CJASN
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2: S25-S35, 2007
© 2007 American Society of Nephrology
doi: 10.2215/CJN.00320107

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kiryluk, K.
Right arrow Articles by Gharavi, A. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kiryluk, K.
Right arrow Articles by Gharavi, A. G.

Viruses and Diseases of the Kidney

Genetic Susceptibility, HIV Infection, and the Kidney

Krzysztof Kiryluk, Jeremiah Martino, and Ali G. Gharavi

Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, New York

Address correspondence to: Dr. Ali G. Gharavi, Department of Medicine, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, 630 W 168th street, P&S 10-432 New York, NY 10032. Phone: 212-342-1277; Fax: 212-305-3475; E-mail: ag2239{at}columbia.edu


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Approaches to Studying Genetic...
 Genetic Susceptibility and HIV
 Genetic Susceptibility and HIVAN
 Disclosures
 References
 
In recent years, the sequencing of mammalian and microbial genomes has provided the opportunity to study how genetic variation in the host and pathogen influence the course of infectious disease. In the case of HIV-1 infection, such studies have led to identification of key viral proteins that determine pathogenicity, immune evasion, or drug resistance. In addition, candidate gene association studies have uncovered a large number of host genetic variants that influence the outcome of infection and some organ-specific complications. HIV-associated nephropathy (HIVAN) is a pathologically distinct complication of HIV infection. Interindividual variability in incidence, skewed ethnic distribution, and familial aggregation of HIVAN with other forms of ESRD have suggested genetic susceptibility as a major contributing factor. This article reviews the host genetic factors that influence the course of HIV-1 infection and discusses murine models that have increased the understanding of HIVAN pathogenesis and demonstrated the role of genetic background on determination of disease.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Approaches to Studying Genetic...
 Genetic Susceptibility and HIV
 Genetic Susceptibility and HIVAN
 Disclosures
 References
 
Infectious diseases represent a complex encounter between two organisms with distinct genomes. Whereas the pathogen's genome has evolved to maximize efficient invasion of the host for perpetuation of its life cycle, the host has evolved defense mechanisms to protect itself from deleterious consequences of infection. The interaction of genetic factors between host and pathogen influences every aspect of infection, from acquisition, resistance, and immune response to disease progression and specific end-organ complications. Genetic determinants of infectious disease have been increasingly clarified in the past few years, largely as a result of our expanded knowledge of the mammalian and microbial genomes as well as major technological advances in molecular genetics. In this review, we discuss the host genetic susceptibility factors that predispose to HIV infection and its complications. We also discuss how such approaches may be used to discover genes that confer susceptibility to HIV-associated nephropathy (HIVAN). Table 1 summarizes the definitions of the common genetic terms used in this review.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1. Definitions of the selected genetic terms used in the text

 

    Approaches to Studying Genetic Susceptibility to Infectious Disease
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Approaches to Studying Genetic...
 Genetic Susceptibility and HIV
 Genetic Susceptibility and HIVAN
 Disclosures
 References
 
Methodologically, one can study either genetic variations in the pathogen that lead to infectious complications or focus on host genetic susceptibility factors. The sequencing of the HIV genome has improved understanding of the function of specific viral gene products and led to successful identification of genetic variations that enhance pathogenicity. The HIV-1 genome encodes a total of nine genes that are flanked by long terminal repeat sequences that are required for genome integration and regulation. These can be subdivided into genes that encode the major structural proteins (gag, pol, and env), the regulatory proteins (tat and rev), and the accessory proteins (vif, vpr, vpu, and nef). Their major function and polymorphisms are summarized in Table 2. The rapid replication of the virus coupled with the error-prone viral transcription process results in the generation of many viral mutants in the course of a single infection. As a consequence, HIV virus is able to effectively evade the immune system of the host. Sequencing of variants that develop in the course of HIV-1 infection has provided significant insight into disease pathogenesis. Mutations in the viral peptides that are presented to HLA class I molecules and viral inhibition of HLA I cell surface expression can allow the virus to escape recognition by cytotoxic T cells and NK cells (1,2). Viral antigenic variation and inhibition of HLA class II helps to evade the humoral immunity (2,3). HIV-1 is also able to evolve independently in various tissues, forming latent viral reservoirs that evade immune surveillance and promote organ specific complications (4). The high mutation rates are also responsible for drug resistance and present a major obstacle for vaccine development.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 2. HIV-1 viral genes and their products, function, and polymorphismsa

 
Approaches for identification of host susceptibility loci fall into two broad categories: linkage approaches and association studies. The linkage approach consists of following of co-segregation of disease with specific markers that can point to chromosomal location of the susceptibility gene. Linkage studies necessitate identification of families with the trait of interest and are best suited for detection of single genes with large effects. The advantage of this approach is the ability to identify novel genes without any previous knowledge about disease pathogenesis. In the nephrology field, the application of the linkage method has enabled identification of many genes underlying Mendelian forms of renal disease (e.g., polycystic kidney disease [5,6], congenital nephrotic syndrome [7], FSGS [810]), proving novel insights into disease pathogenesis. However, studying genetic susceptibility to infectious disorders by linkage approaches is complicated by the requirement for multiplex families. Hence, one would need to identify families that segregate a genetic susceptibility factor that is unmasked by exposure of multiple family members to the infectious agent. Such studies have been carried out for infectious disorders that are endemic in certain parts of the word, such as tuberculosis and leprosy. For example, studying South Vietnamese multiplex families led to the identification of variants that are shared between the PARK2/PARCG genes as genetic susceptibility factors for leprosy (11,12).

If an infectious disease affects rodents, then one can also carry out linkage studies in inbred strains. For example, a large number of well-defined inbred mouse strains can be tested for susceptibility to infectious diseases of interest. Mice with contrasting susceptibility can then be interbred to generate a mapping progeny that can identify loci that impart susceptibility to infectious disease. The power of mouse linkage studies lies in the possibility to breed mice in large numbers and the ability to control environmental parameters strictly. Because of these advantages, one can study complex, multifactorial traits and dissect gene–gene and gene–environment interactions (13,14). In addition, the completion of the genome sequence of the mouse has greatly facilitated gene identification (15). Given the large degree of conservation between mammalian genome, it is likely that genes that are identified in rodent models will point to biologic pathways that will be relevant to the human situation. The feasibility of this approach is demonstrated by successful identification of genes that mediate susceptibility to tuberculosis, anthrax, and legionella infections (1618).

Genetic association studies investigate the impact of genetic factors on disease by comparing allele frequencies of molecular variants in case-control cohorts (19,20). Association studies do not require families and have the potential to address a genetic basis of sporadic forms of disease. In the candidate gene association studies, a gene that has been implicated in the disease of interest is surveyed for polymorphisms, which are then genotyped in cohorts of patients and healthy control subjects. Nowadays, array technology permits simultaneous interrogation of hundreds of thousands of polymorphisms for testing association of variants with the disease of interest. Hence, comprehensive genome-wide association studies have become feasible, lifting the requirement for a priori knowledge of disease biology (21). This approach is best suited for studying multifactorial traits, which are typically determined by the interplay of multiple variants that confer small additive effects on the phenotype. If case patients and control subjects are well matched, then one would expect that statistically significant differences in allele frequency will emerge at true susceptibility loci. Genetic association studies are usually very vulnerable to type I error, requiring replication of findings in multiple independent cohorts, yet candidate gene association studies have led to many interesting discoveries about genetic susceptibility to HIV infection (see next section). Recent genome-wide association studies have identified susceptibility genes for macular degeneration, obesity, and inflammatory bowel disease (2224). Genome-wide association studies for susceptibility to infectious disease will likely emerge in the next few years.


