Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Podcasts
    • Subject Collections
    • Archives
    • Kidney Week Abstracts
    • Saved Searches
  • Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Resources
  • Trainees
    • Peer Review Program
    • Prize Competition
  • About CJASN
    • About CJASN
    • Editorial Team
    • CJASN Impact
    • CJASN Recognitions
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
    • Reprint Information
    • Subscriptions
  • ASN Kidney News
  • Other
    • ASN Publications
    • JASN
    • Kidney360
    • Kidney News Online
    • American Society of Nephrology

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
American Society of Nephrology
  • Other
    • ASN Publications
    • JASN
    • Kidney360
    • Kidney News Online
    • American Society of Nephrology
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Advertisement
American Society of Nephrology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Podcasts
    • Subject Collections
    • Archives
    • Kidney Week Abstracts
    • Saved Searches
  • Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Resources
  • Trainees
    • Peer Review Program
    • Prize Competition
  • About CJASN
    • About CJASN
    • Editorial Team
    • CJASN Impact
    • CJASN Recognitions
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
    • Reprint Information
    • Subscriptions
  • ASN Kidney News
  • Visit ASN on Facebook
  • Follow CJASN on Twitter
  • CJASN RSS
  • Community Forum
Moving Points in Nephrology
You have accessRestricted Access

Obstetric Nephrology: Lupus and Lupus Nephritis in Pregnancy

Todd J. Stanhope, Wendy M. White, Kevin G. Moder, Andrew Smyth and Vesna D. Garovic
CJASN December 2012, 7 (12) 2089-2099; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2215/CJN.12441211
Todd J. Stanhope
*Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Wendy M. White
†Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kevin G. Moder
‡Divisions of Rheumatology and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andrew Smyth
§Department of Medicine, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Vesna D. Garovic
‖Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data Supps
  • Info & Metrics
  • View PDF
Loading

Summary

SLE is a multi-organ autoimmune disease that affects women of childbearing age. Renal involvement in the form of either active lupus nephritis (LN) at the time of conception, or a LN new onset or flare during pregnancy increases the risks of preterm delivery, pre-eclampsia, maternal mortality, fetal/neonatal demise, and intrauterine growth restriction. Consequently, current recommendations advise that the affected woman achieve a stable remission of her renal disease for at least 6 months before conception. Hormonal and immune system changes in pregnancy may affect disease activity and progression, and published evidence suggests that there is an increased risk for a LN flare during pregnancy. The major goal of immunosuppressive therapy in pregnancy is control of disease activity with medications that are relatively safe for a growing fetus. Therefore, the use of mycophenolate mofetil, due to increasing evidence supporting its teratogenicity, is contraindicated during pregnancy. Worsening proteinuria, which commonly occurs in proteinuric renal diseases toward the end of pregnancy, should be differentiated from a LN flare and/or pre-eclampsia, a pregnancy-specific condition clinically characterized by hypertension and proteinuria. These considerations present challenges that underscore the importance of a multidisciplinary team approach when caring for these patients, including a nephrologist, rheumatologist, and obstetrician who have experience with these pregnancy-related complications. This review discusses the pathogenesis, maternal and fetal risks, and management pertinent to SLE patients with new onset or a history of LN predating pregnancy.

Introduction

SLE is a multi-organ autoimmune disease that affects women of childbearing age. Early studies of women with SLE reported increased risks of preterm birth, hypertensive diseases of pregnancy and lupus flare, both during pregnancy and in the postpartum period. Reported outcomes were poor; consequently, therapeutic abortion was frequently recommended (1–4). Recent studies have reported more favorable outcomes, and patients are seldom counseled against pregnancy (5,6). Fecundity in SLE remains undiminished, save for the subgroups with antiphospholipid antibody syndrome (7) or advanced renal insufficiency (i.e., creatinine ≥3 mg/dl), or those women previously treated with cytotoxic alkylating agents. Given the increased maternal and fetal risks associated with lupus nephritis (LN), the clinician should be familiar with the pertinent issues related to its management before and during pregnancy.

Pregnancy as an Altered Immune State

The pregnant state is characterized by hormonal modulation of both innate and adaptive immunity to establish maternal immune tolerance to a semiallogeneic fetus expressing both maternal and paternal antigens. During normal pregnancy, the number of CD4+/CD25+ regulatory T cells (Tregs) is increased. These cells have a potent immunosuppressive action and contribute to fetal tolerance. In addition, normal pregnancy is characterized by a shift from a Th1 cell-mediated to a Th2 antibody-mediated immune response (commonly referred to as Th2 polarization). This relative suppression of Th1 cell-mediated immunity mediates the maternal immune tolerance of the fetus (8,9).

Immunologic changes may affect the incidence and severity of autoimmune disease and pregnancy outcome. For example, the number of Tregs is diminished in pre-eclamptic relative to normotensive pregnancies (9). Patients with SLE have fewer Tregs that also are functionally defective, which may confer increased risks for pre-eclampsia and maternal and fetal morbidity (10). In the setting of Th2 polarization, Th2-mediated diseases, such as SLE, may worsen during pregnancy. In addition, the risk for disease flare may be further enhanced by the hormonal changes of pregnancy, consistent with animal models suggesting that elevated estrogen levels are associated with increased lupus activity (11). These theoretical considerations are further supported by the clinical observations that pregnant women with SLE seem to be at increased risk of disease flare, although the implications of these immunologic changes on the incidence and severity of SLE are not fully understood.

SLE and Pregnancy

The incidence and prevalence of SLE are 1.4–21.9 and 7.4–159.4 per 100,000 people, respectively, although women are disproportionately affected, as reflected by a female prevalence of 9:1 (12). Reports of the effect of pregnancy on SLE activity are mixed, with some studies reporting a two- to three-fold increased risk of flare, whereas others indicate no increased risk (11,13–16). Measurable SLE disease activity is present in 40%–50% of pregnancies, with the most common manifestations being cutaneous disease (25%–90%), LN (up to 75%), arthritis (20%), and hematologic disease, including thrombocytopenia (10%–40%). Risk factors for a SLE flare include active disease within 6 months before conception, a history of multiple flares, and discontinuation of hydroxychloroquine (Figure 1) (14). Flares can occur at any gestational age, as well as in the postpartum period (17).

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Renal biopsy by electron microscopy of a 31-year-old woman with SLE for 10 years who presented at 6 weeks of gestation. Before pregnancy, she was managed with daily prednisone, hydroxychloroquine, and warfarin for a history of antiphospholipid syndrome. At her first visit, prednisone was continued, warfarin was changed to dalteparin, and hydroxychloroquine was discontinued. At 12 weeks, she presented with chest pain and shortness of breath. Evaluation revealed worsening proteinuria, hypertension, and altered renal function (creatinine 1.6 mg/dl from 1.0 mg/dl baseline). Renal biopsy (electron microscopy as shown) disclosed membranous GN. The prednisone dose was increased and hydroxychloroquine was restarted. At 15 weeks of gestation, she experienced shortness of breath due to pulmonary embolism, with subsequent cardiorespiratory arrest. After resuscitation, she was intubated, but developed oliguria unresponsive to diuretics. Continuous renal replacement therapy was initiated for fluid overload, and vasopressors were required. Fetal demise was documented, maternal evaluation was consistent with brain death, and support was withdrawn. D, immune deposits; GBM, glomerular basement membrane; TRS, tuboreticular structure.

SLE during pregnancy is accompanied by increased maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality. The risk of pre-eclampsia ranges from 11% to 35%, although most reports show that the risk is closer to 30% (14,17–19) compared with a risk of approximately 5% in the general population. A recent study of 396 pregnancies complicated by SLE compared outcomes in pregnancies before and after the onset of SLE. Complications of pregnancy after the onset of SLE included an increased risk of fetal death (29.7% versus 14.2%) and preterm birth (26.7% versus 5.8%). Predictors of pregnancy loss included LN (odds ratio [OR], 7.3), the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies (OR, 3.9), and a SLE flare during pregnancy (OR, 1.9). Preterm delivery was associated with LN (OR, 18.9), anti-Ro antibodies (OR, 13.9), hypertension (OR, 15.7), and SLE flare (OR, 2.5) (20). These data have been corroborated by numerous other studies (19,21–25). Anti-Ro/SSA antibodies are associated with an increased risk of congenital heart block (1%–2%), neonatal lupus, and laboratory abnormalities, including hematologic (thrombocytopenia and neutropenia) and hepatic abnormalities (elevated transaminases), in asymptomatic infants within the first 27 days of life (26,27). Clinical remission of SLE activity and careful control of the disease are associated with improved outcomes, underlying the importance of careful monitoring of these patients throughout pregnancy (28–30).

LN and Pregnancy

Physiologic Changes during Pregnancy

Important changes in renal physiology occur during pregnancy. Progesterone-induced smooth muscle relaxation and compression of the ureters by the enlarging uterus can result in a physiologic hydronephrosis, predisposing the pregnant woman to pyelonephritis and symptomatic urolithiasis. The GFR increases by 50% to 60%, with a subsequent increase in creatinine clearance of approximately 30%. Serum creatinine in a pregnant woman is lower than in a nonpregnant woman, and varies by trimester. Therefore, a serum creatinine of 0.9 mg/dl may suggest underlying renal disease (31,32). The progression of pregnancy in patients with pre-existing renal disease may be accompanied by an increase in proteinuria, and either de novo or worsening of existing hypertension (33). These should be differentiated from a new onset or LN flare and/or pre-eclampsia, a pregnancy-specific condition clinically characterized by hypertension and proteinuria, and its severe form, HELLP syndrome, characterized by hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, and low platelet count (Table 1).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Differentiation of pre-eclampsia, HELLP syndrome, and active lupus nephritis

Clinical Course and Outcomes

Up to 75% of patients with SLE have clinically evident renal disease, which is one of the American College of Rheumatology criteria used for the classification of SLE (34). Active renal involvement is defined as the presence of active urine sediment (>5 red and white blood cells per high-powered field and/or ≥1 cellular casts) and/or proteinuria >0.5 g/d, with or without an elevation in serum creatinine. If conception occurs after a period of 12–18 months (minimum of 6 months) of remission, pregnancies generally have favorable outcomes (34).

The relationship between LN and pregnancy outcomes is complex. Pregnancy may have adverse short- and long-term effects on kidney function, including an increased risk for LN flare and progression to ESRD. The risk for progression is determined in part by the severity of the underlying renal disease and is increased for patients with creatinine values >1.4 mg/dl (33). Underlying renal disease, in turn, places these pregnancies at higher risk for maternal and fetal complications, including spontaneous abortion, premature delivery, intrauterine growth retardation, and pre-eclampsia (35).

Risk of LN Flare in Pregnancy

Hormonal and immunologic changes in pregnancy seem to affect the activity of SLE in general, and LN in particular. Studies comparing flare rates between pregnant and nonpregnant patients have reported conflicting data (36–38). However, studies that have used a patient's own nonpregnant course for comparison have demonstrated an increased risk of LN flare during pregnancy (15,39,40). A recent meta-analysis reported rates ranging from 1.5% to 83% for a LN flare during pregnancy. The random-effect rate of LN flare was estimated at 25.6% (17.4%–33.8%) (41). Given the increased risk of maternal and neonatal morbidity associated with active LN (42), with the risk for flare as high as 70% (43), close monitoring with monthly assessments of disease activity is recommended.

Maternal Outcomes

The risk of maternal morbidity is increased in the setting of active LN (11,23,44–47), including an increased risk of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (42). A recent meta-analysis reported frequencies of 16.3% for hypertension and 7.6% for pre-eclampsia among pregnant LN patients. Active nephritis was associated with an increased risk of hypertension in pregnancy, whereas both active nephritis and a history of nephritis conferred increased risks of hypertension and pre-eclampsia compared with SLE patients without histories of LN (41). Although progressive renal impairment may occur, it is generally mild, and ESRD requiring hemodialysis is rare, even in patients with active LN (14). The risk of severe morbidity, including eclampsia, stroke, and maternal death approached 1%, although statistical significance was achieved only for maternal death (41). Importantly, a recent review of the literature identified 17 cases of maternal mortality in pregnancies with LN. In all patients, death occurred in the setting of active renal disease, with infection and SLE complications being the two most common causes, accounting for 41.2% and 29.4% of all deaths, respectively. This emphasizes the importance of planning pregnancy, judicious use of immunosuppressive therapy, and the need for expert monitoring (48).

Fetal and Neonatal Outcomes

Fetal and neonatal morbidity and mortality may also be increased in pregnancies complicated by LN. Although a recent study reported that LN does not lead to worsened fetal outcomes (42), others report increased risks of preterm birth (39.4%), intrauterine growth restriction (12.7%), stillbirth (3.6%), and neonatal death (2.5%). Data are insufficient to clarify the effect of kidney function and the amount of proteinuria at the start of pregnancy on maternal and neonatal outcomes (41). Children born to mothers positive for anti-SSA/Ro and anti-SSB/La antibodies are at risk for congenital heart block. These pregnancies should be monitored by fetal cardiac auscultation, echocardiography, and neonatal electrocardiography after delivery (49).

Antiphospholipid Antibodies and Antiphospholipid Syndrome

Antiphospholipid antibodies, including lupus anticoagulant and anticardiolipin antibodies, are autoantibodies that bind to cardiolipin and/or β2 glycoprotein-I bound to phospholipids. The presence of these antibodies, in association with venous or arterial thromboses and/or pregnancy complications (e.g., recurrent miscarriages), constitutes antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). Both the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies and APS are frequently seen in association with SLE, with pregnancy complications including fetal loss, which generally occurs after 10 weeks of gestation, and an increased relative risk of pre-eclampsia (50,51). A meta-analysis reported the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies in approximately one-quarter of lupus pregnancies (41).

Because the risk of pregnancy loss has been correlated with the number of positive tests for different antiphospholipid antibodies, screening for the presence of these antibodies during the initial evaluation of all lupus pregnancies is recommended (52).

The mainstay of management is anticoagulation (see Medical Management: Chronic Anticoagulation), which seems to improve both maternal and fetal outcomes. Immunosuppression is reserved for those who, in addition to APS, have active SLE. Women with a history of APS and arterial thrombotic events should be advised against pregnancy due to high risks for not only pregnancy loss, but also stroke and maternal morbidity and mortality (17). For these women, gestational carriers can be considered as a means of achieving parenting goals without taking risks related to their own child bearing. Because oocyte retrieval exposes women to high doses of estrogen, which may increase the risk of flare, it should be performed during disease remission (53).

Preconception Counseling

The goal of preconception counseling should be to bond with the patient in pursuit of optimizing her health before becoming pregnant. Fecundity may be decreased by the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies, progressive renal insufficiency, and previous treatment with cytotoxic alkylating agents. Before attempting to conceive, teratogenic immunosuppressives should be changed to those most appropriate for pregnancy (Table 2). Similarly, antihypertensives with adverse fetal effects, such as angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers, should be changed to alternatives safe for use during pregnancy.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2.

Anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive drugs in pregnancy

Systemic activity of SLE must be assessed, with careful attention to renal involvement. A recent LN flare is a risk factor for recurrence; consequently, renal function should be stable without evidence for an active LN flare for a minimum of 6 consecutive months on a medical regimen that is safe to continue throughout pregnancy (12).

The first visit should include a physical examination, BP measurements, and a baseline laboratory evaluation (Table 3). Renal biopsy data should be incorporated into the counseling session (32). World Health Organization LN classes I, II, and V are known to have low activity and chronicity indices, whereas classes III and IV tend to be more aggressive and are associated with an increased incidence of LN flare (54,55). A prospective study reported an increased incidence of hypertension and pre-eclampsia in patients with class III or IV LN (37.1%), compared with either class II or V nephritis (11.1%), or age, parity, and duration of lupus-matched controls without renal involvement (11.6%). These findings suggest that LN classes III and IV may be associated with an increased risk for hypertensive disease (56). The meta-analysis that followed did not report a statistically significant association between histologic subclass and rate of unsuccessful pregnancy (41). This observation needs to be interpreted within the limitations of the meta-analysis, including a limited amount of data available for correlative studies between LN classes and pregnancy outcomes, and the fact that most of these renal biopsies were performed years before the pregnancies that were analyzed. Consequently, uncertainty remains as to the implications of the World Health Organization classification in pregnancy, suggesting that careful antenatal surveillance in the patients with proliferative LN forms is indicated.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 3.

Laboratory testing of SLE/lupus nephritis patients during pregnancy

Antepartum Management

Pregnant patients with SLE and LN are best managed throughout pregnancy by a multidisciplinary team, including an obstetrician (optimally a maternal fetal medicine specialist), a rheumatologist, and a nephrologist (Figure 2). Baseline laboratory studies (Table 3) may be repeated at the first prenatal visit and should certainly be obtained if no preconception counseling took place. Monthly prenatal visits are indicated, with the frequency of laboratory testing depending on the activity of SLE/LN. Serial fetal ultrasound examinations are indicated to monitor fetal growth. Consideration should be given to consultation with an anesthesiologist regarding intrapartum analgesia in cases with evidence of thrombocytopenia or coagulation abnormalities.

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Flow diagram of the management of lupus nephritis in pregnancy. *For a confirmed diagnosis of pre-eclampsia, delivery is the only definitive treatment option. ACE, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor therapy; ARB, angiotensin receptor blocker therapy; LN, lupus nephritis.

The distinction between the onset of active LN and pre-eclampsia can be challenging because both diseases share common manifestations, including hypertension and increasing proteinuria (Table 1). This distinction is critical because LN is managed with immunosuppression, whereas delivery, even remote from term, is indicated for severe and superimposed pre-eclampsia. A number of biomarkers have been associated with increased LN activity, although validation is required before using them to differentiate LN from pre-eclampsia (57–59).

Renal biopsy should be considered if the laboratory evaluation is nondiagnostic. A biopsy can be safely performed in patients with adequate BP control and normal coagulation parameters to achieve a definitive diagnosis and inform treatment decisions (60). Typically, renal biopsy is not advisable after 32 weeks of gestation. The risks and benefits of biopsy versus delivery should be considered with the obstetrical and neonatal providers. Although early studies reported high complication rates, including gross hematuria in 16.7% and perirenal hematoma in 4.4% (61), more recent series report similar complication rates to nonpregnant women (62,63).

In the first and second trimesters of pregnancy in patients with SLE, diagnosed either before or during pregnancy, renal biopsy may facilitate the initiation of disease-specific treatment, rather than empirical treatment, which can be advanced postpartum to include immunosuppressive agents that are otherwise contraindicated during pregnancy. Empirical treatment can be considered under special clinical circumstances such as in patients who present with active urine sediment, proteinuria, and serological abnormalities, who either have an established diagnosis of LN based on a previous kidney biopsy or who refuse the procedure.

Medication Management

Antepartum management of patients with histories of LN should focus either on the treatment of active disease or on prevention of a LN flare. Given the additional concerns related to the developing fetus, consideration must be given to the pregnancy-related safety and efficacy of the medications commonly used to manage LN (Table 2).

Chronic Anticoagulation

Pregnancy is a hypercoagulable state, and the risk for thrombotic events is further increased by the obstruction of venous return by the enlarged uterus. Therefore, anticoagulation is indicated for all SLE patients positive for antiphospholipid antibodies and a history of thrombotic event(s), regardless of whether they were receiving anticoagulation before pregnancy. Because warfarin is contraindicated during pregnancy due to its teratogenicity and potential for life-threatening hemorrhage in the infant (64), patients treated with warfarin should receive therapeutic anticoagulation with either unfractionated heparin (UFH) or low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) when pregnant. In the absence of a previous history of thrombotic event(s), prophylactic anticoagulation, consisting of a low dose aspirin (81 mg/d), with either UFH or LMWH, should be initiated for pregnant women meeting the obstetric criteria for APS, such as ≥3 pregnancy losses or a late pregnancy loss. For women with antiphospholipid antibodies who do not meet the clinical criteria for APS, an acceptable approach is close clinical surveillance; other options include antepartum aspirin, or prophylactic UFH or LMWH. In the absence of antiphospholipid antibodies, prophylactic anticoagulation should be considered for pregnant LN patients with nephrotic syndrome, because the hypercoagulable state inherent to nephrotic syndrome may worsen further with pregnancy, leading to an increased risk for thromboembolic complications (65). As for all other patients in whom anticoagulation is initiated during pregnancy, heparin should be started immediately after confirmation of an intrauterine pregnancy, and continued for at least 6 weeks postpartum. For the specific therapeutic and prophylactic anticoagulation regimens, therapeutic goals, and monitoring strategies, please refer to the American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines on venous thromboembolism, thrombophilia, antithrombotic therapy, and pregnancy (65).

