Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Podcasts
    • Subject Collections
    • Archives
    • ASN Meeting Abstracts
    • Saved Searches
  • Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Resources
    • Reprint Information
  • Trainees
    • Peer Review Program
    • Prize Competition
  • About CJASN
    • About CJASN
    • Editorial Team
    • CJASN Impact
    • CJASN Recognitions
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Advertising
    • Reprint Information
    • Subscriptions
    • Feedback
  • ASN Kidney News
  • Other
    • JASN
    • Kidney360
    • Kidney News Online
    • American Society of Nephrology

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
American Society of Nephrology
  • Other
    • JASN
    • Kidney360
    • Kidney News Online
    • American Society of Nephrology
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Advertisement
American Society of Nephrology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Podcasts
    • Subject Collections
    • Archives
    • ASN Meeting Abstracts
    • Saved Searches
  • Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Resources
    • Reprint Information
  • Trainees
    • Peer Review Program
    • Prize Competition
  • About CJASN
    • About CJASN
    • Editorial Team
    • CJASN Impact
    • CJASN Recognitions
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Advertising
    • Reprint Information
    • Subscriptions
    • Feedback
  • ASN Kidney News
  • Visit ASN on Facebook
  • Follow CJASN on Twitter
  • CJASN RSS
  • Community Forum
Original ArticlesESRD and Chronic Dialysis
You have accessRestricted Access

Decoy Receptor 3, a Novel Inflammatory Marker, and Mortality in Hemodialysis Patients

Szu-Chun Hung, Ta-Wei Hsu, Yao-Ping Lin and Der-Cherng Tarng
CJASN August 2012, 7 (8) 1257-1265; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2215/CJN.08410811
Szu-Chun Hung
*Division of Nephrology, Buddhist Tzu Chi General Hospital, Taipei Branch, Taiwan;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ta-Wei Hsu
†Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, National Yang-Ming University Hospital, Yilan, Taiwan;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yao-Ping Lin
‡Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine and Immunology Research Center, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Der-Cherng Tarng
‡Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine and Immunology Research Center, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; and
§Department and Institute of Physiology, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data Supps
  • Info & Metrics
  • View PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    DcR3 correlates with inflammatory markers. Univariate analysis of the correlation of DcR3 with (A) IL-6, (B) hs-CRP, (C) serum albumin, (D) ICAM-1, and (E) VCAM-1. Logarithmic transformation of DcR3, IL-6, and hs-CRP was used to normalize the distributions for univariate analyses. DcR3, decoy receptor 3; hs-CRP, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein; ICAM-1, intercellular adhesion molecule-1; VCAM-1, vascular cell adhesion molecule-1.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Predictive accuracy of DcR3, IL-6, and albumin estimated by using time-dependent ROC curve analysis. A shows the time-dependent AUCs for all of the markers and B (DcR3), C (IL-6), and D (albumin) show the ROC curves at different time periods. The AUCs at 36 months for DcR3, IL-6, and albumin were 0.74, 0.66 (P<0.01 versus DcR3), and 0.66 (P<0.01 versus DcR3), respectively. The AUCs at 48 month for DcR3, IL-6, and albumin were 0.73, 0.65 (P<0.01 versus DcR3), and 0.68 (P<0.05 versus DcR3), respectively. AUC, area under curve; DcR3, decoy receptor 3; ROC, receiver operating characteristic.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Kaplan–Meier analysis curves in hemodialysis patients at risk for cardiovascular and all-cause mortality. All patients were stratified by the tertiles of baseline serum decoy receptor 3 (DcR3) to assess the unadjusted risks for (A) cardiovascular mortality and (B) all-cause mortality.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Patients’ characteristics according to tertiles of DcR3 levels

