|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Acid/Base and Electrolyte Disorders |





,**
* Department of Internal Medicine, Jolimont/Tubize-Nivelles Hospital, Tubize,
Research Unit for the Study of Hydromineral Metabolism and ** Department of General Internal Medicine, Erasmus University Hospital, Free University of Brussels, Brussels, and
Department of Internal Medicine, Regional Hospital Center of Citadelle, Liege, Belgium;
Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University Medical Center Care Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany; || Szent Imre Kórház és Rendelöintézet I, Belgyógyászati Osztály, Budapest, Hungary; ¶ Department of Intensive Care Unit, Raymond Poincare Hospital, Garches, France; and 
Clinical Development, Sanofi-Aventis, Malvern, Pennsylvania
Address correspondence to: Dr. Alain Soupart, Research Unit for the Study of Hydromineral Metabolism, Department of General Internal Medicine, Free University of Brussels, Hôpital Erasme, 808, route de Lennik, 1070 Brussels, Belgium. Phone: +322-555-4960; Fax: +322-555-3211; E-mail: alainsoupart{at}swing.be
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In this study, we investigated the efficacy and the safety of a new oral nonpeptide V2RA, satavaptan (SR121463B) (11), in correcting hyponatremia in patients with SIADH of various origins. After the initial phase of the study (short-term, 1 mo), we evaluated for the first time the efficacy and the tolerance of a V2RA over a long-term period (12 mo).
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
20 mmol/L) as a result of low solute intake (anorexia) were included. Drug-induced SIADH was limited to carbamazepine and antidepressants. The search for the cause of SIADH (especially neoplasia and iatrogenic) was performed carefully by each investigator before considering the origin as idiopathic.
Inclusion criteria were age 18 yr or older, stable hyponatremia (serum sodium [SNa] increase
4 mmol/L between two measurements of 24 h apart) between 115 and 132 mmol/L during the screening period, ability to give a written informed consent, and ability to follow verbal and written instructions. Exclusion criteria were cardiac failure, symptomatic liver disease or serum alanine aminotransferase or aspartate aminotransferase more than two-fold the upper limit of normal, uncontrolled diabetes (blood glucose
200 mg/dl), significant renal impairment (serum creatinine >150 µmol/L), inadequate hematologic function (hemoglobin <9 g/dl, neutrophils <1500/mm3, platelets <100,000/mm3), and hypothyroidism or adrenal deficiency. Radiotherapy and chemotherapy within 2 wk before study drug administration were not allowed. Previous and concomitant administration of some drugs were not accepted (from 1 mo before the randomization for demeclocycline or lithium and 2 d for diuretics and urea). Women who were of childbearing potential and had positive pregnancy test and women with absence of medically approved contraceptive methods were excluded.
Protocol
In the first part of the study (1 mo), after a screening period (day 6 to day 1) to confirm stable hyponatremia, patients were randomly assigned to take placebo or a once-daily dose of 25 or 50 mg of satavaptan during a double-blind period of up to 5 d. The duration of the double-blind period could have been <5 d if SNa reached values
135 mmol/L on two consecutive days before day 5. Patients were hospitalized during the double-blind period. The double-blind period was followed by 23 d of open-label treatment (dosage adjustment). In the initial dosage adjustment on day 6, if the last SNa on day 5 was <135 mmol/L, then patients received a dosage of satavaptan equal to the dosage of their group. If SNa was
135 mmol/L, then they received a dosage that was one level below the dosage of their group (in case of 25 mg, the drug was discontinued). From day 7 to the end of the open-label period, the dosage was adjusted on the basis of the results of SNa. In the second part of the study (12 mo), the long-term efficacy and the safety of the satavaptan were assessed in an open-label trial with 12.5, 25, or 50 mg once daily.
Drug was administered in the morning under fasting conditions. During the entire study, it was recommended to limit total fluid intake to 1500 ml/d. Dietary sodium intake remained unchanged throughout the study for each patient.
Treatment aim was to obtain normalization of the SNa within a range of 135 to 145 mmol/L on two separate consecutive determinations. Responders were patients who reached normal SNa levels or increasing SNa levels by at least 5 mmol/L from baseline over at least 24 h during the double-blind period.
Body weight was assessed each day during the double-blind period before dosing and on days 6, 7, 10, 14, 21, and 28 in the open-label period. Vital signs, including supine and standing systolic and diastolic BP, heart rate, and oral temperature, were assessed three times per day from day 1 to day 7 and once a day thereafter (just before dosing). Thirst index was evaluated by a visual analogue scale each day of the double-blind period and on days 6, 7, 10, 14, 21, and 28 of the open-label period (7). Electrocardiogram (standard 12-lead) was recorded at screening and on days 5, 14, and 28, before dosing.
Blood samples for SNa and osmolality measurements were collected between 7 and 9 a.m. on fasting patients before and 6 and 12 h after drug intake each day during the double-blind period and before drug intake at each visit of the open-label period. Blood samples also were collected on screening day and on days 5, 14, and 28 before dosing for standard hematology and serum chemistry.
For arginine vasopressin, renin, and aldosterone, blood samples were taken at the same time from patients in the supine position for at least 30 min. Plasma satavaptan concentration was determined just before drug intake and 3, 6, and 12 h after by use of a validated liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (Department of Sanofi-Synthelabo Research, Malvern, PA). Urine samples were collected daily (collections from 8 a.m. to 2 p.m., and from 2 p.m. to 8 a.m.) for urinary volume, electrolyte, and osmolality determinations.
Free water clearance (FWC) was calculated using the following formula: (urinary flow rate) x (1 urinary osmolality/serum osmolality). Effective FWC (EFWC) was calculated using the following formula: (urinary flow rate) x (1 urinary sodium + potassium/SNa).
Written informed consent was obtained from each patient. The study protocol was approved by the local ethics committee of the participating centers.
Statistical Analyses
Data are provided as mean ± SD or SEM as appropriate. All statistical tests were two sided at the 5% significance level. Comparison of data between treatment groups was done by using ANOVA for continuous data and Fisher exact test for qualitative variables.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
There were no significant differences in the baseline characteristics of the patients between groups (Table 1). In the patients with drug-induced SIADH, all cases were related to carbamazepine that was prescribed for epilepsy or chronic pain (the drug was continued during the study). Patients presented with moderate hyponatremia (range 114 to 131 mmol/L). The low urinary sodium that was observed in some patients may be attributed to the low caloric and solute intake of the patients.
|
|
The number of responders at the end of the double-blind period was significantly higher in both satavaptan groups compared with placebo. Responders were 79% (11 of 14 patients) in the 25-mg group (P = 0.006 versus placebo), 83% (10 of 12 patients) in the 50-mg group (P = 0.005 versus placebo), and 13% (one of eight patients) in the placebo group. For responder patients, the median time to reach response in SNa levels was significantly lower in the 25-mg group (63 h; P = 0.010) and the 50-mg group (30 h; P = 0.002) in comparison with the placebo group (>120 h).
At the end of the double-blind period, SNa concentrations were significantly correlated to trough plasma satavaptan concentrations (P < 0.0001, r = 0.694). The correlation remained statistically significant (but weaker) when one outlier patient with high SNa (156 mmol/L) was removed from the analysis (P = 0.038, r = 0.243). For both dosages, a large interindividual variability was observed in plasma satavaptan concentrations. Maximal concentrations were observed 3 h after dosing, and mean plasma concentrations increased with dosage and duration of administration with stabilization on day 5 (data not shown). Overall, plasma satavaptan concentrations were lower in nonresponders than in responders. A decrease in exposure to satavaptan was observed in patients who received carbamazepine, a widely known CYP3A inducer. Among the five nonresponders who were on active treatment, two patients (one in the 25-mg group and one in the 50-mg group) received carbamazepine during the study. However, three patients who were on carbamazepine were responders (two in the 25-mg group and one in the 50-mg group). In three nonresponders, the lack of increase in SNa despite a large increase in diuresis and a decrease in urinary osmolality probably was due to an increase in water intake (likely patients with "reset osmostat").
