CJASN
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 4: 316-322, 2009
© 2009 American Society of Nephrology
doi: 10.2215/CJN.02580508

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Russo, D.
Right arrow Articles by Andreucci, V. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Russo, D.
Right arrow Articles by Andreucci, V. E.

Clinical Nephrology

Pulse Pressure and Presence of Coronary Artery Calcification

Domenico Russo*, Luigi F. Morrone{dagger}, Stefania Brancaccio*, Paola Napolitano*, Ermanno Salvatore{dagger}, Rosanna Spadola*, Massimo Imbriaco{ddagger}, Cinzia V. Russo*, and Vittorio E. Andreucci*

Departments of * Nephrology and {ddagger} Radiology, University Federico II, Naples, and {dagger} Ospedale G. Rummo Benevento, Italy

Correspondence: Dr. Domenico Russo, Department of Nephrology, University Federico II., Via G Marconi, 80, 80024 Cardito, Napoli, Italy. Phone: 00 39 (0) 81 7464305; Fax: 00 30 (0) 81 7464305; E-mail: domenicorusso51{at}hotmail.com

Background: Coronary calcification (CAC) is found in early stages of CKD. Pulse pressure (PP) predicts CAC in dialysis patients. This study evaluates the accuracy of PP in predicting CAC in patients not yet on dialysis (CKD patients).

Methods: CKD patients (n = 388) underwent coronary calcium score (CAC score) and abdominal x-ray (n = 128) for estimating aorta calcification (AAC). Biochemistry and PP were measured every 3 and 6 months in patients with stage 4 to 5 and 2 to 3 CKD, respectively. The accuracy of PP and AAC was assessed by receiver operating characteristics analysis.

Results: PP correlated with CAC score in the whole cohort and in patients with stages 2 to 3 and stages 4 to 5 CKD. PP >60 mmHg predicted CAC score >0 (OR: 2.14; P < 0.001), ≥100 (OR: 2.92; P < 0.001), ≥400 (OR: 6.17; P < 0.001) after multivariable adjustment. Area under the curve (AUC) was 0.626 for CAC score >0, 0.676 for score >100, and 0.746 for score >400. PP >60 mmHg reduced the rate of event-free survival. AAC was found in 58% of patients and correlated with CAC score. AUC was 0.628 for CAC score >0, 0.652 for score >100, 0.831 for score >400.

Conclusion: PP may identify CKD patients with subclinical CAC who need further evaluation. Accuracy of PP and AAC is nearly similar in predicting CAC. High PP indicates vessel wall alterations leading to adverse outcome.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society of Nephrology.