    Characteristic Serum DcR3 TertilesP Value
    0.05−0.92 ng/ml (n=105)0.93−2.41 ng/ml (n=105)2.45−17.78 ng/ml (n=106)
    Age (yr)58±1259±1461±130.06a
    Male sex48 (45.7)52 (49.5)50 (47.2)0.86b
    Smoking history35 (33.3)32 (30.5)35 (33.0)0.89b
    Hypertension47 (44.8)46 (43.8)52 (49.1)0.72b
    Diabetes mellitus33 (31.4)36 (34.3)35 (33.0)0.91b
    Previous CVD15 (14.3)21 (20.0)30 (28.6)0.04b
    Hemodialysis vintage (mo)72 (37–131)76 (36–120)61 (26–118)0.34c
    Body mass index (kg/m2)22.1±3.422.3±3.122.1±4.20.87a
    Systolic BP (mmHg)134±26134±22138±240.40a
    Diastolic BP (mmHg)75±1575±1076±110.73a
    RAS blockade27 (25.7)30 (28.6)29 (27.3)0.90b
    Total no. of antihypertensives3 (0–4)3 (0–3)4 (0–5)0.67c
    Statin16 (15.2)15 (14.3)19 (17.9)0.75b
    Laboratory parameters
     Kt/V urea2.10±0.482.05±0.412.01±0.740.58a
     albumin (g/dl)4.01±0.313.95±0.413.79±0.35<0.001a
     hs-CRP (mg/L)3.75 (1.30–6.39)3.86 (1.52–8.24)5.70 (2.23–8.81)0.01c
     IL-6 (pg/ml)2.79 (1.66–5.53)4.09 (2.20–4.09)5.36 (2.52–14.4)<0.001c
     ICAM-1 (ng/ml)431 (333–599)511 (385–738)668 (437–818)0.02c
     VCAM-1 (ng/ml)1903 (1491–2391)2139 (1585–2798)2550 (1672–3771)0.04c
     plasma glucose (mg/dl)113±28112±29110±290.90a
     total cholesterol (mg/dl)193±48192±45192±470.90a
     triglyceride (mg/dl)190 (182–248)188 (181–260)189 (184–237)0.88c
     calcium (mg/dl)9.7±0.79.6±0.99.6±0.80.62a
     phosphate (mg/dl)5.1±1.35.2±1.54.9±1.30.21a
     intact PTH (pg/ml)254 (109–421)217 (94–530)202 (65–468)0.81c
     hemoglobin (g/dl)10.6±1.510.6±1.610.3±1.60.30a
     dose of epoetin (U/kg per week)71 (30–99)68 (33–94)71 (20–95)0.67c
     ferritin (μg/L)288 (160–452)322 (182–492)346 (196–585)0.29c
     transferrin saturation (%)25±1225±1126±140.68a
    • All variables were expressed as n (%) for categorical data and as means ± SD or medians and interquartile ranges for continuous data with or without a normal distribution, respectively. Previous CVD category consisted of coronary artery disease, cerebrovascular disease, and peripheral arterial disease. DcR3, decoy receptor 3; CVD, cardiovascular disease; RAS, renin-angiotensin system; hs-CRP, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein; ICAM-1, intercellular adhesion molecule-1; VCAM-1, vascular cell adhesion molecule-1; PTH, parathyroid hormone.

    • ↵a Statistical analysis by ANOVA.

    • ↵b Statistical analysis by the Pearson chi-squared test.

    • ↵c Statistical analysis by the Kruskal–Wallis test.

    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Multivariate regression models for the prediction of DcR3

    ParameterDifference in DcR3SEMP Value
    Age (yr)−0.0040.0130.75
    Sex (male)0.0140.0580.81
    Diabetes mellitus (presence)0.0080.0730.42
    Previous CVD (presence)0.1650.0610.04
    HD vintage (mo)−0.0090.0180.69
    Kt/V urea−0.0360.0210.28
    log IL-6 (pg/ml)0.2480.0710.26
    log ICAM-1 (ng/ml)0.1340.0720.07
    log VCAM-1 (ng/ml)0.2020.0960.01
    Albumin (g/dl)−0.2290.0870.009
    Body mass index (kg/m2)−0.0160.0090.52
    • The adjusted r2 of the model was 0.294. Logarithmic transformation of DcR3, IL-6, hs-CRP, ICAM-1 and VCAM-1 was used to normalize the distributions for multivariate analysis. DcR3, decoy receptor 3; CVD, cardiovascular disease; HD, hemodialysis; hs-CRP, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein; ICAM-1, intercellular adhesion molecule-1; VCAM-1, vascular cell adhesion molecule-1.

    • View popup
    Table 3.

    Prediction model of pertinent factors for mortality using AUC

    VariableAUC
    Traditional cardiovascular risk factors0.75 (0.70−0.80)
    VCAM-10.76 (0.71−0.80)
    VCAM-1 + albumin0.78 (0.74−0.83)
    VCAM-1 + albumin + IL-60.79 (0.75−0.84)
    VCAM-1 + albumin + IL-6 + DcR30.80 (0.75−0.84)
    • Risk prediction was assessed by the C statistic. Each variable was stepwise added to assess the incremental change in AUC for predicting mortality at 48 months. Traditional cardiovascular risk factors included age, sex, smoking status, diabetes, total cholesterol, and systolic BP in the model. AUC, area under the ROC curve; VCAM-1, vascular cell adhesion molecule-1; DcR3, decoy receptor 3.

    • View popup
    Table 4.

    Multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis for relative risk of cardiovascular and overall mortality calculated for DcR3 tertiles and for a 1-SD unit change in log DcR3 levels in a follow-up of 54 months

    Cardiovascular MortalityAll-Cause Mortality
    Hazard Ratio (95% Confidence Interval)Hazard Ratio (95% Confidence Interval)
    CrudeAge- and Sex-AdjustedMultivariate AdjustmentCrudeAge- and Sex-AdjustedMultivariate Adjustment
    DcR3 by tertiles
     lower tertile1.01.01.01.01.01.0
     middle tertile1.4 (0.5−3.9)1.3 (0.4−3.6)1.3 (0.5−3.8)1.6 (0.9−2.8)1.5 (0.8−2.6)1.4 (0.9−2.5)
     upper tertile3.6 (1.5−8.6)3.0 (1.2−7.2)2.8 (1.1−7.3)2.9 (1.7−4.9)2.5 (1.4−4.2)2.1 (1.1−3.7)
     P for trend0.0020.0070.04<0.0010.0010.02
    Log DcR3
     1-SD unit increase1.7 (1.2−2.6)1.6 (1.2−2.4)1.4 (1.1−2.1)1.7 (1.3−2.1)1.6 (1.2−2.0)1.3 (1.1−1.7)
     P value0.0070.03<0.05<0.0010.0010.04
    • Hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals were derived from Cox regression analysis with DcR3 taken into account as a time-dependent covariate. The multivariate model included variables for age, sex, smoking status, diabetes, prior cardiovascular disease, body mass index, total cholesterol, systolic BP, hemodialysis duration, urea Kt/V, serum albumin, hemoglobin, IL-6, and vascular cell adhesion molecule-1. DcR3, decoy receptor 3.

    • View popup
    Table 5.

    Prediction gain by DcR3 over a model of traditional cardiovascular risk factors

    Multivariate Cox Hazards ModelHR (95% CI)P ValueAICaΔAICb
    Cardiovascular mortality
     cardiovascular risk factors335.50.0
     + VCAM-1 (1 SD unit)1.8 (0.7−4.4)0.15346.711.2
     + albumin (1 g/L)0.9 (0.6−1.3)0.48345.09.5
     + hs-CRP (1 SD unit)1.6 (0.9−2.5)0.05341.45.9
     + IL-6 (1 SD unit)1.7 (1.1−2.7)0.01339.33.8
     + DcR3 (1 SD unit)1.5 (1.1−2.4)0.03341.56.0
    All-cause mortality
     cardiovascular risk factors872.50.0
     + VCAM-1 (1 SD unit)1.7 (1.0−3.1)0.03889.617.1
     + albumin (1 g/dl)0.7 (0.5−0.9)0.01882.710.2
     + hs-CRP (1 SD unit)1.3 (0.9−1.7)0.05892.319.8
     + IL-6 (1 SD unit)1.6 (1.2−2.1)0.01885.412.9
     + DcR3 (1 SD unit)1.5 (1.2−2.0)<0.01884.011.5
    • DcR3, decoy receptor 3; HR, hazard ratio; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval; AIC, Akaike Information Criterion; VCAM-1, vascular cell adhesion molecule-1; hs-CRP, high-sensitive C-reactive protein.

