CJASN
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published ahead of print on February 13, 2008
Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
© 2008 American Society of Nephrology
doi: 10.2215/CJN.03460807
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
CJN.03460807v1
3/3/736    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Clark, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Golper, T. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Clark, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Golper, T. A.

Received August 16, 2007
Accepted on January 14, 2008

ORIGINAL ARTICLES

Safety and Efficacy of Regional Citrate Anticoagulation During 8-Hour Sustained Low-Efficiency Dialysis

John A. Clark , Gerald Schulman , and Thomas A. Golper 1

Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee


1 To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: thomas.golper{at}vanderbilt.edu.


   Abstract

Background and objectives: Patients who may benefit from sustained low-efficiency dialysis therapy are often at risk for bleeding. A safe and simple "regional" anticoagulation strategy would be beneficial. The modification of existing regional citrate anticoagulation protocols to typically performed 8-h sustained low-efficiency dialysis is necessary.

Design, setting, participants, & measurements: Sustained low-efficiency dialysis was performed at blood and dialysate rates of 250 and 300 ml/min, respectively. The circuit was anticoagulated with 4% sodium citrate (citrate 136, sodium 408 mmol/L) and reversed with CaCl2. Every 2 h, electrolytes, ionized circuit, and patient calcium were monitored during the first two versions. The second version differed by an increased infusion of CaCl2 and lower infusion of citrate, both by 10%. The third version measured only laboratory values before and after sustained low-efficiency dialysis.

Results: There were 41 treatments in the first iteration, 42 in the second, and 34 in the final iteration. All versions were titrated to maintain patient ionized calcium of 4.0 to 4.8 mg/dl (1.0 to 1.2 mmol/L) and the circuit ionized calcium between 0.8 and 1.6 mg/dl (0.2 and 0.4 mmol/L). The final protocol infusion was 31 mmol/h citrate and 41 mmol/h elemental calcium, which kept circuit and patient ionized calcium at targets. No unexpected metabolic complications occurred.

Conclusions: Compared with continuous renal replacement therapy, one must increase the calcium infusion because of the more efficient removal of the calcium citrate complex. Safe and effective regional citrate anticoagulation can be performed in 8-h sustained low-efficiency dialysis without metabolic complications with laboratory surveillance only before and after sustained low-efficiency dialysis treatment; however, certain safeguards are mandatory.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2008 by the American Society of Nephrology.