CJASN
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published ahead of print on October 29, 2008
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 4: 22-32, 2009
© 2009 American Society of Nephrology
doi: 10.2215/CJN.03480708

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
CJN.03480708v1
4/1/22    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nasr, S. H.
Right arrow Articles by D'Agati, V. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nasr, S. H.
Right arrow Articles by D'Agati, V. D.

Clinical Immunology and Pathology

Dense Deposit Disease: Clinicopathologic Study of 32 Pediatric and Adult Patients

Samih H. Nasr*, Anthony M. Valeri{dagger}, Gerald B. Appel{dagger}, Julius Sherwinter{ddagger}, Michael B. Stokes*, Samar M. Said*, Glen S. Markowitz*, and Vivette D. D'Agati*

* Department of Pathology and {dagger} Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Columbia University, College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York; and {ddagger} Children's Healthcare of Atlanta at Scottish Rite, Atlanta, Georgia

Correspondence: Dr. Samih H. Nasr, Department of Pathology, Columbia University, College of Physicians and Surgeons, 630 West 168th Street, VC14-224, New York, New York, 10032. Phone: 212-305-9669; Fax: 212-342-5380; E-mail: sn386{at}columbia.edu

Background and objectives: Dense deposit disease (DDD) is a rare disorder that most commonly affects children. This study reports the largest North American series addressing clinicopathologic and outcome differences in children and adults.

Design, setting, participants, & measurements: Thirty-two patients with DDD were analyzed from the archives of Columbia University between 1977 and 2007. Characteristic intramembranous electron-dense deposits defined all diagnoses.

Results: The cohort included 14 children (<16 yr) and 18 adults, with 39% of adults >60 yr. The female/male ratio was 1.9. At presentation, the mean 24-h urine protein was 4.6 g, nephrotic syndrome was present in 33%, renal insufficiency in 59%, and hematuria in 87% of patients. Compared with adults, children had lower incidence of renal insufficiency and were more likely to have reduced C3. Histologic pattern included membranoproliferative, mesangial, endocapillary, and crescentic glomerulonephritis. Treatment included immunosuppression (IS) alone in seven, renin angiotensin system (RAS) blockade alone in six, and combined IS/RAS blockade in 11. On follow-up (mean 63 mo) available in 27 patients, 26% had complete response, 48% had persistent renal dysfunction, and 26% had ESRD. Correlates of ESRD were older age and higher creatinine at biopsy, the absence of combined IS/RAS blockade therapy and the presence of subepithelial humps, but not histologic pattern. On multivariate analysis, age and creatinine emerged as the only independent predictors of ESRD.

Conclusions: DDD is clinically and pathologically heterogeneous. Adults have worse outcome than children, despite similar treatment. Combined IS/RAS blockade appears superior to either agent alone.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society of Nephrology.