CJASN
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published ahead of print on May 17, 2006
Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
© 2006 American Society of Nephrology
doi: 10.2215/CJN.01110905
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
CJN.01110905v1
1/4/730    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kanno, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Suzuki, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kanno, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Suzuki, H.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article

Received September 23, 2005
Accepted on March 27, 2006

ORIGINAL ARTICLES

Add-On Angiotensin Receptor Blocker in Patients Who Have Proteinuric Chronic Kidney Diseases and Are Treated with Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors

Yoshihiko Kanno *, Tsuneo Takenaka *, Tsukasa Nakamura {dagger}, and Hiromichi Suzuki *1

*Department of Nephrology, Saitama Medical School, Saitama, and {dagger}Department of Internal Medicine, Shin Matsudo Central General Hospital, Chiba, Japan


1 To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: iromichi{at}saitama-med.ac.jp.


   Abstract

The benefit of the add-on angiotensin II receptor blocker candesartan to angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors in inhibition of progression of nephropathy in hypertensive patient with nondiabetic renal disease compared with monotherapy with ACE inhibitors remains controversial. All patients were previously treated with ACE inhibitors. Urinary protein excretion of patients exceeded 1.0 g/d despite treatment with ACE inhibitors. Ninety hypertensive patients with chronic renal insufficiency were randomly assigned to one of two groups. One group received ACE inhibitor plus candesartan (2 to 12 mg/d), and a control group received only ACE inhibitor. The target BP was ≤130/80 mmHg. The primary outcome was the changes in serum creatinine and the reduction of proteinuria. The mean duration of follow-up was 3.1 ± 0.4 yr. At years 2 and 3, systolic and diastolic BP were reduced from 140 ± 3/84 ± 2 to 129 ± 1/78 ± 2 mmHg (candesartan group) and from 135 ± 2/85 ± 2 to 130 ± 2/80 ± 2 mmHg (ACE inhibitors group). In both groups, both systolic and diastolic BP decreased significantly from the beginning to the end of the study (P < 0.01). The serum creatinine concentration increased from 3.02 ± 0.27 to 3.38 ± 0.49 mg/dl (candesartan plus ACE inhibitor group) versus 3.00 ± 0.37 to 4.48 ± 0.57 mg/dl (ACE inhibitor group; P < 0.01) at year 3. Although the level of proteinuria significantly declined in each group (P < 0.05), the degree of reductions in proteinuria was greater in the candesartan group than in the ACE inhibitors group (P < 0.01). In the patients who were treated with candesartan and ACE inhibitor or ACE inhibitor alone, pretreatment proteinuria correlated significantly with decline of renal function, whereas reduction of proteinuria negatively correlated with decline in renal function in the patients who were treated with candesartan. Candesartan with an ACE inhibitor is effective in slowing the progression of renal insufficiency in hypertensive patients with nondiabetic renal disease through reduction of proteinuria.


Related Article

More Work to Do on Renin-Angiotensin System Blockade
Yiming Z. Lit and Timothy W. Meyer
Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2006 1: 611-613. [Full Text] [PDF]






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2006 by the American Society of Nephrology.