CJASN
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published ahead of print on May 21, 2008
Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
© 2008 American Society of Nephrology
doi: 10.2215/CJN.01510308
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
CJN.01510308v1
3/5/1364    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Agarwal, R.
Right arrow Articles by Kelley, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Agarwal, R.
Right arrow Articles by Kelley, K.

Received March 31, 2008
Accepted on April 24, 2008

Article

Diagnosing Hypertension by Intradialytic Blood Pressure Recordings

Rajiv Agarwal *1, Tesfamariam Metiku *, Getachew G. Tegegne *, Robert P. Light *, Zerihun Bunaye *, Dagim M. Bekele *, and Ken Kelley {dagger}

*Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine and Richard L. Roudebush VA Medical Center, Indianapolis, Indiana; and {dagger}Inquiry Methodology Program, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana


1 To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: ragarwal{at}iupui.edu.


   Abstract

Background and objectives: The diagnosis of hypertension among hemodialysis patients by predialysis or postdialysis blood pressure (BP) recordings is imprecise and biased and has poor test-retest reliability. The use of intradialytic BP measurements to diagnose hypertension is unknown.

Design, setting, participants, & measurements: A diagnostic-test study was done with interdialytic ambulatory BP as reference standard. Index BP recordings tested were: predialysis (method 1), postdialysis (method 2), intradialytic (method 3), intradialytic including predialyis and postdialysis (method 4), and the average of predialysis and postdialysis (method 5). Each index BP was recorded over six consecutive dialysis treatments.

Results: There were differences among index BP measurements in reproducibility, bias, precision, and accuracy. Method 4 was the most reproducible (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.70 for systolic and diastolic BP). All 5 measurement methods overestimated 44-h ambulatory systolic BP. Methods 2, 3, or 4 overestimated ambulatory systolic BP by only a small amount. Method 4 was the most precise and accurate. For diagnosis of hypertension, BP cut-point by method 4 of 135/75 mmHg, had a sensitivity of 90.4% and specificity of 75.9% for systolic BP (area under ROC curve 0.90). Median cut-off systolic BP of 140 mmHg from a single dialysis provides approximately 80% sensitivity and 80% specificity in diagnosing systolic hypertension; a median cut-off diastolic BP of 80 mmHg provides approximately 75% sensitivity and 75% specificity in diagnosing diastolic hypertension.

Conclusions: Consideration of intradialytic BP measurements together with predialysis and postdialysis BP measurements improves the reproducibility, bias, precision, and accuracy of BP measurement compared with predialysis or postdialysis measurements.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CJASNHome page
B. M. Chavers, C. A. Solid, F. X. Daniels, S.-C. Chen, A. J. Collins, D. L. Frankenfield, and C. A. Herzog
Hypertension in Pediatric Long-term Hemodialysis Patients in the United States
Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., August 1, 2009; 4(8): 1363 - 1369.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2008 by the American Society of Nephrology.