CJASN
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published ahead of print on September 10, 2008
Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
© 2008 American Society of Nephrology
doi: 10.2215/CJN.02860608
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
CJN.02860608v1
3/6/1615    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Perazella, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Parikh, C. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Perazella, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Parikh, C. R.

Received June 11, 2008
Accepted on July 16, 2008

ORIGINAL ARTICLES

Diagnostic Value of Urine Microscopy for Differential Diagnosis of Acute Kidney Injury in Hospitalized Patients

Mark A. Perazella 1, Steven G. Coca , Mehmet Kanbay , Ursula C. Brewster , and Chirag R. Parikh

Section of Nephrology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut


1 To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: mark.perazella{at}yale.edu.


   Abstract

Background and objectives: Urine microscopy is the oldest and one of the most commonly used tests for differential diagnosis of acute kidney injury (AKI), but its performance has not been adequately studied in the setting of AKI.

Design, setting, participants, & measurements: Fresh urine samples were obtained from 267 consecutive patients with AKI, and urinary sediment was examined. The cause of AKI was assessed at two time points: (1) Before urine microscopy diagnosis and (2) after patient discharge or death (final diagnosis). A urinary scoring system also was created on the basis of casts and renal tubular epithelial cells (RTEC) to differentiate acute tubular necrosis (ATN) from prerenal AKI.

Results: The urinary sediment scoring system was highly predictive of the final diagnosis of ATN. In patients with a high pretest probability of ATN (initial diagnosis of ATN), any casts or RTEC (score ≥2) resulted in very high positive predictive value and low negative predictive value for a final diagnosis of ATN. In patients with a low pretest probability of ATN (initial diagnosis of prerenal AKI), lack of casts or RTEC on urinary sediment examination had a sensitivity of 0.73 and specificity of 0.75 for a final diagnosis of prerenal AKI. The negative predictive value of lack of casts or RTEC in patients with low pretest probability of disease was 91%.

Conclusions: Urine sediment examination is a valuable diagnostic tool for confirming the diagnosis of ATN. A score of ≥2 on an ATN urinary sediment scoring system is an extremely strong predictor of ATN.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CJASNHome page
M. A. Perazella and C. R. Parikh
How Can Urine Microscopy Influence the Differential Diagnosis of AKI?
Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., April 1, 2009; 4(4): 691 - 693.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2008 by the American Society of Nephrology.