CJASN
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published ahead of print on October 22, 2008
Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
© 2008 American Society of Nephrology
doi: 10.2215/CJN.04840908
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
CJN.04840908v1
3/6/1608    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Parasuraman, R.
Right arrow Articles by Venkat, K. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Parasuraman, R.
Right arrow Articles by Venkat, K. K.


COMMENTARY TO CONTROVERSIES IN NEPHROLOGY

Utility of Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate in Live Kidney Donation

Ravi Parasuraman 1 and K. K. Venkat

Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan


1 To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: rparasu1{at}hfhs.org.


   Abstract

Live kidney donation is considered safe; nevertheless, data supporting such claims are almost exclusively of white origin with very limited long-term outcomes in ethnic minority donors. This prospective observational study consisted of a total of 103 previous kidney donors (54 black and 49 white) with mean follow-up days of 743.5 ± 603.9 for white and 845.1 ± 668.5 for black donors. The black donors had a statistically significant greater loss of estimated GFR (eGFR; 39.8 ml/min per 1.73 m2) in comparison with white donors (30.4 ml/min per 1.73 m2; P = 0.001). In multivariate analysis, predonation eGFR of <100 ml/min and age at the time of donation were the significant predictors for postdonation eGFR <60 ml/min among black donors. Because eGFR using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease 4 formula is not validated in live kidney donors, the significance of eGFR <60 ml/min per 1.73 m2 in previous kidney donors is unclear. Long-term prospective study with a gold standard method such as iothalamate GFR measurement is needed to define the actual decrease in eGFR after kidney donation.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
NEJMHome page
C. L. Davis, M. Cooper, W. L. Freeman, L. F. Ross, J. R. Thistlethwaite Jr., L. F.C. Dols, W. Weimar, J. N.M. IJzermans, H. N. Ibrahim, and A. J. Matas
Long-Term Consequences of Kidney Donation
N. Engl. J. Med., May 28, 2009; 360(22): 2370 - 2372.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2008 by the American Society of Nephrology.