CJASN
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published ahead of print on September 10, 2008
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 3: 1615-1619, 2008
© 2008 American Society of Nephrology
doi: 10.2215/CJN.02860608

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
CJN.02860608v1
3/6/1615    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Perazella, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Parikh, C. R.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Perazella, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Parikh, C. R.

Acute Renal Failure

Diagnostic Value of Urine Microscopy for Differential Diagnosis of Acute Kidney Injury in Hospitalized Patients

Mark A. Perazella, Steven G. Coca, Mehmet Kanbay, Ursula C. Brewster, and Chirag R. Parikh

Section of Nephrology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut

Correspondence: Dr. Mark A. Perazella, FMP 107, 333 Cedar Street, Section of Nephrology Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520-8029. Phone: 203-785-4184; Fax: 203-785-7068; E-mail: mark.perazella{at}yale.edu

Background and objectives: Urine microscopy is the oldest and one of the most commonly used tests for differential diagnosis of acute kidney injury (AKI), but its performance has not been adequately studied in the setting of AKI.

Design, setting, participants, & measurements: Fresh urine samples were obtained from 267 consecutive patients with AKI, and urinary sediment was examined. The cause of AKI was assessed at two time points: (1) Before urine microscopy diagnosis and (2) after patient discharge or death (final diagnosis). A urinary scoring system also was created on the basis of casts and renal tubular epithelial cells (RTEC) to differentiate acute tubular necrosis (ATN) from prerenal AKI.

Results: The urinary sediment scoring system was highly predictive of the final diagnosis of ATN. In patients with a high pretest probability of ATN (initial diagnosis of ATN), any casts or RTEC (score ≥2) resulted in very high positive predictive value and low negative predictive value for a final diagnosis of ATN. In patients with a low pretest probability of ATN (initial diagnosis of prerenal AKI), lack of casts or RTEC on urinary sediment examination had a sensitivity of 0.73 and specificity of 0.75 for a final diagnosis of prerenal AKI. The negative predictive value of lack of casts or RTEC in patients with low pretest probability of disease was 91%.

Conclusions: Urine sediment examination is a valuable diagnostic tool for confirming the diagnosis of ATN. A score of ≥2 on an ATN urinary sediment scoring system is an extremely strong predictor of ATN.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by the American Society of Nephrology.