Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Podcasts
    • Subject Collections
    • Archives
    • ASN Meeting Abstracts
    • Saved Searches
  • Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Resources
    • Reprint Information
  • Trainees
    • Peer Review Program
    • Prize Competition
  • About CJASN
    • About CJASN
    • Editorial Team
    • CJASN Impact
    • CJASN Recognitions
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Advertising
    • Reprint Information
    • Subscriptions
    • Feedback
  • ASN Kidney News
  • Other
    • JASN
    • Kidney360
    • Kidney News Online
    • American Society of Nephrology

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
American Society of Nephrology
  • Other
    • JASN
    • Kidney360
    • Kidney News Online
    • American Society of Nephrology
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Advertisement
American Society of Nephrology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Podcasts
    • Subject Collections
    • Archives
    • ASN Meeting Abstracts
    • Saved Searches
  • Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Resources
    • Reprint Information
  • Trainees
    • Peer Review Program
    • Prize Competition
  • About CJASN
    • About CJASN
    • Editorial Team
    • CJASN Impact
    • CJASN Recognitions
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Advertising
    • Reprint Information
    • Subscriptions
    • Feedback
  • ASN Kidney News
  • Visit ASN on Facebook
  • Follow CJASN on Twitter
  • CJASN RSS
  • Community Forum
Editorials
You have accessRestricted Access

To Treat or Not to Treat IgA Nephropathy? That Is the Question!

Gerald B. Appel
CJASN May 2006, 1 (3) 347-348; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2215/CJN.00330106
Gerald B. Appel
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • View PDF
Loading

IgA nephropathy (IgAN) remains one of the most common forms of idiopathic glomerulonephritis in many populations worldwide (1,2). It also is a potentially serious condition in which from 4 to 38% of patients progress to ESRD by 10 yr (2). Given its frequency and significance, there should be a consensus on which treatment strategy is optimal for patients with IgAN (1,3,4). For those who work with patients with IgAN, the reasons for a lack of consensus are obvious. First, despite progress in understanding the mechanisms that are involved in IgAN, ranging from abnormalities of galactosylation of the hinge region of the IgA molecule to altered mesangial cell binding and incitement of inflammatory mediators, the pathogenesis of the disease remains unknown (1,5). Hence, specific treatment cannot be directed at the cause of the disease, and we are forced to use less specific disease modifiers. A second problem in dealing with the treatment of IgAN is the variability of glomerular manifestations and their severity. Some patients seem to show no progression of disease over many years, whereas others present with crescentic glomerulonephritis and progress to renal failure in weeks to months. How can one treatment be effective in such a diverse disease population? A third problem is the long duration of disease progression in many patients who ultimately do experience a progressive course. All treatments with medications must include an assessment of risk versus benefit by the prescribing clinician. The longer and slower the course of disease progression, the more that potential toxicities of treatment become a factor in this cost–benefit analysis.

Despite these limitations, numerous studies have examined the treatment of IgAN. Many include data on trials that are retrospective, nonrandomized, uncontrolled, or insufficient in number to reach statistically significant conclusions (6). Many patients who are unable to judge these data critically form opinions about treatment options from less-than-optimal sources. There are more data on the potential benefits of tonsillectomy in IgAN on the Internet than in the medical literature! Some therapies have little risk, have been shown to be effective in almost all studies regardless of flaws in design, and have been proved effective in randomized, controlled trials so that there is consensus. The use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin II receptor antagonists in patients with proteinuric or hypertensive IgAN is regarded as routine standard therapy by many clinicians (7). Likewise statin use in hyperlipidemic patients with IgAN is not a source of much controversy. However, there is no such consensus on therapy with fish oils or corticosteroids or other immunosuppressive agents for patients with IgAN, despite numerous studies. Some of these studies are very well designed, have been published in the very best medical journals, and would seem to provide a conclusive answer on therapy (8–10); yet they are counterbalanced by other studies that have failed to show positive results. If there were clear, confirmatory data from a well-performed large, randomized, blinded, controlled trial, then the answer would be clear. This is the intent of the manuscript by Hogg et al. in this issue of CJASN (11), which describes the much-awaited results of a large, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial that evaluated the role of prednisone and omega 3 fatty acids (O3FA) in slowing the progression of renal disease in patients with IgAN. Approximately 100 patients with biopsy-proven IgAN and a GFR >50 ml/min per 1.73 m2 were randomly assigned to receive either 2 yr of a tapering dose of prednisone every other day, 4 g/d O3FA, or placebo. Hypertensive patients were treated with an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, and the primary outcome was clearly defined as a fall in GFR to <60% of baseline. The results are disappointing for treatment enthusiasts. Neither the prednisone nor the O3FA showed benefit over the placebo group in time to renal failure. Indeed, of the 14 patients who experienced progressive renal failure, two were in the prednisone group, four were in the placebo group, and eight were in the O3FA group.

Does this study provide a definitive answer on therapy of IgAN? The bad news is, unfortunately, no. The authors state that definitive conclusions cannot be made from this study. The most significant factor in predicting progressive renal failure in this patient population was initial urine protein-to-creatinine ratio (UP/C). Those with a higher ratio had more progressive disease. Many other studies have noted that the degree of proteinuria at baseline or follow-up is of major prognostic influence in patients with IgAN (12,13). Unfortunately, the randomization process in this study did not stratify patients equally for urine UP/C. The O3FA group had significantly higher UP/C than the placebo group. Even with appropriate randomization for degree of proteinuria, the short follow-up even to 3 yr may not be long enough to show effects of treatment on the course of many patients.

