CJASN
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 1: S19-S23, 2006
© 2006 American Society of Nephrology
doi: 10.2215/CJN.01420406

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bishu, K.
Right arrow Articles by Agarwal, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bishu, K.
Right arrow Articles by Agarwal, R.

Iron Deficiency in the 2006 K/DOQI ERA: Diagnosis and Management

Acute Injury with Intravenous Iron and Concerns Regarding Long-Term Safety

Kalkidan Bishu, and Rajiv Agarwal

Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, and Richard L. Roudebush VA Medical Center, Indianapolis, Indiana

Address correspondence to: Dr. Rajiv Agarwal, Department of Medicine, VAMC, 111N, 1481 West 10th Street, Indianapolis, IN 46202. Phone: 317-554-0000 ext. 2241; Fax: 317-554-0298; E-mail: ragarwal{at}iupui.edu


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Intravenous Iron Formulations...
 Iron Generates Oxidative Stress...
 Intravenous Iron,...
 Intravenous Iron Sucrose Causes...
 Conclusion
 References
 
Intravenous iron is widely used to maintain adequate iron stores and prevent iron deficiency anemia in patients with chronic kidney disease, yet concerns remain about its long-term safety with respect to oxidative stress, kidney injury, and accelerated atherosclerosis, which are the subjects of this review. Three parenteral iron formulations are available for use in the United States: Iron dextran, iron gluconate, and iron sucrose. Iron dextran, especially the high molecular form, has been linked with anaphylactoid and anaphylactic reactions, and its use has been declining. A portion of intravenous iron preparations is redox-active, labile iron available for direct donation to transferrin. In vitro tests show that commonly available intravenous iron formulations have differing capacities to saturate transferrin directly: Iron gluconate > iron sucrose > iron dextran. Intravenous iron treatment produces oxidative stress, as demonstrated by increases in plasma levels of lipid peroxidation products (malondialdehyde), at a point that is much earlier than the time to peak concentration of catalytically active iron, suggesting a direct effect of iron sucrose on oxidative stress. Furthermore, iron sucrose infusion produces endothelial dysfunction that seems to peak earlier than the serum level of free iron. Intravenous iron sucrose infusion also has been shown to produce acute renal injury and inflammation as demonstrated by increased urinary albumin, enzyme (N-acetyl-ß-glucosaminidase), and cytokine (chemokine monocyte chemoattractant protein-1) excretions. Although the long-term dangers of intravenous iron are unproved, these data call for examination of effects of intravenous iron on the potential for long-term harm in patients with chronic kidney disease.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Intravenous Iron Formulations...
 Iron Generates Oxidative Stress...
 Intravenous Iron,...
 Intravenous Iron Sucrose Causes...
 Conclusion
 References
 
Iron losses in dialysis patients exceed dietary absorption of iron (1,2). In the pre-erythropoietin era, it was not uncommon to see a consistent decline in serum ferritin levels in this group of patients. Oral absorption of iron does not occur when serum ferritin is approximately 50 ng/ml in hemodialysis patients (3). Intravenous iron is widely used and indicated for treatment of iron deficiency anemia (4). This use of intravenous iron is being extended to patients who have chronic kidney disease (CKD) and are not yet on dialysis (5), yet concerns regarding the safety of intravenous iron remain (6). The short-term safety of intravenous iron relates to allergic, anaphylactoid, and anaphylactic reactions with these drugs (7,8). These reactions are more common with iron dextran, especially with the higher molecular weight dextrans (8). The nondextran iron formulations have a much better safety profile (911). The long-term safety concerns of intravenous iron treatment relate to oxidative stress, inflammation, and renal and cardiovascular injury, which are the subjects of this review.


    Intravenous Iron Formulations Differ in Their Ability to Donate Iron to Transferrin
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Intravenous Iron Formulations...
 Iron Generates Oxidative Stress...
 Intravenous Iron,...
 Intravenous Iron Sucrose Causes...
 Conclusion
 References
 
Oxidative stress, that is iron catalyzed, is more likely to occur when iron is not bound to transferrin and is catalytically active. To determine whether intravenous iron donates iron to transferrin directly and whether any differences exist between dextran and nondextran iron preparations Agarwal (12) performed an in vitro experiment. Transferrin was incubated with various formulations of intravenous iron in the same concentration for various lengths of time. Figure 1 demonstrates different degrees of transferrin saturation (TSAT) by urea-PAGE after incubation of transferrin with iron gluconate and iron sucrose. Transferrin has two binding sites, and when bound to iron, apotransferrin is converted to monoferric or diferric transferrin. Urea-PAGE analysis is able to separate apotransferrin, monoferric, and diferric transferrin. Iron dextran after 3 h of incubation with transferrin showed no direct transfer of iron from iron dextran to transferrin. Conversely there was substantial transfer of iron to transferrin for both iron sucrose and iron gluconate in a time-dependent and dose-dependent manner (Figure 2). The nondextran formulations also differ significantly in their ability to donate iron; iron gluconate saturates transferrin faster than iron sucrose. Other investigators have made similar observations (13,14). The risk-benefit ratio of the various iron preparations, however, cannot be ascertained by the rate of iron transfer because the determinations described were made using in vitro studies and such analysis would require clinical trials. Nevertheless, these data suggest a hypothesis that commercially available intravenous iron formulations may have clinical differences in their potential to cause oxidative stress and injury and repair anemia.


Figure 1
View larger version (68K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Urea-PAGE of transferrin incubating for varying times with 100 µg/ml iron gluconate (left) or iron sucrose (right). Control lane has apotransferrin alone showing a single band. After varying times of incubation (shown on top of each lane), a greater proportion of saturation is seen with iron gluconate compared with iron sucrose. Reprinted from reference (12).

 

Figure 2
View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Dose response (A) and time-dependent (B) transfer of iron from each pharmaceutical preparation to transferrin on the basis of urea-PAGE analysis is shown. No direct transfer occurred with iron dextran, but nondextran iron formulations showed direct transferrin saturation. Greater tendency for saturating transferrin is seen with iron gluconate compared with iron sucrose. Reprinted from reference (12).

 

    Iron Generates Oxidative Stress in Humans
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Intravenous Iron Formulations...
 Iron Generates Oxidative Stress...
 Intravenous Iron,...
 Intravenous Iron Sucrose Causes...
 Conclusion
 References
 
Patients who are on dialysis are at a higher risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD) than is the general population. There is a consensus that atherosclerosis, an important cause of cardiovascular mortality in patients with ESRD (15), is a state of heightened oxidative stress (16). Likewise, CKD is a highly pro-oxidant state (17,18).

Several studies have examined the effects of intravenous iron therapy on oxidative stress. Zager et al. (19) studied the safety of various intravenous formulations of iron in terms of lipid peroxidation and cell injury in in vitro systems using cell cultures or human proximal tubular cells, endothelial cells, and tubules. They showed that when cell viability is assessed in vitro after exposure to iron sucrose, iron gluconate, and iron dextran preparations, iron sucrose is the most toxic and iron dextran the least. They also showed that all three agents resulted in a massive and similar increase in lipid peroxidation. Whole-animal studies show that intravenous administration of iron dextran in rats with chronic renal failure also induces oxidative stress (20,21).

Consistent with the findings in animals, an exacerbation of oxidative stress occurs after intravenous infusion of iron sucrose in dialysis patients, as demonstrated by an increase in plasma concentrations of malondialdehyde (MDA), one of the end products of the peroxidation of polyunsaturated fatty acids (22). Roob et al. (23) demonstrated that intravenous iron leads to the generation of MDA, with plasma concentrations reaching a peak at 30 min after the start of an infusion of 100 mg of intravenous iron sucrose in patients who are on hemodialysis. When vitamin E was given along with intravenous iron, there was some mitigation of oxidative stress, although MDA levels still were higher than for patients who did not receive intravenous iron. They also measured bleomycin-detectable iron, a marker for redox-active iron, and found a rapid increase in plasma bleomycin-detectable iron. In fact, Tovbin et al. (24) found that intravenous iron leads to greater protein oxidation in hemodialysis patients when they have a greater amount of inflammation. These data support the hypothesis that the administration of intravenous iron generates redox-active free iron and oxidative stress.


