CJASN
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 3: S101-S116, 2008
© 2008 American Society of Nephrology
doi: 10.2215/CJN.03510807

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Srinivas, T. R.
Right arrow Articles by Meier-Kriesche, H.-U.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Srinivas, T. R.
Right arrow Articles by Meier-Kriesche, H.-U.

Article

Minimizing Immunosuppression, an Alternative Approach to Reducing Side Effects: Objectives and Interim Result

Titte R. Srinivas, and Herwig-Ulf Meier-Kriesche

Division of Nephrology, Hypertension and Transplantation, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida

Correspondence: Dr. Herwig-Ulf Meier-Kriesche, Medical Director, Kidney and Pancreas Transplantation, University of Florida, 1600 SW Archer Road, Box 100224, Gainesville FL 32610-0224. Phone: 352-846-2692, Fax: 352-392-3581; E-mail: meierhu{at}medicine.ufl.edu

Exceptionally low acute rejection rates and excellent graft survival can be achieved with cyclosporine and tacrolimus (CNI)-based immunosuppressive protocols that incorporate antiproliferative immunosuppressants and corticosteroids. However, despite short-term success, long-term attrition of graft function and side effects of immunosuppressive agents continue to be significant problems, leaving clinicians looking for possible interventions. CNI nephrotoxicity is but one of numerous factors that may contribute to long-term damage in transplant kidneys. Metabolic, cosmetic, and neuropsychiatric complications of steroids affect quality of life after transplantation. Newer immunosuppressive agents such as mycophenolate mofetil and sirolimus (Rapa) have raised the possibility of withdrawing or avoiding CNIs or steroids altogether. In this report we review studies that address either CNI or steroid minimization strategies and discuss their risks versus benefits. Given the accumulated experience to date, in our opinion the use of CNIs and steroids as part of immunosuppressive regimens remains the proven standard of care for renal transplant patients. The long-term safety and efficacy of CNI and steroid minimization strategies needs to be further validated in controlled clinical trials with adequate long-term follow-up.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by the American Society of Nephrology.