Immunosuppressive Therapy

In pregnant patients with SLE, immunosuppressive therapy is indicated as induction therapy for either flare, new onset disease, or maintenance therapy for patients in remission. Therapeutic options for LN, commonly based on the renal biopsy results in nonpregnant patients, are limited. For example, mycophenolate mofetil and cyclophosphamide, frequently used for proliferative forms of LN, are contraindicated during pregnancy. Both induction and maintenance regimens are commonly based on corticosteroid therapy, azathioprine, and calcineurin inhibitors (e.g., cyclosporine and tacrolimus), which have acceptable safety profiles in pregnancy. In addition, membranous LN (class V) ideally would be treated with renin–angiotensin blockade, but these agents are contraindicated in pregnancy. Specific pros and cons for each class/agent with respect to their use in pregnancy are as follows.

Corticosteroids.

Their efficacy in the management of LN is well established, and prednisone and prednisolone are appropriate for continued use throughout pregnancy. Low doses (5–10 mg/d) are unlikely to cause adrenal insufficiency and thymic hyperplasia in infants (66). Because dexamethasone and betamethasone both cross the placenta and reach the fetus at high concentrations, their use is best reserved for obstetrical indications only (67,68). Corticosteroid use had been associated with orofacial clefts during pregnancy in both animal models and human patients (69,70). However, a recent large-scale, population-based study from Denmark did not confirm this association (71).

Hydroxychloroquine.

Several reports have supported the safety and efficacy of its use in pregnancies complicated by LN, and its discontinuation in gravid patients increases the risk of lupus flare (Figure 1) (72–76). An international multidisciplinary expert panel has advocated its use as first-line maintenance therapy in pregnancies complicated by LN (68).

Azathioprine.

Azathioprine use in pregnancy has been studied predominantly in women with inflammatory bowel disease, and in those with prior renal transplantation. A retrospective cohort study of 476 women taking azathioprine early in pregnancy reported an increased risk of ventricular and atrial septal defects, as well as preterm birth (77). As a result, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) assigned azathioprine to category “D.” Data regarding the use of azathioprine in pregnancy complicated by SLE are limited to one cohort of 31 pregnancies. The authors reported favorable outcomes and, consequently, recommended azathioprine for the treatment of SLE/LN in pregnancy (14). Despite the FDA category, in patients with disease well controlled with azathioprine, treatment may be continued during pregnancy to minimize the risk of flare.

Calcineurin Inhibitors.

Experience with cyclosporine and tacrolimus in pregnancy comes primarily from studies of renal transplant patients. Cyclosporine is more commonly used in pregnancy than tacrolimus, due to longer experience and data from experimental models and human studies suggesting its safe use during pregnancy (68). With respect to tacrolimus, although only rare fetal effects have been documented with its use, the risk of pre-eclampsia, relative to cyclosporine, may be increased (78). The increased volume of distribution with the progression of pregnancy may result in low maternal levels of either tacrolimus or cyclosporine; doses may need to be adjusted based on trough blood levels. Consideration for using tacrolimus over cyclosporine for induction should be given, on the basis of data suggesting comparable rates of remission achieved with tacrolimus compared with the regimen with cyclophosphamide (79). Although these data are insufficient to recommend the use of tacrolimus for induction in the general population, they may support tacrolimus use for pregnant patients for whom mycophenolate mofetil and cyclophosphamide are contraindicated. To date, evidence supporting its efficacy in the management of LN during pregnancy is promising, but limited (80).

Intravenous Ig.

Intravenous Ig (IVIG) has demonstrated benefit in nonpregnant patients with LN (81,82). Caution should be given particularly to sucrose-containing IVIG because it has been associated with renal insufficiency, although this association was not noted in a review of the use of IVIG in nonpregnant LN patients (82). Although more evidence is necessary, the use of IVIG may be reasonable in LN flares refractory to other treatment modalities.

Mycophenolate Mofetil.

With a mounting body of evidence indicating its teratogenicity, the drug was recently downgraded from FDA pregnancy category C to category D, implying that its use in pregnancy should be avoided (83,84). Although assigned to the same category as azathioprine, the risks associated with mycophenolate mofetil are much higher, and azathioprine is a safer alternative in patients who require treatment during pregnancy.

Cyclophosphamide.

Its teratogenicity has been documented in human and animal studies, and consequently, its use should be restricted in women who have not completed childbearing (14,68). However, recent studies report its safe usage as part of the management of breast cancer, during the second and third trimesters of pregnancy, without any significant fetal complications (85). Many physicians continue to avoid using cyclophosphamide where possible, but these reports suggest a potential benefit, particularly in high-risk cases.

Rituximab.

Rituximab is a monoclonal antibody directed against CD20 that is being studied for use in SLE and LN (86,87). Because data regarding its safety in pregnancy are lacking, rituximab should be avoided until its safety and efficacy have been demonstrated.

Methotrexate.

Methotrexate is a well established teratogen and is contraindicated in pregnancy. Methotrexate should be discontinued at least 3 months before conception (88).

Intrapartum and Postpartum Management

Decisions regarding the timing and mode of delivery should be made in conjunction with an obstetrician with experience in managing labor in the setting of renal disease. Delivery may be best in a tertiary care center where neonatologists are available, particularly if a patient is likely to deliver before 37 weeks of gestation. Cesarean section should be reserved for obstetrical indications. If the patient is breastfeeding, consideration should be given to the safety of immunosuppressive medications for the infant (Table 3). The patient should be followed postpartum with regular visits, because LN flare may occur.

In summary, available evidence suggests that SLE and LN in pregnancy confer increased risks for neonatal and maternal morbidity. However, pregnancy outcomes can be optimized if appropriately managed by a multidisciplinary team of physicians, with appropriate preconception counseling and surveillance.

Disclosures

None.

Acknowledgments

The project described was supported in part by Award K08HD051714 (V.D.G.) from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health & Human Development.

The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health & Human Development or the National Institutes of Health.

Footnotes

  • Published online ahead of print. Publication date available at www.cjasn.org.

  • Copyright © 2012 by the American Society of Nephrology

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Friedman EA,
    2. Rutherford JW
    : Pregnancy and lupus erythematosus. Obstet Gynecol 8: 601–610, 1956
    OpenUrlPubMed
  2. 2.
    1. Boyd A Jr.,
    2. Stoddard FJ,
    3. Pierce DF
    : Lupus erythematosus simulating toxemia of pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 74: 1062–1065, 1957
    OpenUrlPubMed
  3. 3.
    1. Cox JB
    : Disseminated lupus erythematosus in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 26: 511–514, 1965
    OpenUrlPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Rahman A,
    2. Isenberg DA
    : Systemic lupus erythematosus. N Engl J Med 358: 929–939, 2008
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Carvalheiras G,
    2. Vita P,
    3. Marta S,
    4. Trovão R,
    5. Farinha F,
    6. Braga J,
    7. Rocha G,
    8. Almeida I,
    9. Marinho A,
    10. Mendonça T,
    11. Barbosa P,
    12. Correia J,
    13. Vasconcelos C
    : Pregnancy and systemic lupus erythematosus: Review of clinical features and outcome of 51 pregnancies at a single institution. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol 38: 302–306, 2010
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Carmona F,
    2. Font J,
    3. Cervera R,
    4. Muñoz F,
    5. Cararach V,
    6. Balasch J
    : Obstetrical outcome of pregnancy in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. A study of 60 cases. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 83: 137–142, 1999
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    Practice Bulletin No ACOG; American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Committee on Practice Bulletins-Obstetrics: ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 118: Antiphospholipid syndrome. Obstet Gynecol 117: 192–199, 2011.
  8. 8.↵
    1. Aluvihare VR,
    2. Kallikourdis M,
    3. Betz AG
    : Regulatory T cells mediate maternal tolerance to the fetus. Nat Immunol 5: 266–271, 2004
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Saito S,
    2. Sakai M,
    3. Sasaki Y,
    4. Tanebe K,
    5. Tsuda H,
    6. Michimata T
    : Quantitative analysis of peripheral blood Th0, Th1, Th2 and the Th1:Th2 cell ratio during normal human pregnancy and preeclampsia. Clin Exp Immunol 117: 550–555, 1999
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Munoz-Suano A,
    2. Hamilton AB,
    3. Betz AG
    : Gimme shelter: The immune system during pregnancy. Immunol Rev 241: 20–38, 2011
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Zen M,
    2. Ghirardello A,
    3. Iaccarino L,
    4. Tonon M,
    5. Campana C,
    6. Arienti S,
    7. Rampudda M,
    8. Canova M,
    9. Doria A
    : Hormones, immune response, and pregnancy in healthy women and SLE patients. Swiss Med Wkly 140: 187–201, 2010
    OpenUrlPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Ortega LM,
    2. Schultz DR,
    3. Lenz O,
    4. Pardo V,
    5. Contreras GN
    : Review: Lupus nephritis: Pathologic features, epidemiology and a guide to therapeutic decisions. Lupus 19: 557–574, 2010
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Petri M
    : Sex hormones and systemic lupus erythematosus. Lupus 17: 412–415, 2008
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Clowse ME
    : Lupus activity in pregnancy. Rheum Dis Clin North Am 33: 237–252, v, 2007
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    1. Ruiz-Irastorza G,
    2. Lima F,
    3. Alves J,
    4. Khamashta MA,
    5. Simpson J,
    6. Hughes GR,
    7. Buchanan NM
    : Increased rate of lupus flare during pregnancy and the puerperium: A prospective study of 78 pregnancies. Br J Rheumatol 35: 133–138, 1996
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Lockshin MD
    : Pregnancy does not cause systemic lupus erythematosus to worsen. Arthritis Rheum 32: 665–670, 1989
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Petri M
    : Hopkins Lupus Pregnancy Center: 1987 to 1996. Rheum Dis Clin North Am 23: 1–13, 1997
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.
    1. Chakravarty EF,
    2. Colón I,
    3. Langen ES,
    4. Nix DA,
    5. El-Sayed YY,
    6. Genovese MC,
    7. Druzin ML
    : Factors that predict prematurity and preeclampsia in pregnancies that are complicated by systemic lupus erythematosus. Am J Obstet Gynecol 192: 1897–1904, 2005
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    1. Cavallasca JA,
    2. Laborde HA,
    3. Ruda-Vega H,
    4. Nasswetter GG
    : Maternal and fetal outcomes of 72 pregnancies in Argentine patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Clin Rheumatol 27: 41–46, 2008
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    1. Al Arfaj AS,
    2. Khalil N
    : Pregnancy outcome in 396 pregnancies in patients with SLE in Saudi Arabia. Lupus 19: 1665–1673, 2010
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    1. Vinet E,
    2. Clarke AE,
    3. Gordon C,
    4. Urowitz MB,
    5. Hanly JG,
    6. Pineau CA,
    7. Isenberg D,
    8. Rahman A,
    9. Wallace D,
    10. Alarcón GS,
    11. Bruce I,
    12. Petri M,
    13. Dooley MA,
    14. Kalunian K,
    15. Maddison P,
    16. Aranow C,
    17. van Vollenhoven R,
    18. Bernatsky S
    : Decreased live births in women with systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 63: 1068–1072, 2011
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. 22.
    1. Ko HS,
    2. Ahn HY,
    3. Jang DG,
    4. Choi SK,
    5. Park YG,
    6. Park IY,
    7. Lee G,
    8. Park SH,
    9. Shin JC
    : Pregnancy outcomes and appropriate timing of pregnancy in 183 pregnancies in Korean patients with SLE. Int J Med Sci 8: 577–583, 2011
    OpenUrlPubMed
  23. 23.↵
    1. Bramham K,
    2. Hunt BJ,
    3. Bewley S,
    4. Germain S,
    5. Calatayud I,
    6. Khamashta MA,
    7. Nelson-Piercy C
    : Pregnancy outcomes in systemic lupus erythematosus with and without previous nephritis. J Rheumatol 38: 1906–1913, 2011
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. 24.
    1. Whitelaw DA,
    2. Hall D,
    3. Kotze T
    : Pregnancy in systemic lupus erythematosus: A retrospective study from a developing community. Clin Rheumatol 27: 577–580, 2008
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. 25.↵
    1. Surita FG,
    2. Parpinelli MA,
    3. Yonehara E,
    4. Krupa F,
    5. Cecatti JG
    : Systemic lupus erythematosus and pregnancy: Clinical evolution, maternal and perinatal outcomes and placental findings. Sao Paulo Med J 125: 91–95, 2007
    OpenUrlPubMed
  26. 26.↵
    1. Brucato A,
    2. Cimaz R,
    3. Caporali R,
    4. Ramoni V,
    5. Buyon J
    : Pregnancy outcomes in patients with autoimmune diseases and anti-Ro/SSA antibodies. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol 40: 27–41, 2011
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. 27.↵
    1. Izmirly PM,
    2. Saxena A,
    3. Kim MY,
    4. Wang D,
    5. Sahl SK,
    6. Llanos C,
    7. Friedman D,
    8. Buyon JP
    : Maternal and fetal factors associated with mortality and morbidity in a multi-racial/ethnic registry of anti-SSA/Ro-associated cardiac neonatal lupus. Circulation 124: 1927–1935, 2011
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. 28.↵
    1. Georgiou PE,
    2. Politi EN,
    3. Katsimbri P,
    4. Sakka V,
    5. Drosos AA
    : Outcome of lupus pregnancy: A controlled study. Rheumatology (Oxford) 39: 1014–1019, 2000
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. 29.
    1. Kwok LW,
    2. Tam LS,
    3. Zhu T,
    4. Leung YY,
    5. Li E
    : Predictors of maternal and fetal outcomes in pregnancies of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Lupus 20: 829–836, 2011
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. 30.↵
    1. Wong CH,
    2. Chen TL,
    3. Lee CS,
    4. Lin CJ,
    5. Chen CP
    : Outcome of pregnancy in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol 45: 120–123, 2006
    OpenUrlPubMed
  31. 31.↵
    1. Cunningham F,
    2. Leveno K,
    3. Bloom S,
    4. Hauth J,
    5. Rouse D,
    6. Spong C
    : Maternal physiology. In: Williams Obstetrics, 23rd Ed., New York, McGraw-Hill, 2010, pp 107–135
  32. 32.↵
    1. Germain S,
    2. Nelson-Piercy C
    : Lupus nephritis and renal disease in pregnancy. Lupus 15: 148–155, 2006
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. 33.↵
    1. Hou S
    : Pregnancy in chronic renal insufficiency and end-stage renal disease. Am J Kidney Dis 33: 235–252, 1999
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. 34.↵
    1. Hochberg MC
    : Updating the American College of Rheumatology revised criteria for the classification of systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum 40: 1725, 1997
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. 35.↵
    1. Ramin SM,
    2. Vidaeff AC,
    3. Yeomans ER,
    4. Gilstrap LC 3rd.
    : Chronic renal disease in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 108: 1531–1539, 2006
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. 36.↵
    1. Mintz G,
    2. Niz J,
    3. Gutierrez G,
    4. Garcia-Alonso A,
    5. Karchmer S
    : Prospective study of pregnancy in systemic lupus erythematosus. Results of a multidisciplinary approach. J Rheumatol 13: 732–739, 1986
    OpenUrlPubMed
  37. 37.
    1. Wong KL,
    2. Chan FY,
    3. Lee CP
    : Outcome of pregnancy in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. A prospective study. Arch Intern Med 151: 269–273, 1991
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. 38.↵
    1. Urowitz MB,
    2. Gladman DD,
    3. Farewell VT,
    4. Stewart J,
    5. McDonald J
    : Lupus and pregnancy studies. Arthritis Rheum 36: 1392–1397, 1993
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. 39.↵
    1. Petri M,
    2. Howard D,
    3. Repke J
    : Frequency of lupus flare in pregnancy. The Hopkins Lupus Pregnancy Center experience. Arthritis Rheum 34: 1538–1545, 1991
    OpenUrlPubMed
  40. 40.↵
    1. Zulman JI,
    2. Talal N,
    3. Hoffman GS,
    4. Epstein WV
    : Problems associated with the management of pregnancies in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. J Rheumatol 7: 37–49, 1980
    OpenUrlPubMed
  41. 41.↵
    1. Smyth A,
    2. Oliveira GH,
    3. Lahr BD,
    4. Bailey KR,
    5. Norby SM,
    6. Garovic VD
    : A systematic review and meta-analysis of pregnancy outcomes in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus and lupus nephritis. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 5: 2060–2068, 2010
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  42. 42.↵
    1. Gladman DD,
    2. Tandon A,
    3. Ibañez D,
    4. Urowitz MB
    : The effect of lupus nephritis on pregnancy outcome and fetal and maternal complications. J Rheumatol 37: 754–758, 2010
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  43. 43.↵
    1. Petri M
    : Pregnancy in SLE. Baillieres Clin Rheumatol 12: 449–476, 1998
    OpenUrlPubMed
  44. 44.↵
    1. Huong DL,
    2. Wechsler B,
    3. Vauthier-Brouzes D,
    4. Beaufils H,
    5. Lefebvre G,
    6. Piette JC
    : Pregnancy in past or present lupus nephritis: A study of 32 pregnancies from a single centre. Ann Rheum Dis 60: 599–604, 2001
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  45. 45.
    1. Soubassi L,
    2. Haidopoulos D,
    3. Sindos M,
    4. Pilalis A,
    5. Chaniotis D,
    6. Diakomanolis E,
    7. Antsaklis A,
    8. Zerefos N
    : Pregnancy outcome in women with pre-existing lupus nephritis. J Obstet Gynaecol 24: 630–634, 2004
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  46. 46.
    1. Molad Y,
    2. Borkowski T,
    3. Monselise A,
    4. Ben-Haroush A,
    5. Sulkes J,
    6. Hod M,
    7. Feldberg D,
    8. Bar J
    : Maternal and fetal outcome of lupus pregnancy: A prospective study of 29 pregnancies. Lupus 14: 145–151, 2005
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  47. 47.↵
    1. Wagner SJ,
    2. Craici I,
    3. Reed D,
    4. Norby S,
    5. Bailey K,
    6. Wiste HJ,
    7. Wood CM,
    8. Moder KG,
    9. Liang KP,
    10. Liang KV,
    11. Rose C,
    12. Rozkos T,
    13. Sitina M,
    14. Grande JP,
    15. Garovic VD
    : Maternal and foetal outcomes in pregnant patients with active lupus nephritis. Lupus 18: 342–347, 2009
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  48. 48.↵
    1. Ritchie J,
    2. Smyth A,
    3. Tower C,
    4. Helbert M,
    5. Venning M,
    6. Garovic VD
    : Maternal deaths in women with lupus nephritis: A review of published evidence [published online ahead of print February 6, 2012]. Lupus doi:0961203311434939
  49. 49.↵
    1. Askanase AD,
    2. Friedman DM,
    3. Copel J,
    4. Dische MR,
    5. Dubin A,
    6. Starc TJ,
    7. Katholi MC,
    8. Buyon JP
    : Spectrum and progression of conduction abnormalities in infants born to mothers with anti-SSA/Ro-SSB/La antibodies. Lupus 11: 145–151, 2002
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  50. 50.↵
    1. McNeil HP,
    2. Chesterman CN,
    3. Krilis SA
    : Immunology and clinical importance of antiphospholipid antibodies. Adv Immunol 49: 193–280, 1991
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  51. 51.↵
    1. do Prado AD,
    2. Piovesan DM,
    3. Staub HL,
    4. Horta BL
    : Association of anticardiolipin antibodies with preeclampsia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 116: 1433–1443, 2010
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  52. 52.↵
    1. Ruffatti A,
    2. Tonello M,
    3. Cavazzana A,
    4. Bagatella P,
    5. Pengo V
    : Laboratory classification categories and pregnancy outcome in patients with primary antiphospholipid syndrome prescribed antithrombotic therapy. Thromb Res 123: 482–487, 2009
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  53. 53.↵
    1. Ruiz-Irastorza G,
    2. Khamashta MA
    : Lupus and pregnancy: Ten questions and some answers. Lupus 17: 416–420, 2008
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  54. 54.↵
    1. Contreras G,
    2. Roth D,
    3. Pardo V,
    4. Striker LG,
    5. Schultz DR
    : Lupus nephritis: A clinical review for practicing nephrologists. Clin Nephrol 57: 95–107, 2002
    OpenUrlPubMed
  55. 55.↵
    1. Contreras G,
    2. Pardo V,
    3. Cely C,
    4. Borja E,
    5. Hurtado A,
    6. De La Cuesta C,
    7. Iqbal K,
    8. Lenz O,
    9. Asif A,
    10. Nahar N,
    11. Leclerq B,
    12. Leon C,
    13. Schulman I,
    14. Ramirez-Seijas F,
    15. Paredes A,
    16. Cepero A,
    17. Khan T,
    18. Pachon F,
    19. Tozman E,
    20. Barreto G,
    21. Hoffman D,
    22. Almeida Suarez M,
    23. Busse JC,
    24. Esquenazi M,
    25. Esquenazi A,
    26. Garcia Mayol L,
    27. Garcia Estrada H
    : Factors associated with poor outcomes in patients with lupus nephritis. Lupus 14: 890–895, 2005
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  56. 56.↵
    1. Carmona F,
    2. Font J,
    3. Moga I,
    4. Làzaro I,
    5. Cervera R,
    6. Pac V,
    7. Balasch J
    : Class III-IV proliferative lupus nephritis and pregnancy: A study of 42 cases. Am J Reprod Immunol 53: 182–188, 2005
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  57. 57.↵
    1. Mok CC
    : Biomarkers for lupus nephritis: A critical appraisal. J Biomed Biotechnol 2010: 638413, 2010
    OpenUrlPubMed
  58. 58.
    1. Rovin BH,
    2. Zhang X
    : Biomarkers for lupus nephritis: The quest continues. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 4: 1858–1865, 2009
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  59. 59.↵
    1. Akhter E,
    2. Burlingame RW,
    3. Seaman AL,
    4. Magder L,
    5. Petri M
    : Anti-C1q antibodies have higher correlation with flares of lupus nephritis than other serum markers. Lupus 20: 1267–1274, 2011
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  60. 60.↵
    1. Lindheimer MD,
    2. Davison JM
    : Renal biopsy during pregnancy: ‘To b … or not to b …?’. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 94: 932–934, 1987
    OpenUrlPubMed
  61. 61.↵
    1. Schewitz LJ,
    2. Friedman IA,
    3. Pollak VE
    : Bleeding after renal biopsy in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 26: 295–304, 1965
    OpenUrlPubMed
  62. 62.↵
    1. Chen HH,
    2. Lin HC,
    3. Yeh JC,
    4. Chen CP
    : Renal biopsy in pregnancies complicated by undetermined renal disease. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 80: 888–893, 2001
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  63. 63.↵
    1. Day C,
    2. Hewins P,
    3. Hildebrand S,
    4. Sheikh L,
    5. Taylor G,
    6. Kilby M,
    7. Lipkin G
    : The role of renal biopsy in women with kidney disease identified in pregnancy. Nephrol Dial Transplant 23: 201–206, 2008
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  64. 64.↵