There is good news in this study. This was a multicenter, randomized, blinded, and placebo-controlled trial. This is the way in which future treatment studies in IgAN must be designed. Small, retrospective, uncontrolled trials just will not give the answers that clinicians want and that their patients deserve. This study also calls attention to the fact that risk factor stratification, including UP/C, will be crucial in future studies. It points out the need for large numbers of patients with adequate follow-up periods. This clearly will require multicenter, national trials. Such a study of the use of mycophenolate mofetil in progressive IgAN now is under way in the United States. However, until definitive results are provided, the clinician still is served best by considering the risks and benefits of O3FA, prednisone, and other immunosuppressive agents on an individual basis.

  • Copyright © 2006 by the American Society of Nephrology

References

  1. ↵
    Haas M: IgA nephropathy. Semin Nephrol24 :177– 295,2004
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  2. ↵
    Geddes CC, Rauta V, Gronhagen-Riska C, Bartosik LP, Jardine AG, Ibels LS, Pei Y, Cattran DC: A tricontinental view of IgA nephropathy. Nephrol Dial Transplant18 :1541– 1548,2003
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    Ballardie FW: IgA nephropathy treatment 25 years on: Can we halt progression? The evidence base. Nephrol Dial Transplant19 :1041– 1046,2004
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    Alexopoulos E: Treatment of primary IgA nephropathy. Kidney Int65 :341– 345,2004
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    Coppo R, Amore A: Aberrant glycosylation in IgA nephropathy. Kidney Int65 :1544– 1547,2004
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    Strippoli G, Manno C, Schena FP: An “evidence based” survey of therapeutic options in IgA nephropathy: Assessment and criticism. Am J Kidney Dis41 :1129– 1139,2003
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    Praga M, Guitierrez E, Gonzales E, Morales E, Hernandez E: Treatment of IgA nephropathy with angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors: A randomized controlled trial. J Am Soc Nephrol14 :1578– 1583,2003
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    Pozzi C, Andrulli S, del Vecchio L, Melis P, Fogazzi GB, Altieri P, Ponticelli C, Locatelli F: Corticosteroid effectiveness in IgA nephropathy: Long-term results of a randomized controlled trial. J Am Soc Nephrol15 :157– 163,2004
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. Donadio JV Jr, Gande JP, Spenceer DC, Dart RA, Larson TS, Spencer DC: The long-term outcome of patients with IgAN treated with fish oil in a controlled trial. J Am Soc Nephrol10 :1772– 1777,1999
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    Ballardie FW, Roberts JD: Controlled prospective trial of prednisolone and cytotoxics in progressive IgA nephropathy. J Am Soc Nephrol13 :142– 148,2002
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    Hogg RJ, Lee J, Nardelli N, Julian BA, Cattran D, Waldo B, Wyatt R, Jennette C, Sibley R, Hyland K, Fitzgibbons L, Hirschmann G, Donadio JV, Holub BJ: Clinical trial to evaluate omega-3 fatty acids and alternate day prednisone in patients with IgA nephropathy: Report from the Southwest Pediatric Nephrology Study Group. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol1 :467– 474,2006
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    Bartosik LP, Lajoie G, Sugar L, Cattran DC: Predicting progression in IgA nephropathy. Am J Kidney Dis38 :728– 735,2001
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    Donadio JV, Bergstrahl, Grand JP, Rademcher DM: Proteinuria patterns and their association with subsequent end-stage renal disease in IgA nephropathy. Nephrol Dial Transplant17 :1197– 1203,2002
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
Vol. 1, Issue 3
May 2006
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
View Selected Citations (0)
Print
Download PDF
Sign up for Alerts
Email Article
Thank you for your help in sharing the high-quality science in CJASN.
Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
To Treat or Not to Treat IgA Nephropathy? That Is the Question!
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Society of Nephrology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Society of Nephrology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
To Treat or Not to Treat IgA Nephropathy? That Is the Question!
Gerald B. Appel
CJASN May 2006, 1 (3) 347-348; DOI: 10.2215/CJN.00330106

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
To Treat or Not to Treat IgA Nephropathy? That Is the Question!
Gerald B. Appel
CJASN May 2006, 1 (3) 347-348; DOI: 10.2215/CJN.00330106
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • View PDF

More in this TOC Section

  • Time to Procurement and Post-Kidney Transplant Outcomes
  • Recurrent Hyperkalemia in Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System Inhibitor (RAASi) Treatment
  • Postkidney Transplant Care and Health Outcomes of US Veterans
Show more Editorials

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Similar Articles

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Articles

  • Current Issue
  • Early Access
  • Subject Collections
  • Article Archive
  • ASN Meeting Abstracts

Information for Authors

  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Trainee of the Year
  • Author Resources
  • ASN Journal Policies
  • Reuse/Reprint Policy

About

  • CJASN
  • ASN
  • ASN Journals
  • ASN Kidney News

Journal Information

  • About CJASN
  • CJASN Email Alerts
  • CJASN Key Impact Information
  • CJASN Podcasts
  • CJASN RSS Feeds
  • Editorial Board

More Information

  • Advertise
  • ASN Podcasts
  • ASN Publications
  • Become an ASN Member
  • Feedback
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Password/Email Address Changes
  • Subscribe

© 2021 American Society of Nephrology

Print ISSN - 1555-9041 Online ISSN - 1555-905X

Powered by HighWire