Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Podcasts
    • Subject Collections
    • Archives
    • Kidney Week Abstracts
    • Saved Searches
  • Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Resources
  • Trainees
    • Peer Review Program
    • Prize Competition
  • About CJASN
    • About CJASN
    • Editorial Team
    • CJASN Impact
    • CJASN Recognitions
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
    • Reprint Information
    • Subscriptions
  • ASN Kidney News
  • Other
    • ASN Publications
    • JASN
    • Kidney360
    • Kidney News Online
    • American Society of Nephrology

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
American Society of Nephrology
  • Other
    • ASN Publications
    • JASN
    • Kidney360
    • Kidney News Online
    • American Society of Nephrology
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Advertisement
American Society of Nephrology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Podcasts
    • Subject Collections
    • Archives
    • Kidney Week Abstracts
    • Saved Searches
  • Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Resources
  • Trainees
    • Peer Review Program
    • Prize Competition
  • About CJASN
    • About CJASN
    • Editorial Team
    • CJASN Impact
    • CJASN Recognitions
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
    • Reprint Information
    • Subscriptions
  • ASN Kidney News
  • Visit ASN on Facebook
  • Follow CJASN on Twitter
  • CJASN RSS
  • Community Forum
Patient Voice
Open Access

Public Policy and Patient Choice of Dialysis Modality

Lori Hartwell
CJASN December 2019, 14 (12) 1677-1678; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2215/CJN.12151019
Lori Hartwell
Renal Support Network, Glendale, California
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • View PDF
Loading
  • public policy
  • peri
  • hemodialysis
  • humans
  • United States
  • Medicaid
  • nephrologists
  • kidney transplantation
  • motivation
  • dialysis
  • vulnerable populations
  • goals
  • quality of life
  • respite care
  • home hemodialysis
  • Medicare
  • renal insufficiency
  • renal dialysis
  • health care costs
  • fear
  • anxiety
  • abdomen
  • homeless persons
  • chronic renal insufficiency
  • quality of health care

This study evaluated the effect of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Prospective Payment System (PPS) on peritoneal dialysis (PD) utilization (1). I read this study with interest, because I truly believe that PD was a lifesaving treatment option for me, and I am always perplexed that the majority of people receiving dialysis in the United States choose hemodialysis.

During my childhood, I was on acetate hemodialysis and frequently had seizures; my BP was out of control, often running in the 200s. I was the first child to receive PD at my pediatric facility, and there were a lot of learning curves. Despite the obstacles of a brand new therapy, I regained some of the normalcies of teenage years, fluid management was better controlled, and my BP was normal through the next 9 years of my life. I did not have to rely on my tiny vascular system for an access for hemodialysis. My quality of life had improved. I only had to visit the doctor and nurse monthly. Limited visits helped me avoid being subjected to the sadness in a dialysis unit as well as illness and infection caught in medical settings.

When I was told that I had to return to hemodialysis due to my PD catheter needing to be changed, I said that I would rather die than do hemodialysis. The will to live is strong, and I eventually agreed to get an access. I was in my early twenties, I was distraught, and I did not want to give up my autonomy of care. Luckily, I was successfully transplanted soon after that ordeal.

I get angry when I hear that people who have kidney failure have not been given the option of PD. One of my younger peers was told by her doctor that she was not a candidate for PD. I insisted that she get a second opinion. After a few hematology mishaps, she found another doctor and ended up doing PD for several years until her successful kidney transplant. When I was in an outpatient setting receiving care, I told a grandmother who had just started dialysis about PD, and she knew immediately that she wanted to adopt that regimen so that she could travel and visit grandkids without a hassle.

When the CMS bundled payments for dialysis services to promote more PD, it was encouraging. I am not surprised that more people started, stayed on, and switched to PD or that there was an uptick in providers offering this treatment option after payment incentives proved favorable.

I am glad that the authors dug deep and found that there are additional barriers to patients being offered and succeeding at PD that are not payment driven (1). The study findings confirm my suspicion that doctors not trained in the PD treatment modality do not always offer patients all of their treatment options. There is a known shortage of nephrologists, and the lack of training for nephrologists in the care of PD is clearly still an issue.

I have heard from many of my peers that they were offered PD but that the doctor presented it in a negative manner as more likely to lead to infections, etc. The benefits of no needle sticks and a more liberal diet were not mentioned, and infections from hemodialysis happen as well.

I commend the authors for identifying inequities related to provider experience, patient education about modality types, lower reimbursement rates for Medicaid patients, and access to specialty care. I affirm their finding that “policies should be developed to support outreach and education on dialysis for underserved patients with known CKD … recognize CKD earlier among these patients and refer them to nephrologists before ESKD development” (1).

The following are barriers to PD that patients have expressed to me.

  • Home environment not sterile enough, big enough, or appropriate for maintenance or storing

    items

  • Anxiety and stress issues of dialysis process

  • No one to help—fear of doing it alone

  • Fear of serious medical incident

  • Physical issues, such as inability to lift medical equipment/bags

  • Weight gain/body image issues

  • Unstable health or cognitive issues

  • Homelessness or unstable home situation

  • Plan of care is to be transplanted, and catheter placed in abdomen is not a medical recommendation by transplant team

  • Feeling of isolation at home

An interesting question that the study raises is how does being on home dialysis affect a person’s ability to get a kidney transplant? I suspect that patients on home dialysis, because of their proactive involvement in their care regimen, are more likely to pursue a kidney transplant. If this turns out to be true, this would be an interesting statistic to share with patients.

In addition to increasing the number of patients on PD through payment reform, we must address the barriers listed above to incentivize patients. Are there incentives that can offset health care costs if the patient takes on their own care? Can there be payment for respite care if the patient gets tired, needs a break, gets sick, or needs assistance at home?

With the Executive Order of Advancements in Kidney Health signed by President Trump, another payment will be created to incentivize the kidney community to put people on home dialysis. The goal of 80% by 2025 is ambitious and may lead to people receiving PD even if it is not the best treatment option for them.

It is encouraging to know that Medicare’s PPS for dialysis is leading to greater use of a treatment that offers higher quality of life for many people who have kidney failure. Payment will always drive practice. Incentives and policies must lead to better provider training and support, patient education, quality of care, and selection of the best treatment option without bias.

Disclosures

Ms. Hartwell is the founder of the Renal Support Network.

Footnotes

  • Published online ahead of print. Publication date available at www.cjasn.org.

  • See related article, “Trends in Peritoneal Dialysis Use in the United States after Medicare Payment Reform,” on pages 1763–1772.

  • Copyright © 2019 by the American Society of Nephrology

References

  1. ↵
    1. Sloan CE,
    2. Coffman CJ,
    3. Sanders LL,
    4. Maciejewski ML,
    5. Lee SD,
    6. Hirth RA,
    7. Wang V
    : Trends in peritoneal dialysis use in the United States after Medicare payment reform. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 14: 1763–1772, 2019
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology: 14 (12)
Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
Vol. 14, Issue 12
December 06, 2019
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
View Selected Citations (0)
Print
Download PDF
Sign up for Alerts
Email Article
Thank you for your help in sharing the high-quality science in CJASN.
Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Public Policy and Patient Choice of Dialysis Modality
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Society of Nephrology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Society of Nephrology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Public Policy and Patient Choice of Dialysis Modality
Lori Hartwell
CJASN Dec 2019, 14 (12) 1677-1678; DOI: 10.2215/CJN.12151019

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Public Policy and Patient Choice of Dialysis Modality
Lori Hartwell
CJASN Dec 2019, 14 (12) 1677-1678; DOI: 10.2215/CJN.12151019
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Disclosures
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • View PDF

More in this TOC Section

  • Changing Health Disparities in Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease (ADPKD)
  • Medicare Bundled Payment Policy and Anemia Care
  • COVID-19 Vaccination for Patients Undergoing Long-Term Hemodialysis
Show more Patient Voice

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Similar Articles

Related Articles

  • Trends in Peritoneal Dialysis Use in the United States after Medicare Payment Reform
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Keywords

  • public policy
  • peri
  • hemodialysis
  • humans
  • United States
  • Medicaid
  • nephrologists
  • kidney transplantation
  • motivation
  • dialysis
  • Vulnerable Populations
  • goals
  • quality of life
  • respite care
  • home hemodialysis
  • Medicare
  • renal insufficiency
  • renal dialysis
  • Health Care Costs
  • fear
  • anxiety
  • abdomen
  • homeless persons
  • chronic renal insufficiency
  • quality of health care

Articles

  • Current Issue
  • Early Access
  • Subject Collections
  • Article Archive
  • ASN Meeting Abstracts

Information for Authors

  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Trainee of the Year
  • Author Resources
  • ASN Journal Policies
  • Reuse/Reprint Policy

About

  • CJASN
  • ASN
  • ASN Journals
  • ASN Kidney News

Journal Information

  • About CJASN
  • CJASN Email Alerts
  • CJASN Key Impact Information
  • CJASN Podcasts
  • CJASN RSS Feeds
  • Editorial Board

More Information

  • Advertise
  • ASN Podcasts
  • ASN Publications
  • Become an ASN Member
  • Feedback
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Password/Email Address Changes
  • Subscribe to ASN Journals
  • Wolters Kluwer Partnership

© 2022 American Society of Nephrology

Print ISSN - 1555-9041 Online ISSN - 1555-905X

Powered by HighWire