Abstract
Background and objectives: The study aim was to establish the incidence and characterize all encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis (EPS) cases in patients treated by peritoneal dialysis (PD).
Design, setting, participants, & measurements: The patient cohort, which started PD from January 1, 2000, to December 31, 2007, was identified from the Scottish Renal Registry (n = 1238). Possible EPS cases were identified by the ten adult Scottish renal units. Patient records were examined to ensure cases met diagnostic criteria.
Results: Forty-six cases were identified; 19 had their first PD exposure after January 1, 2000. The rate was 1.5%, an incidence of 4.9 per 1000 person-years. The incidence increased with PD duration, with rates of 0, 0.6, 2.0, 3.5, 8.1, 8.8 and 5% at <1, 1 to 2, >2 to 3, >3 to 4, >4 to 5, >5 to 6 and >6 yr PD exposure, respectively. The median PD duration of EPS cases was 5.1 yr (interquartile range [IQR] 3.4 to 6.1 yr). At diagnosis, 12 (26%) were on PD and 33 (72%) were diagnosed <2 yr after PD stopped. The cases had a median of 3.3 episodes of peritonitis (range 0 to 20, IQR 1 to 4.5). Thirty (65%) had used 3.86% dextrose dialysate and 45 (98%) had used Extraneal. The mortality was 42% at 1 yr postdiagnosis with a median survival of 149 d (IQR 61 to 408 d).
Conclusions: The incidence reported in this study may be used to inform patients of the minimum risk of developing EPS on PD.
Encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis (EPS) is a devastating complication of peritoneal dialysis (PD), first described in 1980 (1). EPS is thought to result from chronic intra-abdominal inflammation that is multifactorial in origin. Prolonged PD represents the most consistent “risk factor” identified (2–6).
EPS is uncommon, but the incidence is unknown. A UK series identified 27 EPS cases, indicating a rate of 3.3% over 7 yr (7). An Australian study identified 54 cases in 14 yr, giving a rate of 0.7% (4). Japanese and Korean studies describe rates of 0.8 to 2.5% (2,3,5,6). Kawanishi et al. published a 2 yr follow-up of a PD cohort in 2001, suggesting an incidence of 0.8% (2). They published a further analysis in 2004 reporting an incidence of 2.5%, which may reflect the longer follow-up inherent to the study design rather than a true incidence increase (3). These studies include incident and prevalent patients on PD, which does not allow accurate calculation of incidence (2–7). To calculate a true incidence of EPS, a cohort of patients must be followed from the start of PD to identify all cases diagnosed thereafter.
The clinical features of EPS have been described previously (2–9). Onset may occur on PD, but most cases become apparent after stopping PD, including after renal transplantation (2–8). Clinical, radiologic and pathologic criteria for EPS diagnosis were defined by the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis (ISPD) in 2000 (10).
There is little evidence to guide management of EPS patients. In Japan, enterolysis (surgical division of adhesions) is recommended but there are few European reports on EPS surgery (11–15). Case series have assessed total parenteral nutrition, immunosuppression and tamoxifen, and some have shown encouraging results (3,7,16- 26). There are no reliable biochemical or radiologic screening tests to identify patients at risk or in the early stages of EPS (27,28).
The primary aim of this study was to report the EPS incidence in patients using PD for end-stage renal failure (ESRF) in Scotland between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2007. A secondary aim was to characterize these cases.
Materials and Methods
The cohort of adult patients who started PD between January 1, 2000, to December 31, 2007, in Scotland (n = 1238) was identified from the Scottish Renal Registry (SRR). The ten adult renal units in Scotland identified potential EPS cases diagnosed on or after January 1, 2000. Medical records were examined to ensure all cases met ISPD diagnostic criteria including clinical features and either radiologic and/or histopathological confirmation (10). Seven cases were excluded because there was another potential cause for their presentation (n = 5) or they lacked radiologic or pathologic confirmation of EPS (n = 2). Peritonitis was defined as a PD effluent white cell count above 100 per mm3.
We searched the SRR database (for International Classification of Disease codes; ICD-9/ICD-10) reported in hospital discharge statistics, but no additional cases were found. All cases have been used to describe the clinical presentation. Only incident cases who started PD after January 1, 2000, are used to calculate the EPS incidence. For clarity, we refer to the 46 period-prevalent cases as Group A and the subgroup of 19 incident cases as Group B.
Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS®. The incidence of EPS was calculated as number of EPS cases divided by number of patients at risk, taking into account the person-time during which events were observed and time elapsed before EPS diagnosis (29). Logistic analysis was undertaken and odds ratios calculated comparing PD duration and probability of developing EPS. Cumulative risks were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method to plot time from first PD to EPS diagnosis. Peritonitis rates were calculated as the number of patient months on PD divided by number of infections and expressed as number of months between episodes. The rates were converted to events per person-years for Poisson regression analysis to test the difference between the groups (relative risk).
Results
Incidence
Between January 1, 2000, to December 31, 2007, 46 patients met ISPD criteria for EPS diagnosis (Group A), of which 19 were first exposed to PD on or after January 1, 2000 (Group B). Of the 1238 patients exposed to PD after January 1, 2000, the overall rate is 1.5% in the 8 yr to end December 2007 (19 of 1238). This represents an incidence of 4.9 per 1000 person- years or 8.7 per 1000 person-years of PD.
The rates according to PD exposure are shown in Table 1. Beyond 4 yr of PD there is a marked increase in the proportion developing EPS (one in 12 patients at risk). The odds ratio of developing EPS with a PD exposure of >2 to 4 yr versus ≤2 yr is 10.4 (2.2 to 49.4) and for >4 yr versus >3 to 4 yr exposure is 3.2 (1.2 to 8.6). The cumulative risk of developing EPS after starting PD is shown in Figure 1.
Cumulative risk function of developing EPS according to days since first PD exposure between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2007.
Incidence rates of EPS related to total duration of PD exposure (not necessarily continuous)
Comparison with Previous Studies
To allow comparison, in Table 2 (last column) we present our data using the same calculation of EPS rate as previous studies (number of EPS cases/incident and prevalent PD patients during study period).
Comparison of previous and current epidemiological studies of EPS
Dialysis History and Timing of Diagnosis
There is a significant association between duration of PD and EPS (P < 0.001). The median PD duration before EPS diagnosis (not necessarily continuous) was 5.1 yr (range 1.1 to 12.2, IQR 3.4 to 6.1 yr). For 1219 patients unaffected by EPS, the median PD duration was 1.3 yr (range 1 d to 7.9 yr, IQR 0.6 to 2.5 yr) while for Group B the median PD duration was 3.6 yr (range 1.1 to 6.1, IQR 2.9 to 4.9 yr) (see Figure 2). Twenty-eight (61%) had used automated peritoneal dialysis.
(A) PD Duration: Non-EPS cohort first exposed to PD after January 1, 2000 (n = 1219). (B) PD Duration: EPS cases first exposed to PD after January 1, 2000 (n = 19).
Twenty-two (50%) cases had been transplanted before EPS diagnosis and in six the transplant was still functioning. The transplant patients received calcineurin inhibitor-based (cyclosporine or tacrolimus) immunosuppression. At diagnosis 12 of 46 (26%) were on PD, 33 of 46 (72%) were diagnosed within 2 yr and 29 of 46 (63%) within a year of stopping PD. Fourteen (30%) were diagnosed within 3 mo of peritonitis, and in 11 (24%) this episode was severe enough to merit PD catheter removal.
Demographics
There is no significant association with age or sex and EPS. Twenty-five (54%) were male, 43 (94%) Caucasian and median age at diagnosis was 50 yr (range 23 to 82, IQR 42 to 61 yr). The primary renal diagnoses are listed in Table 3.
Underlying cause of renal failure of the EPS cases and incident PD population 2000-2007 (GN = glomerulonephritis)
Clinical Presentation
The most common features are shown in Table 4. All patients had at least one of these three symptoms: abdominal pain, vomiting and abdominal distension (with ascites or with bowel obstruction). Forty-two cases (91%) had diagnostic imaging (Table 4) and 29 (63%) had a laparotomy or laparoscopy.
Main clinical features and radiological abnormalities found in the 46 cases of EPS diagnosed in Scotland 2000-2007
Possible Risk Factors
Four patients had no history of peritonitis. For Group A, the median number of peritonitis episodes was three (range 0 to 20, IQR 1 to 4.5 episodes), equating to one episode every 20 mo PD, and for Group B, one episode every 17 mo. The rate in all PD patients in Scotland between 2000 and 2007 was one episode every 20 mo. The differences in these rates were NS (Relative Risk = 1.18, 95% confidence interval 0.9 to 1.57).
In Group A, 16 (35%) had documented episodes of Staphylococcus aureus peritonitis (1 MRSA), 5 (11%) fungal peritonitis and 1 (2%) Pseudomonas peritonitis. The two patients who developed EPS despite under 18 mo PD had one peritonitis episode each, caused by coagulase negative Staphylococci in both cases.
Thirty patients (65%) had used high-strength dextrose (3.86%) and 45 (98%) had used Extraneal. No patients were treated solely with “bio-compatible” dialysate. Various brands of dextrose-based dialysate were used by the EPS cases. The last total creatinine clearance result measured within 6 mo of stopping PD for EPS cases and the Scottish PD population is shown in Table 5. Compared with the remainder of the Scottish PD population, a significantly larger proportion of EPS cases had stopped PD because of ultrafiltration failure or inadequate dialysis (Table 6).
Total creatinine clearance (renal and PD clearance combined) for EPS cases within 6 mo before stopping PD compared to Scottish PD patients’ achieved clearance from Scottish Renal Registry data 2000-2007
Reasons for stopping PD in the EPS cases and the Scottish PD population from Scottish Renal Registry data 2000-2007
Thirty-one cases (67%) were prescribed β-blockers. We have ACE-inhibitor and angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) prescription details for two units: 11 of 18 (61%) were not prescribed either drug while on PD, 4 (22%) were prescribed an ACE or ARB for the duration of PD and 3 were prescribed one or other for <50% of PD. We had access to complete radiology records for 34 cases; 6 (18%) had an MRI scan before EPS diagnosis.
Treatment
Table 7 details the drugs prescribed to treat the EPS cases. Only three patients had elective surgical intervention. It was beyond the scope of this retrospective study to assess response to treatment, particularly with respect to mortality.
Immunosuppressive drug therapy prescribed to EPS cases
Survival
By the study end, on December 31, 2007, 26 of the patients with EPS (57%) had died. The mortality rate was 42% one year after diagnosis. The median survival from diagnosis was 180 d (range 1 to 1075, IQR 61–408 d).
Discussion
Incidence and Cumulative Risk of EPS
The aim of this study was to report the incidence and establish the risk of EPS for patients starting PD in Scotland. Our data support previous reports, with 98% of our cases (45 of 46) developing EPS either on PD or within 2 yr of stopping PD (3–7). More of our cohort may still develop EPS; therefore, we report the minimum risk of developing EPS when treated with PD in Scotland.
Previous studies suggest that PD duration should not exceed 5 yr, to try to avoid EPS (6,7). However, by 5 yr of PD, 22 of 46 (48%) of our cases had developed EPS. Our figures suggest that if PD is continued beyond 4 yr, at least 8.1% will develop EPS. Previous studies reported rates at 4 yr PD exposure of 5% (Australia) and <1% (Japan) (3,4). We do not know whether the rates in our study represent an increase in the incidence and/or clinical awareness of EPS, or if it reflects differences in study design. This makes direct comparison with other studies difficult. To allow a crude comparison of the EPS rate, we used the same methodology as in previous studies (Table 2), which suggests the overall rate in Scotland is comparable to recent UK and Japanese studies (3,7). Given the higher incidence of EPS with shorter PD duration in our and Rigby's series from Australia compared with Japanese studies, future prospective studies should investigate the differences between our countries’ practice: namely population characteristics, PD prescription/technique and peritonitis details.
Patients should be informed of risks associated with treatments. Two questions need to be answered: 1) Should we continue PD for patients established on treatment (i.e., what is the risk of EPS if a patient continues on PD treatment having survived on PD for a given time period)? and 2) should we start a patient on PD given the risk of EPS (i.e., what is the overall risk of developing EPS for a patient before starting PD)?
With respect to the first question, our incidence data allows more accurate quantification of the risk of developing EPS for patients already on PD (Table 1). After 1 yr of PD, the EPS risk is almost 0, but after 4 yr it is at least one in 12. The risk must be interpreted in context; for a patient awaiting cadaveric transplantation after several years of PD, the risk of EPS may be considered to be too great to remain on PD, whereas the same risk may be acceptable for an elderly patient with no option of transplantation.
The second question is more difficult to answer. When a patient starts PD, it is not known how long he or she will continue PD, or how long the patient will survive. Although the risk of EPS is significant beyond 4 yr, the chance of a patient remaining on PD for 4 yr is small, and so the overall risk of EPS is small. The cumulative risk calculates the percentage of patients who have developed EPS by year of follow-up after starting PD, regardless of whether they remained on PD or not (Figure 1). This allows quantification of the predicted risk of developing EPS.
Diagnosis
The main presenting symptoms were abdominal pain, vomiting and/or abdominal distension. In the early case series (1980 to1994), 92% of patients had bowel obstruction at some point (4). Only 26% of our cases had evidence of bowel obstruction, which is comparable with Summers’ study (22%) (7). These data suggest we are diagnosing EPS earlier than in historical studies.
There appear to be two presentations of EPS. An “acute” presentation following severe peritonitis, with rapid development of clinical features (observed in 24%), would correspond with Japanese data where 25% of cases appeared to be triggered by peritonitis (3). Other cases followed a “subacute” course, with grumbling symptoms. We believe EPS develops as a result of peritoneal irritation, which may come in a variety or combination of forms. If the insult is intense, the fibrotic process may be more aggressive and the clinical course more acute. If the insult is less intense, but recurrent or persistent, the fibrosis and clinical course may be more insidious.
Risk Factors
Previous studies suggest that PD peritonitis may predispose to EPS, particularly if caused by Staphylococcus aureus, fungi and/or Pseudomonas (6,30). The peritonitis rates and causative organisms in our EPS cases were comparable to concurrent rates in the Scottish PD population.
All except one case had used Extraneal dialysate, and the majority required treatment with high-strength dextrose dialysis fluid (30 of 46). It is difficult to untangle whether this reflects ultrafiltration failure in the early stages of EPS, or whether these fluids somehow promote EPS. Unfortunately, consecutive peritoneal equilibration test results were not available to help determine the relationship of ultrafiltration failure to use of these products. Despite speculation that Extraneal could contribute to the pathogenesis of EPS, the data published are inconclusive (31,32).
Although initial reports implicated β-blockers in the pathogenesis of EPS, recent data, including our own, do not support this theory in relation to β-blockers currently used (4,33). ACE-inhibitor and/or ARB drugs may delay peritoneal fibrosis but some of our EPS cases were treated with these drugs (34,35). Gadolinium contrast is linked to the development of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis, but as only six cases had an MRI scan, it is unlikely that gadolinium causes EPS (36,37).
Treatment
There are no randomized, controlled trials to guide EPS treatment. Case-series suggest that immunosuppression (prednisolone, azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil) posttransplant or as specific therapy can help (3,7,16–21). Interest has focused on tamoxifen, which has fibrinolytic properties, and encouraging results have been observed (22–26). In Scotland, treatment was inconsistent but tamoxifen was prescribed most often. There is evidence that calcineurin inhibitors may promote peritoneal fibrosis, which may help explain why patients can develop EPS despite immunosuppression following renal transplantation (38).
Surgery (enterolysis) is associated with variable outcomes and high mortality rates (3,9–15). However, with experienced surgeons, Japan reports impressive results and improved survival using corticosteroids and surgery (11–13,39). The rarity of EPS in Europe makes it difficult for surgeons to develop sufficient expertise unless surgical treatment is centralized to a specialist center.
Survival
Patient survival on PD is poor even without EPS; the mortality rate for our cohort was 34% by the study end (Figure 3). Patients usually continue PD for several years before EPS develops. Therefore patients who develop EPS are likely to have been among the fitter PD patients and may be expected to live longer than the average PD patient had they not developed EPS. The survival plot illustrates this whereby the survival lines initially diverge and the EPS patients have a better survival rate until 4 yr when the survival curves converge, then cross. The key observation is the high mortality of 42% at 1 yr after EPS diagnosis.
Kaplan-Meier survival plots of patients from start of PD for EPS cases (n = 19) and unaffected cohort (n = 1219).
In our case series, EPS was listed as a contributing cause of death in only 14 of 25 cases (56%) despite definite premorbid diagnosis. It will be difficult to monitor EPS if it is under-recorded in official statistics.
Limitations
Our study was retrospective until June 2006 and prospective from July 1, 2006, to December 31, 2007. If cases have been missed, the incidence we report is an underestimate. To minimize this we performed a search of the national diagnostic records system but found no additional cases.
Conclusion
Large, prospective, multinational studies are required to address the clinical problems created by a possible rising incidence of EPS. Using our data as a guide, the risk of EPS for patients treated with PD in Scotland is near zero after 1 yr of PD, but the minimum risk after 4 yr of PD is one in 12. However, the cumulative risk is modest at 2.6% by 5 yr, reflecting the reality that few patients continue PD beyond 4 yr. The incidence reported in this study may be used to inform patients of the minimum risk of developing EPS after starting PD.
Disclosures
None.
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank the nurses, doctors and administrative staff of all the individual renal centers for their assistance in identifying the cases of EPS and providing their clinical records. Thanks also to the Scottish Renal Registry staff.
These data have been presented orally at the UK Renal Association meeting in Glasgow, UK, May 13 through 16, 2008 and as a poster at the American Society of Nephrology meeting in Philadelphia, PA, November 4 through 9, 2008.
Footnotes
Published online ahead of print. Publication date available at www.cjasn.org.
- Received February 20, 2009.
- Accepted May 7, 2009.
- Copyright © 2009 by the American Society of Nephrology
References
In this issue
Jump to section
More in this TOC Section
Cited By...
- Early Detection of Imminent Encapsulating Peritoneal Sclerosis: Free Water Transport, Selected Effluent Proteins, or Both?
- Length of Time on Peritoneal Dialysis and Encapsulating Peritoneal Sclerosis -- Position Paper for ISPD: 2017 Update
- Absence of Post-Transplantation Encapsulating Peritoneal Sclerosis after Relatively Short Exposure to Peritoneal Dialysis: Prospective Analysis Using Repeated Abdominal CT Scanning
- Symptom Management of the Patient with CKD: The Role of Dialysis
- The Current State of Peritoneal Dialysis
- Higher Dialysate Matrix Metalloproteinase-2 Levels Are Associated with Peritoneal Membrane Dysfunction
- Interstitial Fibrosis Restricts Osmotic Water Transport in Encapsulating Peritoneal Sclerosis
- Genetic Polymorphisms and Peritoneal Membrane Function
- Encapsulating Peritoneal Sclerosis in the Era of a Multi-Disciplinary Approach Based on Biocompatible Solutions: the NEXT-PD Study
- Living with Encapsulating Peritoneal Sclerosis (EPS): The Patient's Perspective
- Can EPS Development Be Avoided with Early Interventions? The Potential Role of Tamoxifen--A Single-Center Study
- Is There an End in Sight for Encapsulating Peritoneal Sclerosis?
- Dialysate Cytokine Levels Do Not Predict Encapsulating Peritoneal Sclerosis
- Gadolinium Deposits Could Influence the Course of Encapsulating Peritoneal Sclerosis
- American Society of Nephrology Quiz and Questionnaire 2012: Renal Replacement Therapy
- Towards Standardized Reporting in Studies of Encapsulating Peritoneal Sclerosis
- Phenotypes of Encapsulating Peritoneal Sclerosis--Macroscopic Appearance, Histologic Findings, and Outcome
- Persistent Sterile Peritoneal Inflammation After Catheter Removal for Refractory Bacterial Peritonitis Predicts Full-Blown Encapsulating Peritoneal Sclerosis
- Old and New Perspectives on Peritoneal Dialysis in Italy Emerging from the Peritoneal Dialysis Study Group Census
- Canadian Society of Nephrology Guidelines/Recommendations on Peritoneal Dialysis Adequacy 2011--Response to Comments by Liakopoulos et al.
- FLUID FLOW STRESS AFFECTS PERITONEAL CELL KINETICS: POSSIBLE PATHOGENESIS OF PERITONEAL FIBROSIS
- RISK FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH ENCAPSULATING PERITONEAL SCLEROSIS IN DUTCH EPS STUDY
- DIFFERENCE IN THE EXPRESSION OF HORMONE RECEPTORS AND FIBROTIC MARKERS IN THE HUMAN PERITONEUM--IMPLICATIONS FOR THERAPEUTIC TARGETS TO PREVENT ENCAPSULATING PERITONEAL SCLEROSIS
- A COLLABORATIVE APPROACH TO UNDERSTANDING EPS: THE EUROPEAN PERSPECTIVE
- IS ENCAPSULATING PERITONEAL SCLEROSIS RARE IN NORTH AMERICA?
- INCIDENCE OF ENCAPSULATING PERITONEAL SCLEROSIS: A SINGLE-CENTER EXPERIENCE WITH LONG-TERM PERITONEAL DIALYSIS IN THE UNITED STATES
- EXPLORING THE ASSOCIATION BETWEEN ICODEXTRIN AND ENCAPSULATING PERITONEAL SCLEROSIS
- Back to the Future: Changes in the Dialysis Delivery Model in the UK
- LENGTH OF TIME ON PERITONEAL DIALYSIS AND ENCAPSULATING PERITONEAL SCLEROSIS: POSITION PAPER FOR ISPD