CJASN
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published ahead of print on May 3, 2006
Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
© 2006 American Society of Nephrology
doi: 10.2215/CJN.00580705
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
CJN.00580705v1
1/4/774    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Inrig, J. K.
Right arrow Articles by Szczech, L. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Inrig, J. K.
Right arrow Articles by Szczech, L. A.

Received July 29, 2005
Accepted on March 15, 2006

ORIGINAL ARTICLES

Mortality by Dialysis Modality among Patients Who Have End-Stage Renal Disease and Are Awaiting Renal Transplantation

Jula K. Inrig *1, Jie L. Sun {dagger}, Qinghong Yang {dagger}, Libbie P. Briley *, and Lynda A. Szczech *

*Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Duke University Medical Center, and {dagger}Department of Statistics, Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina


1 To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: inrig001{at}mc.duke.edu.


   Abstract

Comparing outcomes related to dialysis modality is complicated by selection bias introduced by patients and physicians. To address the impact of selection bias, this study compared mortality by initial dialysis modality among patients who had ESRD and were placed on the transplant waiting list. This study was a historical prospective cohort of 12,568 patients in the United States who initiated dialysis between May 1, 1995, and October 31, 1998, and were placed on the transplant waiting list before dialysis initiation. Two-year mortality was compared using Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards models that analyzed patients primarily using an intention-to-treat approach and separately censored patients on a modality switch. At 2 yr, the unadjusted mortality rate was 6.6% among peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients compared with 6.9% among hemodialysis (HD) patients (hazard ratio [HR] 1.01; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.82 to 1.23). After controlling for differences in baseline characteristics, comorbidities, and laboratory variables, the selection of PD versus HD remained associated with a similar 2-yr mortality risk (HR 1.03; 95% CI 0.83 to 1.28). In separate models, 2-yr mortality associated with PD versus HD was significant among patients with body mass index (BMI) ≥26 kg/m2 (HR 1.37; 95% CI 1.01 to 1.83) but not among patients with BMI <26 kg/m2 (HR 0.81; 95% CI 0.61 to 1.07). Results were similar after censoring on a modality switch. In conclusion, although choice of initial dialysis modality seems to be associated with equivalent outcomes among patients who have ESRD and are placed on the transplant waiting list, patients with BMI ≥26 kg/m2 have increased 2-yr mortality associated with the selection of PD versus HD. Because the interpretation of observational data is highly affected by residual confounding and selection bias, further efforts should focus on the formation and testing of hypotheses to improve dialysis delivery.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
S. P. McDonald, M. R. Marshall, D. W. Johnson, and K. R. Polkinghorne
Relationship between Dialysis Modality and Mortality
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., January 1, 2009; 20(1): 155 - 163.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2006 by the American Society of Nephrology.