CJASN
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published ahead of print on July 30, 2008
Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
© 2008 American Society of Nephrology
doi: 10.2215/CJN.01820408
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
CJN.01820408v1
3/6/1702    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tarzi, R. M.
Right arrow Articles by Brown, E. A.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tarzi, R. M.
Right arrow Articles by Brown, E. A.

Received April 18, 2008
Accepted on June 19, 2008

ORIGINAL ARTICLES

Assessing the Validity of an Abdominal CT Scoring System in the Diagnosis of Encapsulating Peritoneal Sclerosis

Ruth M. Tarzi *1, Adrian Lim {dagger}, Steven Moser {dagger}, Sohail Ahmad *, Abraham George *, Gowrie Balasubramaniam *, Elaine J. Clutterbuck *, Wladyslaw Gedroyc {dagger}, and Edwina A. Brown *

*Imperial College Kidney and Transplant Institute and {dagger}Department of Radiology, Hammersmith Hospital, London, United Kingdom


1 To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: r.tarzi{at}imperial.ac.uk.


   Abstract

Background and objectives: Encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis (EPS) is a severe peritoneal fibrotic reaction in patients on long-term peritoneal dialysis (PD). The early clinical features may be nonspecific. The purpose of the study is to assess the reliability and diagnostic utility of abdominal CT scanning in the diagnosis of EPS.

Design, setting, participants, & measurements: Abdominopelvic CT scans of 27 patients diagnosed with EPS on clinical and radiologic grounds in our unit from 1997 to 2006 were retrospectively analyzed. In addition, 35 control CT scans were scored: 15 from hemodialysis patients (HD controls) and 20 from patients on PD (PD controls). Scans were anonymized and scored independently by three radiologists.

Results: Inter-rater agreement was moderate to very good (kappa = 0.40 to 0.75) for peritoneal calcification, bowel distribution, bowel wall thickening, and bowel dilation but poorer for loculation of ascites and peritoneal thickening. There was a strongly significant difference between the total CT scan scores at EPS diagnosis and controls (P < 0.00001). Each individual parameter also showed significant differences between EPS and controls (P < 0.006). Bowel tethering and peritoneal calcification were the most specific parameters, and. loculation was the least discriminatory parameter. Interestingly, prediagnostic scans a median of 1.5 yr before EPS diagnosis were normal or near-normal in 9 of 13 EPS patients.

Conclusions: CT scanning is a valid and reliable adjunct to the diagnosis of EPS but may not be useful as a screening tool, as the prediagnostic scans did not show abnormalities in many patients who subsequently developed EPS.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2008 by the American Society of Nephrology.