    Intravenous Iron, Atherosclerosis, and Endothelial Dysfunction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Intravenous Iron Formulations...
 Iron Generates Oxidative Stress...
 Intravenous Iron,...
 Intravenous Iron Sucrose Causes...
 Conclusion
 References
 
CVD is the primary cause of death in patients with ESRD (15), and atherosclerosis is the major cause of ischemic heart disease in dialysis patients. Studies have found that common carotid artery intima-media thickness, an early marker of atherosclerosis, is associated with annual intravenous iron dose (25,26), serum ferritin (25), and markers of oxidant-mediated protein damage (25) in patients with ESRD. The current paradigm for the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis emphasizes the central role of endothelial dysfunction (27) that seems to be mediated through oxidative stress (28). Endothelial dysfunction and injury trigger an inflammatory cascade that, if unabated, could lead to remodeling of the arterial wall. That iron may be important in mediating atherosclerosis is supported by a recent study from the Netherlands that demonstrated increased adhesion of normal human monocyte cells to human umbilical endothelial cells that were treated with the serum of patients with hemochromatosis (29). The expression of the adhesion molecules intercellular adhesion molecule-1, vascular cellular adhesion molecule-1, and E-selectin also was positively correlated to free iron levels.

A few studies demonstrated modulation of endothelial function by intravenous iron administration. Rooyakkers et al. (30) administered intravenous iron sucrose to people with normal kidney function and evaluated endothelial function, free iron levels, and free-radical activity (Figure 3). Intravenous iron sucrose increased free radical activity and reduced flow-mediated dilation. Intravenous iron did not impair nitroglycerin-induced dilation, which is a measure of endothelium-independent vessel function. At 10 min after the administration of iron sucrose, there was a substantial increase in free iron that continued to rise up to 4 h after infusion. If free iron is considered to be directly responsible for the endothelial dysfunction, then it would be expected that at 4 h, there would be greater endothelial dysfunction than at 10 min. Instead, endothelial dysfunction was maximal at 10 min and had normalized by 4 h, suggesting that free iron is not the direct cause for the dysfunction. Oxidative stress, maximally generated at 10 min, was better correlated with impairment of endothelial function.


Figure 3
View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Changes in non–transferrin-bound iron (NTBI), oxygen radical activity, and flow-mediated dilation (FMD) at baseline and 10 and 240 min after ferric saccharate. (Left) Steady increase in percentage in NTBI 10 and 240 min after infusion of ferric saccharate compared with baseline. (Middle) Percentage change in oxygen radical generation compared with baseline. At 10 and 240 min after infusion of ferric saccharate, oxygen radical formation has increased significantly. (Right) Percentage decrease in FMD 10 and 240 min after infusion of ferric saccharate compared with baseline. At 10 min, FMD has decreased significantly. *P < 0.05 versus baseline. Adapted from reference (30).

 
A study by Zheng et al. (31) evaluated in a double-blind, controlled experiment the effect of iron sucrose given in a recommended dose (100 mg) but at a slower rate (30 min rather than 5 min) to assess its effect on endothelial function as measured by flow-mediated dilation in 40 healthy volunteers. All participants were preloaded with oral methionine to increase plasma homocysteine levels. Intravenous iron reduced endothelial function at 1 h with iron sucrose. At 4 h, endothelial function was similarly reduced in the placebo group compared with the iron group, suggesting that oral methionine load also can impair endothelial function. Although free iron levels were measured, it is unclear whether this was the sole cause of endothelial dysfunction. The study by Rooyakkers et al. (30), described earlier, showed dissociation between free iron and endothelial dysfunction; endothelial dysfunction peaks a lot sooner than the peak in free iron concentration.


    Intravenous Iron Sucrose Causes Acute Renal Injury in CKD
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Intravenous Iron Formulations...
 Iron Generates Oxidative Stress...
 Intravenous Iron,...
 Intravenous Iron Sucrose Causes...
 Conclusion
 References
 
In a model of obstructive uropathy in mice, Zager et al. (32) showed that intravenous iron generates the proinflammatory chemokine monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1). Whether administration of intravenous iron to people with CKD generates oxidative stress and renal injury was the subject of another study by Agarwal et al. (33). Patients who had CKD and were not on dialysis were given intravenous iron sucrose 100 mg over 5 min. TSAT was measured using urea-PAGE. Plasma and urine samples were collected and assayed for biomarkers of lipid peroxidation (MDA), redox state (plasma and erythrocyte oxidized and reduced glutathione [oxidized glutathione and reduced glutathione]), antioxidant enzymes, and markers for renal tubular and glomerular injury and/or inflammation (MCP-1, urine total protein, and N-acetyl-ß-glucosaminidase). Plasma and urine samples were collected at 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, and 24 h after intravenous iron sucrose administration. After these studies were performed as baseline for the group of 20 patients, the patients were randomly assigned to receive either N-acetylcysteine (NAC) 600 mg twice a day for 7 d (n = 10) or placebo (n = 10). Seven days later, another dose of intravenous iron sucrose was administered to all participants, and urine and plasma samples were collected at timed intervals.

The hemoglobin concentrations in the two groups were not changed at 1 wk. In contrast, a single dose of 100 mg of iron increased the ferritin level from 85 to 91 ng/ml for the placebo group and from 127 to 169 ng/ml for the NAC group. These differences were statistically significant. There was a progressive increase in TSAT as measured by urea-PAGE, which did not reach a peak until 3 h after intravenous iron infusion. At approximately 24 h, TSAT reached a level that was approximately twice the baseline level. The peak in TSAT occurred at 3 h after intravenous iron administration. At 15 min, there already was a peak in oxidative stress as measured by plasma MDA. Similar to the findings in normal, healthy volunteers (30), in this study of people with CKD, there was peak generation of oxidative stress within 15 min of intravenous iron infusion. Oxidative stress returned to baseline within 24 h. Similar results were obtained for urinary MDA. Urinary N-acetyl-ß-glucosaminidase and protein excretion rates showed a rapid rise and decline to baseline levels in 24 h that paralleled the generation of oxidative stress. In a more detailed analysis of the nature of oxidative stress and injury in these patients, Agarwal (34) showed that acute renal injury and oxidative stress after administration of intravenous iron sucrose produces carbonylation, fragmentation, and loss of immunoreactivity of urinary albumin in a time-dependent manner. Furthermore, consistent with the observations of Zager et al. (32), MCP-1 was generated and excreted rapidly in response to intravenous iron (35). Although oxidative stress was reduced with NAC, it did not affect renal injury and inflammation as measured by proteinuria, enzymuria, and urinary MCP-1 excretion (33,35). Therefore, it seems that intravenous iron sucrose is not only generating free iron and causing oxidative stress and renal damage but also may be causing renal injury directly. This revised model of renal injury with intravenous iron is shown in Figure 4.


Figure 4
View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Proposed pathway of injury as envisioned initially (bold arrows) and as modified by the results of the trial (dashed arrows) (33).

 
Leehey et al. (36) studied iron gluconate, in two different dosages, for its ability to cause oxidative stress and renal injury and also looked for protection from injury with NAC. They performed a four-period crossover study in eight patients with CKD. Sodium ferric gluconate was administered in a dosage of 125 mg over 1 h with or without NAC or a higher dosage of sodium ferric gluconate, 250 mg, over 2 h with or without NAC. Every patient underwent each one of these four therapies. Adult US veterans who had an estimated GFR of <60 ml/min, hemoglobin concentration <12, TSAT <20%, and/or ferritin levels <100 ng/ml were included in the study. Oxidative stress was measured by MDA generation, and renal injury was measured by enzymuria, albuminuria, and proteinuria. The patients were older men, had hemoglobin of 9.8 g/dl, ferritin of 119 ng/ml, and creatinine of 3.1 mg/dl.

Not surprising, TSAT increased rapidly and in a dose-dependent manner with sodium ferric gluconate and was not influenced by NAC. Plasma and urinary MDA increased with intravenous iron, but the difference was not statistically significant when different dosages of sodium ferric gluconate were compared, likely as a result of the limited power of the study. NAC did not block the oxidative stress response. Despite the generation of oxidative stress, there was no increase in proteinuria or albuminuria even with the higher dosage of iron gluconate. There was an increase in enzymuria, especially at the high dosage, which was not statistically significant probably because of low power of the study.


    Conclusion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Intravenous Iron Formulations...
 Iron Generates Oxidative Stress...
 Intravenous Iron,...
 Intravenous Iron Sucrose Causes...
 Conclusion
 References
 
