CJASN
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published ahead of print on November 16, 2005
Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
© 2005 American Society of Nephrology
doi: 10.2215/CJN.00340705
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
CJN.00340705v1
1/1/33    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Suri, R. S.
Right arrow Articles by Daugirdas, J. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Suri, R. S.
Right arrow Articles by Daugirdas, J. T.

Received July 5, 2005
Accepted on September 27, 2005

Original Articles

Daily Hemodialysis: A Systematic Review

Rita S. Suri *1, Gihad E. Nesrallah {dagger}, Rahul Mainra *, Amit X. Garg *{ddagger}, Robert M. Lindsay *, Tom Greene {sect}, and John T. Daugirdas ||

*Division of Nephrology and {ddagger}Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario and {dagger}Division of Nephrology, Humber Regional Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; {sect}Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic Research Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio; and ||Department of Medicine, University of Illinois, Chicago, Illinois


1 To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: rita.suri{at}lhsc.on.ca.


   Abstract

Several studies have reported improved outcomes with daily hemodialysis (DHD), but the strength of this evidence has not been evaluated. The published evidence on DHD was synthesized and its quality rated to inform need and sample size calculations for a randomized trial. Citations were identified in MEDLINE and EMBASE using validated search strategies. Dialysis journals that were not indexed and bibliographies of relevant articles were hand-searched. Two authors reviewed all citations. Articles that reported original data on five or more adults who were receiving DHD (1.5 to 3 h, 5 to 7 d/wk) for ≥3 mo were included. Twenty-five articles reporting 14 unique populations with 268 patients (five to 72 per study) met inclusion criteria. Of the 14 cohorts, 13 were studied with an observational design, 10 were studied prospectively, and four had parallel control groups. Mean age ranged form 41 to 64 yr, mean time on dialysis was 2 to 11 yr, 0 to 28% of patients had diabetes, >90% had arteriovenous fistulae, and >50% were dialyzed at home. Most data were described at ≤12 mo of follow-up. Outcomes included quality of life, cardiovascular disease, erythropoiesis, nutritional status, hospitalizations, and vascular access failures. Reporting was too heterogeneous to allow pooling of data. Ten of 11 studies suggested improvements in blood pressure; findings for other outcomes varied. Discontinuation of DHD occurred in 0 to 57% in-center and 0 to 15% home patients. Studies of DHD are limited by small sample size, nonideal control groups, selection and dropout biases, and paucity of data on potential risks. Randomized trials with adequate statistical power are required to establish the efficacy and the safety of DHD.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CJASNHome page
A. S. Kliger
New Options to Improve Hemodialysis Patient Outcomes
Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., April 1, 2009; 4(4): 694 - 695.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
C. Couchoud, J. Kooman, P. Finne, T. Leivestad, O. Stojceva-Taneva, J. B. Ponikvar, F. Collart, R. Kramar, A. de Francisco, K. J. Jager, et al.
From registry data collection to international comparisons: examples of haemodialysis duration and frequency
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., January 1, 2009; 24(1): 217 - 224.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NDT PlusHome page
I. Ledebo and C. Ronco
The best dialysis therapy? Results from an international survey among nephrology professionals
NDT Plus, December 1, 2008; 1(6): 403 - 408.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
C. P. Lee, S. A. Zenios, and G. M. Chertow
Cost-Effectiveness of Frequent In-Center Hemodialysis
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., September 1, 2008; 19(9): 1792 - 1797.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
P. Komenda, M. Copland, L. Er, O. Djurdjev, and A. Levin
Outcomes of a provincial home haemodialysis programme--a two-year experience: establishing benchmarks for programme evaluation
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., August 1, 2008; 23(8): 2647 - 2652.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
A. X. Garg, T. Greene, and N. W. Levin
A well-conducted randomized trial that establishes no benefit of therapy is an important medical advance
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., January 1, 2008; 23(1): 52 - 55.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2005 by the American Society of Nephrology.