At the end of the double-blind period, the 6-h postdose diuresis was increased by 573 ± 423 ml in the 25-mg group (P = 0.002 versus placebo), 488 ± 392 ml in the 50-mg group (P = 0.009 versus placebo), and 10 ± 179 ml in the placebo group. At the end of the double-blind period, the 6-h postdose urinary osmolality was 225 ± 100 mOsm/kg H2O in the 25-mg group, 179 ± 112 mOsm/kg H2O in the 50-mg group, and 350 ± 160 mOsm/kg H2O in the placebo group. The decrease was significant in the 50-mg group (P = 0.044 versus placebo). The 6-h postdose urinary electrolyte excretion (sodium and potassium) was not significantly modified by satavaptan.
Figure 2 shows the 6-h postdose FWC in the three groups during the double-blind period. It was increased from baseline in a dosage-related manner in the satavaptan groups. A peak was observed the first day. Mean change from baseline at the end of the double-blind period was significantly higher for the 50-mg dose (P = 0.008 versus placebo) and close to significance for the 25-mg dose (P = 0.058 versus placebo). A very similar pattern was observed for EFWC (Figure 3).
|
|
|
Safety.
No clinically relevant changes were observed for respiratory rate and oral temperature. For BP, at the end of the double-blind period, a moderate decrease in standing systolic and diastolic BP was observed in the 50-mg group compared with placebo (decrease of 6 ± 23 mmHg versus increase of 2 ± 12 mmHg and decrease of 8 ± 14 mmHg versus decrease of 4 ± 12 mmHg, respectively). No other clinically relevant changes were observed in supine BP in the 50-mg group or in supine or standing BP in the 25-mg group, compared with placebo. Orthostatic hypotension (systolic BP standing supine
20 mmHg) was observed in eight (67%) patients in the 25-mg group, five (50%) patients in the 50-mg group, and four (44%) patients in the placebo group during the double-blind period.
Electrocardiogram at the end of the double-blind period showed an increase in mean heart rate from baseline in the 25-mg group (6 ± 14 bpm) and in the placebo group (6 ± 23 bpm) but not in the 50-mg group (decrease of 2 ± 10 bpm). No trend to prolonged QTcB interval (>450 ms in men and >470 ms in women) was observed.
During the double-blind period, four (15%) patients who were treated with satavaptan (in both groups) and two (22%) patients who were treated with placebo experienced at least one adverse event, including a serious adverse event (Table 3). None of the adverse events was considered by the investigators to be related to study treatment. During the overall exposure to satavaptan (double-blind + open-label treatment), 18 (51%) patients experienced at least one adverse event, including a serious adverse event. In only one patient were the adverse events (polyuria, nausea, moderate rigors, and confusion) considered by the investigator to be related to study treatment (patient on 25 mg of satavaptan during the open-label period). Serious adverse events, observed in seven (20%) patients, were sepsis (leading to death), respiratory failure (with recovery), bronchitis (with recovery), gastrointestinal hemorrhage (leading to death), vasculitis (leading to death), pneumonia (leading to death), and malignant brain neoplasm (leading to death). None of the serious adverse events was considered by the investigators to be related to study treatment. Overall, three (9%) patients withdrew from study treatment as a result of serious adverse events (worsening of preexisting vasculitis on placebo during the double-blind period, gastrointestinal hemorrhage on 25 mg of satavaptan during the open-label period, and respiratory failure on 25 mg of satavaptan during the open-label period).
|
Among the nine patients who had rapid correction of SNa during the double-blind period (increase in SNa >8 mmol/L within 24 h after the first dose), one patient experienced vomiting of mild intensity (25 mg of satavaptan). No significant changes in other laboratory parameters (renal, hepatic, or hematologic testings) were noticed in satavaptan-treated patients compared with placebo.
Long-Term Study (Second Part)
Eighteen patients (12 women and six men) who initially were included in the short-term study (1 mo) were able to be included in this long-term study (at least 12 mo). Mean (±SD) age was 68 ± 14 yr, and the origin of SIADH was malignancy (n = 2), drug (n = 4), miscellaneous (n = 4), and idiopathic (n = 8). Three dosages of satavaptan were available during this period (12.5, 25, and 50 mg, administered once daily). The dosage was adjusted as a function of the SNa values in patients who were on controlled water intake (
1500 ml/d). Table 4 shows the evolution of the SNa during the open-label long-term extension.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Three other compounds with selectivity for V2 receptors (or V1a + V2) and oral bioavailability are currently in development (or recently approved): OPC41061 (tolvaptan), VPA985 (lixivaptan), and YM087 (conivaptan: V1a + V2). Few published studies with these V2RA have been conducted in patients with cirrhosis (with or without hyponatremia) (7,9,13) and patients with congestive heart failure (with or without hyponatremia) (14,15) showing that these V2RA are effective in increasing FWC in various water-retention disorders. In SIADH, most of the publications are focused on short-term studies (<1 wk) (710). In our study, the number of responders to satavaptan at the end of the double-blind was comparable with both 25-mg (79%) and 50-mg (83%) dosages, the lowest SNa observed being 131 mmol/L. The normalization of the natremia after oral administration of satavaptan is the result of the rapid and marked increase in the renal free water excretion. During the first month of treatment, mean SNa remained normal and the majority (79%) of the patients were controlled with the dosage of 25 mg/d.
Excessive correction of hyponatremia is a hazardous situation with major risks for brain damage (myelinolysis) and neurologic sequelae (16). Careful approach of patients with sustained hyponatremia implies a limited correction below 12 mmol/L per 24 h (and <18 mmol/L per 48 h) and even less than 8 to 10 mmol/L per 24 h for patients with additional risk factors for myelinolysis (16,17). In our study, the mean daily increase in SNa was lower than 8 mmol/L in the first 24 h of correction with satavaptan. Few patients (n = 3) in the active treatment group had a correction level above 12 mmol/L per 24 h (maximum daily increase observed 16 mmol/L per 24 h) after the first dose of satavaptan. None of them presented neurologic complications. The maximum SNa increase and aquaresis were observed 3 to 6 h after dosing, but SNa continued to increase further. Like with the other therapies, excessive correction with V2RA could produce osmotic demyelination (18,19). Good control and limited correction are achievable by use of titrated doses of V2RA during the initial phase of correction, especially in patients with severe hyponatremia (<115 to 120 mmol/L). Indeed, most of published cases of myelinolysis were reported in patients with initial SNa <115 mmol/L (20), which was not the case in our study.
The efficacy of satavaptan to control the natremia remained excellent during the entire study period. Under a state of relative water control (<1500 ml/d), mean SNa values remained within the normal range during the open-label period.
These encouraging data over the efficacy of satavaptan are strengthened by the good tolerance to the treatment that was observed in our patients. Only a slight increase in thirst was noted in both dosage groups. Some patients regained weight during treatment probably because their general status improved after correction of the hyponatremia, leading to a better food intake. The most frequently observed change in vital signs was orthostatic hypotension, usually asymptomatic and explained by the aquaretic activity of the compound. Only one patient presented symptoms that potentially were related to the compound (polyuria, nausea, rigors, and confusion), and no patients discontinued the study in relation to the treatment, even in the patients who were treated for 12 mo.
Although evolution of the symptoms related to hyponatremia was not significantly evaluated in the design of this study, patients subjectively felt better when treated with satavaptan. Additional studies are in progress to evaluate these particular points.
| Conclusion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
This study was designed by H.M.H., G.D., and Dr. J.G. Verbalis.
We thank F. Coste for supervising the clinical operations; M. De-Ubeda and I. Remoissenet for data collection; S. Turpault for pharmacokinetics measurements; and C. Smolens, D. Lei, and A. Boddy for statistical analysis.
| Footnotes |
|---|
Received January 13, 2006. Accepted August 21, 2006.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. Zietse, N. van der Lubbe, and E. J. Hoorn Current and future treatment options in SIADH NDT Plus, November 1, 2009; 2(suppl_3): iii12 - iii19. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Gross, T. Marczewski, and K. Herbrig The vaptans ante portas: a status report Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., May 1, 2009; 24(5): 1371 - 1373. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Fenske, S. Stork, A. Blechschmidt, S. G. K. Maier, N. G. Morgenthaler, and B. Allolio Copeptin in the Differential Diagnosis of Hyponatremia J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., January 1, 2009; 94(1): 123 - 129. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. W. Lehrich and A. Greenberg When Is It Appropriate to Use Vasopressin Receptor Antagonists? J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., June 1, 2008; 19(6): 1054 - 1058. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. J. Whitmire Nutrition-Focused Evaluation and Management of Dysnatremias Nutr Clin Pract, April 1, 2008; 23(2): 108 - 121. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |