Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Podcasts
    • Subject Collections
    • Archives
    • ASN Meeting Abstracts
    • Saved Searches
  • Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Resources
    • Reprint Information
  • Trainees
    • Peer Review Program
    • Prize Competition
  • About CJASN
    • About CJASN
    • Editorial Team
    • CJASN Impact
    • CJASN Recognitions
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Advertising
    • Reprint Information
    • Subscriptions
    • Feedback
  • ASN Kidney News
  • Other
    • JASN
    • Kidney360
    • Kidney News Online
    • American Society of Nephrology

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
American Society of Nephrology
  • Other
    • JASN
    • Kidney360
    • Kidney News Online
    • American Society of Nephrology
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Advertisement
American Society of Nephrology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Podcasts
    • Subject Collections
    • Archives
    • ASN Meeting Abstracts
    • Saved Searches
  • Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Resources
    • Reprint Information
  • Trainees
    • Peer Review Program
    • Prize Competition
  • About CJASN
    • About CJASN
    • Editorial Team
    • CJASN Impact
    • CJASN Recognitions
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Advertising
    • Reprint Information
    • Subscriptions
    • Feedback
  • ASN Kidney News
  • Visit ASN on Facebook
  • Follow CJASN on Twitter
  • CJASN RSS
  • Community Forum
Public Policy Series
You have accessRestricted Access

A Matter of Choice: Opportunities and Obstacles Facing People with ESRD

Judith Feder, Mark V. Nadel and Mahesh Krishnan
CJASN March 2016, 11 (3) 536-538; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2215/CJN.04470415
Judith Feder
*Georgetown University McCourt School of Public Policy, Washington, DC; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mark V. Nadel
*Georgetown University McCourt School of Public Policy, Washington, DC; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mahesh Krishnan
†DaVita HealthCare Partners, Denver, Colorado
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • View PDF
Loading

Abstract

Kidney failure is an overwhelming, life–shattering event, but patients with ESRD do not see themselves as being at the end stage of their lives. On the contrary, patients opting for kidney dialysis are choosing to live. Ideally, then, public policy would support patients’ choices about how to live—specifically, the choice to continue working. Many patients with ESRD faced with the limitations of their health status and the demands of their treatment understandably choose to leave their jobs, a choice that is facilitated by the availability of public disability and health insurance. However, other patients who have the desire and opportunity to continue working may not get the guidance and support that can actually make their employment possible. Specifically, current disability and health insurance may fail to provide timely treatment and employment counseling to help patients with ESRD remain in their jobs. We, therefore, propose that the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services support ESRD Networks to initiate more timely employment and treatment counseling in both the ESRD and the late–stage pre–ESRD setting. Although it is too late to require such counseling in the new network scope of work for 2016–2020, active experimentation in the next few years can lay the groundwork for a subsequent contract.

  • chronic renal failure
  • patient education
  • employment support
  • health insurance

Kidney Failure and Employment: Background

Entitlement to Medicare benefits for ESRD was originally enacted in 1972, with the promise that such entitlement, combined with vocational rehabilitation, would allow some patients to maintain employment or return to work (1). In this context, renal rehabilitation has been defined as the move from disability to ability, of which return to or maintenance of employment, if desired, is one aspect (2). Despite this noble vision, there has been little progress toward this goal in the past 40 years. As of 2012, the US Renal Data System reports there are approximately 440,000 patients on dialysis (3). Although recent data are not available, a special study previously showed that, although 42% of patients were employed before dialysis, only 21% remained employed at the start of the dialysis, and only 13% remained employed 6 months later (4).

The employment rate for patients with ESRD in the United States is considerably lower than it is in Europe and Japan (D.M. Dickinson, et al., unpublished data). There may be options for the United States to do better. The high rate at which patients on dialysis in the United States leave the workforce may reflect factors other than age or education—specifically, the lack of timely counseling on employment and treatment options for people with late-stage CKD or ESRD.

The Paradox of Disability Policy

Public policy facilitates enrollment for disability payments and health benefits after dialysis begins. Either the patient or the dialysis facility submits a claim to Social Security, which directly approves the Medicare claim and submits the disability claim to its disability operations office. Patients are automatically deemed disabled if they are medically determined to have ESRD and undergoing dialysis that is expected to last at least 12 months (5), contingent only on insured status for Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI) or income and asset levels sufficiently low to quality for Supplemental Security Income (SSI). Medicare entitlement generally begins 3 months after the beginning of dialysis, with the exception of for those patients who initiate peritoneal dialysis or undergo transplant (6).

Economically, monthly disability benefits are modest, averaging only $1145 in 2014 compared with the United States average individual income of $3625 (7). For patients who leave work, the income reduction is likely substantial. In addition, patients may face higher out-of-pocket costs for medical care when they shift to Medicare from employer-sponsored insurance, where cost-sharing protections are more generous than those for Medicare. In contrast to older Medicare beneficiaries, beneficiaries under age 65 years old lack federally guaranteed access to supplemental or Medigap insurance that can mitigate Medicare’s relatively significant cost–sharing obligations (8). Patients with ESRD are also explicitly excluded from participation in Medicare Advantage plans that sometimes supplement Medicare coverage at no extra costs (9). As a result, patients with ESRD in many states can be denied access to supplemental coverage or charged higher premiums that reflect their compromised health status.

The fact that so many patients with ESRD give up employment, despite these financial disincentives, may reflect a persistent paradox in disability policy. Eligibility for SSDI and SSI disability benefits for patients on dialysis, as with all beneficiaries historically, has been premised on the beneficiary’s permanent inability to work (10). However, today’s social norms and civil rights laws have evolved to enable people with disabilities to work, while still providing them public support. Although disability policies have advanced somewhat to reflect these norms, effective support for patients with ESRD (and perhaps, others) who have the capacity and desire to work is still missing.

One policy intended to encourage employment is the long–standing trial work period that allows beneficiaries to work for a period without losing benefits and when that period ends, quality for expedited reinstatement of benefits if their income falls. A more recent policy initiative, the Ticket to Work program, enacted in 1999 gives SSDI and SSI beneficiaries access to employment networks or state vocational rehabilitation providers who furnish a variety of services to help people with disabilities return to work, enter a new line of work, or even, work for the first time. These services are paid for by Social Security (11). However, after they are on the disability rolls, beneficiaries generally do not leave; 10% of new beneficiaries completed a trial work period, and 2.8% returned to work over a recent 10-year period (12).

The limited effect of SSDI and SSI work incentive programs suggests that they offer too little too late—beginning, as they do, only after a disability claim is allowed. Earlier referral for employment counseling has, in fact, been shown to help people stay connected to the workforce (13). Creating a supportive infrastructure to maintain employment rather than aiming to find new employment might be more effective in enabling patients to remain employed. To that end, we propose a policy shift to provide more educational efforts before or alongside the initiation of dialysis.

A Policy Proposal to Sustain Employment

Changes in the policy environment create the potential to end the disability paradox for people with ESRD or late-stage CKD. Policy commitment to better align medical treatment with patient preferences is taking place along with a longer-standing commitment to better integrate people with disabilities into the workforce. Both commitments call for a new approach to patients with late-stage CKD or newly diagnosed ESRD: specifically, engagement of the ESRD Networks in providing employment counseling in addition to treatment modality counseling that could assist employed patients who are about to start dialysis keep their jobs.

We propose that networks focus on new rather than existing patients on dialysis to avoid or minimize a lapse in employment and thereby, maximize the potential for job retention. The alternative (assisting patients on dialysis in finding new jobs) is intrinsically more challenging, not only because of patients’ compromised health status and treatment needs but also, their relatively advanced age, because one half of all patients newly on dialysis are over the age of 65 years old (14).

Networks would provide new patients with a combination of treatment and employment counseling. Traditionally, modality selection may occur without attention to psychosocial considerations, such as desire to work, but encouragement of comprehensive education—addressing not only complex medical factors but also, psychosocial factors, including a wish to work—is appropriate to decisions that affect overall quality of life.

The greater flexibility that a patient has in managing treatment, the easier it is for him or her to maintain a job. Peritoneal dialysis rather than hemodialysis makes employment easier for some, because it requires less time in the clinic (15). Similarly, home or nocturnal dialysis rather than center-based dialysis provides greater flexibility to accommodate work schedules (16). Combining education on treatment options with employment counseling could further enhance patients’ choices and opportunities.

Comprehensive treatment and employment counseling could be implemented most easily through Medicare’s contracts with ESRD Networks, which are modified on a periodic basis. Ideally, future contracts for scope of work would be modified to hold networks responsible for implementing a pre–ESRD education program in conjunction with employment support from state vocational rehabilitation centers. Although it is too late to modify the upcoming contract for 2016–2020, now is the time for the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services to encourage networks to experiment with such an initiative as one of their quality improvement projects or initiate a demonstration program across multiple networks. Specifically, networks would be expected to add employment-related counseling to the modality and transplant education that they currently provide patients who are new to dialysis as well as patients with late-stage CKD on referral from the patient’s nephrologist. This counseling would then parallel the widely accepted approach to predialysis vascular access preparation.

Early referral for employment counseling has been shown to help people stay connected to the workforce (13,17). If networks show their capacity to successfully implement more extensive counseling, it could become part of a future ESRD Network scope of work. Improvements in performance over time may reduce the labor needs for two major activities for ESRD Networks, data quality and vascular access quality improvement, creating capacity for ESRD Networks to work on employment counseling.

Although Medicare currently pays individual physicians to provide pre–ESRD treatment education, that benefit is not available to patients who are not already Medicare beneficiaries and does not include employment counseling. However, some ESRD Networks are already providing treatment counseling to all patients pursuant to Medicare’s requirement that networks support rehabilitation of patients on dialysis (18). If Medicare were to make pretreatment education a requirement in its network contracts and connect that to employment counseling, the full range of patients with ESRD could receive comprehensive counseling in a timely fashion.

For some patients, remaining employed may significantly affect their quality of life. Those patients would also likely receive enhanced earnings and health insurance coverage. Additionally, there may be a health benefit as well, because observational research shows that, in ESRD, working is associated with better health status, although this can only be taken as associative and not causal (19).

At the population level, greater employment among patients with ESRD also has the potential to reduce public costs for patients on SSDI and Medicare (20)—avoiding or delaying disability payments and delaying Medicare coverage for the first 30 months of dialysis. Additional health insurance costs for employers could potentially be offset by reductions in nonmedical benefit costs—such as payouts under disability and life insurance policies—that could be avoided or reduced if patients with ESRD remain employed (21). Finally, timely comprehensive counseling would fulfill the promise of renal rehabilitation made when Congress instituted health and disability protections for people with ESRD.

Disclosures

None.

Acknowledgments

DaVita HealthCare Partners, which operates freestanding dialysis units, provided funding support to J.F. and M.N. M.K. is an employee of DaVita HealthCare Partners and holds stock in the company.

Footnotes

  • Published online ahead of print. Publication date available at www.cjasn.org.

  • Copyright © 2016 by the American Society of Nephrology

References

  1. ↵
    1. Rettig RA
    : Special treatment--the story of Medicare’s ESRD entitlement. N Engl J Med 364: 596–598, 2011
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Solomon-Dimmitt R
    : Focus on rehabilitation: Teamwork that works. Adv Ren Replace Ther 6: 278–281, 1999
    OpenUrlPubMed
  3. ↵
    United States Renal Data System: Annual Data Report: Atlas of Chronic Kidney Disease and End-Stage Renal Disease in the United States, Vol. 2, Bethesda, MD, National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, 2013, p 216
  4. ↵
    ECRI Health Technology Assessment Group: Determinants of disability in patients with chronic renal failure. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Summ) 13: 1–5, 2000
    OpenUrlPubMed
  5. ↵
    US Social Security Administration: Disability Evaluation under Social Security. Available at: http://www.ssa.gov/disability/professionals/bluebook/6.00-Genitourinary-Adult.htm#6_05. Accessed April 8, 2015
  6. ↵
    US Social Security Administration: Program Operations Manual System (POMS): Di 45001.001 End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) Entitlement Provisions. Available at: https://secure.ssa.gov/poms.nsf/lnx/0445001001. Accessed April 8, 2015
  7. ↵
    1. Monaco K
    : Disability Insurance Plans: Trends in Employee Access and Employer Costs. Beyond the Numbers, 2015. Available at: http://www.bls.gov/opub/btn/volume-4/disability-insurance-plans. Accessed June 10, 2015
  8. ↵
    Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services: Medicare for People with End-Stage Renal Disease. Module 6. Available at: http://www.cms.gov/Outreach-and-Education/Training/CMSNationalTrainingProgram/Downloads/2013-Medicare-for-People-with-End-Stage-Renal-Disease-Workbook.pdf. Accessed June 10, 2015
  9. ↵
    Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services: What If I Have End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD)? Available at: http://www.medicare.gov/sign-up-change-plans/medicare-health-plans/medicare-advantage-plans/esrd-and-medicare-advantage-plans.html. Accessed June 10, 2015
  10. ↵
    1. Tappe K,
    2. Turkelson C,
    3. Doggett D,
    4. Coates V
    : Disability under Social Security for patients with ESRD: An evidence-based review. Disabil Rehabil 23: 177–185, 2001
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    US Social Security Administration: Red Book. A Summary Guide to Employment Supports for Persons with Disabilities under the Social Security Disability Insurance and Supplemental Security Income Programs. Available at: www.ssa.gov/redbook/. Accessed June 10, 2015
  12. ↵
    1. Lui S,
    2. Stapleton D
    : How Many SSDI Beneficiaries Leave the Rolls for Work? More Than You Might Think, 2010. Available at: http://www.ssa.gov/redbook/documents/TheRedBook2014.pdf. Accessed April 8, 2015
  13. ↵
    1. Rasgon S,
    2. Schwankovsky L,
    3. James-Rogers A,
    4. Widrow L,
    5. Glick J,
    6. Butts E
    : An intervention for employment maintenance among blue-collar workers with end-stage renal disease. Am J Kidney Dis 22: 403–412, 1993
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Knoll GA
    : Is kidney transplantation for everyone? The example of the older dialysis patient. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 4: 2040–2044, 2009
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. ↵
    1. Muehrer RJ,
    2. Schatell D,
    3. Witten B,
    4. Gangnon R,
    5. Becker BN,
    6. Hofmann RM
    : Factors affecting employment at initiation of dialysis. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 6: 489–496, 2011
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. ↵
    1. Hope J
    : A patient perspective on the barriers to home dialysis. J Ren Care 39[Suppl 1]: 3–8, 2013
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Rasgon S,
    2. James-Rogers A,
    3. Chemleski B,
    4. Ledezma M,
    5. Mercado L,
    6. Besario M,
    7. Trivedi J,
    8. Miller M,
    9. Dee L,
    10. Pryor L,
    11. Yeoh H
    : Maintenance of employment on dialysis. Adv Ren Replace Ther 4: 152–159, 1997
    OpenUrlPubMed
  18. ↵
    End Stage Renal Disease Network of Texas: Vocational Rehabilitation. Available at: http://esrdnetwork.org/patients-families/patient-education/voc-rehab/. Accessed June 10, 2015
  19. ↵
    1. Curtin RB,
    2. Oberley ET,
    3. Sacksteder P,
    4. Friedman A
    : Differences between employed and nonemployed dialysis patients. Am J Kidney Dis 27: 533–540, 1996
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Whalen D,
    2. Gimm G,
    3. Ireyes H,
    4. Gilman G,
    5. Croake S
    : Demonstration to Maintain Independence and Employment (DMIE), 2012. Available at: http://www.mathematica-mpr.com/our-publications-and-findings/publications/demonstration-to-maintain-independence-and-employment-dmie. Accessed April 8, 2015
  21. ↵
    1. Kamal-Bahl SJ,
    2. Pantely S,
    3. Pyenson B,
    4. Alexander CM
    : Employer-paid nonmedical costs for patients with diabetes and end-stage renal disease. Prev Chronic Dis 3: A83, 2006
    OpenUrlPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology: 11 (3)
Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
Vol. 11, Issue 3
March 07, 2016
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
View Selected Citations (0)
Print
Download PDF
Sign up for Alerts
Email Article
Thank you for your help in sharing the high-quality science in CJASN.
Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
A Matter of Choice: Opportunities and Obstacles Facing People with ESRD
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Society of Nephrology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Society of Nephrology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
A Matter of Choice: Opportunities and Obstacles Facing People with ESRD
Judith Feder, Mark V. Nadel, Mahesh Krishnan
CJASN Mar 2016, 11 (3) 536-538; DOI: 10.2215/CJN.04470415

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
A Matter of Choice: Opportunities and Obstacles Facing People with ESRD
Judith Feder, Mark V. Nadel, Mahesh Krishnan
CJASN Mar 2016, 11 (3) 536-538; DOI: 10.2215/CJN.04470415
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Kidney Failure and Employment: Background
    • The Paradox of Disability Policy
    • A Policy Proposal to Sustain Employment
    • Disclosures
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • View PDF

More in this TOC Section

  • New Organ Allocation System for Combined Liver-Kidney Transplants and the Availability of Kidneys for Transplant to Patients with Stage 4–5 CKD
  • Consolidation in the Dialysis Industry, Patient Choice, and Local Market Competition
  • New Opportunities for Funding Dialysis-Dependent Undocumented Individuals
Show more Public Policy Series

Cited By...

  • Socioeconomic Position and Incidence of Glomerular Diseases
  • A Validation Study of Employment Status in Late-Stage CKD
  • Google Scholar

Similar Articles

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Keywords

  • chronic renal failure
  • patient education
  • employment support
  • health insurance

Articles

  • Current Issue
  • Early Access
  • Subject Collections
  • Article Archive
  • ASN Meeting Abstracts

Information for Authors

  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Trainee of the Year
  • Author Resources
  • ASN Journal Policies
  • Reuse/Reprint Policy

About

  • CJASN
  • ASN
  • ASN Journals
  • ASN Kidney News

Journal Information

  • About CJASN
  • CJASN Email Alerts
  • CJASN Key Impact Information
  • CJASN Podcasts
  • CJASN RSS Feeds
  • Editorial Board

More Information

  • Advertise
  • ASN Podcasts
  • ASN Publications
  • Become an ASN Member
  • Feedback
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Password/Email Address Changes
  • Subscribe

© 2021 American Society of Nephrology

Print ISSN - 1555-9041 Online ISSN - 1555-905X

Powered by HighWire