CJASN
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published ahead of print on January 24, 2007
Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
© 2007 American Society of Nephrology
doi: 10.2215/CJN.01880606
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
CJN.01880606v1
2/2/268    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schon, D.
Right arrow Articles by de Lissovoy, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schon, D.
Right arrow Articles by de Lissovoy, G.

Received June 1, 2006
Accepted on December 17, 2006

ORIGINAL ARTICLES

Increasing the Use of Arteriovenous Fistula in Hemodialysis: Economic Benefits and Economic Barriers

Donald Schon *, Steven W. Blume {dagger}1, Kimberly Niebauer {dagger}, Christopher S. Hollenbeak {dagger}{ddagger}, and Gregory de Lissovoy {dagger}{sect}

*Arizona Kidney Disease and Hypertension Center Surgery Center and Renal Section, University of Arizona Health Sciences Center, Phoenix, Arizona; {dagger}Center for Health Economics and Policy, United BioSource Corp., Bethesda, Maryland; {ddagger}Surgery and Health Evaluation Sciences, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania; and {sect}Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland


1 To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: steve.blume{at}unitedbiosource.com.


   Abstract

The Fistula First Initiative set a goal of 66% arteriovenous (AV) fistula-based access among US hemodialysis patients. This study modeled the impact of achieving the target AV fistula placement rate on Medicare expenditures and on dialysis patient survival and also reviewed economic disincentives for providers that will inhibit achieving this target. The model projects lifetime costs and survival in the US 2003 incident hemodialysis population. Annual treatment costs were estimated from previous analyses of Medicare expenditures by access modality. Patient survival by mode of access was derived from the Dialysis Morbidity and Mortality Study (DMMS). These parameters were applied to a cohort of patients who meet the 66% AV fistula target and an identical cohort with the current vascular access case mix. Comparison of outcomes yields estimates of differential total expenditures and total patient life-years. If prevalence AV fistula-based access in the 2003 incident hemodialysis cohort were 66% rather than the observed 35%, then the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services would save $840 million in access-attributed expenditures over the expected lifetime of these patients. However, population survival would increase by 35,000 additional life-years, increasing total lifetime expenditures by a net of $1.4 billion. Relative to the current mix of access modality, the shift to 66% AV fistula would be achieved at a net incremental cost of $40,000 per year of life gained. Economic barriers to reaching this goal include financial disincentives to providing adequate predialysis care, performing AV fistula surgical procedures, and monitoring vascular access flow. Achievement of the 66% AV fistula target is cost-effective. Financial incentives in the form of higher reimbursement to encourage wider use of AV fistula placement also could be cost-effective.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CJASNHome page
L. M. Moist, L. Trpeski, Y. Na, and C. E. Lok
Increased Hemodialysis Catheter Use in Canada and Associated Mortality Risk: Data from the Canadian Organ Replacement Registry 2001-2004
Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., November 1, 2008; 3(6): 1726 - 1732.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2007 by the American Society of Nephrology.