Intravenous iron generates oxidative stress, inflammation, endothelial dysfunction, and renal injury. The propensity for these events is increased with nondextran iron, but the clinical use of iron dextran, especially the large molecular form, is complicated by anaphylactic reactions and death. There seem to be differences between iron sucrose and iron gluconate in their ability to donate iron directly to transferrin (gluconate > sucrose) and to cause proteinuria and enzymuria (seen with iron sucrose only). Although antioxidants somewhat can mitigate the oxidative stress, they do not limit the renal injury that is caused by intravenous iron sucrose. This is consistent with the hypothesis that intravenous iron may be causing oxidative stress and renal injury by two independent pathways. The short-term experiments described earlier are provocative but not conclusive. The determination of the long-term clinical significance of these observations in patients with CKD or those who are on peritoneal dialysis requires clinical trials.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Intravenous Iron Formulations...
 Iron Generates Oxidative Stress...
 Intravenous Iron,...
 Intravenous Iron Sucrose Causes...
 Conclusion
 References
 

  1. Fishbane S, Maesaka JK: Iron management in end-stage renal disease. Am J Kidney Dis29 :319 –333,1997[Medline]
  2. Macdougall IC, Tucker B, Thompson J, Tomson CR, Baker LR, Raine AE: A randomized controlled study of iron supplementation in patients treated with erythropoietin. Kidney Int50 :1694 –1699,1996[Medline]
  3. Eschbach JW, Cook JD, Scribner BH, Finch CA: Iron balance in hemodialysis patients. Ann Intern Med87 :710 –713,1977[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. NKF-K/DOQI clinical practice guidelines for anemia of chronic kidney disease: Update 2000. Am J Kidney Dis37 :S182 –S238,2001[Medline]
  5. Van Wyck DB, Roppolo M, Martinez CO, Mazey RM, McMurray S: A randomized, controlled trial comparing IV iron sucrose to oral iron in anemic patients with nondialysis-dependent CKD. Kidney Int68 :2846 –2856,2005[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. Agarwal R, Warnock D: Issues related to iron replacement in chronic kidney disease. Semin Nephrol22 :479 –487,2002[Medline]
  7. Hamstra RD, Block MH, Schocket AL: Intravenous iron dextran in clinical medicine. JAMA243 :1726 –1731,1980[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Faich G, Strobos J: Sodium ferric gluconate complex in sucrose: Safer intravenous iron therapy than iron dextrans. Am J Kidney Dis33 :464 –470,1999[Medline]
  9. Michael B, Coyne DW, Fishbane S, Folkert V, Lynn R, Nissenson AR, Agarwal R, Eschbach JW, Fadem SZ, Trout JR, Strobos J, Warnock DG: Sodium ferric gluconate complex in hemodialysis patients: Adverse reactions compared to placebo and iron dextran. Kidney Int61 :1830 –1839,2002[CrossRef][Medline]
  10. Coyne DW, Adkinson NF, Nissenson AR, Fishbane S, Agarwal R, Eschbach JW, Michael B, Folkert V, Batlle D, Trout JR, Dahl N, Myirski P, Strobos J, Warnock DG: Sodium ferric gluconate complex in hemodialysis patients. II. Adverse reactions in iron dextran-sensitive and dextran-tolerant patients. Kidney Int63 :217 –224,2003[CrossRef][Medline]
  11. Charytan C, Levin N, Al Saloum M, Hafeez T, Gagnon S, Van Wyck DB: Efficacy and safety of iron sucrose for iron deficiency in patients with dialysis-associated anemia: North American clinical trial. Am J Kidney Dis37 :300 –307,2001[Medline]
  12. Agarwal R: Transferrin saturation with intravenous irons: An in vitro study. Kidney Int66 :1139 –1144,2004[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. Esposito BP, Breuer W, Slotki I, Cabantchik ZI: Labile iron in parenteral iron formulations and its potential for generating plasma nontransferrin-bound iron in dialysis patients. Eur J Clin Invest32[Suppl 1] :42 –49,2002[CrossRef]
  14. van Wyck D, Anderson J, Johnson K: Labile iron in parenteral iron formulations: A quantitative and comparative study. Nephrol Dial Transplant19 :561 –565,2004[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. United States Renal Data System: USRDS 2005 Annual Data Report: Atlas of End-Stage Renal Disease in the United States, Bethesda, National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases,2005
  16. Stocker R, Keaney JF Jr: Role of oxidative modifications in atherosclerosis. Physiol Rev84 :1381 –1478,2004[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Haugen E, Nath KA: The involvement of oxidative stress in the progression of renal injury. Blood Purif17 :58 –65,1999[CrossRef][Medline]
  18. Himmelfarb J, Stenvinkel P, Ikizler TA, Hakim RM: The elephant in uremia: Oxidant stress as a unifying concept of cardiovascular disease in uremia. Kidney Int62 :1524 –1538,2002[CrossRef][Medline]
  19. Zager RA, Johnson AC, Hanson SY, Wasse H: Parenteral iron formulations: A comparative toxicologic analysis and mechanisms of cell injury. Am J Kidney Dis40 :90 –103,2002[CrossRef][Medline]
  20. Lim CS, Vaziri ND: The effects of iron dextran on the oxidative stress in cardiovascular tissues of rats with chronic renal failure. Kidney Int65 :1802 –1809,2004[CrossRef][Medline]
  21. Lim CS, Vaziri ND: Iron and oxidative stress in renal insufficiency. Am J Nephrol24 :569 –575,2004[CrossRef][Medline]
  22. Lim PS, Wei YH, Yu YL, Kho B: Enhanced oxidative stress in haemodialysis patients receiving intravenous iron therapy. Nephrol Dial Transplant14 :2680 –2687,1999[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Roob JM, Khoschsorur G, Tiran A, Horina JH, Holzer H, Winklhofer-Roob BM: Vitamin E attenuates oxidative stress induced by intravenous iron in patients on hemodialysis. J Am Soc Nephrol11 :539 –549,2000[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Tovbin D, Mazor D, Vorobiov M, Chaimovitz C, Meyerstein N: Induction of protein oxidation by intravenous iron in hemodialysis patients: Role of inflammation. Am J Kidney Dis40 :1005 –1012,2002[CrossRef][Medline]
  25. Drueke T, Witko-Sarsat V, Massy Z, Descamps-Latscha B, Guerin AP, Marchais SJ, Gausson V, London GM: Iron therapy, advanced oxidation protein products, and carotid artery intima-media thickness in end-stage renal disease. Circulation106 :2212 –2217,2002[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Reis KA, Guz G, Ozdemir H, Erten Y, Atalay V, Bicik Z, Ozkurt ZN, Bali M, Sindel S: Intravenous iron therapy as a possible risk factor for atherosclerosis in end-stage renal disease. Int Heart J46 :255 –264,2005[CrossRef][Medline]
  27. Ross R: Atherosclerosis: An inflammatory disease. N Engl J Med340 :115 –126,1999[Free Full Text]
  28. Cai H, Harrison DG: Endothelial dysfunction in cardiovascular diseases: The role of oxidant stress. Circ Res87 :840 –844,2000[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Kartikasari AE, Georgiou NA, Visseren FL, van Kats-Renaud H, Sweder van AB, Marx JJ: Endothelial activation and induction of monocyte adhesion by nontransferrin-bound iron present in human sera. FASEB J20 :353 –355,2006[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Rooyakkers TM, Stroes ES, Kooistra MP, van Faassen EE, Hider RC, Rabelink TJ, Marx JJ: Ferric saccharate induces oxygen radical stress and endothelial dysfunction in vivo. Eur J Clin Invest32[Suppl 1] :9 –16,2002
  31. Zheng H, Huang X, Zhang Q, Katz SD: Iron sucrose augments homocysteine-induced endothelial dysfunction in normal subjects. Kidney Int69 :679 –684,2006[CrossRef][Medline]
  32. Zager RA: Parenteral iron treatment induces MCP-1 accumulation in plasma, normal kidneys, and in experimental nephropathy. Kidney Int68 :1533 –1542,2005[CrossRef][Medline]
  33. Agarwal R, Vasavada N, Sachs NG, Chase S: Oxidative stress and renal injury with intravenous iron in patients with chronic kidney disease. Kidney Int65 :2279 –2289,2004[CrossRef][Medline]
  34. Agarwal R: On the nature of proteinuria with acute renal injury in patients with chronic kidney disease. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol288 :F265 –F271,2005[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Agarwal R: Proinflammatory effects of iron sucrose in chronic kidney disease. Kidney Int69 :1259 –1263,2006[CrossRef][Medline]
  36. Leehey DJ, Palubiak DJ, Chebrolu S, Agarwal R: Sodium ferric gluconate causes oxidative stress but not acute renal injury in patients with chronic kidney disease: A pilot study. Nephrol Dial Transplant20 :135 –140,2005[Abstract/Free Full Text]




This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bishu, K.
Right arrow Articles by Agarwal, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bishu, K.
Right arrow Articles by Agarwal, R.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS