Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Podcasts
    • Subject Collections
    • Archives
    • ASN Meeting Abstracts
    • Saved Searches
  • Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Resources
    • Reprint Information
  • Trainees
    • Peer Review Program
    • Prize Competition
  • About CJASN
    • About CJASN
    • Editorial Team
    • CJASN Impact
    • CJASN Recognitions
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Advertising
    • Reprint Information
    • Subscriptions
    • Feedback
  • ASN Kidney News
  • Other
    • JASN
    • Kidney360
    • Kidney News Online
    • American Society of Nephrology

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
American Society of Nephrology
  • Other
    • JASN
    • Kidney360
    • Kidney News Online
    • American Society of Nephrology
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Advertisement
American Society of Nephrology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Podcasts
    • Subject Collections
    • Archives
    • ASN Meeting Abstracts
    • Saved Searches
  • Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Resources
    • Reprint Information
  • Trainees
    • Peer Review Program
    • Prize Competition
  • About CJASN
    • About CJASN
    • Editorial Team
    • CJASN Impact
    • CJASN Recognitions
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Advertising
    • Reprint Information
    • Subscriptions
    • Feedback
  • ASN Kidney News
  • Visit ASN on Facebook
  • Follow CJASN on Twitter
  • CJASN RSS
  • Community Forum
Moving Points in Nephrology
You have accessRestricted Access

Approaches to Testing New Treatments in Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease: Insights from the CRISP and HALT-PKD Studies

Arlene B. Chapman
CJASN July 2008, 3 (4) 1197-1204; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2215/CJN.00060108
Arlene B. Chapman
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data Supps
  • Info & Metrics
  • View PDF
Loading

This article has a correction. Please see:

  • Erratum - September 01, 2008

Abstract

Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) is an inherited systemic disease characterized by a prolonged subclinical course of gradual renal cyst expansion, resulting in massively enlarged kidneys and renal failure by the fifth to sixth decade. Renal cyst expansion results in intrarenal ischemia and activation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) and relates to the development and maintenance of hypertension in ADPKD. Hypertension relates to disease progression in ADPKD with regard to renal volume, proteinuria, cardiovascular complications, and progression to end-stage renal disease. Novel magnetic resonance imaging methods developed in the Consortium for Radiologic Imaging for the Study of Polycystic Kidney Disease (CRISP) provide accurate estimates of change in renal volume over a short period of time in ADPKD patients with intact renal function. In CRISP an increase in renal volume of 63.4 ml/yr was found. PKD1 status, male gender, hypertension, reduced renal blood flow, and proteinuria are associated with increased renal volume and change in renal volume over time. HALT-Polycystic Kidney Disease (HALT-PKD) is designed to test whether blockade of RAAS and/or rigorous blood pressure control play a role in slowing renal progression during early (using magnetic resonance imaging methods developed in CRISP) and during late (using measures, including composite of time to doubling of serum creatinine, onset of end-stage renal disease, or death) phases in ADPKD. Findings from CRISP and the rationale for interventions in ADPKD are described, and the design of the HALT-PKD clinical trial is outlined.

Recent significant advances have occurred in understanding the genetics and molecular pathogenesis of autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD). Complex pathways regulating the formation and development of cysts are being elucidated. Primary ciliary dysfunction plays a universal role in cystic disorders. New, molecularly targeted therapies are available and can be tested in ADPKD, offering hope for a cure or impact in this disorder.

To determine the efficacy and reliably translate new therapies in ADPKD, the Consortium for Radiologic Imaging Studies of Polycystic Kidney Disease study (CRISP) funded by the National Institutes of Health (National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases) was established to develop methods that reliably measure disease progression in ADPKD over a relatively short period of time. In tandem with the CRISP study, randomized clinical trials (RCTs) are now being performed in ADPKD using magnetic imaging methods developed in CRISP. Specifically, the HALT-PKD Network has been developed to assess the benefit of rigorous blood pressure (BP) control and maximal inhibition of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) on progressive renal disease and cardiovascular manifestations in ADPKD. This review will highlight the observations from CRISP and describe the rationale for and study design of the HALT-PKD Network.

Clinical Hallmarks and Pathogenesis of ADPKD

ADPKD is the most commonly inherited autosomal dominant renal disease, occurring in 1:400 to 1:1000 individuals accounting for approximately 2.5% of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) in the United States. ADPKD is a heterogeneous disorder resulting from mutations in at least two genes, PKD1 and PKD2. A total of 85% of affected families are linked to a mutation in the PKD1 gene located on the short arm of chromosome 16 (16p13.3 region). Mutations in the PKD2 gene located on the long arm of chromosome 4 (4q21.2 region), accounting for 15% of affected families (1). Polycystin 1 and 2 colocalize in the primary cilium and are required for membrane-based calcium channels to operate properly (2). Cilia create a transmembrane calcium current in the presence of stretch or luminal flow, leading to a signaling cascade and multiple intracellular events. These pathways are altered or inhibited when a mutation in PKD1 or PKD2 takes place. In the absence of PKD1 or PKD2 function, cystic epithelia dedifferentiate, losing planar polarity, increasing cell division (3) and apoptosis (4), and losing reabsorptive capacity. These events result in cyst growth and expansion, ultimately resulting in enlarged kidneys and progressive renal injury.

ADPKD is a systemic disease resulting in liver, pancreas, thyroid, subarachnoid, and seminal vesicle cysts in addition to inguinal hernias. The vascular phenotype of ADPKD includes intracranial aneurysms, early-onset hypertension with early reductions in renal blood flow, mitral valve prolapsed, and abnormalities in biventricular function. However, the clinical hallmark of ADPKD is gradual and massive cystic enlargement of the kidneys, ultimately resulting in renal failure (5).

Epidemiology of ADPKD: Difficulty with Evaluating Potential Therapeutic Agents

In ADPKD, gradual cyst expansion results in renal enlargement and ultimate progression to renal failure with a mean age of onset of 59 yr (6). Although ADPKD children are usually asymptomatic, elevated BP, increased left ventricular mass, and hernias are common and are associated with cyst number and kidney size. Importantly, glomerular hyperfiltration is a common finding in ADPKD children, suggesting that there is a significant amount of compensatory glomerular hyperfiltration that occurs in association with cyst expansion and probable nephron loss. The average age of diagnosis of ADPKD is 27 yr and hypertension is 31 yr, before loss of renal function (7,8). Once renal dysfunction occurs, a universal rapid decline in renal function (∼5.9 ml/min per yr) occurs (Figure 1). Importantly, almost all RCTs in ADPKD have been performed at this late stage in ADPKD and fail to demonstrate benefit.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Renal survival curve in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease. These demonstrate a long duration of intact renal function before loss of renal function or entry into ESRD.

Food and Drug Administration-acceptable outcome measures of progressive renal disease include frequency or time to ESRD, doubling of serum creatinine, or death. Other outcome measures are less favorably accepted and include change in rate of loss of renal function (serum creatinine, reciprocal of serum creatinine, or glomerular filtration rate [GFR]), change in proteinuria, or protocol biopsy. Regardless, all of these outcome measures are ineffective with little or no role in ADPKD given the long presymptomatic phase and late age of onset of renal dysfunction in this disorder.

CRISP

The CRISP consortium, funded by National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, was developed to establish reliable measures of disease progression early in ADPKD (9). CRISP is an ongoing prospective observational study with 3 yr of annual cyst and kidney growth measurements available in 243 ADPKD patients with relatively intact initial renal function. Magnetic resonance imaging done annually initially included gadolinium enhancement. In total, there were 972 exposures in 726 patient-years and no reported cases of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis (10). Subsequent studies proposed in the current continuation (CRISP II) do not include gadolinium infusions. Significant findings from CRISP are summarized in Table 1.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Highlights of the observations obtained from the CRISP study program

The CRISP cohort demonstrated significant progression of renal cyst growth and renal enlargement before loss of kidney function (7,11). CRISP participants initially demonstrated age-associated increases in renal and cyst volumes. Hypertensive individuals demonstrated significantly greater renal and cyst volumes compared with their normotensive counterparts and PKD1 individuals demonstrated significantly greater renal and cyst volumes than PKD2 individuals. CRISP subjects most often demonstrated renal volumes in excess of 1000 ml, with normal being 150 ml. Renal volume associated inversely with iothalamate clearance (GFR) and correlated with urinary protein excretion, both significant predictors of poor renal outcome in ADPKD. Liver cystic volume was measured and liver cystic disease was highly prevalent (>85% of CRISP participants) (12). Women were more often affected than men, particularly early (<25 yr of age); however, in those >35 yr of age, >95% of the entire CRISP cohort demonstrated liver cysts.

Renal growth occurred in almost all CRISP participants with a mean rate of increase of 5.3% (−5.3, −17%) or 63.4 ml/yr (11). Changes in total renal and cyst volumes were similar (204 ± 246 versus 218 ± 263 ml), indicating that cyst expansion accounts for the increased renal volume estimates found in ADPKD. Younger individuals with larger kidneys (>1500 ml, <30 yr) demonstrated the greatest growth rates (12.7%/yr). Overall, change in total renal volume was associated reciprocally with change in GFR. In participants with kidneys >1500 ml, GFR declined (−4.3 ml/min per yr). In a subset of 131 CRISP participants, quantitative renal blood flow measures were obtained during magnetic resonance imaging studies (13). A significant inverse relationship was found between renal volume and renal blood flow and reduction in renal blood flow significantly correlated with increases in renal volume, before loss of GFR. Importantly, when accounting for age, gender, hypertension status, renal volume, and renal blood flow, age and renal blood flow were the most significant predictors of loss of renal function. These finding suggest that vascular change associated with cyst expansion and alterations in renal vascularization are a central problem related to loss of renal function in ADPKD.

Using denaturing high performance liquid chromatography, direct sequencing, and large deletion detection methodologies, mutations in PKD1 or PKD2 were found in 89.1% of tested CRISP individuals (14,15). Overall, 15% were PKD2 and 85% PKD1, consistent with other reported ADPKD populations. The spectrum of mutations included frameshift (31.1%), nonsense (26.1%), missense (24.4%), splicing (12.2%), or in-frame deletions or insertion (6.1%) mutations. Previously reported mutations were found in 30% of families in the CRISP cohort.

In general, PKD2 is a less severe form of polycystic kidney disease than PKD1 with a later age of onset of ESRD and hypertension (1,7,16). Less severe disease was also found in PKD2 CRISP participants. PKD2 subjects demonstrated significantly smaller renal volumes compared with PKD1 subjects. However, the rate of renal growth was similar between PKD1 (5.7%/yr) and PKD2 (5.0%/yr) (P = not significant). When cyst numbers in PKD2 and PKD1 individual renal images were determined, fewer cysts were found in PKD2 individuals (11.3 versus 22.1 cysts/image, P < 0.01) (15). These findings indicate, therefore, that cystogenesis rather than the rate of cyst expansion accounts for the differences in renal volume observed between PKD genotypes.

A large variation in the rate of renal-volume evolution is evident in the CRISP cohort. Gender, hypertension status, and genotype play major roles in the variation seen. Mathematical modeling using CRISP renal volumes and demographic data demonstrate a curvilinear or exponential renal growth curve. By estimating the relative contributions of cyst number, age of cyst appearance, and rate of cyst growth to overall cyst burden and renal volume in CRISP, our understanding of cyst kinetics in ADPKD is now expanded. If one assumes an initial cyst size <2 mm (0.0042 ml), given all originate from a parent nephron, varying degrees of cyst burden at birth (500 versus 2000 cysts) and varying rates of cyst growth (5% to 25%), while using the established CRISP renal volume measures, improved understanding of cyst kinetics in ADPKD are obtained (17). Cyst growth rates of at least 20% to 25%/yr are required to reach the magnitude of renal volume observed in the CRISP cohort. If late initiation of renal cysts predominate (i.e., age >20 yr), little subsequent total renal growth over the next 20 yr occurs with renal volume estimates significantly less than those observed in CRISP. These data suggest that early cystogenesis is required in ADPKD, accompanied by a moderate rate of cyst expansion as opposed to continued cystogenesis throughout adulthood. By this analysis, new cyst formation in adulthood has little or no impact on increases in renal volume in ADPKD.

Testing Therapeutics in ADPKD: The Rationale for the HALT-PKD Clinical Trial

Cardiovascular disease is a major cause of mortality in ADPKD. Hypertension contributes to the development of cardiovascular disease and is a significant predictor of renal progression in ADPKD (18). At the mean age of 44 yr, 48% of hypertensive ADPKD adults have left ventricular hypertrophy (19). More than 70% of ADPKD subjects initiating dialysis have left ventricular hypertrophy (20). Microalbuminuria and proteinuria correlate with progression of renal disease in ADPKD (7,21) and are amenable to inhibition of the RAAS.

Hypertension occurs early and before loss of renal function, and clinical data support evidence for activation of RAAS in patients with ADPKD. Activation of the RAAS has been found in normotensive and hypertensive ADPKD subjects. As cysts enlarge, they compress the renal vasculature and attenuate the renal vessels causing intrarenal ischemia and activation of the RAAS (19,22,23) The RAAS contributes to hypertension in ADPKD but may also independently accelerate renal cyst growth. Renin is synthesized by the tubular epithelium in individuals with ADPKD and is found in increased quantities in juxtaglomerular apparatus and the afferent arterioles (22). Renal volume, significantly associated with cyst growth and enlargement, as seen in CRISP, is increased in hypertensive adults and children compared with their normotensive counterparts before loss of renal function (8,24,25). Increased circulating levels of plasma renin activity and aldosterone are present in hypertensive ADPKD patients with normal renal function compared with well-matched essential hypertensive individuals (23). Importantly, short-term therapy with angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) in hypertensive ADPKD individuals is associated with a relative improvement in renal blood flow compared with essential hypertensives.

These data suggest that drugs that block the RAAS (renin inhibitors, ACEIs, angiotensin receptor blockers [ARBs], or aldosterone antagonists) should play a reno-protective role in ADPKD. However, definitive information on the potential role of complete blockade of the RAAS to prevent progression of renal dysfunction in ADPKD is lacking. Maschio et al. have performed the only prospective randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled study to assess the benefits of ACEI on renal progression in nondiabetic kidney diseases (26). This study included 64 ADPKD individuals with mean creatinine clearance of 42 ml/min followed over 3 yr (26). A doubling of serum creatinine concentration occurred with equal frequency in the ACEI ramapril (27%) and the placebo group (26%). In the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) study, which was designed to assess the role of dietary protein and phosphorous intake and level of BP control on renal disease progression, 221 of 840 subjects had ADPKD (27). Overall, there was no significant reduction in GFR decline in those treated with either the low-protein diet or low BP, and ACEIs were used in approximately 40%. In a 7-yr prospective trial of 72 ADPKD patients assessing both level of BP control and class of antihypertensive agent used, no advantage of the ACEI enalapril versus the calcium channel blocker amlodipine was found in reducing the rate of decline of estimated GFR (19). Proteinuria and left ventricular hypertrophy were significantly reduced in the enalapril-treated group. In addition, albumin creatinine ratios were higher in the amlodipine group versus the enalapril group (148 ± 74 versus 14 ± 6) after 5 yr of intervention.

Although a definitive study to demonstrate efficacy of ACEIs on renal progression in ADPKD is not available, there is a wealth of evidence that ACEI is of benefit in slowing renal progression in nondiabetic kidney disease. Clinical practice guidelines from the National Kidney Foundation and the Joint National Committee on Prevention Detection Evaluation and Treatment of High BP call for ACEI as the first line agent for treatment of hypertension in patients with chronic kidney disease (28–30). In addition, ACEIs or ARBs have renoprotective effects (antiproteinuric) in the progression of diabetic and nondiabetic renal disease independent of antihypertensive effects (26,31–35).

A recent meta-analysis from 11 randomized clinical trials in nondiabetic kidney disease, including 145 ADPKD individuals, reported a 25% (but nonsignificant) relative risk reduction in the composite endpoint of ESRD, doubling of serum creatinine in individuals on ACEI versus other antihypertensive agents (36,37). These findings were from secondary analyses, performed in relatively small numbers of subjects with limited follow-up. Therefore, a rigorous clinical trial, adequately powered to assess the effect of ACEI on renal progression in ADPKD, has not been performed.

As in other renal diseases, complete blockade of the RAAS using ACEI does not occur in ADPKD. Angiotensin II (ANGII) contributes to the decreased renal plasma flow and increased systemic vascular resistance found in hypertensive ADPKD subjects (38,39). In addition, normalization of renal blood flow in hypertensive ADPKD individuals with ACEIs is not complete (23,40). Systemic ANGII levels do not suppress with chronic ACEIs in ADPKD, and systemic and renal hemodynamic responses to intravenous angiotensin I (ANGI) and ANGII persist in the presence of ACEIs (38,39).

Other non–ACE-dependent mechanisms for renal activation of the RAAS may exist in ADPKD. ANGII activity through chymase pathways has been demonstrated in polycystic kidneys (41). If one considers use of ACEIs in the setting of other inhibitors of the RAAS, the sustained benefit from increased bradykinin activity related to ACEIs and decreased ANGII at the tissue level through combination therapies is possible.

Addition of ARBs to ACEIs helps to prevent the escape phenomenon from ACEIs and reduces action of ANGII produced independent of the ACE pathway (Figure 2). Combination of ACEI and ARB also allows for the potential activation of the vasodilatory ANGII type 2 receptor while preventing the detrimental effects of ANGIV.

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

The cascade of the renin-angiotensin aldosterone system with respect to administration of angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blocking agents. Note increased activation of the AT2 and the Non-AT1/NonAT2 pathways with administration of angiotensin receptor blockers.

ARB therapy prevents action of ANGII in the systemic and renal circulations by binding with ANGII 1a receptors. However, ANGII levels also increase with chronic ARB therapy in ADPKD; systemic and renal hemodynamic responses to intravenous ANGII administration are not completely suppressed in the presence of ARB, and tissue penetration of ARB differs across local tissue beds (38,39). Given that ANGII level and action are important in regulating BP and renal plasma flow and appears to promote cyst growth in ADPKD, combination therapy with ACEIs and ARBs to maximally block ANG II production and action may be warranted.

To date, <20 good-quality studies involving 654 subjects with chronic renal insufficiency, either crossover or parallel designed, are available to determine the efficacy of combined ACEI and ARB therapy in proteinuric renal diseases (42–48). In general, the combination of an ACEI with ARB reduces BP by −4/3 mmHg compared ACEI or ARB administered as monotherapy. In many of these studies, BP is lower in drug combination groups, making it difficult to establish benefits due to drug combination or to differences in BP obtained. The COOPERATE trial (43) in 263 patients over 2.9 yr in nondiabetic patients with proteinuric renal disease using fixed doses for ACEIs and ARBs together demonstrated long-term renoprotection compared with either agent alone. Combined ACEI/ARB therapy reduced proteinuria by 30% compared with ACEIs and by 29% compared with ARBs. Doubling of serum creatinine or ESRD was reached by 11% of subjects receiving combination therapy compared with 23% on monotherapy with an ACEI or ARB alone (hazard ratio = 0.38 to 0.4 for combination versus ACEI or ARB, respectively). In another study, fosinopril or irbesartan therapy showed a reduction in proteinuria of 35%, whereas combination therapy reduced proteinuria by 60% versus placebo (44).

HALT-PKD: Study Design and Organization

The HALT-PKD study is the first prospective clinical interventional study sponsored by the National Institutes of Health (National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases) for adults with ADPKD. The hypothesis will be tested that intensive blockade of the RAAS with combination ACEIs and ARBs will delay the progression of renal disease independent of BP control in participants compared with ACEI monotherapy alone. In addition, the hypothesis will be tested that rigorous versus moderate BP control will be more effective in slowing progression of renal disease in early ADPKD.

HALT-PKD involves seven clinical centers and a Data Coordinating Center with plans to recruit 1020 subjects between January 2006 and December 2008. HALT-PKD is a prospective RCT designed to determine the independent effects of renin-angiotensin system blockade using both ACEIs and ARBs as well as BP lowering on renal disease progression in early study A (GFR, >60 ml/min; n = 548) and more advanced renal disease study B (GFR, 25 to 60 ml/min; n = 472). The ACEI lisinopril is prescribed for all patients in HALT (both study A and B). It is not known whether the addition of an ARB, telmisartan, will provide renal or cardiovascular protection in ADPKD patients. Thus, patients in both study A and study B will be randomized to lisinopril plus placebo versus lisinopril plus telmisartan. In study A, hypertensive and borderline hypertensive (>130/80 mmHg) ADPKD subjects 15 to 50 yr of age are randomized in a 2 × 2 factorial design to lisinopril (ACEI) and placebo versus ACEI and telmisartan (ARB) and two levels of BP control: standard (120 to 130/70 to 80 mmHg) versus rigorous goal (95 to 110/65 to 75 mmHg). Study A uses a primary structural endpoint, change in total kidney volume over 4 yr by MRI, as developed in CRISP and will be the first study to assess kidney volume change as a primary endpoint in a RCT. Secondary outcomes in study A include the rate of change in estimated GFR using the 4-point Modification of Diet in Renal Disease equation (49), change in renal blood flow and left ventricular mass using magnetic resonance imaging, change in albuminuria, and PKD-related symptoms.

In study B, hypertensive and borderline hypertensive ADPKD subjects 18 to 65 yr of age with GFR 25 to 60 ml/min are randomized to ACEI and placebo versus ACEI and ARB therapy with a single BP goal of 110 to 130/<80 mmHg. The primary outcome is time to the composite endpoints of doubling of serum creatinine, ESRD, or death.

The HALT-PKD trial will provide important information related to disease progression in ADPKD given the large number of subjects to be studied and the design of the trial.

With the completion of the HALT study, we will establish the relative benefits of BP control and inhibition of the RAAS in both early and late stages of ADPKD, which will guide clinicians regarding best practices for ADPKD patients. Data from the HALT-PKD study will establish treatment standards and provide the necessary information to allow for the design of specific molecularly targeted therapies in ADPKD. Given the number of novel measures to be performed in this RCT, valuable structural information regarding cardiac and renal outcomes in ADPKD will guide future interventions when considering other inhibitors of the RAAS in ADPKD, including renin inhibitors and aldosterone receptor antagonists.

Disclosures

None.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the CRISP and HALT investigators, coordinators, and data coordinating center staff for their dedication to the completion of both CRISP and HALT studies as well as Debora Clem, Mary Virginia Gaines, Gigi Flynn, and Robin Woltman for their tireless organization and communication throughout the conduct of these studies.

Footnotes

  • Published online ahead of print. Publication date available at www.cjasn.org.

  • Copyright © 2008 by the American Society of Nephrology

References

  1. ↵
    Churchill DN, Bear JC, Morgan J, Payne RH, McManamon PJ, Gault MH: Prognosis of adult onset polycystic kidney disease re-evaluated. Kidney Int26 :190– 193,1984
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    Weimbs T: Regulation of mTOR by polycystin-1: is polycystic kidney disease a case of futile repair? Cell Cycle5 :2425– 2429,2006
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    Park JY, Schutzer WE, Lindsley JN, Bagby SP, Oyama TT, Anderson S, Weiss RH: p21 is decreased in polycystic kidney disease and leads to increased epithelial cell cycle progression: roscovitine augments p21 levels. BMC Nephrol8 :12 ,2007
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    Woo D: Apoptosis and loss of renal tissue in polycystic kidney disease. N Engl J Med333 :18– 25,1995
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    Gabow PA: Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease. N Engl J Med329 :332– 342,1993
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    Gabow PA, Johnson AM, Kaehny WD, Kimberling WJ, Lezotte DC, Duley IT, Jones RH: Factors affecting the progression of renal disease in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease. Kidney Int41 :1311– 1319,1992
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    Chapman AB, Guay-Woodford L, Grantham JJ, Torres VE, Bae KT, Baumgarten DA, Kenney PJ, King BF, Glockner J, Wetzel L, Brummer M, O’Neill WC, Robbin M, Bennett WM, Klahr S, Hirschman G, Kimmel P, Thompson PA, Miller P: Renal structure in early autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease: the Consortium for Radiologic Imaging Studies of Polycystic Kidney Disease (CRISP) Cohort. Kidney Int64 :1035– 1045,2003
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    Gabow PA, Chapman AB, Johnson AM, Tangel DJ, Duley IT, Kaehny WD, Manco-Johnson M, Schrier RW: Renal structure and hypertension in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease. Kidney Int38 :1177– 1180,1990
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    Bae KT, Commean PK, Lee J: Volumetric measurement of renal cysts and parenchyma using MRI: phantoms and patients with polycystic kidney disease. J Comput Assisted Tomogr24 :614– 619,2000
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    Chapman AB, Grantham JJ, Torres VE, Guay-Woodford LM, Braun W, Rahbari-Oskoui F, Kelleher C, Schrier RW, Perrone R, Steinman TI, Miskulin D, Meyers CM, Bost JE, Miller JP, Bae KT: Absence of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis (NSF) following gadolinium exposure in ADPKD individuals with stable CKD. J Am Soc Nephrol18 :837A ,2007
    OpenUrl
  11. ↵
    Grantham JJ, Torres VE, Chapman AB, Guay-Woodford LM, Bae KT, King BF Jr, Wetzel LH, Baumgarten DA, Kenney PJ, Harris PC, Klahr S, Bennett WM, Hirschman GN, Meyers CM, Zhang X, Zhu F, Miller JP: Volume progression in polycystic kidney disease. N Engl J Med354 :2122– 2130,2006
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    Bae KT, Zhu F, Chapman AB, Torres VE, Grantham JJ, Guay-Woodford LM, Baumgarten DA, King BF Jr, Wetzel LH, Kenney PJ, Brummer ME, Bennett WM, Klahr S, Meyers CM, Zhang X, Thompson PA, Miller JP: Magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of hepatic cysts in early autosomal-dominant polycystic kidney disease: the Consortium for Radiologic Imaging Studies of Polycystic Kidney Disease cohort. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol1 :64– 69,2006
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    Torres VE, King BF, Chapman AB, Brummer ME, Bae KT, Glockner JF, Arya K, Risk D, Felmlee JP, Grantham JJ, Guay-Woodford LM, Bennett WM, Klahr S, Meyers CM, Zhang X, Thompson PA, Miller JP: Magnetic resonance measurements of renal blood flow and disease progression in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol2 :112– 120,2007
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    Rossetti S, Chauveau D, Walker D, Saggar-Malik A, Winearls CG, Torres VE, Harris PC: A complete mutation screen of the ADPKD genes by DHPLC. Kidney Int61 :1588– 1599,2002
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    Harris PC, Bae KT, Rossetti S, Torres VE, Grantham JJ, Chapman AB, Guay-Woodford LM, King BF, Wetzel LH, Baumgarten DA, Kenney PJ, Consugar M, Klahr S, Bennett WM, Meyers CM, Zhang QJ, Thompson PA, Zhu F, Miller JP: Cyst number but not the rate of cystic growth is associated with the mutated gene in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease. J Am Soc Nephrol17 :3013– 3019,2006
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. ↵
    Parfrey PS, Bear JC, Morgan J, Cramer BC, McManamon PJ, Gault MH, Churchill DN, Singh M, Hewitt R, Somlo S, et al.: The diagnosis and prognosis of autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease. N Engl J Med323 :1085– 1090,1990
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    Grantham JJ, Cook LT, Torres VE, Bost JE, Chapman AB, Harris PC, Guay-Woodford LM, Bae KT: Determinants of renal volume in autosomal-dominant polycystic kidney disease. Kidney Int73 :108– 116,2008
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    Perrone RD, Ruthazer R, Terrin NC: Survival after end-stage renal disease in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease: contribution of extrarenal complications to mortality. Am J Kidney Dis38 :777– 784,2001
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    Ecder T, Chapman AB, Brosnahan GM, Edelstein CL, Johnson AM, Schrier RW: Effect of antihypertensive therapy on renal function and urinary albumin excretion in hypertensive patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease. Am J Kidney Dis35 :427– 432,2000
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    Levin A, Singer J, Thompson CR, Ross H, Lewis M: Prevalent left ventricular hypertrophy in the predialysis population: identifying opportunities for intervention. Am J Kidney Dis27 :347– 354,1996
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    Chapman AB, Johnson AM, Gabow PA, Schrier RW: Overt proteinuria and microalbuminuria in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease. J Am Soc Nephrol5 :1349– 1354,1994
    OpenUrlAbstract
  22. ↵
    Graham PC, Lindop GBM: The anatomy of the renin-secreting cell in adult polycystic kidney disease. Kidney Int33 :1084– 1090,1988
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    Chapman AB, Johnson A, Gabow PA, Schrier RW: The renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system and autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease. N Engl J Med323 :1091– 1096,1990
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    Fick-Brosnahan GM, Belz MM, McFann KK, Johnson AM, Schrier RW: Relationship between renal volume growth and renal function in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease: a longitudinal study. Am J Kidney Dis39 :1127– 1134,2002
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    Fick-Brosnahan GM, Tran ZV, Johnson AM, Strain JD, Gabow PA: Progression of autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease in children. Kidney Int5 :1654– 1662,2001
    OpenUrl
  26. ↵
    Maschio G, Alberti D, Janin G, Locatelli F, Mann JF, Motolese M, Ponticelli C, Ritz E, Zucchelli P: Effect of the angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor benazepril on the progression of chronic renal insufficiency: the Angiotensin-Converting-Enzyme Inhibition in Progressive Renal Insufficiency Study Group. N Engl J Med334 :939– 945,1996
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. ↵
    Klahr S, Breyer JA, Beck GJ, Dennis VW, Hartman JA, Roth D, Steinman TI, Wang SR, Yamamoto ME: Dietary protein restriction, blood pressure control, and the progression of polycystic kidney disease: Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study Group. J Am Soc Nephrol5 :2037– 2047,1995
    OpenUrlAbstract
  28. ↵
    National Kidney Foundation: K/DOQI clinical practice guidelines for chronic kidney disease: evaluation, classification, and stratification. Am J Kidney Dis39[ Suppl]:S1– S266,2002
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. National Kidney Foundation: K/DOQI clinical practice guidelines on hypertension and antihypertensive agents in chronic kidney disease. Am J Kidney Dis43[ Suppl]:S1– S290,2004
    OpenUrlPubMed
  30. ↵
    Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR, Cushman WC, Green LA, Izzo JL Jr, Jones DW, Materson BJ, Oparil S, Wright JT Jr, Roccella EJ: The Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure: the JNC 7 report. JAMA289 :2560– 2572,2003
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. ↵
    Lewis EJ, Hunsicker LG, Bain RP, Rohde RD: The effect of angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibition on diabetic nephropathy: the Collaborative Study Group. N Engl J Med329 :1456– 1462,1993
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. Ihle BU, Whitworth JA, Shahinfar S, Cnaan A, Kincaid-Smith PS, Becker GJ: Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition in nondiabetic progressive renal insufficiency: a controlled double-blind trial. Am J Kidney Dis27 :489– 495,1996
    OpenUrlPubMed
  33. Kamper AL, Holstein-Rathlou NH, Leyssac PP, Strandgaard S: The influence of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition on renal tubular function in progressive chronic nephropathy. Am J Kidney Dis28 :822– 831,1996
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. Fernandez-Andrade C, Russo D, Iversen B, Zucchelli P, Aranda P, Guerra L, Casado S: Comparison of losartan and amlodipine in renally impaired hypertensive patients. Kidney Int Suppl68[ Suppl]:S120– S124,1998
    OpenUrlPubMed
  35. ↵
    Russo D, Pisani A, Balletta M, De Nicola L, Savino F, Andreucci M, Minutolo R: Additive antiproteinuric effect of converting enzyme inhibitor and losartan in normotensive patients with IgA nephropathy. Am J Kidney Dis33 :851– 856,1999
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. ↵
    Jafar TH, Schmid CH, Landa M, Giatras I, Toto R, Remuzzi G, Maschio G, Brenner BM, Kamper A, Zucchelli P, Becker G, Himmelmann A, Bannister K, Landais P, Shahinfar S, de Jong PE, de Zeeuw D, Lau J, Levey AS: Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and progression of nondiabetic renal disease: a meta-analysis of patient-level data. Ann Intern Med135 :73– 87,2001
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. ↵
    Jafar T, Strandgaard S, Kamper A, Maschio G, Becker G, Landa M, Schmid CH, Levey A: Effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors on the progression of polycystic kidney disease. J Am Soc Nephrol11 :392A ,2000
    OpenUrl
  38. ↵
    Stepniakowski KT, Gerron GG, Chapman AB: Basal systemic, adrenal, and renal responses to angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (Enalapril (En) 20 mg), angiotensin receptor blocker (Losartan (Los) 50 mg) vs combination therapy in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (PKD). J Am Soc Nephrol13 :508A ,2002
    OpenUrl
  39. ↵
    Stepniakowski KT, Gerron GG, Chapman AB: Dissociation between systemic, adrenal, and renal response to angiotensin converting enzyme inhibition (Enalapril (En) 20 mg/day), angiotensin receptor blocker (Losartan (Los) 50 mg/day) vs combination therapy (En/Los) in subjects with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (PKD) during equimolar intravenous angiotensin I (Ang I) and angiotensin II (Ang II) infusion. J Am Soc Nephrol13 :507A ,2002
    OpenUrl
  40. ↵
    Barrett BJ, Foley R, Morgan J, Hefferton D, Parfrey P: Differences in hormonal and renal vascular responses between normotensive patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease and unaffected family members. Kidney Int46 :1118– 1123,1994
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  41. ↵
    McPherson EA, Luo Z, Brown RA, Lebard LS, Corless CC, Speth RC, Bagby SP: Chymase-like angiotensin II-generating activity in end-stage human autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease. J Am Soc Nephrol15 :493– 500,2004
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  42. ↵
    MacKinnon M, Shurraw S, Akbari A, Knoll GA, Jaffey J, Clark HD: Combination therapy with an angiotensin receptor blocker and an ACE inhibitor in proteinuric renal disease: a systematic review of the efficacy and safety data. Am J Kidney Dis48 :8– 20,2006
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  43. ↵
    Nakao N, Yoshimura A, Morita H, Takada M, Kayano T, Ideura T: Combination treatment of angiotensin-II receptor blocker and angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor in non-diabetic renal disease (COOPERATE): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet361 :117– 124,2003
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  44. ↵
    Strippoli GF, Craig M, Deeks JJ, Schena FP, Craig JC: Effects of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor antagonists on mortality and renal outcomes in diabetic nephropathy: systematic review. BMJ329 :828 ,2004
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  45. Doulton TW, He FJ, MacGregor GA: Systematic review of combined angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition and angiotensin receptor blockade in hypertension. Hypertension45 :880– 886,2005
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  46. Lacourciere Y, Belanger A, Godin C, Halle JP, Ross S, Wright N, Marion J: Long-term comparison of losartan and enalapril on kidney function in hypertensive type 2 diabetics with early nephropathy. Kidney Int58 :762– 769,2000
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  47. ↵
    Casas JP, Chua W, Loukogeorgakis S, Vallance P, Smeeth L, Hingorani AD, MacAllister RJ: Effect of inhibitors of the renin-angiotensin system and other antihypertensive drugs on renal outcomes: systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet366 :2026– 2033,2005
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  48. ↵
    Wolf G, Ritz E: Combination therapy with ACE inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers to halt progression of chronic renal disease: pathophysiology and indications. Kidney Int67 :799– 812,2005
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  49. ↵
    Levey AS, Bosch JP, Lewis JB, Greene T, Rogers N, Roth D: A more accurate method to estimate glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine: a new prediction equation. Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study Group. Ann Intern Med130 :461– 470,1999
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
Vol. 3, Issue 4
July 2008
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
View Selected Citations (0)
Print
Download PDF
Sign up for Alerts
Email Article
Thank you for your help in sharing the high-quality science in CJASN.
Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Approaches to Testing New Treatments in Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease: Insights from the CRISP and HALT-PKD Studies
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Society of Nephrology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Society of Nephrology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Approaches to Testing New Treatments in Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease: Insights from the CRISP and HALT-PKD Studies
Arlene B. Chapman
CJASN Jul 2008, 3 (4) 1197-1204; DOI: 10.2215/CJN.00060108

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Approaches to Testing New Treatments in Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease: Insights from the CRISP and HALT-PKD Studies
Arlene B. Chapman
CJASN Jul 2008, 3 (4) 1197-1204; DOI: 10.2215/CJN.00060108
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Clinical Hallmarks and Pathogenesis of ADPKD
    • Epidemiology of ADPKD: Difficulty with Evaluating Potential Therapeutic Agents
    • CRISP
    • Testing Therapeutics in ADPKD: The Rationale for the HALT-PKD Clinical Trial
    • HALT-PKD: Study Design and Organization
    • Disclosures
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data Supps
  • Info & Metrics
  • View PDF

More in this TOC Section

  • Recommended Clinical Trial End Points for Dialysis Catheters
  • Clinical Trial End Points for Hemodialysis Vascular Access
  • Definitions and End Points for Interventional Studies for Arteriovenous Dialysis Access
Show more Moving Points in Nephrology

Cited By...

  • 'A sword of Damocles: patient and caregiver beliefs, attitudes and perspectives on presymptomatic testing for autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease: a focus group study
  • Decreased polycystin 2 expression alters calcium-contraction coupling and changes {beta}-adrenergic signaling pathways
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Kidney and Cyst Volume in Children with ADPKD
  • Early Renal Abnormalities in Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease
  • Targeting Cyst Initiation in ADPKD
  • Introduction: New Insights, Treatments, and Management Strategies for ADPKD
  • Google Scholar

Similar Articles

Related Articles

  • Erratum
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Articles

  • Current Issue
  • Early Access
  • Subject Collections
  • Article Archive
  • ASN Meeting Abstracts

Information for Authors

  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Trainee of the Year
  • Author Resources
  • ASN Journal Policies
  • Reuse/Reprint Policy

About

  • CJASN
  • ASN
  • ASN Journals
  • ASN Kidney News

Journal Information

  • About CJASN
  • CJASN Email Alerts
  • CJASN Key Impact Information
  • CJASN Podcasts
  • CJASN RSS Feeds
  • Editorial Board

More Information

  • Advertise
  • ASN Podcasts
  • ASN Publications
  • Become an ASN Member
  • Feedback
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Password/Email Address Changes
  • Subscribe

© 2021 American Society of Nephrology

Print ISSN - 1555-9041 Online ISSN - 1555-905X

Powered by HighWire