Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Podcasts
    • Subject Collections
    • Archives
    • ASN Meeting Abstracts
    • Saved Searches
  • Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Resources
    • Reprint Information
  • Trainees
    • Peer Review Program
    • Prize Competition
  • About CJASN
    • About CJASN
    • Editorial Team
    • CJASN Impact
    • CJASN Recognitions
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Advertising
    • Reprint Information
    • Subscriptions
    • Feedback
  • ASN Kidney News
  • Other
    • JASN
    • Kidney360
    • Kidney News Online
    • American Society of Nephrology

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
American Society of Nephrology
  • Other
    • JASN
    • Kidney360
    • Kidney News Online
    • American Society of Nephrology
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Advertisement
American Society of Nephrology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Podcasts
    • Subject Collections
    • Archives
    • ASN Meeting Abstracts
    • Saved Searches
  • Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Resources
    • Reprint Information
  • Trainees
    • Peer Review Program
    • Prize Competition
  • About CJASN
    • About CJASN
    • Editorial Team
    • CJASN Impact
    • CJASN Recognitions
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Advertising
    • Reprint Information
    • Subscriptions
    • Feedback
  • ASN Kidney News
  • Visit ASN on Facebook
  • Follow CJASN on Twitter
  • CJASN RSS
  • Community Forum
Dialysis
You have accessRestricted Access

Utility of the “Surprise” Question to Identify Dialysis Patients with High Mortality

Alvin H. Moss, Jesse Ganjoo, Sanjay Sharma, Julie Gansor, Sharon Senft, Barbara Weaner, Cheryl Dalton, Karen MacKay, Beth Pellegrino, Priya Anantharaman and Rebecca Schmidt
CJASN September 2008, 3 (5) 1379-1384; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2215/CJN.00940208
Alvin H. Moss
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jesse Ganjoo
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sanjay Sharma
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Julie Gansor
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sharon Senft
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Barbara Weaner
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Cheryl Dalton
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Karen MacKay
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Beth Pellegrino
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Priya Anantharaman
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rebecca Schmidt
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data Supps
  • Info & Metrics
  • View PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background and objectives: Dialysis patients are increasingly characterized by older age, multiple comorbidities, and shortened life expectancy. This study investigated whether the “surprise” question, “Would I be surprised if this patient died in the next year?” identifies patients who are at high risk for early mortality.

Design, setting, participants, & measurements: This prospective cohort study of 147 patients in three hemodialysis dialysis units classified patients into “yes” and “no” groups on the basis of the “surprise” question response and tracked patient status (alive or dead) at 12 mo. Demographics, Charlson Comorbidity Index score, and Karnofsky Performance Status score were measured.

Results: Initially, 34 (23%) patients were classified in the “no” group. Compared with the 113 patients in the “yes” group, the patients in the “no” group were older (72.5 ± 12.8 versus 64.5 ± 14.9), had a higher comorbidity score (7.1 ± 2.3 versus 5.8 ± 2.1), and had a lower performance status score (69.7 ± 17.1 versus 81.6 ± 15.8). At 12 mo, 22 (15%) patients had died; the mortality rate for the “no” group was 29.4% and for the “yes” group was 10.6%. The odds of dying within 1 yr for the patients in the “no” group were 3.5 times higher than for patients in the “yes” group, (odds ratio 3.507, 95% CI 1.356 to 9.067, P = 0.01).

Conclusions: The “surprise” question is effective in identifying sicker dialysis patients who have a high risk for early mortality and should receive priority for palliative care interventions.

  • Received February 25, 2008.
  • Accepted June 4, 2008.
  • Copyright © 2008 by the American Society of Nephrology
View Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
Vol. 3, Issue 5
September 2008
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
View Selected Citations (0)
Print
Download PDF
Sign up for Alerts
Email Article
Thank you for your help in sharing the high-quality science in CJASN.
Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Utility of the “Surprise” Question to Identify Dialysis Patients with High Mortality
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Society of Nephrology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Society of Nephrology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Utility of the “Surprise” Question to Identify Dialysis Patients with High Mortality
Alvin H. Moss, Jesse Ganjoo, Sanjay Sharma, Julie Gansor, Sharon Senft, Barbara Weaner, Cheryl Dalton, Karen MacKay, Beth Pellegrino, Priya Anantharaman, Rebecca Schmidt
CJASN Sep 2008, 3 (5) 1379-1384; DOI: 10.2215/CJN.00940208

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Utility of the “Surprise” Question to Identify Dialysis Patients with High Mortality
Alvin H. Moss, Jesse Ganjoo, Sanjay Sharma, Julie Gansor, Sharon Senft, Barbara Weaner, Cheryl Dalton, Karen MacKay, Beth Pellegrino, Priya Anantharaman, Rebecca Schmidt
CJASN Sep 2008, 3 (5) 1379-1384; DOI: 10.2215/CJN.00940208
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusions
    • Disclosures
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data Supps
  • Info & Metrics
  • View PDF

More in this TOC Section

  • Defining Left Ventricular Hypertrophy in Children on Peritoneal Dialysis
  • Cardiac Geometry in Children Receiving Chronic Peritoneal Dialysis: Findings from the International Pediatric Peritoneal Dialysis Network (IPPN) Registry
  • Geographic and Educational Factors and Risk of the First Peritonitis Episode in Brazilian Peritoneal Dialysis Study (BRAZPD) Patients
Show more Dialysis

Cited By...

  • Early palliative care: the surprise question and the palliative care screening tool--better together
  • The Impact of Frailty on Technique Failure and Mortality in Patients on Home Dialysis
  • Staying the Course: Through End of Life in ESRD
  • Nephrology Provider Prognostic Perceptions and Care Delivered to Older Adults with Advanced Kidney Disease
  • Frailty Screening Tools for Elderly Patients Incident to Dialysis
  • Whats the prognosis, Doc?
  • Docteur, quel est le pronostic?
  • A Systematic Intervention To Improve Serious Illness Communication In Primary Care
  • Serious Illness Conversations in ESRD
  • The "surprise question" for predicting death in seriously ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
  • A qualitative study exploring use of the surprise question in the care of older people: perceptions of general practitioners and challenges for practice
  • Conservative Management and End-of-Life Care in an Australian Cohort with ESRD
  • We Need to Train the Trainers
  • Development of the Serious Illness Care Program: a randomised controlled trial of a palliative care communication intervention
  • How the ESRD Quality Incentive Program Could Potentially Improve Quality of Life for Patients on Dialysis
  • Predicting palliative care needs and mortality in end stage renal disease: use of an at-risk register
  • CKD in Elderly Patients Managed without Dialysis: Survival, Symptoms, and Quality of Life
  • A Palliative Approach to Dialysis Care: A Patient-Centered Transition to the End of Life
  • A Communication Framework for Dialysis Decision-Making for Frail Elderly Patients
  • Sex Differences and Attitudes toward Living Donor Kidney Transplantation among Urban Black Patients on Hemodialysis
  • Just ask: discussing goals of care with patients in hospital with serious illness
  • Prognosis and management of chronic kidney disease (CKD) at the end of life
  • Dying on Dialysis: The Case for a Dignified Withdrawal
  • Five Policies to Promote Palliative Care for Patients with ESRD
  • Re-envisioning Fistula First in a Patient-Centered Culture
  • Considerations in Starting a Patient with Advanced Frailty on Dialysis: Complex Biology Meets Challenging Ethics
  • Can the impact of an acute hospital end-of-life care tool on care and symptom burden be measured contemporaneously?
  • Communication Skills Training for Dialysis Decision-Making and End-of-Life Care in Nephrology
  • Predicting 12-Month Mortality for Peritoneal Dialysis Patients Using the "Surprise" Question
  • The Ethics of End-of-Life Care for Patients with ESRD
  • <<Devrais-je aller en dialyse, docteur?>>: Amorcer une dialyse avec un aine atteint d'insuffisance renale au stade ultime
  • "Should I go on dialysis, Doc?": Initiating dialysis in elderly patients with end-stage renal disease
  • Renal Replacement Therapy in the Elderly Population
  • Advance Care Planning in CKD/ESRD: An Evolving Process
  • Informing Our Elders About Dialysis: Is an Age-Attuned Approach Warranted?
  • End-of-Life Care Preferences and Needs: Perceptions of Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease
  • Predicting Six-Month Mortality for Patients Who Are on Maintenance Hemodialysis
  • Dialysis in Late Life: Benefit or Burden
  • Google Scholar

Similar Articles

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Articles

  • Current Issue
  • Early Access
  • Subject Collections
  • Article Archive
  • ASN Meeting Abstracts

Information for Authors

  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Trainee of the Year
  • Author Resources
  • ASN Journal Policies
  • Reuse/Reprint Policy

About

  • CJASN
  • ASN
  • ASN Journals
  • ASN Kidney News

Journal Information

  • About CJASN
  • CJASN Email Alerts
  • CJASN Key Impact Information
  • CJASN Podcasts
  • CJASN RSS Feeds
  • Editorial Board

More Information

  • Advertise
  • ASN Podcasts
  • ASN Publications
  • Become an ASN Member
  • Feedback
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Password/Email Address Changes
  • Subscribe

© 2021 American Society of Nephrology

Print ISSN - 1555-9041 Online ISSN - 1555-905X

Powered by HighWire