    Genetic Susceptibility and HIV
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Approaches to Studying Genetic...
 Genetic Susceptibility and HIV
 Genetic Susceptibility and HIVAN
 Disclosures
 References
 
In general, studies of associations between hosts’ susceptibility genes and HIV (summarized in Table 3) have concentrated on two categories of suspects: genes that are involved in the HIV life cycle and genes that are involved in the host's immune defense. The first category includes polymorphisms in the molecules that HIV uses as co-receptors (variants with different affinities to gp-120) and polymorphisms in their natural ligands (variants that compete with the virus). The best characterized of these traits is a delta 32 mutation in the CCR5 co-receptor discovered in 1996 (25). The homozygotes for a nonfunctional CCR5 have a 32-bp deletion from the coding region that leads to a frameshift mutation. The CCR5-delta32 homozygotes are resistant to infection with macrophage-tropic virus but remain susceptible to infection with T cell–tropic HIV strains, which use CXCR4 for cell entry (26). The heterozygotes have a reduced risk for HIV acquisition and a modest reduction in the rate of disease progression (27). It is interesting that there is a marked racial difference in the frequency of CCR5-delta32 allele, which seems to be much greater among white individuals compared with other ethnic minorities in the United States, including black individuals (27). In addition, several genetic polymorphisms have been identified in the CCR5 promoter region. These may affect HIV transmission or disease progression through effects on the levels of CCR5 expression. For example, an infected host that is homozygous for allele 59029-G within the CCR5 promoter region is less likely to progress to AIDS than a host that is homozygous for the 59029-A allele (28). Another genetic trait, the CCR2-V641 mutation, also seems to affect disease progression (29). Unlike CCR5-delta32 mutation, which is found primarily in white individuals, this mutation was equally frequent in all ethnic groups studied. It is unclear how CCR2 mutation affects disease progression, but it has been suggested that it tracks trough linkage disequilibrium with one of the mutations in the promoter region of CCR5 (30).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 3. Genetic host factors in HIV infectiona

 
Although no known variants of CXCR4 are linked with increased HIV susceptibility, a mutation that affects the expression level of its only known ligand, SDF-1, seems to delay AIDS progression (31). SDF-1 has been shown to block in vitro infection with the T lymphocyte–tropic HIV variant. The mutation in the regulatory sequence of SDF-1 leads to upregulation of its synthesis and may result in competitive inhibition of "T-tropic" virus from binding to CXCR4. In a parallel manner, the natural ligands for CCR5 co-receptor (chemokine MIP-1-{alpha}, MIP-1-ß, and RANTES) have emerged as potential HIV susceptibility factors. Macrophage inflammatory protein-1-{alpha}P (MIP-1-{alpha}P) is encoded by the CCL3L1 gene, which has undergone several segmental duplications during human evolution. The resulting "copy number" polymorphism has been recently studied in association with the HIV-1 susceptibility in a case-control study. The possession of a low CCL3L1 copy number is associated with a markedly enhanced susceptibility to HIV-1 (32). Comparable to the effect of SDF-1 on T-tropic strains, higher dosages of MIP-1-{alpha}P may result in competitive inhibition of M-tropic viruses. Another CCR5 ligand, RANTES, has also been under investigation. In this case, the results are less compelling, but it seems that some RANTES alleles are associated with decreased risk for HIV acquisition and others with accelerated disease progression (33).

Furthermore, HLA genotypes seem to affect AIDS outcomes. By and large, associations between HIV and alleles at class I HLA loci have been observed more frequently than for class II HLA, suggesting that cell-mediated immunity is more effective against HIV than humoral (class II–mediated) immunity. For example, the HLA I allele B*35 has been strongly associated with rapid progression to AIDS (34,35). In contrast, alleles B*57 and B*27 have been associated with long-term nonprogression (36,37). Unfortunately, because of extensive diversity of the HLA alleles, many studies are underpowered to assess accurately the risk that is associated with typically low-frequency HLA variants.

In addition to individual HLA polymorphisms, heterozygosity at all HLA class I loci seems to be protective against AIDS progression (38). The advantage of individuals who are heterozygous at HLA I loci is likely a result of their ability to present a greater variety of antigenic peptides to T cells than homozygotes, resulting in a more productive cellular immune response. Because HLA heterozygosity provides a survival advantage, it seems that a high degree of HLA polymorphism is maintained evolutionarily by selective pressure of continuous exposures to various infectious agents.

Finally, there is recent evidence for a complex gene interaction between specific HLA I alleles and their receptors. For example, the KIR3DS1 gene (killer Ig-like receptor 3) is expressed by NK cells, critical effector cells of the innate antiviral immune response. The gene product recognizes HLA class I molecules on infected target cells and modulates NK activity. Martin et al. (39) found strong evidence of epistatic interaction between HLA-B Bw4-80I allele and KIR3DS1 alleles and showed that joint consideration of these loci is significantly more predictive of disease progression than analysis of each locus separately. KIR gene complex consists of at least 14 genes that are located on chromosome 19q13 and demonstrates significant allelic and haplotype variability. It is interesting that several recent studies correlated outcomes of other viral infections, in particular hepatitis C virus (40) and human papillomavirus (41), with the presence or absence of certain KIR genes in combination with individual HLA alleles.

These examples illustrate genetic factors that confer susceptibility or resistance to primary HIV infection or progression of disease. A similar concept, however, can be applied to organ-specific complications of HIV infection. One may ask, for example, whether there are genes that confer resistance to HIV-related wasting syndrome, HIV-associated neuropathy, HIV dementia, or HIVAN. There are several landmark studies that support this hypothesis for other viral infections. For example, herpes simplex virus-1 infects a large portion of otherwise healthy individuals, but only a minority develop life-threatening HSV-1 encephalitis. The observation that HSV-1 encephalitis clusters in families as well as previous animal studies of IFN signaling pathways permitted the discovery of an encephalitis susceptibility gene that is inherited in an autosomal recessive Mendelian pattern. The defect was present in the intracellular protein UNC-93B, which resulted in impaired cellular responses to IFN-{alpha}, -ß, and -{lambda} (42).

Another example from the HIV literature relates to the susceptibility to HIV neuropathy and dementia. Corder et al. (43) compared the frequency of neurologic symptoms for HIV-positive individuals with and without the E4 allele of apoprotein E, which is an established genetic risk factor for Alzheimer's disease. Peripheral neuropathy was present in 70% of E4-positive patients compared with 39% of E4-negative patients, and the risk for dementia for patients with the E4 allele was also twice that of those without (30% compared with 15%). The authors concluded that the HIV injury to the nervous system may be at least in part genetically determined.


