<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rdf:RDF
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
 xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
 xmlns:prism="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/prism/"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
>

<channel rdf:about="http://cjasn.asnjournals.org">
<title>Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology Economics</title>
<link>http://cjasn.asnjournals.org</link>
<description>Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology RSS feed -- recent Economics articles</description>
<prism:eIssn>1555-905X</prism:eIssn>
<prism:publicationName>Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology</prism:publicationName>
<prism:issn>1555-9041</prism:issn>
<items>
 <rdf:Seq>
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://cjasn.asnjournals.org/cgi/content/short/4/2/419?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://cjasn.asnjournals.org/cgi/content/short/4/2/428?rss=1" />
 </rdf:Seq>
</items>
<image rdf:resource="http://cjasn.asnjournals.org/icons/banner/title.gif" />
</channel>

<image rdf:about="http://cjasn.asnjournals.org/icons/banner/title.gif">
<title>Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology</title>
<url>http://cjasn.asnjournals.org/icons/banner/title.gif</url>
<link>http://cjasn.asnjournals.org</link>
</image>

<item rdf:about="http://cjasn.asnjournals.org/cgi/content/short/4/2/419?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The Costs and Benefits of Automatic Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate Reporting]]></title>
<link>http://cjasn.asnjournals.org/cgi/content/short/4/2/419?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<P>Background and objectives: The prevalence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) has increased over the past two decades. The sensitivity of serum creatinine (sCr) to identify CKD is low. As a result, many healthcare centers report estimated GFR (eGFR) with routine blood work. The aim of this study was to determine the cost-effectiveness of automatic eGFR reporting compared with reporting sCr alone.</P>
<P>Design, setting, participants, &amp; measurements: A Markov model was designed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of reporting eGFR compared with reporting sCr alone in a hypothetical cohort of 60-yr-old individuals undergoing annual blood chemistry testing over 18 yr. Paths and path probabilities were identical between the two arms, except for the sensitivity and specificity of eGFR and sCr to detect CKD.</P>
<P>Results: eGFR reporting was dominant with a cost/effectiveness ratio of $16,751/quality-adjusted life year (QALY) <I>versus</I> $16,779/QALY for sCr reporting. Monte Carlo microsimulations in a hypothetical cohort of 10,000 patients demonstrated that over 18 yr, an average of 13 fewer deaths, 29 fewer ESRD events, and 11,348 more false positive CKD (FP-CKD) cases occurred with eGFR reporting. A sensitivity analysis revealed that decreasing the FP-CKD quality of life by &gt; 2% rendered sCr reporting more cost-effective than eGFR reporting. If FP-CKD reduced quality of life by 5%, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for sCr reporting <I>versus</I> eGFR reporting would be $4367/QALY.</P>
<P>Conclusion: A decision analysis suggests that reporting eGFR may be beneficial, but this limited benefit was reversed with virtually any reduction in quality of life caused by incorrect diagnosis of CKD.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[den Hartog, J. R., Reese, P. P., Cizman, B., Feldman, H. I.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-02-13</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2215/CJN.04080808</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The Costs and Benefits of Automatic Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate Reporting]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Nephrology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>4</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>427</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-02-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>419</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Economics</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://cjasn.asnjournals.org/cgi/content/short/4/2/428?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Outcomes of Staphylococcus aureus Infection in Hemodialysis-Dependent Patients]]></title>
<link>http://cjasn.asnjournals.org/cgi/content/short/4/2/428?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<P>Background and objectives: <I>Staphylococcus aureus</I> is a leading cause of infection in patients with ESRD. Clinical and economic outcomes associated with <I>S. aureus</I> bacteremia and other <I>S. aureus</I> infections in patients with ESRD were examined.</P>
<P>Design, setting, participants, &amp; measurements: Laboratory, clinical, and hospital billing data from a randomized trial of 3359 hemodialysis-dependent patients hospitalized with <I>S. aureus</I> infection in the United States whose vascular access type was fistula or graft and who were hospitalized with <I>S. aureus</I> infection to evaluate inpatient costs, hospital days, and mortality over 12 wk were used. Generalized linear regression was used to identify independent predictors of 12-wk costs, inpatient days, and mortality.</P>
<P>Results: Of the 279 patients (8.3%) who developed <I>S. aureus</I> infection during approximately 1 yr of follow-up, 25.4% were treated as outpatients. Among patients for whom billing data were available, 89 patients hospitalized with <I>S. aureus</I> bacteremia incurred mean 12-wk inpatient costs of $19,454 and 11.9 inpatient days. Among the 70 patients hospitalized with non-bloodstream <I>S. aureus</I> infections, mean inpatient costs were $19,222 and the mean number of inpatient days was 11.3. Twelve-week mortality was 20.2 and 15.7% for patients with <I>S. aureus</I> bloodstream and non-bloodstream infections, respectively. Older age was independently associated with higher risk of death among patients with <I>S. aureus</I> bacteremia and with higher inpatient costs and more hospital days among patients with non-bloodstream infections.</P>
<P>Conclusions: Hemodialysis-dependent patients with fistula or graft access incur high costs and long inpatient stays when hospitalized for <I>S. aureus</I> infection.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Li, Y., Friedman, J. Y., O'Neal, B. F., Hohenboken, M. J., Griffiths, R. I., Stryjewski, M. E., Middleton, J. P., Schulman, K. A., Inrig, J. K., Fowler, V. G., Reed, S. D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-02-13</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2215/CJN.03760708</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Outcomes of Staphylococcus aureus Infection in Hemodialysis-Dependent Patients]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Nephrology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>4</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>434</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-02-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>428</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Economics</prism:section>
</item>

</rdf:RDF>