|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dialysis |



* Nephrophiles LLC, Santa Fe, New Mexico;
Fresenius Medical Care, Santa Fe, New Mexico;
Advanced Renal Technologies, Bellevue, Washington; and
Department of Medicine, Scribner Kidney Center, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
Correspondence: Dr. Suhail Ahmad, Scribner Kidney Center, 2150 North 107th Street, Suite 160, Seattle, WA 98133. Phone: 206-543-2095; Fax: 206-363-6146; E-mail: sahmad{at}u.washington.edu
Background and objectives: A bicarbonate dialysate acidified with citrate (CD) has been reported to have local anticoagulant effect. This study examines the effect of CD on dialysis efficiency, measured as eKt/Vurea, and predialysis concentrations of BUN, creatinine, phosphate, and β-2 microglobulin in chronic dialysis units.
Design, settings, participants, & measurements: Three outpatient chronic hemodialysis units with 142 patients were switched to CD for 6 mo. Using each patient's prior 6 mo on regular bicarbonate dialysate acidified by acetate (AD) as control, eKt/Vurea was compared with that of CD. Follow-up data for 7 mo after the study were collected from about one-half of the participants remaining on CD and the others returned to AD.
Results: eKt/Vurea, increased (P < 0.0001) from pre-CD value of 1.51 ± 0.01 to 1.57 ± 0.01 with CD. During CD use β-2 microglobulin levels declined (P = 0.0001) from 28.1 ± 10.0 to 25.9 ± 10.0. Similarly, the concentrations of BUN, creatinine, and phosphate also decreased on CD (P < 0.008). In the poststudy period, eKt/Vurea for the patients staying on CD remained unchanged at 1.60 ± 0.17 versus 1.59 ± 0.18 (P = NS), whereas in those returning to AD the eKt/Vurea decreased from 1.55 ± 0.20 to 1.52 ± 0.17 (P < 0.0001).
Conclusions: Data suggest that CD use is associated with increased solute removal.
Related Article
Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2009 4: 1403-1404.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T. A. Golper and R. A. Ward Dialysate ... Ho-Hum! Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., September 1, 2009; 4(9): 1403 - 1404. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |