|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Editorials |

* Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Health Systems, Ann Arbor, Michigan; and
Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California
Correspondence: Dr. Glenn M. Chertow, Division of Nephrology, Stanford University School of Medicine, 780 Welch Road, Suite 106, Palo Alto, CA 94304. Phone: 650-725-4738; Fax: 650-721-1443; E-mail: gchertow{at}stanford.edu
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The assumption that the measured clinical parameters in this representative population are physiologically linked to CKD in African Americans is simplistic and ignores the effects of a combination of genetic and physiologic adaptations superimposed on a background of social and environmental factors that account for minority health disparities (3). The observed population differences noted in the article by Ibrahim et al. (1) were previously well described and should not serve as justification for the policy changes that the authors recommend. Although we agree that clinical practice guidelines should be reviewed and refined over time, the contention that the prevalence or severity of hypertension, anemia, hyperparathyroidism, and other metabolic abnormalities that are associated with the classification of CKD somehow reflects "disadvantage" or barriers to minority communities distracts from real disparities that African American and other minority populations truly experience.
Ibrahim et al. (1) noted racial differences in hemoglobin concentrations in the NHANES population with and without CKD. Variations in hematologic parameters by race are well documented (4,5); African Americans tend to have lower hemoglobin concentrations, mean corpuscular volumes, transferrin saturations, and white blood cell counts than white individuals. In individuals of African ancestry, in part as a result of adaptations against malaria,
-thalassemia and sickle trait are common and significantly contribute to differences in hemoglobin concentrations. Epidemiologic evidence suggests that 7% of African Americans have sickle trait and 30% carry at least one
gene mutation with 9% carrying both genetic variants (4). Iron deficiency is also more common among African American women than other race and gender groups. The NHANES data reported by Ibrahim et al. (1) mirror previous observations in children (5) as well as adults and may be explained by factors other than erythropoietin deficiency related to CKD (the logical fallacy "cum hoc, ergo propter hoc" translated as "with this, because of this" [Latin]).
The authors also raised the possibility that elevations in intact parathyroid hormone (PTH) may suggest "early" development of secondary hyperparathyroidism. A substantial body of evidence elucidates physiologic differences and outcomes in bone metabolism in African Americans (6). Individuals of African descent have higher PTH and 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D [1,25(OH)2D] associated with lower 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] than other race/ethnicity groups (6). Greater skin pigmentation (from multiple ethnic backgrounds) is associated with lower 25(OH)D formation; therefore, enhanced 1,25(OH)2D production in response to higher PTH may be an adaptive response. Further adaptations include intestinal resistance to 1,25(OH)2D and skeletal resistance to PTH, which together favor bone formation and may explain lower rates of osteoporosis and fractures despite higher PTH concentrations in African Americans. In addition to these physiologic characteristics, African Americans have a high prevalence of very low circulating 25(OH)D levels consistent with vitamin D deficiency, thought to be secondary to avoidance of milk products as a result of lactose intolerance as well as overall reduced dietary vitamin D intake (7,8). Concentrations of 25(OH)D and 1,25(OH)2D, which were lower in African Americans in the NHANES III population but not measured during the 2003 through 2006 surveys, are needed to interpret fully the observations by Ibrahim et al. (1) vis-à-vis PTH. Nonetheless, complex physiologic and environmental factors contribute to racial differences in the PTH–vitamin D–calcium–phosphorus axis, including recent evidence supporting differences in the bone-derived circulating hormone fibroblast growth factor 23 (9). Further research characterizing normal vitamin D metabolism in African Americans is needed before disturbances of bone metabolism can be defined and understood or directly attributed to impaired kidney function (again, cum hoc, ergo propter hoc).
An increased prevalence of hyperuricemia in African Americans was previously described in NHANES I (10). Uric acid concentrations are directly correlated with systolic BP (11), obesity (11), and the metabolic syndrome (12), all of which are more prevalent in African Americans than in white individuals. African Americans with hypertension are more often treated with diuretic agents, which can also contribute to hyperuricemia (13). Furthermore, lifestyle behaviors and environmental factors such as high-fructose diets (14), alcohol intake, and lead exposure/intoxication (11,15) are more common in individuals of lower socioeconomic status, including African Americans, and are also associated with hyperuricemia. Thus, several factors other than impaired kidney function could explain the seeming racial imbalance in hyperuricemia with and without CKD.
Overall, comparisons of white to African Americans with regard to health outcomes must take into consideration the impact of social and environment differences, which include barriers to quality health care. Differences in the prevalence of poverty—8.2% for whites compared with 24.3% for African Americans (http://www.census.gov)—result in numerous downstream consequences, including life expectancies an average of 5.1 yr shorter for African Americans. Reflecting these national statistics, the NHANES III African American population was much less likely to have had incomes >$20,000, to have completed high school, and to have had health insurance. These socioeconomic factors are indicators of access to health care and therefore, not surprising, have been linked to health outcomes such as glycemic and hypertension control (16). Even among Medicare beneficiaries, clinical performance measures were 7 to 14% lower for African Americans than for white individuals (17); therefore, any observations based on race/ethnicity must consider sociodemographic disparity as a determinant of observed differences. Using CKD burden in African Americans as an example, sociodemographic, lifestyle, and related clinical factors combined explained 44% of the excess ESRD burden (18). Furthermore, 80% of accelerated progression in diabetic nephropathy among African Americans was attributed to these same factors (19).
As we venture to understand the burden of CKD in the African American population, we must strive to appreciate the full scope of contributing factors to the burden of CKD. Examining health consequences outside the context of socioeconomic, cultural, behavioral, and even biologic differences may lead us down the path of misdirected policies that do not address the root causes of real health disparities.
| Disclosures |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
See related article, "Screening for Chronic Kidney Disease Complications in US Adults: Racial Implications of a Single GFR Threshold," on pages 1792–1799 of the November 2008 issue of CJASN.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
I: Serum uric acid is a determinant of metabolic syndrome in a population-based study.
Am J Hypertens19
:1055
–1062,2006[CrossRef][Medline]Related Article
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |