|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Received February 21, 2007
Accepted on March 26, 2007
ORIGINAL ARTICLES |
1,
,
,
,
,
,
*Dialysis Center Groningen,
Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology,
Hospital and Clinical Pharmacy,
Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University Medical Center Groningen and University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
1 To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: j.j.dasselaar{at}dcg.umcg.nl.
| Abstract |
|---|
Measurements of relative blood volume changes (
RBV) during hemodialysis (HD) are based on hemoconcentration and assume uniform mixing of erythrocytes and plasma throughout the circulation. However, whole-body hematocrit (Ht) is lower than systemic Ht. During HD, a change in the ratio between whole-body to systemic Ht (F cell ratio) is likely to occur as a result of a net shift of low Ht blood from the microcirculation to the macrocirculation. Hence,
RBV may differ significantly from total blood volume changes (
TBV). Therefore, this study compared
RBV and
TBV during HD. Plasma and erythrocyte volumes were measured using 125I- and 123I-radioiodinated albumin and 51Cr-labeled erythrocytes, respectively. After validation of the standardized method in two patients on a nondialysis day, seven patients completed the protocol during HD. 125I-albumin and 51Cr-labeled erythrocytes were administered 20 min before the start of HD. 123I-albumin was administered at 160 min into the HD session to quantify and correct for 125I-albumin leakage.
RBV was measured continuously throughout HD. The F cell ratio was derived from whole-body and systemic Ht. Total ultrafiltration volume was 2450 ± 770 ml. TBV declined from 5905 ± 824 to 4877 ± 722 ml during HD. Thus, TBV declined 17.3 ± 4.4%, whereas the RBV decline was only 8.2 ± 3.7% (P = 0.001). The F cell ratio increased from 0.896 ± 0.036 to 0.993 ± 0.049 during HD (P = 0.002).
RBV significantly underestimates
TBV during HD. The rise in F cell ratio strongly suggests that during HD, blood translocates from the microcirculation to the macrocirculation, probably as a cardiovascular compensatory mechanism in response to hypovolemia.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. Schneditz, D. Platzer, and J. T. Daugirdas A diffusion-adjusted regional blood flow model to predict solute kinetics during haemodialysis Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., July 1, 2009; 24(7): 2218 - 2224. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. F. Palmer and W. L. Henrich Recent Advances in the Prevention and Management of Intradialytic Hypotension J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., January 1, 2008; 19(1): 8 - 11. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH |