CJASN
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published ahead of print on April 2, 2008
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 3: 1152-1159, 2008
© 2008 American Society of Nephrology
doi: 10.2215/CJN.03660807

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
CJN.03660807v1
3/4/1152    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Reese, P. P.
Right arrow Articles by Feldman, H. I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Reese, P. P.
Right arrow Articles by Feldman, H. I.

Renal Transplantation

Recruitment of Live Donors by Candidates for Kidney Transplantation

Peter P. Reese, Judy A. Shea, Jeffrey S. Berns, Maureen K. Simon, Marshall M. Joffe, Roy D. Bloom, and Harold I. Feldman

University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

Correspondence: Dr. Peter P. Reese, Renal Division, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, 1 Founders, 3400 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104. Phone: 617-699-8848; Fax: 215-898-0189; E-mail: peter.reese{at}uphs.upenn.edu

Background: Little is known about efforts that renal transplant candidates make to recruit live donors. It was hypothesized that preference for live donor kidney transplantation and greater knowledge about live donor transplantation are associated with candidates’ initiating conversations about donation with potential donors.

Design, setting, participants, & measurements: A cross-sectional study of renal transplant candidates was performed at initial transplant evaluation. Candidates completed a questionnaire that specified whether they had initiated conversations about donation with any potential donors. The questionnaire also measured preference for live donor transplantation, knowledge about transplantation, concern about donor harm, willingness to ask for help in coping with kidney disease, and social support.

Results: Ninety-six candidates participated. Forty-nine (51%) reported initiating a conversation with at least one potential donor. In multivariable logistic regression, domains associated with initiating a conversation included: preference for live donor transplantation, willingness to ask for help, and female gender. Older age was associated with a lower odds of initiating a conversation. Knowledge, concern about donor harm, social support, and ethnicity were not associated with initiating a conversation with a donor.

Conclusions: Attempts at donor recruitment by kidney transplant candidates are common. These findings suggest that interventions that influence preferences about transplantation and willingness to ask others for help are logical targets to enhance access to live donor transplantation.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by the American Society of Nephrology.