CJASN
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published ahead of print on March 29, 2006
Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
© 2006 American Society of Nephrology
doi: 10.2215/CJN.01541005
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
CJN.01541005v1
1/3/475    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Singh, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Singh, H.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article

Received October 31, 2005
Accepted on January 29, 2006

ORIGINAL ARTICLES

Effect of Intravenous Iron Sucrose in Peritoneal Dialysis Patients Who Receive Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agents for Anemia: A Randomized, Controlled Trial

Harmeet Singh *, John Reed {dagger}, Sylvia Noble {ddagger}, Jose L. Cangiano {sect}, David B. Van Wyck , and for the United States Iron Sucrose (Venofer) Clinical Trials Group

*Western Nephrology & Metabolic Bone Disease, PC, Lakewood, Colorado; {dagger}Nephrology Associates, Columbus, Mississippi; {ddagger}Northwestern Louisiana Nephrology, Shreveport, Louisiana; {sect}Puerto Rico School of Medicine, San Juan, Puerto Rico; and ||University of Arizona College of Medicine, Tucson, Arizona



   Abstract

Although iron therapy is essential to optimize use of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESA), randomized, controlled trials have heretofore been unavailable to evaluate reliably the efficacy of intravenous iron as an adjuvant to ESA treatment in peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients. In a multicenter trial, patients who had anemia, PD-dependent chronic kidney disease, stable ESA therapy, and a broad range of iron status (ferritin ≤500 ng/ml, transferrin saturation ≤25%) were randomly assigned to receive either 1 g of iron sucrose intravenously in three divided doses (300 mg over 1.5 h on days 1 and 15, 400 mg over 2.5 h on day 29) or no supplemental iron. No serious adverse drug events occurred after intravenous iron administration. The primary end point, peak hemoglobin increase, was higher (1.3 ± 1.1 versus 0.7 ± 1.1, mean ± SD; P = 0.0028), and anemia intervention (transfusion, increase in ESA dose, or intravenous iron therapy not called for in protocol) occurred later (P = 0.0137) and less often in intravenous iron-treated patients compared with untreated control subjects (one of 66 [1.3%] versus five of 30 [16.7%]). Among patients who did not require intervention, iron-treated patients showed a calculated net ESA dose decrease compared with untreated control subjects. Baseline iron status did not predict responsiveness to intravenous iron therapy. Intravenous iron sucrose is an effective adjunct to ESA therapy in anemic patients with PD-dependent chronic kidney disease and is administered safely as 300 mg over 1.5 h or 400 mg over 2.5 h. Evidence of iron deficiency at baseline is not required to demonstrate intravenous iron efficacy.


Related Article

Intravenous Iron Therapy in Peritoneal Dialysis Patients: Short-Term Efficacy and Long-Term Issues
Richard A. Zager
Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2006 1: 353-355. [Full Text] [PDF]






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2006 by the American Society of Nephrology.