CJASN
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published ahead of print on December 28, 2005
Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
© 2005 American Society of Nephrology
doi: 10.2215/CJN.00820805
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
CJN.00820805v1
1/2/269    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Van Biesen, W.
Right arrow Articles by Vanholder, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Van Biesen, W.
Right arrow Articles by Vanholder, R.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article

Received August 25, 2005
Accepted on November 23, 2005

ORIGINAL ARTICLES

The Personal Dialysis Capacity Test Is Superior to the Peritoneal Equilibration Test to Discriminate Inflammation as the Cause of Fast Transport Status in Peritoneal Dialysis Patients

Wim Van Biesen 1, Arjan Van Der Tol , Nic Veys , Clement Dequidt , Denise Vijt , Norbert Lameire , and Raymond Vanholder

Department of Nephrology, University Hospital Ghent, Ghent, Belgium


1 To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: wim.vanbiesen{at}ugent.be.


   Abstract

This study evaluated the potential of the Personal Dialysis Capacity (PDC) test to discriminate fast transport status (FTS) as a consequence of inflammation versus FTS because of other causes. This distinction is important because new therapeutic options such as icodextrin and automated peritoneal dialysis can abolish the negative impact on outcome of FTS if fast transport is not caused by inflammation. A PDC test and a Peritoneal Equilibration Test (PET) were performed in 135 incident PD patients. Membrane characteristics were related with baseline biochemical parameters and C-reactive protein. After correction for other covariates, only large pore flux (JvL) but not surface area over diffusion distance (A0/dX) or dialysate over plasma concentration was related to C-reactive protein. Using the PDC test for detection of inflammation, positive and negative predictive values were 16/36 and 80/99, respectively, whereas with PET, positive predictive value was 5/20 and negative predictive value 92/115 ({chi}2 = 0.009). In a Cox regression for patient survival with correction for age, a JvL higher than expected by the surface area over diffusion distance, predicted outcome (P = 0.04). Patients with inflammation had a higher JvL (0.21 ± 0.12 versus 0.17 ± 0.09; P = 0.06) and a lower ultrafiltration (89 ± 631 versus 386 ± 601 ml/d; P = 0.06) and urine output (878.45 ± 533.55 versus 1322 ± 822 ml/d; P = 0.023) than patients without inflammation. There was no difference for surface area over diffusion distance (A0/dX) or dialysate over plasma concentration. A PDC test yields far more information about the peritoneal membrane characteristics than a PET. A JvL higher than expected by the A0/dX is an indicator of inflammation and is related to an increased mortality. The PET is not able to discriminate between FTS because of inflammation versus because of anatomic reasons, whereas the PDC test does.


Related Article

Peritoneal Inflammation and High Transport Status
Ramesh Khanna
Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2006 1: 167-169. [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CJASNHome page
J. Perl, K. Huckvale, M. Chellar, B. John, and S. J. Davies
Peritoneal Protein Clearance and not Peritoneal Membrane Transport Status Predicts Survival in a Contemporary Cohort of Peritoneal Dialysis Patients
Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., July 1, 2009; 4(7): 1201 - 1206.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CJASNHome page
A. Davenport and M. K. Willicombe
Hydration Status Does Not Influence Peritoneal Equilibration Test Ultrafiltration Volumes
Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., July 1, 2009; 4(7): 1207 - 1212.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NDT PlusHome page
A. M. Coester, W. Smit, D. G. Struijk, and R. T. Krediet
Peritoneal function in clinical practice: the importance of follow-up and its measurement in patients. Recommendations for patient information and measurement of peritoneal function
NDT Plus, April 1, 2009; 2(2): 104 - 110.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
pdiHome page
A. Jorres, C. Lage, J. Witowski, and T. O. Bender
QUALITY ASSURANCE IN PERITONEAL DIALYSIS
Perit. Dial. Int., June 1, 2007; 27(Supplement_2): S16 - S20.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2005 by the American Society of Nephrology.