Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Podcasts
    • Subject Collections
    • Archives
    • Kidney Week Abstracts
    • Saved Searches
  • Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Resources
  • Trainees
    • Peer Review Program
    • Prize Competition
  • About CJASN
    • About CJASN
    • Editorial Team
    • CJASN Impact
    • CJASN Recognitions
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
    • Reprint Information
    • Subscriptions
  • ASN Kidney News
  • Other
    • ASN Publications
    • JASN
    • Kidney360
    • Kidney News Online
    • American Society of Nephrology

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
American Society of Nephrology
  • Other
    • ASN Publications
    • JASN
    • Kidney360
    • Kidney News Online
    • American Society of Nephrology
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Advertisement
American Society of Nephrology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Podcasts
    • Subject Collections
    • Archives
    • Kidney Week Abstracts
    • Saved Searches
  • Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Resources
  • Trainees
    • Peer Review Program
    • Prize Competition
  • About CJASN
    • About CJASN
    • Editorial Team
    • CJASN Impact
    • CJASN Recognitions
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
    • Reprint Information
    • Subscriptions
  • ASN Kidney News
  • Visit ASN on Facebook
  • Follow CJASN on Twitter
  • CJASN RSS
  • Community Forum
Editorials
You have accessRestricted Access

Hepcidin Assays: Ironing Out Some Details

Jolanta Malyszko
CJASN June 2009, 4 (6) 1015-1016; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2215/CJN.02690409
Jolanta Malyszko
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • View PDF
Loading

Iron is the fourth most common element in the earth's crust and the most abundant transition metal in the human body. It is an essential element required for growth and survival. Maintaining the correct iron balance is crucial for health. All living organisms evolved sophisticated mechanisms to maintain appropriate iron levels in their cells and within their body. It was shown recently that the kidney is also involved in iron metabolism. Our understanding of the molecular control of iron metabolism has increased dramatically in the past 5 yr as a result of the discovery of hepcidin. This is a circulating antimicrobial peptide that is synthesized mainly in the liver, which was recently proposed as a factor that regulates the uptake of dietary iron and its mobilization from macrophages and hepatic stores.

The major circulating bioactive forms of hepcidin consist only of the carboxy-terminal portion (peptides of 25, 22, and 20 amino acids) (1). The exact location of the final prohormone processing is unknown. Propeptide convertases could be located in the blood or in the cell membrane of capillaries. Still no reliable information is available on normal serum levels of mature hepcidin (20, 22, and 25 amino acids); however, 60–amino acid prohepcidin is easily detectable in serum. Hepcidin-25, the major form of mature hepcidin, is cleaved from prohepcidin by convertases. Hepcidin-20 and hepcidin-22 may be directly generated from prohepcidin by convertases or indirectly by degradation of hepcidin-25. Hepcidin-25 and hepcidin-20 are a major form of hepcidin in urine, whereas hepcidin-22 is a minor one (2). The same may be true for serum. The nuclear magnetic resonance structure studies indicated that hepcidin-20 exists as a monomer, whereas hepcidin-25 readily aggregates (1).

Hepcidin-25 was initially identified in human blood using a mass spectrometric assay (3). Then Park et al. (2) isolated urinary hepcidin-25 and hepcidin-20 using cation exchange chromatography and reverse-phase HPLC. There is no consensus on the best assay method for hepcidin, and assays for hepcidin detection and quantification in serum or urine have not been generally available. The detection and quantification of hepcidin in plasma and serum have been hampered by technical difficulties (small size of hepcidin; limited availability of the antigen; isolation of hepcidin from urine involves complex, time-consuming procedures). Moreover, its conservation among animal species complicates the elicitation of an immune response in host species. Urinary hepcidin assays seem to be preferable for studies on iron metabolism because serum hepcidin levels are below the detection limit of the currently used methods. This might be due to a rapid clearance of free serum hepcidin by its binding to ferroportin and its subsequent cellular internalization (4); however, reliable information still is not available on normal serum levels of mature hepcidin (20, 22, and 25 amino acids). The urinary hepcidin excretion could be due either to physiologic incomplete reabsorption (overflow) or to impaired tubular reabsorption during chronic inflammation. Further research has now complicated the scenario. Ganz et al. (5) successfully developed an assay for detection and quantification of urinary hepcidin, but this assay seems to be available only in their laboratory. A method for assay of urinary hepcidin-25 by surface-enhanced laser desorption/ionization time of flight mass spectrometry was reported (6); however, measurement of urinary hepcidin is impossible in patients who have anuria and undergo dialysis. To tackle and overcome the technical problems of hepcidin determination in patients who are on dialysis, Tomosugi et al. (7) used a technology, the surface-enhanced laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (SELDI-TOF MS), to detect serum hepcidin in renal failure. Other serum hepcidin assays that exploited liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS [8]) or isotope dilution micro-HPLC–tandem MS (9) were reported; however, the use of non–hepcidin-related peptides as internal standard may affect the accuracy and reproducibility of the hepcidin concentration measurements. Li et al. (10) developed an LC-MS/MS method to quantify hepcidin in human serum using chemically synthesized hepcidin as a standard and stable isotope-labeled hepcidin as internal standard. Rabbit serum was used as a surrogate matrix for standards because of the presence of endogenous hepcidin in human serum. The method was validated to Food and Drug Administration criteria for bioanalytical assays. As shown by Swinkels et al. (11), there was almost 10-fold difference between lower limit of detection in SELDI (in study by Swinkels et al. [11]) and immunodot (study by Nemeth et al. [4]) in urinary hepcidin. The same difference was found between the assay by Ganz et al. (12) and the assay by Ashby et al. (13). In the studies by Ganz et al. (12) and Zaritsky et al. (14) reported in this issue of CJASN (using the same ELISA), the difference between detection limit was 10-fold, with 0.5 ng/ml in the study by Ashby et al. (13) and 5 ng/ml in the assay developed by Ganz et al. (12). Values of hepcidin in both studies varied the normal range for healthy volunteers was 2 to 55 ng/ml (fifth through 95th percentiles) versus 29 to 254 ng/ml for male patients and 18 to 288 ng/ml for female patients. In patients with CKD, hepcidin levels ranged from 3.1 to 153.0 with a median of 26.5 ng/ml; in patients on dialysis, hepcidin levels ranged from 27.6 to 158.0 ng/ml with median of 58.5 ng/ml; whereas in the study by Zaritsky et al. (14), in adults with CKD, median hepcidin was 269.9 ng/ml, in 26 pediatric patients who were on dialysis, it was 652.4 ng/ml, and in healthy volunteers, it was 72.9 ng/ml. Both assays are immunoassays. Ganz et al. (12) performed the assay by using a functional biotinylated synthetic peptide (hepcidin analog) as a tracer (Intrinsic LifeSciences, La Jolla, CA) and another one for the construction of the standard curve (Bachem, King of Prussia, PA), whereas Ashby et al. (13) used synthetic hepcidin-25 (Bachem, UK) conjugated to Keyhole limpet hemocyjanin. Binding was assessed by competition with I125-labeled hepcidin-25, separated by secondary antibody. This assay is linear up to 200 ng/ml, whereas Ganz et al. (12) claimed that their assay can detect hepcidin within a range of 5 to 4000 ng/ml. It would be nice to know the hepcidin levels for samples obtained from Girelli (who contributed to both studies of Ganz et al. and Swinkels et al., which yielded different magnitude of results) using both methods ELISA and TOF MS. Of interest is that correlation between ELISA values and MS in the recently published study by Koliaraki et al. (15) was only modest (r = 0.863, P = 0.027) in samples obtained from six patients. They described also an immunoassay for serum hepcidin quantification, this time based on a recombinant hepcidin peptide (hepcidin25-His) and a polyclonal antibody (confirmed by Western blot). According to Koliaraki et al. (15), the analytical detection limit of their ELISA assay defined as the concentration corresponding to the mean signal ±3 SD of 10 replicates of the zero calibrator was 5.4 μg/L, similar to the assay of Ganz et al. (12). This assay is capable of measuring serum hepcidin within the range of 10 to 1500 μg/L, which is between both assays of Ganz et al. (12) and Ashby et al. (13).

Enormous progress has been achieved in the field of hepcidin measurement; however, as suggested by Pietrangelo and Trautwein (16), “the reliability of methods must be proved (or disproved) by studies designed specifically for this purpose, and that validation requires that the assay (whether it uses blood or urine) can be transferred to and reproduced in different laboratories.”

Disclosures

None.

Footnotes

  • Published online ahead of print. Publication date available at www.cjasn.org.

  • See related article, “Hepcidin—A Potential Novel Biomarker of Iron Status in Chronic Kidney Disease,” on pages 1051–1056.

  • Copyright © 2009 by the American Society of Nephrology

References

  1. ↵
    Hunter HN, Fulton DB, Ganz T, Vogel HJ: The solution structure of human hepcidin, a peptide-hormone with antimicrobial activity that is involved in iron uptake and hereditary hemochromatosis. J Biol Chem277 :37597– 37603,2002
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    Park CH, Valore EV, Waring AJ, Ganz T: Hepcidin, a urinary antimicrobial peptide synthesized in the liver. J Biol Chem276 :7806– 7810,2001
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    Krause A, Neitz S, Magert HJ, Schyltz A, Forssmann WG, Schulz-Knappe P, Adermann L: LEAP-1, a novel highly disulfide-bonded human peptide exhibits antimicrobial activity. FEBS Lett480 :147– 150,2000
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    Nemeth E, Tuttle MS, Powelson J, Vaughn MB, Donovan A, Ward DM, Ganz T, Kaplan J: Hepcidin regulates cellular iron efflux by binding to ferroportin and inducing its internalization. Science306 :2090– 2093,2004
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    Ganz T: Hepcidin, a key regulator of iron metabolism and mediator of anemia of inflammation. Blood102 :783– 788,2003
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    Kemna E, Tjalsma H, Laarakkers C, Nemeth E, Willems H, Swinkels D: Novel urine hepcidin assay by mass spectrometry. Blood106 :3268– 3270,2005
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    Tomosugi N, Kawabata H, Wakatabe R, Higuchi M, Yamaya H, Umehara H, Ishikawa I: Detection of serum hepcidin in renal failure and inflammation by using ProteinChip System. Blood108 :1381– 1387,2006
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    Murphy AT, Witcher DR, Luan P, Wroblewski VJ: Quantitation of hepcidin from human and mouse serum using liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. Blood110 :1048– 1054,2007
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    Kobold U, Dulffer T, Dangl M, Escherich A, Kubbies M, Röddiger R, Wright JA: Quantification of hepcidin-25 in human serum by isotope dilution micro-HPLC-tandem mass spectrometry. Clin Chem54 :1584– 1586,2008
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    Li H, Rose MJ, Tran L, Zhang J, Miranda LP, James CA, Sasu BJ: Development of a method for the sensitive and quantitative determination of hepcidin in human serum using LC-MS/MS. J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods Feb 28,2009 [epub ahead of print]
  11. ↵
    Swinkels DW, Girelli D, Laarakkers C, Kroot J, Campostrini N, Kemna EH, Tjalsma H: Advances in quantitative hepcidin measurements by time-of-flight mass spectrometry. PLoS ONE3 :e2706 ,2008
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    Ganz T, Olbina G, Girelli D, Nemeth E, Westerman M: Immunoassay for human serum hepcidin. Blood112 :4292– 4297,2008
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    Ashby DR, Gale DP, Busbridge M, Murphy KG, Duncan ND, Cairns TD, Taube DH, Bloom SR, Tam FW, Chapman RS, Maxwell PH, Choi P: Plasma hepcidin levels are elevated but responsive to erythropoietin therapy in renal disease. Kidney Int75 :976– 981,2009
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    Zaritsky J, Young B, Wang HJ, Westerman M, Olbina G, Nemeth E, Ganz T, Rivera S, Nissenson AR, Salusky IB: Hepcidin—A potential novel biomarker of iron status in chronic kidney disease. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol4 :1051– 1056,2009
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. ↵
    Koliaraki V, Marinou M, Vassilakopoulos TP, Vavourakis E, Tsochatzis E, Pangalis GA, Papatheodoridis G, Stamoulakatou A, Swinkels DW, Papanikolaou G, Mamalaki A: A novel immunological assay for hepcidin quantification in human serum. PLoS ONE4 :e4581 ,2009
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    Pietrangelo A, Trautwein C: Mechanisms of disease: The role of hepcidin in iron homeostasis—Implications for hemochromatosis and other disorders. Nat Clin Pract Gastrol Hepatol1 :39– 45,2004
    OpenUrl
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
Vol. 4, Issue 6
June 2009
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
View Selected Citations (0)
Print
Download PDF
Sign up for Alerts
Email Article
Thank you for your help in sharing the high-quality science in CJASN.
Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Hepcidin Assays: Ironing Out Some Details
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Society of Nephrology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Society of Nephrology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Hepcidin Assays: Ironing Out Some Details
Jolanta Malyszko
CJASN Jun 2009, 4 (6) 1015-1016; DOI: 10.2215/CJN.02690409

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Hepcidin Assays: Ironing Out Some Details
Jolanta Malyszko
CJASN Jun 2009, 4 (6) 1015-1016; DOI: 10.2215/CJN.02690409
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Disclosures
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • View PDF

More in this TOC Section

  • Transplant Nephrology
  • APOL1 Kidney Risk Variants and Acute Kidney Injury in Those with COVID-19
  • Telehealth and Kidney Disease Care
Show more Editorials

Cited By...

  • Iron Biology, Immunology, Aging, and Obesity: Four Fields Connected by the Small Peptide Hormone Hepcidin
  • Google Scholar

Similar Articles

Related Articles

  • Hepcidin—A Potential Novel Biomarker for Iron Status in Chronic Kidney Disease
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Articles

  • Current Issue
  • Early Access
  • Subject Collections
  • Article Archive
  • ASN Meeting Abstracts

Information for Authors

  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Trainee of the Year
  • Author Resources
  • ASN Journal Policies
  • Reuse/Reprint Policy

About

  • CJASN
  • ASN
  • ASN Journals
  • ASN Kidney News

Journal Information

  • About CJASN
  • CJASN Email Alerts
  • CJASN Key Impact Information
  • CJASN Podcasts
  • CJASN RSS Feeds
  • Editorial Board

More Information

  • Advertise
  • ASN Podcasts
  • ASN Publications
  • Become an ASN Member
  • Feedback
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Subscribe to ASN Journals
  • Wolters Kluwer Partnership

© 2022 American Society of Nephrology

Print ISSN - 1555-9041 Online ISSN - 1555-905X

Powered by HighWire