    • ↵a AIC (15) for a given model is a function of its maximized log-likelihood and the number of estimable parameters (K): AIC = −2 (maximized log-likelihood) + 2K. In the baseline Cox proportional hazards model, there were six traditional cardiovascular risk factors, including age, sex, smoking status, diabetes, total cholesterol, and systolic BP. VCAM-1, albumin, hs-CRP, IL-6, or DcR3 was added subsequently in order to assess the independent predictive contribution by DcR3.

    • ↵b ΔAIC is the difference between the AIC of baseline model and the AIC of VCAM-1, albumin, hs-CRP, IL-6, or DcR3, respectively. Therefore, the lower the ΔAIC, the higher prediction gain of pertinent biomarker.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology: 7 (8)
Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
Vol. 7, Issue 8
August 07, 2012
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
View Selected Citations (0)
Print
Download PDF
Sign up for Alerts
Email Article
Thank you for your help in sharing the high-quality science in CJASN.
Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Decoy Receptor 3, a Novel Inflammatory Marker, and Mortality in Hemodialysis Patients
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Society of Nephrology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Society of Nephrology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Decoy Receptor 3, a Novel Inflammatory Marker, and Mortality in Hemodialysis Patients
Szu-Chun Hung, Ta-Wei Hsu, Yao-Ping Lin, Der-Cherng Tarng
CJASN Aug 2012, 7 (8) 1257-1265; DOI: 10.2215/CJN.08410811

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Decoy Receptor 3, a Novel Inflammatory Marker, and Mortality in Hemodialysis Patients
Szu-Chun Hung, Ta-Wei Hsu, Yao-Ping Lin, Der-Cherng Tarng
CJASN Aug 2012, 7 (8) 1257-1265; DOI: 10.2215/CJN.08410811
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Summary
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Disclosures
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data Supps
  • Info & Metrics
  • View PDF

More in this TOC Section

Original Articles

  • Short-Duration Prednisolone in Children with Nephrotic Syndrome Relapse
  • Associations between Deprivation, Geographic Location, and Access to Pediatric Kidney Care in the United Kingdom
  • Variability in Culture-Negative Peritonitis Rates in Pediatric Peritoneal Dialysis Programs in the United States
Show more Original Articles

ESRD and Chronic Dialysis

  • Immunogenicity of Augmented Compared With Standard Dose Hepatitis B Vaccine in Pediatric Patients on Dialysis: a Midwest Pediatric Nephrology Consortium Study
  • Changes in the Profile of Endovascular Procedures Performed in Freestanding Dialysis Access Centers over 15 Years
  • Prognostic Value of Residual Urine Volume, GFR by 24-hour Urine Collection, and eGFR in Patients Receiving Dialysis
Show more ESRD and Chronic Dialysis

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Similar Articles

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Articles

  • Current Issue
  • Early Access
  • Subject Collections
  • Article Archive
  • ASN Meeting Abstracts

Information for Authors

  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Trainee of the Year
  • Author Resources
  • ASN Journal Policies
  • Reuse/Reprint Policy

About

  • CJASN
  • ASN
  • ASN Journals
  • ASN Kidney News

Journal Information

  • About CJASN
  • CJASN Email Alerts
  • CJASN Key Impact Information
  • CJASN Podcasts
  • CJASN RSS Feeds
  • Editorial Board

More Information

  • Advertise
  • ASN Podcasts
  • ASN Publications
  • Become an ASN Member
  • Feedback
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Password/Email Address Changes
  • Subscribe

© 2021 American Society of Nephrology

Print ISSN - 1555-9041 Online ISSN - 1555-905X

Powered by HighWire