
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    1. Filler G,
    2. Witt I,
    3. Priem F,
    4. Ehrich JH,
    5. Jung K
    : Are cystatin C and beta 2-microglobulin better markers than serum creatinine for prediction of a normal glomerular filtration rate in pediatric subjects? Clin Chem 43: 1077–1078, 1997pmid:9191564
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  27. ↵
    1. Norlund L,
    2. Fex G,
    3. Lanke J,
    4. Von Schenck H,
    5. Nilsson JE,
    6. Leksell H,
    7. Grubb A
    : Reference intervals for the glomerular filtration rate and cell-proliferation markers: Serum cystatin C and serum beta 2-microglobulin/cystatin C-ratio. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 57: 463–470, 1997pmid:9350064
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. ↵
    1. Parildar Z,
    2. Gulter C,
    3. Habif S,
    4. Mutaf I,
    5. Turgan N,
    6. Ozmen D
    , Bayindir O: Age and gender associated changes in cystatin C and beta2-microglobulin. Turk J Med Sci 32: 317–321, 2002
    OpenUrl
  29. ↵
    1. Jovanović D,
    2. Krstivojević P,
    3. Obradović I,
    4. Durdević V,
    5. Dukanović L
    : Serum cystatin C and beta2-microglobulin as markers of glomerular filtration rate. Ren Fail 25: 123–133, 2003pmid:12617340
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. ↵
    1. Levey AS,
    2. Eckardt KU,
    3. Tsukamoto Y,
    4. Levin A,
    5. Coresh J,
    6. Rossert J,
    7. De Zeeuw D,
    8. Hostetter TH,
    9. Lameire N,
    10. Eknoyan G
    : Definition and classification of chronic kidney disease: A position statement from Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO). Kidney Int 67: 2089–2100, 2005pmid:15882252
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. ↵
    1. Donadio C,
    2. Lucchesi A,
    3. Ardini M,
    4. Donadio E,
    5. Giordani R
    : Serum levels of beta-trace protein and glomerular filtration rate—preliminary results. J Pharm Biomed Anal 32: 1099–1104, 2003pmid:12900000
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. ↵
    1. Levey AS,
    2. Bosch JP,
    3. Lewis JB,
    4. Greene T,
    5. Rogers N,
    6. Roth D,
    7. Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study Group
    : A more accurate method to estimate glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine: A new prediction equation. Ann Intern Med 130: 461–470, 1999pmid:10075613
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. ↵
    1. Wesson L
    : Physiology of the Human Kidney, New York, Grune & Stratton, 1969
  34. ↵
    1. Jones CA,
    2. McQuillan GM,
    3. Kusek JW,
    4. Eberhardt MS,
    5. Herman WH,
    6. Coresh J,
    7. Salive M,
    8. Jones CP,
    9. Agodoa LY
    : Serum creatinine levels in the US population: Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Am J Kidney Dis 32: 992–999, 1998pmid:9856515
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. James GD,
    2. Sealey JE,
    3. Alderman M,
    4. Ljungman S,
    5. Mueller FB,
    6. Pecker MS,
    7. Laragh JH
    : A longitudinal study of urinary creatinine and creatinine clearance in normal subjects. Race, sex, and age differences. Am J Hypertens 1: 124–131, 1988pmid:3401350
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. ↵
    1. Goldwasser P,
    2. Aboul-Magd A,
    3. Maru M
    : Race and creatinine excretion in chronic renal insufficiency. Am J Kidney Dis 30: 16–22, 1997pmid:9214396
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. ↵
    1. Selvin E,
    2. Juraschek SP,
    3. Eckfeldt J,
    4. Levey AS,
    5. Inker LA,
    6. Coresh J
    : Within-person variability in kidney measures. Am J Kidney Dis 2013, in press
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology: 8 (4)
Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
Vol. 8, Issue 4
April 05, 2013
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
View Selected Citations (0)
Print
Download PDF
Sign up for Alerts
Email Article
Thank you for your help in sharing the high-quality science in CJASN.
Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Comparison of Serum Concentrations of β-Trace Protein, β2-Microglobulin, Cystatin C, and Creatinine in the US Population
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Society of Nephrology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Society of Nephrology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Comparison of Serum Concentrations of β-Trace Protein, β2-Microglobulin, Cystatin C, and Creatinine in the US Population
Stephen P. Juraschek, Josef Coresh, Lesley A. Inker, Andrew S. Levey, Anna Köttgen, Meredith C. Foster, Brad C. Astor, John H. Eckfeldt, Elizabeth Selvin
CJASN Apr 2013, 8 (4) 584-592; DOI: 10.2215/CJN.08700812

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Comparison of Serum Concentrations of β-Trace Protein, β2-Microglobulin, Cystatin C, and Creatinine in the US Population
Stephen P. Juraschek, Josef Coresh, Lesley A. Inker, Andrew S. Levey, Anna Köttgen, Meredith C. Foster, Brad C. Astor, John H. Eckfeldt, Elizabeth Selvin
CJASN Apr 2013, 8 (4) 584-592; DOI: 10.2215/CJN.08700812
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Summary
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Disclosures
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data Supps
  • Info & Metrics
  • View PDF

More in this TOC Section

Original Articles

  • Trends in Discard of Kidneys from Hepatitis C Viremic Donors in the United States
  • Availability, Accessibility, and Quality of Conservative Kidney Management Worldwide
  • Zolpidem Versus Trazodone Initiation and the Risk of Fall-Related Fractures among Individuals Receiving Maintenance Hemodialysis
Show more Original Articles

Epidemiology and Outcomes

  • Urine Kidney Injury Biomarkers and Risks of Cardiovascular Disease Events and All-Cause Death: The CRIC Study
  • Temporal and Demographic Trends in Glomerular Disease Epidemiology in the Southeastern United States, 1986–2015
  • Association between Monocyte Count and Risk of Incident CKD and Progression to ESRD
Show more Epidemiology and Outcomes

Cited By...

  • Novel method to determine diagnosis-defining refraction points
  • Serum proteins can successfully predict self-reported ethnicity: Implications for precision-medicine
  • Sex bias in MHC I-associated shaping of the adaptive immune system
  • Prospective association between {beta}2-microglobulin levels and ischemic stroke risk among women
  • Circulating Beta-2 Microglobulin and Risk of Cancer: The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study (ARIC)
  • {beta}2-Microglobulin, Cystatin C, and Creatinine and Risk of Symptomatic Peripheral Artery Disease
  • Google Scholar

Similar Articles

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Articles

  • Current Issue
  • Early Access
  • Subject Collections
  • Article Archive
  • ASN Meeting Abstracts

Information for Authors

  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Trainee of the Year
  • Author Resources
  • ASN Journal Policies
  • Reuse/Reprint Policy

About

  • CJASN
  • ASN
  • ASN Journals
  • ASN Kidney News

Journal Information

  • About CJASN
  • CJASN Email Alerts
  • CJASN Key Impact Information
  • CJASN Podcasts
  • CJASN RSS Feeds
  • Editorial Board

More Information

  • Advertise
  • ASN Podcasts
  • ASN Publications
  • Become an ASN Member
  • Feedback
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Password/Email Address Changes
  • Subscribe

© 2021 American Society of Nephrology

Print ISSN - 1555-9041 Online ISSN - 1555-905X

Powered by HighWire