|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Acute Renal Failure |







* Division of Nephrology, Veterans Administration Medical Center, and
Division of Nephrology, State University of New York at Buffalo; and
Med Data Analytic, Williamsville, New York
Correspondence: Dr. James Lohr, Division of Nephrology, VAMC, 3495 Bailey Avenue, Buffalo, NY 14215. Phone: 716-862-3204; Fax: 716-862-6784; E-mail: James.Lohr{at}med.va.gov
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Design, setting, participants, & measurements: This was a retrospective cohort study of 1358 adult patients who underwent cardiac surgery between January 1, 2001, and December 31, 2005, in two tertiary care hospitals in Buffalo, NY. The incidence of AKI was determined after cardiac surgery. Clinical data were collected using a standardized form that included comorbid condition, use of ACEI/ARB, and intraoperative and postoperative complications.
Results: Overall, 40.2% of patients developed AKI. Preoperative variables that were significantly associated with development of AKI included increasing age; nonwhite race; combined valve surgery and coronary artery bypass grafting compared with coronary artery bypass grafting alone; American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Risk Score category 4/5 compared with 2 to 3; presence of diabetes, congestive heart failure, or neurologic disease at baseline; use of ACEI/ARB; and emergency surgery. Intra- and postoperative factors that were associated with postoperative AKI were hypotension during surgery, use of vasopressors, and postoperative hypotension. Multiple regression logistic model confirmed an independent and significant association of AKI and preoperative use of ACEI/ARB. This was confirmed using a bivariate-probit and propensity score model that adjusts for confounding by indication of use and selection bias.
Conclusions: Preoperative use of ACEI/ARB is associated with a 27.6% higher risk for AKI postoperatively. Stopping ACEI or ARB before cardiac surgery may reduce the incidence of AKI.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) are used commonly in many clinical settings. Although use of ACEI increases survival in patients with congestive heart failure (CHF) and retards the progression of renal disease, its use has been associated with the development of AKI in settings where maintenance of glomerular filtration requires efferent arteriolar constriction, which is blocked by ACEI or angiotensin II receptor antagonists (7,8). ACEI/ARB have been associated with AKI in different clinical situations such as diabetes and CHF and in patients with diarrhea and vomiting (9–11). We hypothesized that long-term preoperative ACE inhibition is associated with the development of AKI after cardiac surgery.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Clinical data were collected using a standardized form. Baseline data collection included demographics (age, gender, race, weight, height, body mass index, smoking history), comorbid conditions including CHF (shortness or breath or weakness with concomitant decreased ejection fraction on two-dimensional echocardiography, chronic obstructive lung disease (based on pulmonary function test), peripheral vascular disease (intermittent claudication, arterial Doppler or surgery for peripheral vascular disease), cerebrovascular accidents (transient ischemic attack/stroke), malignancy, hepatobiliary disease (persistent elevation of aspartate aminotransferase/alanine aminotransferase, liver biopsy), gastrointestinal disease (history of gastrointestinal bleed), hypertension, diabetes, neurologic disease (disease other than stroke), and depression/psychosis. Intraoperative data collection included the on/off pump status, BP, use of vasopressors, and urine output. Postoperatively, serial serum creatinine levels, BP, intravenous fluid, urine output, use of vasopressors, and dialysis requirement were recorded. Preoperative use of ACEI, ARB, and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs was also recorded from the admission note, pharmacy orders. All patients had received ACEI/ARB before surgery.
Definitions
AKI was defined using the modified RIFLE (risk, injury, failure, loss, ESRD) classification: Stage 1, increase in serum creatinine of
0.3 mg/dl or an increase of 50 to 200% from baseline (peak creatinine postoperatively minus preoperative creatinine); stage 2, increase in serum creatinine of 200 to 300%; and stage 3, increase in serum creatinine >300% or serum creatinine level >4 mg/dl (12,13). We did not use urine output in defining AKI.
Race was categorized as white, black, or other. Type of surgery was defined as elective or emergency as per surgical attending note.
Anesthesia risk was determined from preoperative anesthesia records and stratified into five categories. American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Risk Score 1 was defined as a healthy individual; ASA 2, patient with mild systemic disease; ASA 3, patient with severe systemic disease; ASA 4, patient with severe systemic disease with constant threat to life; ASA 5, moribund patient who is not expected to survive without surgery (14).
Statistical Analysis
There were too few patients in stages 2 and 3 AKI; therefore, analysis was done for AKI versus no AKI. Similarly, preanesthesia risk factor was grouped as category 3 or less and 4 and 5 combined because there were very few patients with ASA of 2 and 5 and no patient with ASA 1. Race classification was also changed to white and nonwhite because there were very few patients in the "other" category.
Descriptive statistics and/or frequency distributions were compiled for age; gender; body mass index (BMI); preoperative use of ACEI/ARB and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs; presence of CHF, hypertension, diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, liver disease, or neurologic disease; intraoperative fluid intake; use of vasopressors; and postoperative hypotension or vasopressor use. Data are shown as means ± SD or percentage. The patients who developed AKI and those who did not develop AKI were compared on all of these parameters. Similarly, patients who were using ACEI/ARB and those who were not using ACEI/ARB were compared. The t test was used to test the differences in the mean values of continuous variables, whereas the tests of differences in proportions were based on
2 test or Fisher exact test.
To demonstrate the influence of ACEI/ARB on AKI in patients who had undergone coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), we constructed a naive logistic model that included ACEI/ARB and other covariates:
![]() | (1) |
'1i, and
i is the error term representing unobserved determinants of AKIi. A crucial assumption here is that ACEIi and
i are independent.
Because this was a retrospective study, differences between patients who used ACEI/ARB and those who did not use ACEI/ARB in the outcome of interest (AKI) may be subject to bias; that is, differences in the occurrence of AKI between the two groups may reflect underlying characteristics that may also have contributed to the use of ACEI/ARB and were not measured and controlled for in our naive logistic model (15–19). Therefore, we also used a joint model of ACEI/ARB and AKI. In constructing this model, we used hypertension at baseline as an instrument. This suggests that hypertension affects the use of ACEI/ARB but not the occurrence of AKI directly. In this model, we retained equation 1 but dropped the assumption that ACEIi and
i are independent. Instead, we added an equation that we think drives the use of ACEIi:
![]() |
'2i, and
i is an error term.
ACEI use was determined by
![]() |
Note that only ACEIi was observed and not AECI*i*. The error terms
i and
i were assumed to have bivariate normal distribution such that
![]() |
i and
i are normalized to 0, and the variances are assumed to be 1.
is the correlation coefficient between
i and
i.
The implication that hypertension affects the use of ACEI/ARB but not the occurrence of AKI directly, although it cannot be directly tested, may possibly be inferred. In several analyses of renal insufficiency, baseline hypertension was not in the set of predictors (20–23), although, in one of them (23), systolic BP
160 with CABG was important in predicting renal failure. In one study that focused on risk for postoperative dialysis (24), it was significant, whereas, in another research study on renal insufficiency (25), it was barely significant (P = 0.049). The different objectives of these studies and the different definitions used for renal failure make it difficult to draw a definite conclusion, although it seems that hypertension does not play a major role in predicting AKI, which is the focus of our analysis.
The naive logistic regression model was constructed in steps. First, we tested individual logistic regressions of risk for AKI using variables that had a univariate association with the AKI outcome with P
0.2. All of the variables that had P
0.2 in these individual logistic regressions were candidates for inclusion in the final logistic model along with variables that were selected a priori (age, gender, race). The initial model contained ACEI/ARB and demographic variables. Next, we included diabetes and CHF. Finally, we added intraoperative hypotension to the model. In all models, odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval were calculated. We also estimated a propensity score model using several covariates. We then used the propensity score to match patients (based on nearest neighbor algorithm) who were on ACE/ARB with those who were not. After matching, we estimated the logistic model for AKI with several covariates. Patients with missing data for any of the covariates entered in the model were excluded. No attempt was made to impute data. Model fit was assessed with the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test (26). Collinearity was checked using tolerance and variable inflation factor. We also use the propensity score as a proxy for an index of disease, albeit a nonlinear one, because it is estimated using baseline hypertension, diabetes at baseline, and CHF as covariates.
