CJASN
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published ahead of print on June 25, 2008
Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
© 2008 American Society of Nephrology
doi: 10.2215/CJN.04451007
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
CJN.04451007v1
3/5/1479    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sun, Q.
Right arrow Articles by Li, L.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sun, Q.
Right arrow Articles by Li, L.

Received October 20, 2007
Accepted on May 12, 2008

ORIGINAL ARTICLES

Circulating Anti-endothelial Cell Antibodies Are Associated with Poor Outcome in Renal Allograft Recipients with Acute Rejection

Qiquan Sun , Zhihong Liu , Jinsong Chen , Huiping Chen , Jiqiu Wen , Dongrui Cheng , and Leishi Li *1

Research Institute of Nephrology, Jinling Hospital, Nanjing University School of Medicine, Nanjing, China


1 To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: sunqiquan{at}hotmail.com.


   Abstract

Background and objectives: Anti-endothelial cell antibody (AECA) can cause hyperacute rejection and immediate graft loss after renal transplantation; however, its prevalence and significance during acute rejection are unknown. Previous studies suggested that AECA may be detected in recipients with acute vascular rejection (AVR).

Design, setting, participants, & measurements: We retrospectively analyzed 653 cadaveric renal transplant recipients; circulating AECA was positive in 13 of 47 cases of AVR; another two cases of hyperacute rejection also had detectable AECA. Twenty-six cases of AVR without circulating AECA were selected as controls.

Results: AECA-positive AVR usually occurred within 1 yr after transplantation and mostly was resistant to steroid treatment. Compared with the control group, the AECA-positive group was associated with a significantly lower 1-yr graft survival rate (46.7 versus 80.5%; P = 0.038), and more patients had histologic interstitial plasma cell infiltration (53.8 versus 11.5%; P = 0.005). More patients with AECA-positive AVR experienced another one or more episodes of acute rejection during 1 yr of follow-up (75.0 versus 13.0%; P = 0.003). AECA-positive AVR with C4d deposition in peri-tubular capillaries had the worst outcome in this cohort, and it accounted for 38.5% graft loss in AVR. AECA in turn accounted for 71.4% of graft loss in C4d+ AVR.

Conclusions: Circulating AECA is associated with poor outcome in renal allograft recipients with acute rejection and should be monitored regularly.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2008 by the American Society of Nephrology.