Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Podcasts
    • Subject Collections
    • Archives
    • ASN Meeting Abstracts
    • Saved Searches
  • Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Resources
    • Reprint Information
  • Trainees
    • Peer Review Program
    • Prize Competition
  • About CJASN
    • About CJASN
    • Editorial Team
    • CJASN Impact
    • CJASN Recognitions
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Advertising
    • Reprint Information
    • Subscriptions
    • Feedback
  • ASN Kidney News
  • Other
    • JASN
    • Kidney360
    • Kidney News Online
    • American Society of Nephrology

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
American Society of Nephrology
  • Other
    • JASN
    • Kidney360
    • Kidney News Online
    • American Society of Nephrology
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Advertisement
American Society of Nephrology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Podcasts
    • Subject Collections
    • Archives
    • ASN Meeting Abstracts
    • Saved Searches
  • Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Resources
    • Reprint Information
  • Trainees
    • Peer Review Program
    • Prize Competition
  • About CJASN
    • About CJASN
    • Editorial Team
    • CJASN Impact
    • CJASN Recognitions
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Advertising
    • Reprint Information
    • Subscriptions
    • Feedback
  • ASN Kidney News
  • Visit ASN on Facebook
  • Follow CJASN on Twitter
  • CJASN RSS
  • Community Forum
Editorials
You have accessRestricted Access

The Enigma of Blood Pressure Measurement in Children with CKD

Bonita Falkner
CJASN March 2018, 13 (3) 359-360; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2215/CJN.00110118
Bonita Falkner
Departments of 1Medicine and
2Pediatrics, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • View PDF
Loading
  • children
  • chronic kidney disease
  • blood pressure measurement
  • Child
  • Adult
  • Humans
  • Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory
  • blood pressure
  • White Coat Hypertension, Reference Values
  • Blood Pressure Determination
  • hypertension
  • Sleep
  • Wakefulness
  • Renal Insufficiency, Chronic

Ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) is now recognized as an effective methodology for evaluation of abnormal BP and is recommended as a procedure to confirm hypertension in adults (1). In children, reference values for hypertension (≥95th percentile) on the basis of normative ABPM data, according to age and height, are available (2) and guidelines for ABPM application in childhood have been established (3). The 2017 clinical practice guidelines (2017 CPG) for evaluation and management of hypertension in pediatric patients also recommend use of ABPM as a tool to confirm hypertension and to identify white coat hypertension (4). ABPM has been considered superior to clinic BP measurements because the BP monitoring provides multiple measurements over a 24-hour period outside of the clinic setting and includes measurements during awake and sleep periods. Moreover, it is recognized that clinic BP measurements, in children as well as adults, are commonly obtained in a nonstandardized manner and with different automated devices.

The clinical condition most commonly associated with hypertension in childhood is CKD, wherein over 50% of children have elevated BP including many children already receiving antihypertensive drug therapy (5,6). ABPM is now strongly recommended for management of children with CKD, especially to detect masked hypertension (3). In children with CKD, both hypertension and masked hypertension are associated with left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) (7). Thus, ABPM has been considered an effective tool to determine risk for LVH, and adverse outcome of CKD in children as well as adults. However, as demonstrated in a publication by Ku et al. (8) in this issue of the Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, it is not time to dismiss the value of clinic BP measurements in children with CKD.

These investigators conducted a study to determine whether clinic BP measurements are inferior to ABPM measurements as predictors of adverse outcomes in children with CKD. Data were analyzed from 513 participants in the CKD in Children (CKiD) study who had clinic BP measurements and ABPM performed during similar time frames. Predictors of interest were systolic BP taken at one visit or two repeated visits within a 1-year period compared with mean wake and sleep systolic ambulatory BP. The outcomes were LVH and ESKD. A c-statistic was used to determine the ability of each BP parameter to determine risk for the two outcomes. The rather surprising finding is that the c-statistic for clinic systolic BP was similar to the c-statistic for awake ambulatory BP in ability to predict LVH. In longitudinal analysis, on data over 3.5 years of follow-up, the c-statistic for the clinic systolic BP was also similar to the c-statistic for ambulatory awake systolic BP in predicting ESKD. Thus, according to the analysis of data on a large cohort of children with CKD followed longitudinally, clinic BP measurements were not inferior to ABPM in predicting two significant adverse outcomes of CKD in children.

The good news from this study is that clinic BP measurements continue to be very valuable in management of CKD in children. Despite the significant value of BP measurements obtained over 24 hours outside of the clinic setting, there are drawbacks with 24-hour ABPM. Some children have difficulty wearing the monitors and completing the full 24 hours of measurements, monitors are not always available when needed, parent or other adult time is required to return monitors to the clinic, monitors are expensive and reimbursement, if any, for the procedure is low. Thus, the finding that clinic BP measurements may be as effective as ABPM in ascertaining risk for a poor outcome could be a relief to clinicians when the monitors are not available, when patients are too young or small to wear the monitor, when monitoring is incomplete, or when the patient refuses to cooperate with the ABPM. However, the key point about the clinic BP measurements in this study is that they are obtained by a strict BP protocol. As described in the methods, the details of BP measurement, including measurement by auscultation, training and certification of personnel, position of the child, quiet rest before measurement, and repeated measurements were exactly the same in the multiple participating sites of the CKiD study. This level of uniformity and detail on measurement of BP in children would be needed to approach the c-statistic for LVH or ESKD found in the report by Ku et al. (8) The variations in BP measurement methods in the clinical setting are well known. Automated devices are commonly used, rest time is limited, and repeat measurements are not regularly obtained. Because BP reference data that define the 90th and 95th percentile are on the basis of auscultated BP measurements, the 2017 CPG states that confirmation of hypertension or elevated BP should be on the basis of BP measurement by auscultation. To encourage more accurate BP measurements in the clinical setting for all children and adolescents, the 2017 CPG guidelines also provide considerable detail on correct BP measurement methods (4). Although the 2017 CPG BP measurement methods are very similar, the methods in the report by Ku et al. (8) are more rigorous, with at least three auscultated measurements at each visit. Thus, applying the CKiD protocol for clinic BP measurement could be a plausible method to ascertain risk for adverse outcome in children with CKD when ABPM is not possible.

Although not the focus of the study, the report by Ku et al. (8) reveals findings on a major management issue for children with CKD, which is that of BP control. Since the 2004 Forth Report on hypertension in children and adolescents, the recommendation had been to treat hypertension and elevated BP in children with CKD to a BP level that is <90th percentile (9). A previous analysis on the prevalence of hypertension, on the basis of clinic BP, in the CKiD cohort reported 14% with systolic hypertension (5). In the report by Ku et al. (8), 11% of children with CKD had hypertension (BP≥95th percentile) by clinic systolic BP and 25% had systolic hypertension by ABPM. Thus, BP control in children with CKD is less than optimal even in pediatric nephrology centers. The importance of BP control in preserving kidney function in children with CKD has been demonstrated by the European Effect of Strict BP Control and ACE Inhibition on Progression of Chronic Renal Failure in Pediatric Patients (ESCAPE) study (10). ESCAPE is a randomized trial on children with CKD that compared intensive BP treatment with conventional treatment. The treatment target for intensive treatment was 24-hour mean ambulatory pressure <50th percentile using uptitration of an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor. The target for conventional treatment was mean ambulatory pressure from 50th to <95th percentile. During the 5-year study period, there was significantly lower progression to ESKD in the intensive treatment (29.9%) compared with conventional treatment (41.7%). On the basis of this strong evidence on children with CKD, the 2017 CPG now recommends treatment with an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker to a 24-hour mean ambulatory BP <50th percentile (4). At this point it is difficult to determine what clinic BP level would be equivalent to a 24-hour mean ambulatory BP at the 50th percentile, and ABPM will continue to be a critical tool in managing BP in children with CKD. Although achieving an optimal BP level in children with CKD remains a major challenge, clinic BP measurements remain a valuable tool when obtained using standardized measurement techniques.

Disclosures

None.

Footnotes

  • Published online ahead of print. Publication date available at www.cjasn.org.

  • See related article, “Twenty-Four–Hour Ambulatory Blood Pressure versus Clinic Blood Pressure Measurements and Risk of Adverse Outcomes in Children with CKD,” on pages 422–428.

  • Copyright © 2018 by the American Society of Nephrology

References

  1. ↵
    1. Siu AL; U.S. Preventive Services Task Force
    : Screening for high blood pressure in adults: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med 163: 778–786, 2015pmid:26458123
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Wühl E,
    2. Witte K,
    3. Soergel M,
    4. Mehls O,
    5. Schaefer F; German Working Group on Pediatric Hypertension
    : Distribution of 24-h ambulatory blood pressure in children: Normalized reference values and role of body dimensions. J Hypertens 20: 1995–2007, 2002pmid:12359978
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Flynn JT,
    2. Daniels SR,
    3. Hayman LL,
    4. Maahs DM,
    5. McCrindle BW,
    6. Mitsnefes M,
    7. Zachariah JP,
    8. Urbina EM; American Heart Association Atherosclerosis, Hypertension and Obesity in Youth Committee of the Council on Cardiovascular Disease in the Young
    : Update: Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in children and adolescents: A scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Hypertension 63: 1116–1135, 2014pmid:24591341
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Flynn JT,
    2. Kaelber DC,
    3. Baker-Smith CM,
    4. Blowey D,
    5. Carroll AE,
    6. Daniels SR,
    7. de Ferranti SD,
    8. Dionne JM,
    9. Falkner B,
    10. Flinn SK,
    11. Gidding SS,
    12. Goodwin C,
    13. Leu MG,
    14. Powers ME,
    15. Rea C,
    16. Samuels J,
    17. Simasek M,
    18. Thaker VV,
    19. Urbina EM; Subcommittee on Screening and Management of High Blood Pressure in Children
    : Clinical practice guideline for screening and management of high blood pressure in children and adolescents. Pediatrics 140: e20171904, 2017
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    1. Flynn JT,
    2. Mitsnefes M,
    3. Pierce C,
    4. Cole SR,
    5. Parekh RS,
    6. Furth SL,
    7. Warady BA; Chronic Kidney Disease in Children Study Group
    : Blood pressure in children with chronic kidney disease: A report from the Chronic Kidney Disease in Children study. Hypertension 52: 631–637, 2008pmid:18725579
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    1. Samuels J,
    2. Ng D,
    3. Flynn JT,
    4. Mitsnefes M,
    5. Poffenbarger T,
    6. Warady BA,
    7. Furth S; Chronic Kidney Disease in Children Study Group
    : Ambulatory blood pressure patterns in children with chronic kidney disease. Hypertension 60: 43–50, 2012pmid:22585950
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    1. Mitsnefes M,
    2. Flynn J,
    3. Cohn S,
    4. Samuels J,
    5. Blydt-Hansen T,
    6. Saland J,
    7. Kimball T,
    8. Furth S,
    9. Warady B; CKiD Study Group
    . Masked hypertension associates with left ventricular hypertrophy in children with CKD. J Am Soc Nephrol 21: 137–144, 2010pmid:19917781
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    1. Ku E,
    2. McCulloch CE,
    3. Warady BA,
    4. Furth SL,
    5. Grimes BA,
    6. Mitsnefes M
    : 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure versus clinic blood pressure measurements and risk of adverse outcomes in children with CKD. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol, 13: 422–428, 2018
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    1. National High Blood Pressure Education Program Working Group on High Blood Pressure in Children and Adolescents
    : The fourth report on the diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment of high blood pressure in children and adolescents. Pediatrics 114[Suppl 4th Report]: 555–576, 2004pmid:15286277
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    1. Wühl E,
    2. Trivelli A,
    3. Picca S,
    4. Litwin M,
    5. Peco-Antic A,
    6. Zurowska A,
    7. Testa S,
    8. Jankauskiene A,
    9. Emre S,
    10. Caldas-Afonso A,
    11. Anarat A,
    12. Niaudet P,
    13. Mir S,
    14. Bakkaloglu A,
    15. Enke B,
    16. Montini G,
    17. Wingen AM,
    18. Sallay P,
    19. Jeck N,
    20. Berg U,
    21. Caliskan S,
    22. Wygoda S,
    23. Hohbach-Hohenfellner K,
    24. Dusek J,
    25. Urasinski T,
    26. Arbeiter K,
    27. Neuhaus T,
    28. Gellermann J,
    29. Drozdz D,
    30. Fischbach M,
    31. Möller K,
    32. Wigger M,
    33. Peruzzi L,
    34. Mehls O,
    35. Schaefer F; ESCAPE Trial Group
    : Strict blood-pressure control and progression of renal failure in children. N Engl J Med 361: 1639–1650, 2009pmid:19846849
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology: 13 (3)
Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
Vol. 13, Issue 3
March 07, 2018
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
View Selected Citations (0)
Print
Download PDF
Sign up for Alerts
Email Article
Thank you for your help in sharing the high-quality science in CJASN.
Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The Enigma of Blood Pressure Measurement in Children with CKD
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Society of Nephrology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Society of Nephrology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
The Enigma of Blood Pressure Measurement in Children with CKD
Bonita Falkner
CJASN Mar 2018, 13 (3) 359-360; DOI: 10.2215/CJN.00110118

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
The Enigma of Blood Pressure Measurement in Children with CKD
Bonita Falkner
CJASN Mar 2018, 13 (3) 359-360; DOI: 10.2215/CJN.00110118
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Disclosures
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • View PDF

More in this TOC Section

  • Time to Procurement and Post-Kidney Transplant Outcomes
  • Recurrent Hyperkalemia in Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System Inhibitor (RAASi) Treatment
  • Postkidney Transplant Care and Health Outcomes of US Veterans
Show more Editorials

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Similar Articles

Related Articles

  • Twenty-Four–Hour Ambulatory Blood Pressure versus Clinic Blood Pressure Measurements and Risk of Adverse Outcomes in Children with CKD
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Keywords

  • children
  • chronic kidney disease
  • blood pressure measurement
  • Child
  • adult
  • humans
  • Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory
  • blood pressure
  • White Coat Hypertension, Reference Values
  • Blood Pressure Determination
  • hypertension
  • Sleep
  • Wakefulness
  • Renal Insufficiency, Chronic

Articles

  • Current Issue
  • Early Access
  • Subject Collections
  • Article Archive
  • ASN Meeting Abstracts

Information for Authors

  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Trainee of the Year
  • Author Resources
  • ASN Journal Policies
  • Reuse/Reprint Policy

About

  • CJASN
  • ASN
  • ASN Journals
  • ASN Kidney News

Journal Information

  • About CJASN
  • CJASN Email Alerts
  • CJASN Key Impact Information
  • CJASN Podcasts
  • CJASN RSS Feeds
  • Editorial Board

More Information

  • Advertise
  • ASN Podcasts
  • ASN Publications
  • Become an ASN Member
  • Feedback
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Password/Email Address Changes
  • Subscribe

© 2021 American Society of Nephrology

Print ISSN - 1555-9041 Online ISSN - 1555-905X

Powered by HighWire