Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Podcasts
    • Subject Collections
    • Archives
    • ASN Meeting Abstracts
    • Saved Searches
  • Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Resources
    • Reprint Information
  • Trainees
    • Peer Review Program
    • Prize Competition
  • About CJASN
    • About CJASN
    • Editorial Team
    • CJASN Impact
    • CJASN Recognitions
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Advertising
    • Reprint Information
    • Subscriptions
    • Feedback
  • ASN Kidney News
  • Other
    • JASN
    • Kidney360
    • Kidney News Online
    • American Society of Nephrology

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
American Society of Nephrology
  • Other
    • JASN
    • Kidney360
    • Kidney News Online
    • American Society of Nephrology
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Advertisement
American Society of Nephrology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Podcasts
    • Subject Collections
    • Archives
    • ASN Meeting Abstracts
    • Saved Searches
  • Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Resources
    • Reprint Information
  • Trainees
    • Peer Review Program
    • Prize Competition
  • About CJASN
    • About CJASN
    • Editorial Team
    • CJASN Impact
    • CJASN Recognitions
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Advertising
    • Reprint Information
    • Subscriptions
    • Feedback
  • ASN Kidney News
  • Visit ASN on Facebook
  • Follow CJASN on Twitter
  • CJASN RSS
  • Community Forum
Original ArticlesChronic Kidney Disease
You have accessRestricted Access

CKD, Plasma Lipids, and Common Carotid Intima-Media Thickness: Results from the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis

Julio A. Lamprea-Montealegre, Brad C. Astor, Robin L. McClelland, Ian H. de Boer, Gregory L. Burke, Christopher T. Sibley, Daniel O’Leary, A. Richey Sharrett and Moyses Szklo
CJASN November 2012, 7 (11) 1777-1785; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2215/CJN.02090212
Julio A. Lamprea-Montealegre
*Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland;
†Welch Center for Prevention, Epidemiology, and Clinical Research, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Brad C. Astor
‡Department of Medicine and Population Health Sciences, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Robin L. McClelland
§Departments of Biostatistics and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ian H. de Boer
‖Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gregory L. Burke
¶Department of Public Health Sciences, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, North Carolina;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christopher T. Sibley
**National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Daniel O’Leary
††Department of Radiology, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
A. Richey Sharrett
*Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland;
†Welch Center for Prevention, Epidemiology, and Clinical Research, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Moyses Szklo
*Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland;
†Welch Center for Prevention, Epidemiology, and Clinical Research, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data Supps
  • Info & Metrics
  • View PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Additional Files
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Crude and adjusted estimates of the association between LDL cholesterol and IMT (in micrometers). Restricted cubic spline model with knots at the 25th, 50th, and 75th percentiles for LDL cholesterol. The shaded area is the 95% confidence interval for the adjusted restricted cubic spline model. Adjusted for age (years), sex, race/ethnicity, lipid-lowering medication use, presence of diabetes mellitus, presence of hypertension, log-transformed body mass index, log-transformed urinary albumin/creatinine ratio, smoking status (current, former, never smoker), log-transformed triglycerides, log-transformed HDL cholesterol, log-transformed high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, and log-transformed IL-6. eGFR, estimated GFR; IMT, intima-media thickness.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Crude and adjusted estimates of the association between small-dense LDL and IMT (in micrometers). Restricted cubic spline model with knots at the 25th, 50th, and 75th percentiles for small-dense LDL. The shaded area is the 95% confidence interval for the adjusted restricted cubic spline model. Adjusted for age (years), sex, race/ethnicity, lipid-lowering medication use, presence of diabetes mellitus, presence of hypertension, log-transformed body mass index, log-transformed urinary albumin/creatinine ratio, smoking status (current, former, never smoker), log-transformed triglycerides, log-transformed HDL cholesterol, large LDL, log-transformed intermediate density lipoprotein, log-transformed high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, and log-transformed IL-6. eGFR, estimated GFR; IMT, intima-media thickness; Sd-LDL, small-dense LDL.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Adjusted estimates of the association between LDL cholesterol and IMT (in micrometers) according to level of kidney function and presence of inflammation. Restricted cubic spline model with knots at the 25th, 50th, and 75th percentiles for LDL cholesterol. The shaded area is the 95% confidence interval for the adjusted restricted cubic spline model. Adjusted for age (years), sex, race/ethnicity, lipid-lowering medication use, presence of diabetes mellitus, presence of hypertension, log-transformed body mass index, log-transformed urinary albumin/creatinine ratio, smoking status (current, former, never smoker), log-transformed triglycerides, and log-transformed HDL cholesterol. Inflammation is defined as the ≥90th percentile of either IL-6 (≥3 pg/ml) or high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (≥9 mg/L). eGFR, estimated GFR; IMT, intima-media thickness.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Additional Files
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Demographic and clinical characteristics of 6572 participants in the MESA cohort by levels of kidney function

    CharacteristiceGFR ≥60
(n=5719)eGFR 45–59
(n=709)eGFR <45
(n=144)P for Differencea
    Male sex2721 (48)311 (44)66 (46)0.17
    Race<0.001
     Black1600 (28)168 (24)45 (32)
     Chinese689 (12)80 (11)14 (10)
     Hispanic1294 (23)111 (16)30 (21)
     White2136 (37)350 (49)55 (38)
    Age (yr)60 (53–68)71 (65–77)75 (68–79)<0.001
    Body mass index (kg/m2)27.5 (24.4–31.1)27.6 (24.7–31.2)28.3 (25.2–31.9)0.14
    Current smoker782 (14)45 (6)10 (7)<0.001
    Diabetes679 (12)95 (13)35 (24)<0.001
     Biguanide use280 (5)41 (6)4 (3)
     Sulfonylurea use297 (5)46 (6)13 (9)
    Hypertension2353 (41)453 (64)123 (85)<0.001
     Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor use168 (3)41 (6)15 (10)
     β-blocker use447 (8)103 (15)29 (20)
    Use of any lipid-lowering medication836 (15)176 (25)41 (29)<0.001
     Statin use771 (13)162 (23)37 (26)
    Lipid levels (mg/dl)
     Total cholesterol192 (170–215)192 (170–216)191 (169–216)0.95
     LDL-C116 (96–136)113 (95–137)113 (93–135)0.30
     HDL-C48 (41–59)50 (41–60)44 (37–57)<0.001
     Triglycerides109 (77–157)116 (81–162)122 (91–189)<0.001
    Lipoprotein particle concentration (nmol/L)
     Small-dense LDL518 (113–798)489 (105–776)563 (122–817)0.06
     Large LDL601 (426–764)596 (414–775)518 (380–692)0.03
     IDL102 (51–175)112 (53–175)117 (51–188)0.14
    High-sensitivity C-reactive protein (mg/L)1.8 (0.8–4.2)2.1 (1.0–4.5)2.6 (1.3–5.7)<0.001
    IL-6 (pg/ml)1.2 (0.7–1.8)1.4 (1.0–2.1)1.5 (1.1–2.2)<0.001
    Urinary albumin/creatinine ratio (mg/g)5.1 (3.3–10.1)6.2 (3.6–14.8)16.4 (4.5–107.8)<0.001
    Intima-media thickness (μm)830 (730–960)910 (800–1040)940 (830–1060)<0.001
    • Data are n (%) or median (interquartile range). MESA, Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis; eGFR, estimated GFR (ml/min per 1.73 m2); LDL-C, LDL cholesterol; HDL-C, HDL cholesterol; IDL, intermediate density lipoprotein.

    • ↵a P values based on Fisher’s exact test and the Kruskal–Wallis test for categorical and continuous variables, respectively.

    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Adjusted estimates and 95% confidence intervals of the difference in common carotid artery intima-media thickness (in micrometers) per specified differences in lipid particle concentrations, by level of kidney function

    Lipid ParticleeGFR ≥60
(n=5719)eGFR <60
(n=853)P for Interactiona
    Total cholesterol per 10 mg/dlb0.01
     <200 mg/dl2.97 (0.71, 5.23)−4.89 (−12.98, 3.20)
     ≥200 mg/dl4.79 (2.40, 7.18)13.13 (4.82, 21.42)
    LDL-C per 10 mg/dlc0.01
     <130 mg/dl4.65 (2.27, 7.04)−2.53 (−11.46, 6.09)
     ≥130 mg/dl4.76 (2.05, 7.47)15.91 (6.34, 25.49)
    Log HDL-C−21.41 (−41.00, −1.57)−58.49 (−126.61, 9.63)0.10
    Log triglycerides4.65 (−5.41, 14.72)−2.58 (−38.97, 33.82)0.42
    NMR lipids
     Small-dense LDL per 100 nmol/L4.83 (3.16, 6.50)7.48 (1.45, 13.50)0.12
     Large-dense LDL per 100 nmol/L6.21 (4.08, 8.34)12.18 (4.51, 19.86)0.81
     Log IDL0.53 (−3.59, 4.65)2.99 (−12.88, 18.86)0.78
    • Adjusted for age (years), sex, race/ethnicity, lipid-lowering medication use, presence of diabetes mellitus, presence of hypertension, log-transformed body mass index, log-transformed urinary albumin/creatinine ratio, smoking status (current, former, never smoker), log-transformed high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, and log-transformed IL-6. eGFR, estimated GFR (ml/min per 1.73 m2); LDL-C, LDL cholesterol; HDL-C, HDL cholesterol; NMR, nuclear magnetic resonance; IDL, intermediate density lipoprotein.

    • ↵a P values testing for the null hypothesis that all slopes across eGFR strata are identical in linear spline models.

    • ↵b Continuous estimates presented before and after a linear spline knot at 200 mg/dl for eGFR ≥60 (<200, n=3397; ≥200, n=2322) and for eGFR <60 (<200, n=513; ≥200, n=340).

    • ↵c Continuous estimates presented before and after a linear spline knot at 130 mg/dl for eGFR ≥60 (<130, n=3851; ≥130, n=1868) and for eGFR <60(<130, n=596; ≥130, n=257).

    • View popup
    Table 3.

    Adjusted estimates and 95% confidence intervals of the difference in common carotid artery intima-media thickness (in micrometers) per specified differences in lipid particle concentrations according to level of kidney function and presence of inflammation

    Lipid ParticleeGFR ≥60 (n=5719)aPbeGFR<60 (n=853)cPb
    No Inflammation
(n=4726)Inflammation
(n=993)No Inflammation
(n=670)Inflammation
(n=183)
    Total cholesterol per 10 mg/dl0.28<0.01
     <200 mg/dl2.51 (0.02, 5.00)5.71 (0.62, 10.81)1.88 (−6.35, 10.13)−25.90 (−45.53, −6.48)
     ≥200 mg/dl5.65 (3.08, 8.23)1.23 (−5.01, 7.48)8.35 (1.07, 16.60)38.18 (13.87, 62.49)
    LDL-C per 10 mg/dl0.65<0.001
     <130 mg/dl4.41 (1.77, 7.05)5.17 (−0.52, 10.87)4.52 (-4.32, 13.37)−26.02 (−48.70, −3.35)
     ≥130 mg/dl5.44 (2.52, 8.37)2.04 (−5.47, 9.56)10.07 (0.63, 19.51)42.04 (10.58, 73.50)
    Log HDL-C−14.15 (−35.90, 7.60)−52.95 (−102.09, −3.81)0.20−45.39 (−115.92, 25.13)−42.72 (−240.86, 155.4)0.96
    Log triglycerides3.02 (−7.99, 14.03)10.69 (−14.94, 36.31)0.489.70 (−27.83, 47.22)−16.90 (−128.97, 95.19)0.30
    NMR lipids
     Small-dense LDL per 100 nmol/L5.08 (3.25, 6.92)3.28 (−0.01, 7.39)0.897.62 (1.42, 13.82)3.10 (−14.59, 20.77)0.61
     Large LDL per 100 nmol/l5.85 (3.50, 8.19)7.45 (2.26, 12.63)0.8916.45 (8.32, 24.58)0.60 (−19.86, 21.04)0.18
     Log IDL cholesterol0.27 (−4.13, 4.67)2.15 (−9.63, 13.94)0.66−4.88 (−20.91, 11.14)43.66 (−7.64, 94.96)0.38
    • Adjusted for age (years), sex, race/ethnicity, lipid-lowering medication use, presence of diabetes mellitus, presence of hypertension, log-transformed body mass index, log-transformed urinary albumin/creatinine ratio, and smoking status (current, former, never smoker). Inflammation is defined as the ≥90th percentile of either IL-6 (≥3 pg/ml) or high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (≥9 mg/L). eGFR, estimated GFR; LDL-C, LDL cholesterol; HDL-C, HDL cholesterol; IDL, intermediate density lipoprotein.