    1. Stevenson RE,
    2. Burton OM,
    3. Ferlauto GJ,
    4. Taylor HA
    : Hazards of oral anticoagulants during pregnancy. JAMA 243: 1549–1551, 1980
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  65. 65.↵
    1. Bates SM,
    2. Greer IA,
    3. Pabinger I,
    4. Sofaer S,
    5. Hirsh J
    ; American College of Chest Physicians: Venous thromboembolism, thrombophilia, antithrombotic therapy, and pregnancy: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition). Chest 133[Suppl]: 844S–886S, 2008
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  66. 66.↵
    EBPG Expert Group on Renal Transplantation: European best practice guidelines for renal transplantation. Section IV: Long-term management of the transplant recipient. IV.10. Pregnancy in renal transplant recipients. Nephrol Dial Transplant 17[Suppl 4]: 50–55, 2002
    OpenUrl
  67. 67.↵
    1. Ostensen M
    : Disease specific problems related to drug therapy in pregnancy. Lupus 13: 746–750, 2004
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  68. 68.↵
    1. Østensen M,
    2. Khamashta M,
    3. Lockshin M,
    4. Parke A,
    5. Brucato A,
    6. Carp H,
    7. Doria A,
    8. Rai R,
    9. Meroni P,
    10. Cetin I,
    11. Derksen R,
    12. Branch W,
    13. Motta M,
    14. Gordon C,
    15. Ruiz-Irastorza G,
    16. Spinillo A,
    17. Friedman D,
    18. Cimaz R,
    19. Czeizel A,
    20. Piette JC,
    21. Cervera R,
    22. Levy RA,
    23. Clementi M,
    24. De Carolis S,
    25. Petri M,
    26. Shoenfeld Y,
    27. Faden D,
    28. Valesini G,
    29. Tincani A
    : Anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive drugs and reproduction. Arthritis Res Ther 8: 209, 2006
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  69. 69.↵
    1. Fraser FC,
    2. Fainstat TD
    : Production of congenital defects in the off-spring of pregnant mice treated with cortisone; progress report. Pediatrics 8: 527–533, 1951
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  70. 70.↵
    1. Fraser FC,
    2. Sajoo A
    : Teratogenic potential of corticosteroids in humans. Teratology 51: 45–46, 1995
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  71. 71.↵
    1. Hviid A,
    2. Mølgaard-Nielsen D
    : Corticosteroid use during pregnancy and risk of orofacial clefts. CMAJ 183: 796–804, 2011
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  72. 72.↵
    1. Clowse ME,
    2. Magder L,
    3. Witter F,
    4. Petri M
    : Hydroxychloroquine in lupus pregnancy. Arthritis Rheum 54: 3640–3647, 2006
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  73. 73.
    1. Costedoat-Chalumeau N,
    2. Amoura Z,
    3. Huong DL,
    4. Lechat P,
    5. Piette JC
    : Safety of hydroxychloroquine in pregnant patients with connective tissue diseases. Review of the literature. Autoimmun Rev 4: 111–115, 2005
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  74. 74.
    1. Levy RA,
    2. Vilela VS,
    3. Cataldo MJ,
    4. Ramos RC,
    5. Duarte JL,
    6. Tura BR,
    7. Albuquerque EM,
    8. Jesús NR
    : Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) in lupus pregnancy: Double-blind and placebo-controlled study. Lupus 10: 401–404, 2001
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  75. 75.
    1. Cortés-Hernández J,
    2. Ordi-Ros J,
    3. Paredes F,
    4. Casellas M,
    5. Castillo F,
    6. Vilardell-Tarres M
    : Clinical predictors of fetal and maternal outcome in systemic lupus erythematosus: A prospective study of 103 pregnancies. Rheumatology (Oxford) 41: 643–650, 2002
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  76. 76.↵
    The Canadian Hydroxychloroquine Study Group: A randomized study of the effect of withdrawing hydroxychloroquine sulfate in systemic lupus erythematosus. N Engl J Med 324: 150–154, 1991
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  77. 77.↵
    1. Cleary BJ,
    2. Källén B
    : Early pregnancy azathioprine use and pregnancy outcomes. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol 85: 647–654, 2009
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  78. 78.↵
    1. Coscia LA,
    2. Constantinescu S,
    3. Moritz MJ,
    4. Frank AM,
    5. Ramirez CB,
    6. Maley WR,
    7. Doria C,
    8. McGrory CH,
    9. Armenti VT
    : Report from the National Transplantation Pregnancy Registry (NTPR): Outcomes of pregnancy after transplantation. Clin Transpl 65–85, 2010
  79. 79.↵
    1. Chen W,
    2. Tang X,
    3. Liu Q,
    4. Chen W,
    5. Fu P,
    6. Liu F,
    7. Liao Y,
    8. Yang Z,
    9. Zhang J,
    10. Chen J,
    11. Lou T,
    12. Fu J,
    13. Kong Y,
    14. Liu Z,
    15. Fan A,
    16. Rao S,
    17. Li Z,
    18. Yu X
    : Short-term outcomes of induction therapy with tacrolimus versus cyclophosphamide for active lupus nephritis: A multicenter randomized clinical trial. Am J Kidney Dis 57: 235–244, 2011
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  80. 80.↵
    1. Alsuwaida A
    : Successful management of systemic lupus erythematosus nephritis flare-up during pregnancy with tacrolimus. Mod Rheumatol 21: 73–75, 2011
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  81. 81.↵
    1. Zandman-Goddard G,
    2. Levy Y,
    3. Shoenfeld Y
    : Intravenous immunoglobulin therapy and systemic lupus erythematosus. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol 29: 219–228, 2005
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  82. 82.↵
    1. Rauova L,
    2. Lukac J,
    3. Levy Y,
    4. Rovensky J,
    5. Shoenfeld Y
    : High-dose intravenous immunoglobulins for lupus nephritis—a salvage immunomodulation. Lupus 10: 209–213, 2001
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  83. 83.↵
    1. Anderka MT,
    2. Lin AE,
    3. Abuelo DN,
    4. Mitchell AA,
    5. Rasmussen SA
    : Reviewing the evidence for mycophenolate mofetil as a new teratogen: Case report and review of the literature. Am J Med Genet A 149A: 1241–1248, 2009
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  84. 84.↵
    1. El Sebaaly Z,
    2. Charpentier B,
    3. Snanoudj R
    : Fetal malformations associated with mycophenolate mofetil for lupus nephritis. Nephrol Dial Transplant 22: 2722, 2007
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  85. 85.↵
    1. Hahn KM,
    2. Johnson PH,
    3. Gordon N,
    4. Kuerer H,
    5. Middleton L,
    6. Ramirez M,
    7. Yang W,
    8. Perkins G,
    9. Hortobagyi GN,
    10. Theriault RL
    : Treatment of pregnant breast cancer patients and outcomes of children exposed to chemotherapy in utero. Cancer 107: 1219–1226, 2006
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  86. 86.↵
    1. Díaz-Lagares C,
    2. Croca S,
    3. Sangle S,
    4. Vital EM,
    5. Catapano F,
    6. Martínez-Berriotxoa A,
    7. García-Hernández F,
    8. Callejas-Rubio JL,
    9. Rascón J,
    10. D'Cruz D,
    11. Jayne D,
    12. Ruiz-Irastorza G,
    13. Emery P,
    14. Isenberg D,
    15. Ramos-Casals M,
    16. Khamashta MA
    ; The UK-BIOGEAS Registry: Efficacy of rituximab in 164 patients with biopsy-proven lupus nephritis: Pooled data from European cohorts [published online ahead of print October 18, 2011]. Autoimmun Rev doi:10.1016/j.autrev.2011.10.009
  87. 87.↵
    1. Molino C,
    2. Fabbian F,
    3. Longhini C
    : Clinical approach to lupus nephritis: Recent advances. Eur J Intern Med 20: 447–453, 2009
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  88. 88.↵
    1. Moroni G,
    2. Ponticelli C
    : Pregnancy after lupus nephritis. Lupus 14: 89–94, 2005
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology: 7 (12)
Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
Vol. 7, Issue 12
December 07, 2012
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
View Selected Citations (0)
Print
Download PDF
Sign up for Alerts
Email Article
Thank you for your help in sharing the high-quality science in CJASN.
Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Obstetric Nephrology: Lupus and Lupus Nephritis in Pregnancy
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Society of Nephrology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Society of Nephrology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Obstetric Nephrology: Lupus and Lupus Nephritis in Pregnancy
Todd J. Stanhope, Wendy M. White, Kevin G. Moder, Andrew Smyth, Vesna D. Garovic
CJASN Dec 2012, 7 (12) 2089-2099; DOI: 10.2215/CJN.12441211

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Obstetric Nephrology: Lupus and Lupus Nephritis in Pregnancy
Todd J. Stanhope, Wendy M. White, Kevin G. Moder, Andrew Smyth, Vesna D. Garovic
CJASN Dec 2012, 7 (12) 2089-2099; DOI: 10.2215/CJN.12441211
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Summary
    • Introduction
    • Pregnancy as an Altered Immune State
    • SLE and Pregnancy
    • LN and Pregnancy
    • Antiphospholipid Antibodies and Antiphospholipid Syndrome
    • Preconception Counseling
    • Antepartum Management
    • Medication Management
    • Intrapartum and Postpartum Management
    • Disclosures
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data Supps
  • Info & Metrics
  • View PDF

More in this TOC Section

  • Recommended Clinical Trial End Points for Dialysis Catheters
  • Clinical Trial End Points for Hemodialysis Vascular Access
  • Definitions and End Points for Interventional Studies for Arteriovenous Dialysis Access
Show more Moving Points in Nephrology

Cited By...

  • Kidney Outcomes and Risk Factors for Nephritis (Flare/De Novo) in a Multiethnic Cohort of Pregnant Patients with Lupus
  • HELLP syndrome: a diagnostic conundrum with severe complications
  • Podocyturia Predates Proteinuria and Clinical Features of Preeclampsia: Longitudinal Prospective Study
  • Google Scholar

Similar Articles

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Articles

  • Current Issue
  • Early Access
  • Subject Collections
  • Article Archive
  • ASN Meeting Abstracts

Information for Authors

  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Trainee of the Year
  • Author Resources
  • ASN Journal Policies
  • Reuse/Reprint Policy

About

  • CJASN
  • ASN
  • ASN Journals
  • ASN Kidney News

Journal Information

  • About CJASN
  • CJASN Email Alerts
  • CJASN Key Impact Information
  • CJASN Podcasts
  • CJASN RSS Feeds
  • Editorial Board

More Information

  • Advertise
  • ASN Podcasts
  • ASN Publications
  • Become an ASN Member
  • Feedback
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Password/Email Address Changes
  • Subscribe to ASN Journals

© 2022 American Society of Nephrology

Print ISSN - 1555-9041 Online ISSN - 1555-905X

Powered by HighWire