Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Podcasts
    • Subject Collections
    • Archives
    • ASN Meeting Abstracts
    • Saved Searches
  • Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Resources
    • Reprint Information
  • Trainees
    • Peer Review Program
    • Prize Competition
  • About CJASN
    • About CJASN
    • Editorial Team
    • CJASN Impact
    • CJASN Recognitions
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Advertising
    • Reprint Information
    • Subscriptions
    • Feedback
  • ASN Kidney News
  • Other
    • JASN
    • Kidney360
    • Kidney News Online
    • American Society of Nephrology

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
American Society of Nephrology
  • Other
    • JASN
    • Kidney360
    • Kidney News Online
    • American Society of Nephrology
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Advertisement
American Society of Nephrology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Podcasts
    • Subject Collections
    • Archives
    • ASN Meeting Abstracts
    • Saved Searches
  • Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Resources
    • Reprint Information
  • Trainees
    • Peer Review Program
    • Prize Competition
  • About CJASN
    • About CJASN
    • Editorial Team
    • CJASN Impact
    • CJASN Recognitions
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Advertising
    • Reprint Information
    • Subscriptions
    • Feedback
  • ASN Kidney News
  • Visit ASN on Facebook
  • Follow CJASN on Twitter
  • CJASN RSS
  • Community Forum
Editorials
You have accessRestricted Access

Is the End in Sight for the “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” Approach to Advance Care Planning?

Rachel C. Carson and Rachelle Bernacki
CJASN March 2017, 12 (3) 380-381; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2215/CJN.00980117
Rachel C. Carson
*Island Health, Nanaimo Regional Hospital, Nanaimo, British Columbia, Canada; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rachelle Bernacki
†Division of Adult Palliative Care, Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Ariadne Labs, Brigham and Women’s Hospital & Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • View PDF
Loading
  • advance care planning
  • kidney failure, chronic
  • renal dialysis
  • advance directives
  • palliative medicine
  • electronic health records

As evidenced by the extended presence of books like Being Mortal by Atul Gawande and When Breath Becomes Air by the late Paul Kalanithi on the bestseller lists (1), it is clear that there is increasing public awareness and interest in end of life care and values-based medical decision making. Accompanying this increase in public interest is a growing recognition of the importance of advance care planning (ACP) and documentation, in particular for patients with serious illnesses. The outcomes of interventional aggressive care in those patients with a heavy burden of chronic illness have been shown to (1) result in distress in bereaved families (2), (2) cause moral distress in health care professionals (3,4), and (3) escalate costs without an accompanying measurable benefit to patients’ survival or quality of life at the end of life (5).

High-quality conversations about values and goals, a crucial component of ACP, require time and skill on the part of health care professionals. A recent review by Lakin et al. (6) identified multiple barriers to communication in primary care, including deficits in prognostication skills. Many older studies in the literature have failed to show improvement in ACP or ACP documentation, despite intensive effort (7), and more recent studies confirm that poor rates of documentation of ACP persist (8). Fortunately, some more encouraging recent initiatives, such as the Respecting Choices program (9) and the Serious Illness Conversation Guide (10), have reported improved rates of documentation and associated improved outcomes (R. Bernacki et al., unpublished data).

In this context, the paper by Kurella Tamura et al. (11) in this issue of the Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology offers hope that, despite all of the barriers to ACP, patients whose health care teams make the effort to engage, document ACP, and identify surrogate decision makers have an associated reduction in intensity of invasive treatment at the end of life. Kurella Tamura et al. (11) examined a large 2006–2007 cohort of decedent nursing home residents using the federal Minimum Data Set (MDS). They compared prevalence of advance directives and identified surrogate decision makers for a group of dialysis-dependent patients versus a cohort of patients with other serious illnesses. These results add to growing evidence that, despite poor prognosis, patients on dialysis have particularly low rates of documented advance directives and identification of surrogate decision makers (12–14). However, within the renal cohort, the presence of an advance directive, identified surrogate decision maker, or particularly, both is associated with lower intensity of end of life care, fewer hospitalizations, and higher rates of discontinuation of dialysis.

Unfortunately, the authors of this study were limited in the level of detail available in the MDS about the ACP process and conversations that occurred with this cohort of patients. Although all patients had complete data for do not resuscitate orders, there was incomplete information on other treatment limitations and/or presence of a surrogate decision maker. No narrative information regarding patient values and priorities exists in the MDS database, which was developed to ensure safety in nursing homes and therefore, focuses on these measures rather than patient values.

Best practices in discussing goals of care include the following: sharing prognostic information, eliciting decision-making preferences, understanding fears and goals, exploring views on tradeoffs and impaired function, and wishes for family involvement (15). In October of 2015, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, recognizing the value of promoting ACP conversations, added specific billing codes to reimburse physicians for conversations about ACP; the aim of this policy change was to incentivize clinicians to spend time discussing patients’ care preferences and plans. ACP, above all, takes time, often more time than most physicians have to give, especially because episodic “rescue-oriented” care provided by many subspecialties (16) is rewarded more in our current system than longitudinal relationships and primary care. However, here is the conundrum: nephrologists and renal teams typically see patients on dialysis in nursing homes three times a week for the duration of their lives, arguably providing an ideal opportunity for longitudinal, unhurried conversations about what matters in the end with patients that we often get to know quite well. It is, therefore, particularly disappointing that renal patients fare so poorly compared with patients who have other chronic illnesses with better prognoses. The reasons for this difference are likely complex, but it may be that nephrologists simply do not know what to say or how to say it. Although some training programs in best practices in communication exist for nephrologists, such as NephroTalk (17), most nephrologists have not had access to this type of intensive training (18).

Electronic health records (EHRs) can either further disrupt or facilitate the ACP process in patients on dialysis depending on how well they are designed (19) and the degree to which this documentation is available in different care settings. A well designed EHR interface can facilitate the conversations, providing key information from which to launch directly from a previous discussion into discussing the patient’s current health status. Indeed, having these deeply meaningful conversations with patients is a powerful antidote to the despair and burnout in physicians that has been shown to be associated with the ascension of EHR tick boxes in the practice of medicine (20,21).

The results of this study are for a cohort from 2006, and since that time, there has been escalating interest in improving ACP processes for renal patients (22,23). In fact, a recent review outlined best practices in conducting serious illness conversations and offered solutions to overcome barriers as well as practical advice, including specific language and tools, to implement serious illness conversations in the dialysis population (24). Nephrologists practicing now would do well to view the work by Kurella Tamura et al. (11) as evidence that we need to challenge ourselves and support each other to keep improving the way that we engage in and document ACP with our patients.

Disclosures

None.

Acknowledgments

We thank Elizabeth Herman for her thoughtful edits to the text.

Footnotes

  • Published online ahead of print. Publication date available at www.cjasn.org.

  • See related article, “Advance Directives and End-of-Life Care among Nursing Home Residents Receiving Maintenance Dialysis,” on pages 435–442.

  • Copyright © 2017 by the American Society of Nephrology

References

  1. ↵
    The New York Times. Available at: http://www.nytimes.com/books/best-sellers/health. Accessed January 22, 2017
  2. ↵
    1. Higgins PC,
    2. Garrido MM,
    3. Prigerson HG
    : Factors predicting bereaved caregiver perception of quality of care in the final week of life: Implications for health care providers. J Palliat Med 18: 849–857, 2015
    OpenUrl
  3. ↵
    1. Henrich NJ,
    2. Dodek PM,
    3. Alden L,
    4. Keenan SP,
    5. Reynolds S,
    6. Rodney P
    : Causes of moral distress in the intensive care unit: A qualitative study. J Crit Care 35: 57–62, 2016
    OpenUrl
  4. ↵
    1. Downar J,
    2. You JJ,
    3. Bagshaw SM,
    4. Golan E,
    5. Lamontagne F,
    6. Burns K,
    7. Sridhar SK,
    8. Seely A,
    9. Meade MO,
    10. Fox-Robichaud A,
    11. Cook D,
    12. Turgeon AF,
    13. Dodek P,
    14. Xiong W,
    15. Fowler R
    ; Canadian Critical Care Trials Group: Nonbeneficial treatment Canada: Definitions, causes, and potential solutions from the perspective of healthcare practitioners. Crit Care Med 43: 270–281, 2015
    OpenUrlPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Chang DW,
    2. Shapiro MF
    : Association between intensive care unit utilization during hospitalization and costs, use of invasive procedures, and mortality. JAMA Intern Med 176: 1492–1499, 2016
    OpenUrl
  6. ↵
    1. Lakin JR,
    2. Block SD,
    3. Billings JA,
    4. Koritsanszky LA,
    5. Cunningham R,
    6. Wichmann L,
    7. Harvey D,
    8. Lamey J,
    9. Bernacki RE
    : Improving communication about serious illness in primary care: A review. JAMA Intern Med 176: 1380–1387, 2016
    OpenUrlPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Teno J,
    2. Lynn J,
    3. Wenger N,
    4. Phillips RS,
    5. Murphy DP,
    6. Connors AF Jr..,
    7. Desbiens N,
    8. Fulkerson W,
    9. Bellamy P,
    10. Knaus WA
    ; SUPPORT Investigators. Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatment: Advance directives for seriously ill hospitalized patients: Effectiveness with the patient self-determination act and the SUPPORT intervention. J Am Geriatr Soc 45: 500–507, 1997
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Heyland DK,
    2. Barwich D,
    3. Pichora D,
    4. Dodek P,
    5. Lamontagne F,
    6. You JJ,
    7. Tayler C,
    8. Porterfield P,
    9. Sinuff T,
    10. Simon J
    ; ACCEPT (Advance Care Planning Evaluation in Elderly Patients) Study Team; Canadian Researchers at the End of Life Network (CARENET): Failure to engage hospitalized elderly patients and their families in advance care planning. JAMA Intern Med 173: 778–787, 2013
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Hammes BJ,
    2. Rooney BL,
    3. Gundrum JD
    : A comparative, retrospective, observational study of the prevalence, availability, and specificity of advance care plans in a county that implemented an advance care planning microsystem. J Am Geriatr Soc 58: 1249–1255, 2010
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Bernacki R,
    2. Hutchings M,
    3. Vick J,
    4. Smith G,
    5. Paladino J,
    6. Lipsitz S,
    7. Gawande AA,
    8. Block SD
    : Development of the serious illness care program: A randomised controlled trial of a palliative care communication intervention. BMJ Open 5: e009032, 2015
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    1. Kurella Tamura M,
    2. Montez-Rath ME,
    3. Hall YN,
    4. Katz R,
    5. O’Hare AM
    : Advance directives and end-of-life care among nursing home residents receiving maintenance dialysis. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 12: 435–442, 2017
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    1. Holley JL,
    2. Stackiewicz L,
    3. Dacko C,
    4. Rault R
    : Factors influencing dialysis patients’ completion of advance directives. Am J Kidney Dis 30: 356–360, 1997
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Davison SN
    : End-of-life care preferences and needs: Perceptions of patients with chronic kidney disease. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 5: 195–204, 2010
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    1. Moss AH,
    2. Hozayen O,
    3. King K,
    4. Holley JL,
    5. Schmidt RJ
    : Attitudes of patients toward cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the dialysis unit. Am J Kidney Dis 38: 847–852, 2001
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Bernacki RE,
    2. Block SD
    ; American College of Physicians High Value Care Task Force: Communication about serious illness care goals: A review and synthesis of best practices. JAMA Intern Med 174: 1994–2003, 2014
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Gawande A
    : Tell Me Where It Hurts. The New Yorker 92(46): 36–45, 2017
    OpenUrl
  16. ↵
    1. Schell JO,
    2. Arnold RM
    : NephroTalk: Communication tools to enhance patient-centered care. Semin Dial 25: 611–616, 2012
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Holley JL,
    2. Carmody SS,
    3. Moss AH,
    4. Sullivan AM,
    5. Cohen LM,
    6. Block SD,
    7. Arnold RM
    : The need for end-of-life care training in nephrology: National survey results of nephrology fellows. Am J Kidney Dis 42: 813–820, 2003
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Wilson CJ,
    2. Newman J,
    3. Tapper S,
    4. Lai S,
    5. Cheng PH,
    6. Wu FM,
    7. Tai-Seale M
    : Multiple locations of advance care planning documentation in an electronic health record: Are they easy to find? J Palliat Med 16: 1089–1094, 2013
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Verdon DR
    : EHRs: The real story. Why a national outcry from physicians will shake the health information technology sector. Med Econ 91: 18–20, 27, 2014
    OpenUrlPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Babbott S,
    2. Manwell LB,
    3. Brown R,
    4. Montague E,
    5. Williams E,
    6. Schwartz M,
    7. Hess E,
    8. Linzer M
    : Electronic medical records and physician stress in primary care: Results from the MEMO Study. J Am Med Inform Assoc 21: e100–e106, 2014
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. Davison SN,
    2. Torgunrud C
    : The creation of an advance care planning process for patients with ESRD. Am J Kidney Dis 49: 27–36, 2007
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. Song MK,
    2. Ward SE,
    3. Fine JP,
    4. Hanson LC,
    5. Lin FC,
    6. Hladik GA,
    7. Hamilton JB,
    8. Bridgman JC
    : Advance care planning and end-of-life decision making in dialysis: A randomized controlled trial targeting patients and their surrogates. Am J Kidney Dis 66: 813–822, 2015
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Mandel EI,
    2. Bernacki RE,
    3. Block SD
    : Serious illness conversations in ESRD [published online ahead of print December 28, 2016]. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol doi:10.2215/CJN.05760516
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology: 12 (3)
Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
Vol. 12, Issue 3
March 07, 2017
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
View Selected Citations (0)
Print
Download PDF
Sign up for Alerts
Email Article
Thank you for your help in sharing the high-quality science in CJASN.
Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Is the End in Sight for the “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” Approach to Advance Care Planning?
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Society of Nephrology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Society of Nephrology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Is the End in Sight for the “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” Approach to Advance Care Planning?
Rachel C. Carson, Rachelle Bernacki
CJASN Mar 2017, 12 (3) 380-381; DOI: 10.2215/CJN.00980117

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Is the End in Sight for the “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” Approach to Advance Care Planning?
Rachel C. Carson, Rachelle Bernacki
CJASN Mar 2017, 12 (3) 380-381; DOI: 10.2215/CJN.00980117
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Disclosures
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • View PDF

More in this TOC Section

  • Steroid Regimen for Children with Nephrotic Syndrome Relapse
  • Mind the Gap
  • Opportunities for Improvement in Quality of Care of PD-Related Peritonitis in Children
Show more Editorials

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Similar Articles

Related Articles

  • Advance Directives and End-of-Life Care among Nursing Home Residents Receiving Maintenance Dialysis
  • Linguistic Isolation and Access to the Active Kidney Transplant Waiting List in the United States
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Keywords

  • Advance Care Planning
  • Kidney Failure, Chronic
  • renal dialysis
  • Advance Directives
  • palliative medicine
  • Electronic Health Records

Articles

  • Current Issue
  • Early Access
  • Subject Collections
  • Article Archive
  • ASN Meeting Abstracts

Information for Authors

  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Trainee of the Year
  • Author Resources
  • ASN Journal Policies
  • Reuse/Reprint Policy

About

  • CJASN
  • ASN
  • ASN Journals
  • ASN Kidney News

Journal Information

  • About CJASN
  • CJASN Email Alerts
  • CJASN Key Impact Information
  • CJASN Podcasts
  • CJASN RSS Feeds
  • Editorial Board

More Information

  • Advertise
  • ASN Podcasts
  • ASN Publications
  • Become an ASN Member
  • Feedback
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Password/Email Address Changes
  • Subscribe

© 2021 American Society of Nephrology

Print ISSN - 1555-9041 Online ISSN - 1555-905X

Powered by HighWire