CJASN
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 3: S151-S156, 2008
© 2008 American Society of Nephrology
doi: 10.2215/CJN.04301206

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ott, S. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ott, S. M.

Article

Histomorphometric Measurements of Bone Turnover, Mineralization, and Volume

Susan M. Ott

Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington

Correspondence: Dr. Susan M. Ott, Box 356426, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195-6426. Phone: 206-543-3470; E-mail: smott{at}u.washington.edu

A recent Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes report suggested that bone biopsies in patients with chronic kidney disease should be characterized by determining bone turnover, mineralization, and volume. This article focuses on the calculations and interpretation of these measurements. In most cases of renal osteodystrophy, the bone formation rate is roughly similar to the bone resorption rate; therefore, the bone formation indices can be used to describe turnover. It is important to remember that these conventions will not apply in some situations. Activation frequency should not be confused with bone formation rate or bone metabolic unit birth rate. Abnormal mineralization can be described using the osteoid volume, increased osteoid maturation time, or increased mineralization lag time. The concept of bone volume is the easiest to understand, but there is a large error from one biopsy to the next in the same person. There are some difficulties with each of the measurements, and further research in patients with chronic kidney must be done to enable a consensus to be reached about cut points to define categories within the spectrum of renal osteodystrophy and how to evaluate treatment responses.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by the American Society of Nephrology.