|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Renal Transplantation |



* McGill University Health Center, Royal Victoria Hospital, Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Montreal, Quebec, Canada;
Department of Biostatistics and
Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, University of Michigan; and
Ann Arbor Research Collaborative for Health, Ann Arbor, Michigan
Correspondence: Dr. Douglas Keith, McGill University Health Center, Royal Victoria Hospital, Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, 687 Avenue Des Pins, Montreal, PQ, Canada H3A 1A1. Phone: 514-934-1934, ext. 34672; Fax: 514-843-2815; E-mail: Douglas.Keith{at}muhc.mcgill.ca
Background and objectives: Disparities in time to placement on the waiting list on the basis of socioeconomic factors decrease access to deceased-donor renal transplantation for some groups of patients with end-stage renal disease. This study was undertaken to determine candidate factors that influence duration of dialysis before placement on the waiting list among candidates for deceased-donor renal transplantation in the United States from January 2001 to December 2004 and the impact of Medicare eligibility rules on access.
Design, setting, participants, & measurements: Access to the waiting list was measured as the percentage of all wait-listed candidates in the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients database who were listed before dialysis and by the duration of dialysis before placement on the waiting list. Multivariate logistic and linear regressions were used to determine variables that were predictive of preemptive listing and the duration of dialysis before listing.
Results: The odds for preemptive placement on the waiting list improved during the course of the study period, whereas the median duration of prelisting dialysis did not. The candidate factors that were associated with low rates of preemptive listing and prolonged exposure to prelisting dialysis included Medicare insurance, minority race/ethnicity, and low educational attainment. In patients who were listed after the age of 64 yr, the adverse effect of Medicare insurance on access largely disappeared.
Conclusions: The disparity in dialysis exposure could potentially be diminished by concerted efforts on the part of the nephrology and transplant communities to promote early referral and preemptive placement on the waiting list, by calculating waiting time from the date of initiation of dialysis for patients who are on dialysis at the time of referral, and by relaxing Medicare eligibility requirements.
Related Article
Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2008 3: 314-316.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. Schold, T. R. Srinivas, A. R. Sehgal, and H.-U. Meier-Kriesche Half of Kidney Transplant Candidates Who Are Older than 60 Years Now Placed on the Waiting List Will Die before Receiving a Deceased-Donor Transplant Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., July 1, 2009; 4(7): 1239 - 1245. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. C. Norris and L. Y. Agodoa How Long Can We Afford to Wait for Equity in the Renal Transplant Waiting List? J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., June 1, 2009; 20(6): 1168 - 1170. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Norris and A. R. Nissenson Race, Gender, and Socioeconomic Disparities in CKD in the United States J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., July 1, 2008; 19(7): 1261 - 1270. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Norris and A. Nissenson Racial Disparities in Chronic Kidney Disease: Tragedy, Opportunity, or Both? Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., March 1, 2008; 3(2): 314 - 316. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |