Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Podcasts
    • Subject Collections
    • Archives
    • Kidney Week Abstracts
    • Saved Searches
  • Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Resources
  • Trainees
    • Peer Review Program
    • Prize Competition
  • About CJASN
    • About CJASN
    • Editorial Team
    • CJASN Impact
    • CJASN Recognitions
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
    • Reprint Information
    • Subscriptions
  • ASN Kidney News
  • Other
    • ASN Publications
    • JASN
    • Kidney360
    • Kidney News Online
    • American Society of Nephrology

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
American Society of Nephrology
  • Other
    • ASN Publications
    • JASN
    • Kidney360
    • Kidney News Online
    • American Society of Nephrology
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Advertisement
American Society of Nephrology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Podcasts
    • Subject Collections
    • Archives
    • Kidney Week Abstracts
    • Saved Searches
  • Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Resources
  • Trainees
    • Peer Review Program
    • Prize Competition
  • About CJASN
    • About CJASN
    • Editorial Team
    • CJASN Impact
    • CJASN Recognitions
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
    • Reprint Information
    • Subscriptions
  • ASN Kidney News
  • Visit ASN on Facebook
  • Follow CJASN on Twitter
  • CJASN RSS
  • Community Forum
Moving Points in Nephrology
You have accessRestricted Access

How to Use Quality Improvement Tools in Clinical Practice: A Primer for Nephrologists

Christopher T. Chan, Glenn M. Chertow, Gihad Nesrallah and Chaim M. Bell
CJASN May 2016, 11 (5) 891-892; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2215/CJN.11521015
Christopher T. Chan
*Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Glenn M. Chertow
†Division of Nephrology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gihad Nesrallah
‡Department of Nephrology, Humber River Regional Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Chaim M. Bell
§Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • View PDF
Loading
  • tools
  • primer
  • primary health care
  • quality assurance
  • health care
  • quality improvement

Quality improvement is a common lexicon among practicing nephrologists. However, most clinical nephrologists have not received formal training in quality improvement methodology. However, the effect of performance measurement and data reporting in medicine and clinical nephrology has increased exponentially. Indeed, there has been substantial evolution in the size and scope of dialysis programs with increasing complexity and an aging patient population. Despite technical advances in dialysis, the notion of delivering consistent high–quality care remains a challenge. Common programs, such as the American College of Surgeons’ National Surgical Quality Improvement Program and the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services End-Stage Renal Disease Quality Incentive Program, provide data on performance; however, these performance data are often not translated into improvement by many individual clinical programs. We contend that measurement alone is insufficient for affecting actual clinical improvement. Rather, individual clinical programs and providers require quality improvement skills to translate performance data into effective and sustainable health care system changes for their local contexts. Successful quality improvement programs have improved outcomes in other chronic diseases, including hypertension and diabetes (1–3).

In 2008, Medicare’s Final Rule of Conditions for Coverage mandated that the medical director of the dialysis unit be accountable for the quality, safety, and care of the facility. Most recently, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid introduced the End-Stage Renal Disease Quality Incentive Program, which results in payment reductions in subsequent years if specific yearly quality metrics do not meet required targets. The introduction of the balanced scorecard and other quality assessment tools (e.g., patient experience metrics) have proliferated within nephrology practice. Given that nephrologists are continually faced with external pressures (e.g., regulatory and financial) coupled with the notion of quality, it is important to educate ourselves that there is, indeed, an ethical mandate for quality improvement within the continuum of nephrology education and professionalism (4,5).

We hypothesize that, in general, programs and providers are not sufficiently familiar with available quality improvement tools and how to incorporate them into practice, which is the focus of this Moving Points in Nephrology feature in the Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology. We will aim to review the principles of quality improvement and the tools that are needed to translate performance measurement into the changes that actually matter for patients. To this aim, we had the privilege in assembling a team of leading nephrologists with specific expertise in quality improvement. Throughout this feature, we will use a longitudinal practical example to illustrate various quality improvement methods and tools that can be used at different stages in the quality improvement process, namely:

  • (1) How to begin a quality improvement project,

  • (2) How to diagnose a solution to a quality of care problem,

  • (3) How to measure and interpret quality improvement data, and

  • (4) How to sustain change and support continuous quality improvement.

It is important to recognize that we aim to illustrate the methods and framework of quality improvement for clinicians, and it is not our intent to dictate quality indicator measurement, how to identify local quality of care problems, or the local changes that are needed to improve care. In addition, these four articles do not provide a comprehensive list of all of the existing quality improvement tools, and we encourage nephrology health care professionals to advance their quality improvement expertise through practice and experiential learning.

There is no single right way to do quality improvement. Our primer’s ultimate goal is to illustrate the recipe for success in quality improvement, which will require both appropriate methodology and critical understanding of the context in which improvement activities occur.

Disclosures

None.

Footnotes

  • Published online ahead of print. Publication date available at www.cjasn.org.

  • This article is part of a Moving Points Series on quality improvement tools.

  • Copyright © 2016 by the American Society of Nephrology

References

  1. ↵
    1. Tricco AC,
    2. Ivers NM,
    3. Grimshaw JM,
    4. Moher D,
    5. Turner L,
    6. Galipeau J,
    7. Halperin I,
    8. Vachon B,
    9. Ramsay T,
    10. Manns B,
    11. Tonelli M,
    12. Shojania K
    : Effectiveness of quality improvement strategies on the management of diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet 379: 2252–2261, 2012
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Gallagher H,
    2. de Lusignan S,
    3. Harris K,
    4. Cates C
    : Quality-improvement strategies for the management of hypertension in chronic kidney disease in primary care: A systematic review. Br J Gen Pract 60: e258–e265, 2010
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    Shekelle PG, Wachter RM, Pronovost PJ, Schoelles K, McDonald KM, Dy SM, Shojania K, Reston J, Berger Z, Johnsen B, Larkin JW, Lucas S, Martinez K, Motala A, Newberry SJ, Noble M, Pfoh E, Ranji SR, Rennke S, Schmidt E, Shanman R, Sullivan N, Sun F, Tipton K, Treadwell JR, Tsou A, Vaiana ME, Weaver SJ, Wilson R, Winters BD: Making Health Care Safer II: An Updated Critical Analysis of the Evidence for Patient Safety Practices. Comparative Effectiveness Review No. 211 (Prepared by the Southern California-RAND Evidence-Based Practice Center under Contract No. 290-2007-10062-I), AHRQ Publication No. 13-E001-EF, Rockville, MD, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 2013
  3. ↵
    1. Kliger AS
    : Quality measures for dialysis: Time for a balanced scorecard. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 11: 363–368, 2016
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    1. Schiller B
    : The medical director and quality requirements in the dialysis facility. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 10: 493–499, 2015
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology: 11 (5)
Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
Vol. 11, Issue 5
May 06, 2016
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
View Selected Citations (0)
Print
Download PDF
Sign up for Alerts
Email Article
Thank you for your help in sharing the high-quality science in CJASN.
Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
How to Use Quality Improvement Tools in Clinical Practice: A Primer for Nephrologists
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Society of Nephrology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Society of Nephrology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
How to Use Quality Improvement Tools in Clinical Practice: A Primer for Nephrologists
Christopher T. Chan, Glenn M. Chertow, Gihad Nesrallah, Chaim M. Bell
CJASN May 2016, 11 (5) 891-892; DOI: 10.2215/CJN.11521015

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
How to Use Quality Improvement Tools in Clinical Practice: A Primer for Nephrologists
Christopher T. Chan, Glenn M. Chertow, Gihad Nesrallah, Chaim M. Bell
CJASN May 2016, 11 (5) 891-892; DOI: 10.2215/CJN.11521015
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Disclosures
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • View PDF

More in this TOC Section

  • Recommended Clinical Trial End Points for Dialysis Catheters
  • Clinical Trial End Points for Hemodialysis Vascular Access
  • Definitions and End Points for Interventional Studies for Arteriovenous Dialysis Access
Show more Moving Points in Nephrology

Cited By...

  • Integrating Quality Improvement Education into the Nephrology Curricular Milestones Framework and the Clinical Learning Environment Review
  • Google Scholar

Similar Articles

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Keywords

  • tools
  • primer
  • primary health care
  • quality assurance
  • Health Care
  • Quality Improvement

Articles

  • Current Issue
  • Early Access
  • Subject Collections
  • Article Archive
  • ASN Meeting Abstracts

Information for Authors

  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Trainee of the Year
  • Author Resources
  • ASN Journal Policies
  • Reuse/Reprint Policy

About

  • CJASN
  • ASN
  • ASN Journals
  • ASN Kidney News

Journal Information

  • About CJASN
  • CJASN Email Alerts
  • CJASN Key Impact Information
  • CJASN Podcasts
  • CJASN RSS Feeds
  • Editorial Board

More Information

  • Advertise
  • ASN Podcasts
  • ASN Publications
  • Become an ASN Member
  • Feedback
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Password/Email Address Changes
  • Subscribe to ASN Journals

© 2022 American Society of Nephrology

Print ISSN - 1555-9041 Online ISSN - 1555-905X

Powered by HighWire