We then constructed several logistic models for predicting AKI and compared them with the base model, which did not include the propensity score. This model included all of the other covariates and is designated as model 1. The model that excludes one or more variables that are included in another model is called the nested model of the latter. Comparison between these nested models can be achieved by using the differences in the
2 values and differences in the degrees of freedom. For example, if a model includes propensity score (along with other covariates) and a second model excludes only the propensity score variable, then differences in the
2 values between the two models with one degree of freedom (because only one variable is dropped) can be tested for significance.
Kaplan-Meier estimates and survival function for mortality were created by AKI versus no AKI. Unadjusted and adjusted hazard ratios were obtained from Cox model. The naive logistic model was estimated with SAS 9.1 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC) and the bivariate probit model with LIMDEP 9.0 (Econometric Software Inc., Plainview, NY).
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Characteristics for ACEI/ARB use and no ACEI/ARB use before cardiac surgery are shown in Table 1. Significantly more patients with diabetes, ASA risk 4/5, hypertension, CHF, and neurologic disease at baseline received ACEI preoperatively. There was no significant difference in age and baseline serum creatinine between patients who received ACEI and patients who did not receive ACEI. Various multiple logistic regression models were built. Presence of CHF, diabetes, and hypertension was associated with increased odds for use of ACEI.
|
In the univariate analysis and in the individual logistic regressions, preoperative variables that were significantly associated with development of AKI included increasing age; nonwhite race; combined valve surgery and CABG compared with CABG alone; ASA category 4/5 compared with 2 to 3; presence of diabetes, CHF, or neurologic disease at baseline; use of ACEI/ARB; and emergency surgery. Intra- and postoperative factors that were significantly associated with postoperative AKI were hypotension during surgery, use of vasopressors, and postoperative hypotension (Table 2). Multiple regression logistic model and propensity score model confirmed a significant association between AKI and preoperative use of ACEI/ARB (Table 3).
|
|
is significant, indicating the presence of selection bias. The same three variables, baseline hypertension, CHF, and diabetes, were significant predictors of ACEI use in the bivariate probit model as well. It is interesting that the variables that predict the use of ACEI, namely CHF, baseline hypertension, and diabetes, did not enter the equation for AKI significantly. Propensity score models confirm the independent association of ACEI/ARB and AKI (Table 5). Comparison between a base model with and without propensity score provides additional support that ACEI/ARB are significantly associated with acute kidney injury (Table 5).
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
ACEI/ARB are one of the most frequently used classes of antihypertensive drugs. They are also used in the management of CHF and diabetic and nondiabetic nephropathies. Although ACEI therapy usually improves renal blood flow and sodium excretion rates in CHF and reduces the rate of progressive renal injury in chronic kidney disease, its use can also be associated with a syndrome of "functional renal insufficiency" and/or hyperkalemia. Typically, this form of AKI develops shortly after initiation of ACEI use but can be observed after months or years of therapy, even in the absence of previous ill effects. AKI is most likely to occur when renal perfusion pressure cannot be sustained because of substantial decreases in mean arterial pressure or when the GFR is highly angiotensin II dependent.
The association of ACEI therapy with AKI after cardiac surgery has been controversial. In the early 1990s, the benefits of ACEI in heart failure were extrapolated to improved clinical outcome of patients who were undergoing cardiovascular surgery. Colson et al. (27) and Licker et al. (28) studied the effect of acute administration of ACEI prophylactically in cardiopulmonary bypass and aortic surgery patients, respectively, and showed that creatinine clearance was maintained for a short period of time among patients who received ACEI compared with patients who received placebo (in whom creatinine clearance was decreased). This effect of ACEI/ARB on kidney function may be different in patients who have been exposed to ACEI/ARB long term. Indeed, Rady et al. (29) studied the effect of long-term use of ACEI on the incidence of acute organ damage including AKI (defined as postoperative serum creatinine
3.8 mg/dl or doubling of serum creatinine when baseline serum creatinine was >1.9 mg/dl.). They did not find a significant association of use of ACEI and AKI in patients with normal or low left ventricular systolic function; however, that study did not analyze the association of ACEI and postoperative stage 1 or 2 AKI. Our study showed a significant association of long-term use of ACEI/ARB and postcardiac surgery AKI (primarily stage 1 AKI). Similar results were also shown after abdominal aorta surgery. Cittanova et al. (30) studied preoperative risk factors and the risk for AKI (defined as decrease in creatinine clearance by >20% by day 7) after elective aortic surgery. Long-term inhibition of ACE was the only factor that was significantly associated with postoperative AKI. ACEI in combination with aprotonin but not alone was shown to be associated with increased risk for AKI after cardiac surgery (31); however, the definition was different from the modified RIFLE classification. More than half of patients who developed AKI required dialysis, and 48% of patient died, suggesting that those were patients with either stage 2 or stage 3 AKI. Our study predominantly includes patients with stage 1 AKI.
Several studies have examined the risk factors that are associated with AKI after cardiac surgery. Unfortunately, most patient-related factors are irreversible. We looked at use of ACEI/ARB (which can be stopped before surgery) and its association with AKI after cardiac surgery. As expected physiologically, use of these medications was associated with increased risk for AKI after cardiac surgery. When our models were adjusted for known predisposing factors, a significant association persisted. Furthermore, bivariate models and propensity score analysis using different methods, including disease index, confirm the association of ACEI/ARB with AKI. In addition, the AKI models with and without baseline hypertension, diabetes at baseline, and CHF reveal an interesting pattern: When they are included, the propensity score is insignificant, but when they are excluded, the propensity score is significant. This confirms the utility of propensity score as a proxy for an index of the three diseases, but in both models, the estimated coefficients of ACEI/ARB and their significance levels are nearly the same, indicating that even in the presence of a proxy for an index of baseline hypertension, diabetes, and CHF, patients who are treated with ACEI/ARB are more likely to have AKI after surgery than those who are not treated with ACEI/ARB.
There are no definitive data demonstrating that ACEI/ARB should be stopped before surgery; however there are opinions published on this topic. Lazar (32) opined that use of ACEI can benefit patients who undergo surgery by minimizing perioperative ischemia and reducing long-term cardiovascular events. Devbhandari et al. (33) surveyed the opinion of UK cardiovascular surgeons on the continuation of ACEI before cardiac surgery. They found that 35% believed that ACEI should be withheld before surgery, and 65% did not think that ACEI should be withheld. It is clear that there is no consensus on its perioperative use in cardiovascular surgery. Results of our study showed a significant association of preoperative use of ACEI/ARB with AKI, raising the question of whether these medications should be stopped before cardiac surgery.
Our study has several important limitations. Even with various logistic models, we cannot truly evaluate the effect of ACEI/ARB, as we could in a prospective, randomized trial. Although propensity score can adjust for confounding by indication, this may not eliminate residual unobserved factors. The bivariate model does account for selection bias. Furthermore, the data were collected from two major hospitals in one region; therefore, results may not be generalizable to the entire United States.
| Conclusions |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Disclosures |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Received November 27, 2007. Accepted June 4, 2008.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Miceli, R. Capoun, C. Fino, P. Narayan, A. J. Bryan, G. D. Angelini, and M. Caputo Effects of Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitor Therapy on Clinical Outcome in Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 3, 2009; 54(19): 1778 - 1784. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
U. Benedetto, R. Luciani, M. Goracci, F. Capuano, S. Refice, E. Angeloni, A. Roscitano, and R. Sinatra Miniaturized cardiopulmonary bypass and acute kidney injury in coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Ann. Thorac. Surg., August 1, 2009; 88(2): 529 - 535. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Bouzas-Mosquera, N. Alvarez-Garcia, and J. Peteiro Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and risk of acute kidney injury after cardiac surgery. Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 2009; 87(5): 1653 - 1653. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
U. Benedetto, G. Melina, S. Refice, A. Roscitano, E. Angeloni, and R. Sinatra Reply. Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 2009; 87(5): 1653 - 1654. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M.A.C. Onuigbo Reno-prevention vs. reno-protection: a critical re-appraisal of the evidence-base from the large RAAS blockade trials after ontarget--a call for more circumspection QJM, March 1, 2009; 102(3): 155 - 167. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Lameire, W. Van Biesen, E. Hoste, and R. Vanholder The prevention of acute kidney injury: an in-depth narrative review Part 1: volume resuscitation and avoidance of drug- and nephrotoxin-induced AKI NDT Plus, December 1, 2008; 1(6): 392 - 402. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |