CJASN
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published ahead of print on March 4, 2009
Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
© 2009 American Society of Nephrology
doi: 10.2215/CJN.04400808
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
CJN.04400808v1
4/3/651    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tanemoto, M.
Right arrow Articles by Ito, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tanemoto, M.
Right arrow Articles by Ito, S.

Received August 29, 2008
Accepted on November 26, 2008

ORIGINAL ARTICLES

Hemodynamic Index of Atheromatous Renal Artery Stenosis for Angioplasty

Masayuki Tanemoto 1, Takehiro Suzuki , Michiaki Abe , Takaaki Abe , and Sadayoshi Ito

Division of Nephrology, Hypertension, and Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine


1 To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: mtanemoto-tky{at}umin.ac.jp.


   Abstract

Background and objectives: Trans-stenotic pressure gradient across the constriction (PG), a hemodynamic variable of atheromatous renal artery stenosis (ARAS), is a widely used indicator for angioplasty, but its association with the outcome of angioplasty has not been fully investigated.

Design, setting, participants & measurements: In 34 hypertensive cases with unilateral ARAS, we evaluated hemodymanic variables of ARAS with reference to the systemic BP reduction after angioplasty as the outcome.

Results: In each phase, PG divided by its corresponding prestenotic arterial BP (PG/preBP) had better association with the outcome than PG. The mean phase PG/preBP had the largest area under the curve in the receiver operating characteristic analysis (0.794) with the sensitivity/specificity of 0.957/0.545 for its cut-off >0.15. Although the plasma renin activity, which reflects the perfusion to renal parenchyma, was higher in the angioplasty-efficacious cases than in the angioplasty-inefficacious cases before angioplasty (7.8 ± 6.6 versus 3.4 ± 3.8 ng/ml/h, P = 0.049), it was not generally reduced by angioplasty independent of the outcome.

Conclusions: As the index to select ARAS for angioplasty, PG/preBP was better than PG and the mean phase PG/preBP could be the best. However, other factors such as the microvascular kidney disease, which affect the perfusion to renal parenchyma, would influence the outcome.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society of Nephrology.