    • ↵a No inflammation (<200, n=2775; ≥200, n=1951) and inflammation (<200, n=622; ≥200, n=371) for total cholesterol; no inflammation (<130, n=3142; ≥130, n=1584) and inflammation (<130, n=709; ≥130, n=284) for LDL-C.

    • ↵b P values are for interaction.

    • ↵c No inflammation (<200, n=391; ≥200, n=279) and inflammation (<200, n=122; ≥200, n=61) for total cholesterol; no inflammation (<130, n=462; ≥130, n=208) and inflammation (<130, n=134; ≥130, n=49) for LDL-C.

Additional Files

  • Figures
  • Tables
  • Supplemental Data

    Files in this Data Supplement:

    • Supplemental Data
    • Supplemental Data
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology: 7 (11)
Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
Vol. 7, Issue 11
November 07, 2012
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
View Selected Citations (0)
Print
Download PDF
Sign up for Alerts
Email Article
Thank you for your help in sharing the high-quality science in CJASN.
Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
CKD, Plasma Lipids, and Common Carotid Intima-Media Thickness: Results from the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Society of Nephrology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Society of Nephrology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
CKD, Plasma Lipids, and Common Carotid Intima-Media Thickness: Results from the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis
Julio A. Lamprea-Montealegre, Brad C. Astor, Robin L. McClelland, Ian H. de Boer, Gregory L. Burke, Christopher T. Sibley, Daniel O’Leary, A. Richey Sharrett, Moyses Szklo
CJASN Nov 2012, 7 (11) 1777-1785; DOI: 10.2215/CJN.02090212

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
CKD, Plasma Lipids, and Common Carotid Intima-Media Thickness: Results from the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis
Julio A. Lamprea-Montealegre, Brad C. Astor, Robin L. McClelland, Ian H. de Boer, Gregory L. Burke, Christopher T. Sibley, Daniel O’Leary, A. Richey Sharrett, Moyses Szklo
CJASN Nov 2012, 7 (11) 1777-1785; DOI: 10.2215/CJN.02090212
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Summary
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Disclosures
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data Supps
  • Info & Metrics
  • View PDF

More in this TOC Section

Original Articles

  • Short-Duration Prednisolone in Children with Nephrotic Syndrome Relapse
  • Associations between Deprivation, Geographic Location, and Access to Pediatric Kidney Care in the United Kingdom
  • Variability in Culture-Negative Peritonitis Rates in Pediatric Peritoneal Dialysis Programs in the United States
Show more Original Articles

Chronic Kidney Disease

  • NAT8 Variants, N-Acetylated Amino Acids, and Progression of CKD
  • Effect of Urate-Lowering Therapy on Cardiovascular and Kidney Outcomes
  • Combination Treatment with Sodium Nitrite and Isoquercetin on Endothelial Dysfunction among Patients with CKD
Show more Chronic Kidney Disease

Cited By...

  • Coronary heart disease risk associated with the dyslipidaemia of chronic kidney disease
  • High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol and the Risk of All-Cause Mortality among U.S. Veterans
  • Predictors of Subclinical Atheromatosis Progression over 2 Years in Patients with Different Stages of CKD
  • HDL in CKD: How Good Is the "Good Cholesterol?"
  • HDL Cholesterol Is Not Associated with Lower Mortality in Patients with Kidney Dysfunction
  • Biomarkers of Dairy Fatty Acids and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease in the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis
  • Google Scholar

Similar Articles

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Articles

  • Current Issue
  • Early Access
  • Subject Collections
  • Article Archive
  • ASN Meeting Abstracts

Information for Authors

  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Trainee of the Year
  • Author Resources
  • ASN Journal Policies
  • Reuse/Reprint Policy

About

  • CJASN
  • ASN
  • ASN Journals
  • ASN Kidney News

Journal Information

  • About CJASN
  • CJASN Email Alerts
  • CJASN Key Impact Information
  • CJASN Podcasts
  • CJASN RSS Feeds
  • Editorial Board

More Information

  • Advertise
  • ASN Podcasts
  • ASN Publications
  • Become an ASN Member
  • Feedback
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Password/Email Address Changes
  • Subscribe

© 2021 American Society of Nephrology

Print ISSN - 1555-9041 Online ISSN - 1555-905X

Powered by HighWire