    Genetic Susceptibility and HIVAN
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Approaches to Studying Genetic...
 Genetic Susceptibility and HIV
 Genetic Susceptibility and HIVAN
 Disclosures
 References
 
The association between HIV and renal disease was first reported in 1984, shortly after the discovery of HIV (44). In the first 10 yr of the AIDS epidemic, the increase in the incidence of ESRD as a result of HIVAN surpassed any other cause of kidney disease. After the introduction of highly active antiretroviral therapy, the incidence of ESRD as a result of HIV in the United States has not decreased but rather plateaued (45). Several changes in the AIDS epidemic may account for this pattern. Effective therapy increases the prevalence of HIV. The World Health Organization estimates that more than 40 million people worldwide are currently infected with HIV (46). Second, the incidence rate of newly acquired HIV cases remains high. According to the World Health Organization, approximately 4.9 million people became infected with HIV in 2005 (46).

HIVAN is the prototype of collapsing FSGS and exemplifies a pathologically distinct complication of HIV-1 infection. It typically manifests with proteinuria and renal failure, which progresses rapidly to ESRD if untreated. Once dependent on hemodialysis, patients with HIVAN do poorly; their 2-yr all-cause unadjusted survival is 36% as compared with 64% for all other patients with ESRD (47). Renal biopsy is required for diagnosis and typically demonstrates characteristic glomerular lesions that show focal sclerosis with collapse of capillary loops. Extensive tubulointerstitial damage is common, frequently associated with proliferative tubular microcyst formation. Electron microscopy demonstrates characteristic glomerular basement membrane folding and wrinkling within the collapsed loops, frequently leading to partial capillary lumen occlusions. Immunohistochemical staining of podocytes reveals upregulated markers of proliferation and downregulated markers of differentiation (48). Hence, dysregulation of the glomerular epithelial phenotype with consequent dedifferentiation, proliferation, and apoptosis leads to loss of glomerular architecture and is thought to be a principal mechanism of glomerulosclerosis in HIVAN.

Data suggest that HIVAN results from direct epithelial infection. Biopsy studies have demonstrated by immunohistochemistry and DNA in situ hybridization techniques that a small number of renal epithelial cells harbor HIV-1 (49). These findings have then been confirmed by detection of HIV-1 in tubular cells as well as glomerular visceral and parietal epithelial cells by PCR amplification and RNA in situ hybridization (50). It seems that the virus is even capable of active replication and evolution within the renal epithelium (51). These findings suggest that kidney cells not only are infected with HIV-1 but also might constitute a viral reservoir, allowing the virus to undergo slow but productive replication. Nonetheless, the exact process of viral entry into renal tissue remains to be worked out because expression of CD4 and the HIV-1 co-receptors has not been conclusively demonstrated in vivo. In one interesting in vitro study, HIV-1 quasi-species from the kidney demonstrated differential use of co-receptors (e.g., CXCR4) compared with those that were isolated from the blood, consistent with the notion of renal compartmentalization (52). The presence of CXCR4 on renal epithelial cell line therefore suggests a potential route of entry in renal tubular epithelia.

The epidemiology of HIVAN reveals a strikingly skewed ethnic distribution. Among HIV-infected individuals, almost all cases of HIVAN occur in patients of African descent (53). According to a report from the US Renal Data System, HIVAN had the strongest association with black race of all causes of renal failure among patients who were on maintenance dialysis (47). In addition, among 201 black patients with ESRD that was caused by HIVAN, nearly 25% reported a positive family history of ESRD compared with 6% in a white control group (54). In contrast, HIVAN seems to be very rare in the Asian population (55). This skewed ethnic prevalence has been confirmed in European studies and is not explained by the mode of viral transmission (56,57). Moreover, not all African populations seem to have the same predisposition to HIVAN. A recent screening of 126 Ethiopians who had HIV infection and emigrated to Israel revealed that none of the individuals met clinical criteria for HIVAN, as defined by proteinuria >2 g/d (58). This finding is consistent with known genetic diversity of the African population and clearly demonstrates interpopulation heterogeneity in regard to susceptibility to HIVAN. This notion is further illustrated in a study of South Africans, in which collapsing glomerulopathy was the most common histopathologic entity observed among HIV-positive individuals (59,60). However, a significant proportion of HIV-positive black South Africans also presented with an unconventional form of immune complex glomerulopathy, suggesting interindividual variation in susceptibility to classic HIVAN among this population (59). Interindividual variation, racial differences, and familial clustering of kidney disease strongly suggest the existence of HIVAN-specific genetic susceptibility factors that are unmasked in the setting of HIV infection. Although there was an initial suggestion that a polymorphism in the promoter of the Duffy antigen/receptor for chemokines may be involved in susceptibility to HIVAN (61), this has not been confirmed in other studies (62).

Several transgenic animal models of HIVAN have been extremely helpful in formulating the current paradigm of HIVAN pathogenesis. The first model was generated using a noninfectious HIV-1 DNA construct that lacks the gag and pol genes (63,64). The transgenic Tg26 mouse expressed seven of 15 HIV-1 gene products and developed proteinuria and collapsing FSGS with extensive tubulointerstitial damage that resembles the disease that is seen in humans (64). A similar rat model that replicates the phenotype of a transgenic mouse has also been developed (65,66). These experiments convincingly demonstrated that the HIV-1 gene products are important in the pathogenesis of HIVAN. Furthermore, when normal kidneys are transplanted into Tg26 transgenic animals, renal lesions do not develop. Conversely, when kidneys that express HIV-1 transgenes are transplanted into wild-type mice, the disease progresses (67). This suggests that local HIV-1 expression in the kidney is required for HIVAN development, and systemic cytokine release with postulated "bystander" renal injury is unlikely to be responsible for the disease.

The generation of transgenic mice with HIV-1 DNA under the control of CD4 gene promoter was achieved in 1998 and resulted in animals with severe AIDS-like illness (68). It is important to note that in this particular model, viral gene products were not expressed in the glomerular epithelium, and, although animals developed severe tubulointerstitial nephritis, the FSGS pattern was not observed. Subsequent introduction of targeted mutations in selected proviral genes in this model revealed that nef was the major determinant of systemic HIV pathogenicity (69), and specific mutations within the nef SH3-binding domain blunted the development of AIDS-like disease (70). Further support for the pathogenic role of Nef in AIDS came from a recently published study by Schindler et al. (71). The Nef molecule from nonpathogenic strains of simian immunodeficiency virus and HIV-2 induces the downregulation of host T cell receptor/CD3, which seems to be protective through maintaining low levels of immune activation in infected hosts. During viral evolution to HIV-1, Nef supposedly lost this ability, which may partly explain why HIV-1 causes AIDS.

Further animal studies concentrated on dissecting the role of individual viral proteins in pathogenesis of HIVAN. The Nef protein is also highly pathogenic when expressed in kidney cells (57,72,73). The pathogenic role of Nef in the kidney was first described by in vitro experiments, in which podocyte cultures were infected with a series of mutated HIV-1 constructs that had premature stop codons in env, vif, vpr, vpu, nef, tat, or rev gene. It seemed that the nef gene product alone was sufficient to induce podocyte proliferation and dedifferentiation in vitro (72). The transgenic mice with podocyte-specific expression of nef demonstrated similar podocyte dedifferentiation in vivo (57). Surprising, these mice did not develop proteinuria or collapsing FSGS pattern on renal biopsy, suggesting that possibly other viral gene products are necessary to acquire the full disease phenotype. In the studies of other transgenic mouse models, Vpr protein emerged as a new nephrotoxic candidate (74). It seems that both vpr and nef can induce mild podocyte injury independently, but, when coexpressed in double transgenic mice, they can act synergistically to produce the FSGS phenotype although without collapsing features (75). The specific interaction between Nef, Vpr, and other viral gene products is under active investigation. Altogether, it seems that viral proteins perturb cell-cycle regulation, a process that eventually results in the dysregulated podocyte phenotype that is observed in HIVAN. Consistent with this notion, amelioration of HIVAN was achieved by inhibition of cyclin-dependent kinases (76). In addition, downstream targets of HIV proteins in the kidney are increasingly identified. For example, He et al. (73) demonstrated that Nef increases Src activity and Stat3 phosphorylation, activating the mitogen-activated protein kinase 1,2 pathways that are implicated in podocyte dedifferentiation. Other investigators have also identified persistent activation of the NF-{kappa}B, which results in Fas-mediated apoptosis in renal epithelia (77,78). Genes that are involved in these dysregulated pathways represent good candidates for investigation of polymorphisms that are associated with susceptibility to HIVAN.

As exemplified by genetic studies of tuberculosis and Legionella susceptibility in the mouse, investigation of genetic modifiers among transgenic models may be used to identify genetic factors that mediate susceptibility or resistance to HIVAN. Genetic background has a profound influence on the expression of HIVAN phenotype in one of the best validated models of HIVAN, the aforementioned Tg26 mouse that carries a replication-incompetent proviral HIV-1 transgene (79). These mice were generated on the FVB/N strain background and developed a full-blown HIVAN phenotype (63,64). For assessment of the influence of genetic background on the development of HIVAN, Tg26 mice were outcrossed with five other inbred strains to generate F1 hybrids. Transgenic F1 hybrids, which share 50% of their genome from each parental strain, demonstrated striking variations in renal disease, which were independent of transgene expression levels (79). Two strains, CAST/EiJ and Balb/cJ, were completely protected from renal disease. These data demonstrated that in addition to expression of viral genes, a permissive genetic background is required for manifestation of the HIVAN phenotype. These data may therefore explain the variability in phenotype that is observed among different transgenic models. For example, the absence of overt nephropathy in mice with podocyte-specific expression of the nef gene may be attributable to the genetic background (C57BL/6J) used (57). Consistent with these data, mice that expressed a HIV-1 transgenes in glomerular podocytes developed HIVAN only in the FVB/N but not the C57BL/6J genetic background (80). These genetic modifiers may be identified by intercrossing that is susceptible to resistant strains. Therefore, in an informative mapping cohort between the susceptible Tg26 (FVBN/J) and resistant CAST/EiJ strains, a genome-wide analysis of linkage has identified a locus on mouse chromosome 3A1–3 that influences the HIVAN phenotype (named HIVAN1 locus) (79). It is interesting that this locus is syntenic to human chromosome 3q25–27, an interval that shows suggestive evidence of linkage to human diabetic and hypertensive nephropathies (8184). A review of the HIVAN1 linkage interval revealed many interesting positional candidates related to neoplasia, cell-cycle regulation, and neuronal complications of HIV-1 infection. Because the interval is very large, it will require generation of congenic strains to reduce the linkage region. The HIVAN1 interval explained only 15% of the variance in the renal injury score, suggesting that additional loci with smaller effects account for the remaining variation in disease in the cross studied. This motivated generation of another mapping cohort of HIVAN mice using C57BL/6J as a counterstrain, yielding preliminary evidence of a second HIVAN susceptibility interval on mouse chromosome 13 (85). These findings have validated the use of mouse models to map genetic modifiers of HIVAN. The presence of multiple loci in mouse models suggests that susceptibility to HIVAN in humans will likely entail interplay between multiple genetic susceptibility factors. The relevance of genes and pathways identified in the mouse model then can be tested in human cohorts with HIVAN. In addition, the ability to perform genome-wide association studies will now enable investigators to study directly genetic susceptibility to HIVAN in humans. It is expected that the integration of information from murine models and human studies will help define pathways that elucidate the pathogenesis of this common HIV-1 complication.


    Disclosures
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Approaches to Studying Genetic...
 Genetic Susceptibility and HIV
 Genetic Susceptibility and HIVAN
 Disclosures
 References
 
None.


    Acknowledgments
 
This work is supported by National Institutes of Health grant 1PO1 DK56492-01.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Approaches to Studying Genetic...
 Genetic Susceptibility and HIV
 Genetic Susceptibility and HIVAN
 Disclosures
 References
 

  1. Collins KL: How HIV evades CTL recognition. Curr HIV Res1 :31 –40,2003[CrossRef][Medline]
  2. Kamp W, Berk MB, Visser CJ, Nottet HS: Mechanisms of HIV-1 to escape from the host immune surveillance. Eur J Clin Invest30 :740 –746,2000[CrossRef][Medline]
  3. Iannello A, Debbeche O, Martin E, Attalah LH, Samarani S, Ahmad A: Viral strategies for evading antiviral cellular immune responses of the host. J Leukoc Biol79 :16 –35,2006[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Saksena NK, Potter SJ: Reservoirs of HIV-1 in vivo: Implications for antiretroviral therapy. AIDS Rev5 :3 –18,2003[Medline]
  5. Mochizuki T, Wu G, Hayashi T, Xenophontos SL, Veldhuisen B, Saris JJ, Reynolds DM, Cai Y, Gabow PA, Pierides A, Kimberling WJ, Breuning MH, Deltas CC, Peters DJ, Somlo S: PKD2, a gene for polycystic kidney disease that encodes an integral membrane protein. Science272 :1339 –1342,1996[Abstract]
  6. The polycystic kidney disease 1 gene encodes a 14 kb transcript and lies within a duplicated region on chromosome 16. The European Polycystic Kidney Disease Consortium. Cell77 :881 –894,1994[CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Kestila M, Lenkkeri U, Mannikko M, Lamerdin J, McCready P, Putaala H, Ruotsalainen V, Morita T, Nissinen M, Herva R, Kashtan CE, Peltonen L, Holmberg C, Olsen A, Tryggvason K: Positionally cloned gene for a novel glomerular protein—nephrin—is mutated in congenital nephrotic syndrome. Mol Cell1 :575 –582,1998[CrossRef][Medline]
  8. Boute N, Gribouval O, Roselli S, Benessy F, Lee H, Fuchshuber A, Dahan K, Gubler MC, Niaudet P, Antignac C: NPHS2, encoding the glomerular protein podocin, is mutated in autosomal recessive steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome. Nat Genet24 :349 –354,2000[CrossRef][Medline]
  9. Kaplan JM, Kim SH, North KN, Rennke H, Correia LA, Tong HQ, Mathis BJ, Rodriguez-Perez JC, Allen PG, Beggs AH, Pollak MR: Mutations in ACTN4, encoding alpha-actinin-4, cause familial focal segmental glomerulosclerosis. Nat Genet24 :251 –256,2000[CrossRef][Medline]
  10. Winn MP, Conlon PJ, Lynn KL, Farrington MK, Creazzo T, Hawkins AF, Daskalakis N, Kwan SY, Ebersviller S, Burchette JL, Pericak-Vance MA, Howell DN, Vance JM, Rosenberg PB: A mutation in the TRPC6 cation channel causes familial focal segmental glomerulosclerosis. Science308 :1801 –1804,2005[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Mira MT, Alcais A, Van TN, Thai VH, Huong NT, Ba NN, Verner A, Hudson TJ, Abel L, Schurr E: Chromosome 6q25 is linked to susceptibility to leprosy in a Vietnamese population. Nat Genet33 :412 –415,2003[CrossRef][Medline]
  12. Mira MT, Alcais A, Nguyen VT, Moraes MO, Di FC, Vu HT, Mai CP, Nguyen TH, Nguyen NB, Pham XK, Sarno EN, Alter A, Montpetit A, Moraes ME, Moraes JR, Dore C, Gallant CJ, Lepage P, Verner A, Van D, V, Hudson TJ, Abel L, Schurr E: Susceptibility to leprosy is associated with PARK2 and PACRG. Nature427 :636 –640,2004[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. Lander ES, Botstein D: Mapping mendelian factors underlying quantitative traits using RFLP linkage maps. Genetics121 :185 –199,1989[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Darvasi A: Experimental strategies for the genetic dissection of complex traits in animal models. Nat Genet18 :19 –24,1998[CrossRef][Medline]
  15. Waterston RH, Lindblad-Toh K, Birney E, Rogers J, Abril JF, Agarwal P, Agarwala R, Ainscough R, Alexandersson M, An P, Antonarakis SE, Attwood J, Baertsch R, Bailey J, Barlow K, Beck S, Berry E, Birren B, Bloom T, Bork P, Botcherby M, Bray N, Brent MR, Brown DG, Brown SD, Bult C, Burton J, Butler J, Campbell RD, Carninci P, Cawley S, Chiaromonte F, Chinwalla AT, Church DM, Clamp M, Clee C, Collins FS, Cook LL, Copley RR, Coulson A, Couronne O, Cuff J, Curwen V, Cutts T, Daly M, David R, Davies J, Delehaunty KD, Deri J, Dermitzakis ET, Dewey C, Dickens NJ, Diekhans M, Dodge S, Dubchak I, Dunn DM, Eddy SR, Elnitski L, Emes RD, Eswara P, Eyras E, Felsenfeld A, Fewell GA, Flicek P, Foley K, Frankel WN, Fulton LA, Fulton RS, Furey TS, Gage D, Gibbs RA, Glusman G, Gnerre S, Goldman N, Goodstadt L, Grafham D, Graves TA, Green ED, Gregory S, Guigo R, Guyer M, Hardison RC, Haussler D, Hayashizaki Y, Hillier LW, Hinrichs A, Hlavina W, Holzer T, Hsu F, Hua A, Hubbard T, Hunt A, Jackson I, Jaffe DB, Johnson LS, Jones M, Jones TA, Joy A, Kamal M, Karlsson EK, Karolchik D, Kasprzyk A, Kawai J, Keibler E, Kells C, Kent WJ, Kirby A, Kolbe DL, Korf I, Kucherlapati RS, Kulbokas EJ, Kulp D, Landers T, Leger JP, Leonard S, Letunic I, Levine R, Li J, Li M, Lloyd C, Lucas S, Ma B, Maglott DR, Mardis ER, Matthews L, Mauceli E, Mayer JH, McCarthy M, McCombie WR, McLaren S, McLay K, McPherson JD, Meldrim J, Meredith B, Mesirov JP, Miller W, Miner TL, Mongin E, Montgomery KT, Morgan M, Mott R, Mullikin JC, Muzny DM, Nash WE, Nelson JO, Nhan MN, Nicol R, Ning Z, Nusbaum C, O'Connor MJ, Okazaki Y, Oliver K, Overton-Larty E, Pachter L, Parra G, Pepin KH, Peterson J, Pevzner P, Plumb R, Pohl CS, Poliakov A, Ponce TC, Ponting CP, Potter S, Quail M, Reymond A, Roe BA, Roskin KM, Rubin EM, Rust AG, Santos R, Sapojnikov V, Schultz B, Schultz J, Schwartz MS, Schwartz S, Scott C, Seaman S, Searle S, Sharpe T, Sheridan A, Shownkeen R, Sims S, Singer JB, Slater G, Smit A, Smith DR, Spencer B, Stabenau A, Stange-Thomann N, Sugnet C, Suyama M, Tesler G, Thompson J, Torrents D, Trevaskis E, Tromp J, Ucla C, Ureta-Vidal A, Vinson JP, Von Niederhausern AC, Wade CM, Wall M, Weber RJ, Weiss RB, Wendl MC, West AP, Wetterstrand K, Wheeler R, Whelan S, Wierzbowski J, Willey D, Williams S, Wilson RK, Winter E, Worley KC, Wyman D, Yang S, Yang SP, Zdobnov EM, Zody MC, Lander ES: Initial sequencing and comparative analysis of the mouse genome. Nature420 :520 –562,2002[CrossRef][Medline]
  16. Pan H, Yan BS, Rojas M, Shebzukhov YV, Zhou H, Kobzik L, Higgins DE, Daly MJ, Bloom BR, Kramnik I: Ipr1 gene mediates innate immunity to tuberculosis. Nature434 :767 –772,2005[CrossRef][Medline]
  17. Boyden ED, Dietrich WF: Nalp1b controls mouse macrophage susceptibility to anthrax lethal toxin. Nat Genet38 :240 –244,2006[CrossRef][Medline]
  18. Diez E, Lee SH, Gauthier S, Yaraghi Z, Tremblay M, Vidal S, Gros P: Birc1e is the gene within the Lgn1 locus associated with resistance to Legionella pneumophila. Nat Genet33 :55 –60,2003[CrossRef][Medline]
  19. Risch N, Merikangas K: The future of genetic studies of complex human diseases. Science273 :1516 –1517,1996[Medline]
  20. Risch NJ: Searching for genetic determinants in the new millennium. Nature405 :847 –856,2000[CrossRef][Medline]
  21. Hirschhorn JN, Daly MJ: Genome-wide association studies for common diseases and complex traits. Nat Rev Genet6 :95 –108,2005[Medline]
  22. Klein RJ, Zeiss C, Chew EY, Tsai JY, Sackler RS, Haynes C, Henning AK, SanGiovanni JP, Mane SM, Mayne ST, Bracken MB, Ferris FL, Ott J, Barnstable C, Hoh J: Complement factor H polymorphism in age-related macular degeneration. Science308 :385 –389,2005[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Duerr RH, Taylor KD, Brant SR, Rioux JD, Silverberg MS, Daly MJ, Steinhart AH, Abraham C, Regueiro M, Griffiths A, Dassopoulos T, Bitton A, Yang H, Targan S, Datta LW, Kistner EO, Schumm LP, Lee AT, Gregersen PK, Barmada MM, Rotter JI, Nicolae DL, Cho JH: A genome-wide association study identifies IL23R as an inflammatory bowel disease gene. Science314 :1461 –1463,2006[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Herbert A, Gerry NP, McQueen MB, Heid IM, Pfeufer A, Illig T, Wichmann HE, Meitinger T, Hunter D, Hu FB, Colditz G, Hinney A, Hebebrand J, Koberwitz K, Zhu X, Cooper R, Ardlie K, Lyon H, Hirschhorn JN, Laird NM, Lenburg ME, Lange C, Christman MF: A common genetic variant is associated with adult and childhood obesity. Science312 :279 –283,2006[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Dean M, Carrington M, Winkler C, Huttley GA, Smith MW, Allikmets R, Goedert JJ, Buchbinder SP, Vittinghoff E, Gomperts E, Donfield S, Vlahov D, Kaslow R, Saah A, Rinaldo C, Detels R, O'Brien SJ: Genetic restriction of HIV-1 infection and progression to AIDS by a deletion allele of the CKR5 structural gene. Hemophilia Growth and Development Study, Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study, Multicenter Hemophilia Cohort Study, San Francisco City Cohort, ALIVE Study. Science273 :1856 –1862,1996[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Michael NL, Nelson JA, KewalRamani VN, Chang G, O'Brien SJ, Mascola JR, Volsky B, Louder M, White GC, Littman DR, Swanstrom R, O'Brien TR: Exclusive and persistent use of the entry coreceptor CXCR4 by human immunodeficiency virus type 1 from a subject homozygous for CCR5 delta32. J Virol72 :6040 –6047,1998[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Zimmerman PA, Buckler-White A, Alkhatib G, Spalding T, Kubofcik J, Combadiere C, Weissman D, Cohen O, Rubbert A, Lam G, Vaccarezza M, Kennedy PE, Kumaraswami V, Giorgi JV, Detels R, Hunter J, Chopek M, Berger EA, Fauci AS, Nutman TB, Murphy PM: Inherited resistance to HIV-1 conferred by an inactivating mutation in CC chemokine receptor 5: Studies in populations with contrasting clinical phenotypes, defined racial background, and quantified risk. Mol Med3 :23 –36,1997[Medline]
  28. McDermott DH, Zimmerman PA, Guignard F, Kleeberger CA, Leitman SF, Murphy PM: CCR5 promoter polymorphism and HIV-1 disease progression. Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study (MACS). Lancet352 :866 –870,1998[CrossRef][Medline]
  29. Smith MW, Dean M, Carrington M, Winkler C, Huttley GA, Lomb DA, Goedert JJ, O'Brien TR, Jacobson LP, Kaslow R, Buchbinder S, Vittinghoff E, Vlahov D, Hoots K, Hilgartner MW, O'Brien SJ: Contrasting genetic influence of CCR2 and CCR5 variants on HIV-1 infection and disease progression. Hemophilia Growth and Development Study (HGDS), Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study (MACS), Multicenter Hemophilia Cohort Study (MHCS), San Francisco City Cohort (SFCC), ALIVE Study. Science277 :959 –965,1997[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Kostrikis LG, Huang Y, Moore JP, Wolinsky SM, Zhang L, Guo Y, Deutsch L, Phair J, Neumann AU, Ho DD: A chemokine receptor CCR2 allele delays HIV-1 disease progression and is associated with a CCR5 promoter mutation. Nat Med4 :350 –353,1998[CrossRef][Medline]
  31. Winkler C, Modi W, Smith MW, Nelson GW, Wu X, Carrington M, Dean M, Honjo T, Tashiro K, Yabe D, Buchbinder S, Vittinghoff E, Goedert JJ, O'Brien TR, Jacobson LP, Detels R, Donfield S, Willoughby A, Gomperts E, Vlahov D, Phair J, O'Brien SJ: Genetic restriction of AIDS pathogenesis by an SDF-1 chemokine gene variant. ALIVE Study, Hemophilia Growth and Development Study (HGDS), Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study (MACS), Multicenter Hemophilia Cohort Study (MHCS), San Francisco City Cohort (SFCC). Science279 :389 –393,1998[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Gonzalez E, Kulkarni H, Bolivar H, Mangano A, Sanchez R, Catano G, Nibbs RJ, Freedman BI, Quinones MP, Bamshad MJ, Murthy KK, Rovin BH, Bradley W, Clark RA, Anderson SA, O'connell RJ, Agan BK, Ahuja SS, Bologna R, Sen L, Dolan MJ, Ahuja SK: The influence of CCL3L1 gene-containing segmental duplications on HIV-1/AIDS susceptibility. Science307 :1434 –1440,2005[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. McDermott DH, Beecroft MJ, Kleeberger CA, Al-Sharif FM, Ollier WE, Zimmerman PA, Boatin BA, Leitman SF, Detels R, Hajeer AH, Murphy PM: Chemokine RANTES promoter polymorphism affects risk of both HIV infection and disease progression in the Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study. AIDS14 :2671 –2678,2000[CrossRef][Medline]
  34. Gao X, Nelson GW, Karacki P, Martin MP, Phair J, Kaslow R, Goedert JJ, Buchbinder S, Hoots K, Vlahov D, O'Brien SJ, Carrington M: Effect of a single amino acid change in MHC class I molecules on the rate of progression to AIDS. N Engl J Med344 :1668 –1675,2001[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Itescu S, Mathur-Wagh U, Skovron ML, Brancato LJ, Marmor M, Zeleniuch-Jacquotte A, Winchester R: HLA-B35 is associated with accelerated progression to AIDS. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr5 :37 –45,1992[Medline]
  36. Lochner ML, Wolf A: Human immunodeficiency virus-1 associated nephropathy (HIVAN): Epidemiology, pathogenesis, histology, diagnosis, medical management. Nephrol Nurs J:33 :259 –267,2006[Medline]
  37. Carrington M, O'Brien SJ: The influence of HLA genotype on AIDS. Annu Rev Med54 :535 –551,2003[CrossRef][Medline]
  38. Carrington M, Nelson GW, Martin MP, Kissner T, Vlahov D, Goedert JJ, Kaslow R, Buchbinder S, Hoots K, O'Brien SJ: HLA and HIV-1: Heterozygote advantage and B*35-Cw*04 disadvantage. Science283 :1748 –1752,1999[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Martin MP, Gao X, Lee JH, Nelson GW, Detels R, Goedert JJ, Buchbinder S, Hoots K, Vlahov D, Trowsdale J, Wilson M, O'Brien SJ, Carrington M: Epistatic interaction between KIR3DS1 and HLA-B delays the progression to AIDS. Nat Genet31 :429 –434,2002[Medline]
  40. Khakoo SI, Thio CL, Martin MP, Brooks CR, Gao X, Astemborski J, Cheng J, Goedert JJ, Vlahov D, Hilgartner M, Cox S, Little AM, Alexander GJ, Cramp ME, O'Brien SJ, Rosenberg WM, Thomas DL, Carrington M: HLA and NK cell inhibitory receptor genes in resolving hepatitis C virus infection. Science305 :872 –874,2004[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Carrington M, Wang S, Martin MP, Gao X, Schiffman M, Cheng J, Herrero R, Rodriguez AC, Kurman R, Mortel R, Schwartz P, Glass A, Hildesheim A: Hierarchy of resistance to cervical neoplasia mediated by combinations of killer immunoglobulin-like receptor and human leukocyte antigen loci. J Exp Med201 :1069 –1075,2005[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Casrouge A, Zhang SY, Eidenschenk C, Jouanguy E, Puel A, Yang K, Alcais A, Picard C, Mahfoufi N, Nicolas N, Lorenzo L, Plancoulaine S, Senechal B, Geissmann F, Tabeta K, Hoebe K, Du X, Miller RL, Heron B, Mignot C, de Villemeur TB, Lebon P, Dulac O, Rozenberg F, Beutler B, Tardieu M, Abel L, Casanova JL: Herpes simplex virus encephalitis in human UNC-93B deficiency. Science314 :308 –312,2006[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  43. Corder EH, Robertson K, Lannfelt L, Bogdanovic N, Eggertsen G, Wilkins J, Hall C: HIV-infected subjects with the E4 allele for APOE have excess dementia and peripheral neuropathy. Nat Med4 :1182 –1184,1998[CrossRef][Medline]
  44. Ray PE, Xu L, Rakusan T, Liu XH: A 20-year history of childhood HIV-associated nephropathy. Pediatr Nephrol19 :1075 –1092,2004[Medline]
  45. Ross MJ, Klotman PE: Recent progress in HIV-associated nephropathy. J Am Soc Nephrol13 :2997 –3004,2002[Free Full Text]
  46. UNAIDS/WHO: AIDS Epidemic Update,2005 . Available online at http://www.unaids.org/epi/2005
  47. Abbott KC, Hypolite I, Welch PG, Agodoa LY: Human immunodeficiency virus/acquired immunodeficiency syndrome-associated nephropathy at end-stage renal disease in the United States: Patient characteristics and survival in the pre highly active antiretroviral therapy era. J Nephrol14 :377 –383,2001[Medline]
  48. Albaqumi M, Soos TJ, Barisoni L, Nelson PJ: Collapsing glomerulopathy. J Am Soc Nephrol17 :2854 –2863,2006[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  49. Cohen AH, Sun NC, Shapshak P, Imagawa DT: Demonstration of human immunodeficiency virus in renal epithelium in HIV-associated nephropathy. Mod Pathol2 :125 –128,1989
  50. Bruggeman LA, Ross MD, Tanji N, Cara A, Dikman S, Gordon RE, Burns GC, D'Agati VD, Winston JA, Klotman ME, Klotman PE: Renal epithelium is a previously unrecognized site of HIV-1 infection. J Am Soc Nephrol11 :2079 –2087,2000[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  51. Marras D, Bruggeman LA, Gao F, Tanji N, Mansukhani MM, Cara A, Ross MD, Gusella GL, Benson G, D'Agati VD, Hahn BH, Klotman ME, Klotman PE: Replication and compartmentalization of HIV-1 in kidney epithelium of patients with HIV-associated nephropathy. Nat Med8 :522 –526,2002[CrossRef][Medline]
  52. Zerhouni-Layachi B, Husain M, Ross MJ, Marras D, Sunamoto M, Liu X, Klotman PE, Klotman ME: Dual tropism of HIV-1 envelopes derived from renal tubular epithelial cells of patients with HIV-associated nephropathy. AIDS20 :621 –624,2006[Medline]
  53. Cantor ES, Kimmel PL, Bosch JP: Effect of race on expression of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome-associated nephropathy. Arch Intern Med151 :125 –128,1991[Abstract]
  54. Foster MH: Taking HAART in HIVAN: Will protease inhibitor sparing regimens alter renal outcome. Kidney Int65 :1105 –1106,2004[CrossRef][Medline]
  55. Praditpornsilpa K, Napathorn S, Yenrudi S, Wankrairot P, Tungsaga K, Sitprija V: Renal pathology and HIV infection in Thailand. Am J Kidney Dis33 :282 –286,1999[Medline]
  56. Nochy D, Glotz D, Dosquet P, Pruna A, Lemoine R, Guettier C, Weiss L, Hinglais N, Idatte JM, Mery JP: Renal lesions associated with human immunodeficiency virus infection: North American vs. European experience. Adv Nephrol Necker Hosp22 :269 –286,1993[Medline]
  57. Husain M, D'Agati VD, He JC, Klotman ME, Klotman PE: HIV-1 Nef induces dedifferentiation of podocytes in vivo: A characteristic feature of HIVAN. AIDS19 :1975 –1980,2005[Medline]
  58. Behar DM, Shlush LI, Maor C, Lorber M, Skorecki K: Absence of HIV-associated nephropathy in Ethiopians. Am J Kidney Dis47 :88 –94,2006[CrossRef][Medline]
  59. Gerntholtz TE, Goetsch SJ, Katz I: HIV-related nephropathy: A South African perspective. Kidney Int69 :1885 –1891,2006[CrossRef][Medline]
  60. Han TM, Naicker S, Ramdial PK, Assounga AG: A cross-sectional study of HIV-seropositive patients with varying degrees of proteinuria in South Africa. Kidney Int69 :2243 –2250,2006[CrossRef][Medline]
  61. Liu XH, Hadley TJ, Xu L, Peiper SC, Ray PE: Up-regulation of Duffy antigen receptor expression in children with renal disease. Kidney Int55 :1491 –1500,1999[CrossRef][Medline]
  62. Woolley IJ, Kalayjian R, Valdez H, Hamza N, Jacobs G, Lederman MM, Zimmerman PA: HIV nephropathy and the Duffy antigen/receptor for chemokines in African Americans. J Nephrol14 :384 –387,2001[Medline]
  63. Dickie P, Felser J, Eckhaus M, Bryant J, Silver J, Marinos N, Notkins AL: HIV-associated nephropathy in transgenic mice expressing HIV-1 genes. Virology185 :109 –119,1991[CrossRef][Medline]
  64. Kopp JB, Klotman ME, Adler SH, Bruggeman LA, Dickie P, Marinos NJ, Eckhaus M, Bryant JL, Notkins AL, Klotman PE: Progressive glomerulosclerosis and enhanced renal accumulation of basement membrane components in mice transgenic for human immunodeficiency virus type 1 genes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A89 :1577 –1581,1992[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  65. Reid W, Sadowska M, Denaro F, Rao S, Foulke J Jr, Hayes N, Jones O, Doodnauth D, Davis H, Sill A, O'Driscoll P, Huso D, Fouts T, Lewis G, Hill M, Kamin-Lewis R, Wei C, Ray P, Gallo RC, Reitz M, Bryant J: An HIV-1 transgenic rat that develops HIV-related pathology and immunologic dysfunction. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A98 :9271 –9276,2001[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  66. Ray PE, Liu XH, Robinson LR, Reid W, Xu L, Owens JW, Jones OD, Denaro F, Davis HG, Bryant JL: A novel HIV-1 transgenic rat model of childhood HIV-1-associated nephropathy. Kidney Int63 :2242 –2253,2003[CrossRef][Medline]
  67. Bruggeman LA, Dikman S, Meng C, Quaggin SE, Coffman TM, Klotman PE: Nephropathy in human immunodeficiency virus-1 transgenic mice is due to renal transgene expression. J Clin Invest100 :84 –92,1997[Medline]
  68. Hanna Z, Kay DG, Cool M, Jothy S, Rebai N, Jolicoeur P: Transgenic mice expressing human immunodeficiency virus type 1 in immune cells develop a severe AIDS-like disease. J Virol72 :121 –132,1998[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  69. Hanna Z, Kay DG, Rebai N, Guimond A, Jothy S, Jolicoeur P: Nef harbors a major determinant of pathogenicity for an AIDS-like disease induced by HIV-1 in transgenic mice. Cell95 :163 –175,1998[CrossRef][Medline]
  70. Hanna Z, Weng X, Kay DG, Poudrier J, Lowell C, Jolicoeur P: The pathogenicity of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) type 1 Nef in CD4C/HIV transgenic mice is abolished by mutation of its SH3-binding domain, and disease development is delayed in the absence of Hck. J Virol75 :9378 –9392,2001[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  71. Schindler M, Munch J, Kutsch O, Li H, Santiago ML, Bibollet-Ruche F, Muller-Trutwin MC, Novembre FJ, Peeters M, Courgnaud V, Bailes E, Roques P, Sodora DL, Silvestri G, Sharp PM, Hahn BH, Kirchhoff F: Nef-mediated suppression of T cell activation was lost in a lentiviral lineage that gave rise to HIV-1. Cell125 :1055 –1067,2006[CrossRef][Medline]
  72. Husain M, Gusella GL, Klotman ME, Gelman IH, Ross MD, Schwartz EJ, Cara A, Klotman PE: HIV-1 Nef induces proliferation and anchorage-independent growth in podocytes. J Am Soc Nephrol13 :1806 –1815,2002[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  73. He JC, Husain M, Sunamoto M, D'Agati VD, Klotman ME, Iyengar R, Klotman PE: Nef stimulates proliferation of glomerular podocytes through activation of Src-dependent Stat3 and MAPK1,2 pathways. J Clin Invest114 :643 –651,2004[CrossRef][Medline]
  74. Dickie P, Roberts A, Uwiera R, Witmer J, Sharma K, Kopp JB: Focal glomerulosclerosis in proviral and c-fms transgenic mice links Vpr expression to HIV-associated nephropathy. Virology322 :69 –81,2004[CrossRef][Medline]
  75. Zuo Y, Matsusaka T, Zhong J, Ma J, Ma LJ, Hanna Z, Jolicoeur P, Fogo AB, Ichikawa I: HIV-1 Genes vpr and nef synergistically damage podocytes, leading to glomerulosclerosis. J Am Soc Nephrol17 :2832 –2843,2006[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  76. Gherardi D, D'Agati V, Chu TH, Barnett A, Gianella-Borradori A, Gelman IH, Nelson PJ: Reversal of collapsing glomerulopathy in mice with the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor CYC202. J Am Soc Nephrol15 :1212 –1222,2004[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  77. Ross MJ, Martinka S, D'Agati VD, Bruggeman LA: NF-kappaB regulates Fas-mediated apoptosis in HIV-associated nephropathy. J Am Soc Nephrol16 :2403 –2411,2005[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  78. Martinka S, Bruggeman LA: Persistent NF-kappaB activation in renal epithelial cells in a mouse model of HIV-associated nephropathy. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol290 :F657 –F665,2006[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  79. Gharavi AG, Ahmad T, Wong RD, Hooshyar R, Vaughn J, Oller S, Frankel RZ, Bruggeman LA, D'Agati VD, Klotman PE, Lifton RP: Mapping a locus for susceptibility to HIV-1-associated nephropathy to mouse chromosome 3. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A101 :2488 –2493,2004[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  80. Zhong J, Zuo Y, Ma J, Fogo AB, Jolicoeur P, Ichikawa I, Matsusaka T: Expression of HIV-1 genes in podocytes alone can lead to the full spectrum of HIV-1-associated nephropathy. Kidney Int68 :1048 –1060,2005[CrossRef][Medline]
  81. Imperatore G, Hanson RL, Pettitt DJ, Kobes S, Bennett PH, Knowler WC: Sib-pair linkage analysis for susceptibility genes for microvascular complications among Pima Indians with type 2 diabetes. Pima Diabetes Genes Group. Diabetes47 :821 –830,1998[Abstract]
  82. Moczulski DK, Rogus JJ, Antonellis A, Warram JH, Krolewski AS: Major susceptibility locus for nephropathy in type 1 diabetes on chromosome 3q: Results of novel discordant sib-pair analysis. Diabetes47 :1164 –1169,1998[Abstract]
  83. DeWan AT, Arnett DK, Atwood LD, Province MA, Lewis CE, Hunt SC, Eckfeldt J: A genome scan for renal function among hypertensives: The HyperGEN study. Am J Hum Genet68 :136 –144,2001[CrossRef][Medline]
  84. Osterholm AM, He B, Pitkaniemi J, Albinsson L, Berg T, Sarti C, Tuomilehto J, Tryggvason K: Genome-wide scan for type 1 diabetic nephropathy in the Finnish population reveals suggestive linkage to a single locus on chromosome 3q. Kidney Int71 :140 –145,2007[CrossRef][Medline]
  85. Zheng Z, Martino J, D'Agati V, Klotman P, Lifton R, Gharavi AG: A new susceptibility locus for HIVAN maps to mouse chromosome 13 [Abstract]. J Am Soc Nephrol17 :263A ,2006
  86. Huang Y, Paxton WA, Wolinsky SM, Neumann AU, Zhang L, He T, Kang S, Ceradini D, Jin Z, Yazdanbakhsh K, Kunstman K, Erickson D, Dragon E, Landau NR, Phair J, Ho DD, Koup RA: The role of a mutant CCR5 allele in HIV-1 transmission and disease progression. Nat Med2 :1240 –1243,1996[CrossRef][Medline]
  87. Martin MP, Dean M, Smith MW, Winkler C, Gerrard B, Michael NL, Lee B, Doms RW, Margolick J, Buchbinder S, Goedert JJ, O'Brien TR, Hilgartner MW, Vlahov D, O'Brien SJ, Carrington M: Genetic acceleration of AIDS progression by a promoter variant of CCR5. Science282 :1907 –1911,1998[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  88. Kostrikis LG, Neumann AU, Thomson B, Korber BT, McHardy P, Karanicolas R, Deutsch L, Huang Y, Lew JF, McIntosh K, Pollack H, Borkowsky W, Spiegel HM, Palumbo P, Oleske J, Bardeguez A, Luzuriaga K, Sullivan J, Wolinsky SM, Koup RA, Ho DD, Moore JP: A polymorphism in the regulatory region of the CC-chemokine receptor 5 gene influences perinatal transmission of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 to African-American infants. J Virol73 :10264 –10271,1999[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  89. Malhotra U, Holte S, Dutta S, Berrey MM, Delpit E, Koelle DM, Sette A, Corey L, McElrath MJ: Role for HLA class II molecules in HIV-1 suppression and cellular immunity following antiretroviral treatment. J Clin Invest107 :505 –517,2001[Medline]




This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kiryluk, K.
Right arrow Articles by Gharavi, A. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kiryluk, K.
Right arrow Articles by Gharavi, A. G.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS