HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: CJN.04150907v1 3/3/794    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Google Scholar Articles by Lomonte, C. Articles by Basile, C. PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Lomonte, C. Articles by Basile, C.

Does Vitamin D Receptor and Calcium Receptor Activation Therapy Play a Role in the Histopathologic Alterations of Parathyroid Glands in Refractory Uremic Hyperparathyroidism?

Carlo Lomonte^*, Luigi Vernaglione, Domenico Chimienti^*, Andrea Bruno^*, Savino Cocola^*, Annalisa Teutonico^*, Francesco Cazzato^*, and Carlo Basile^*

^* Division of Nephrology, Miulli General Hospital, Acquaviva delle Fonti, and Division of Nephrology, Hospital of Manduria, Manduria, Italy

Correspondence: Dr. Carlo Basile, Via C. Battisti 192, 74100 Taranto, Italy. Phone: +39-80-3054205; Fax: +39-080-762165; E-mail: basile.miulli{at}libero.it

Background and objectives: Vitamin D receptor activation by vitamin D sterols and calcium-sensing receptor stimulation by cinacalcet are the most powerful treatments of secondary hyperparathyroidism. This study was aimed to assess a possible association between histopathologic changes of parathyroid tissue and treatment modality.

Design, setting, participants, & measurements: Studies were performed on 82 parathyroids of 22 adult white hemodialysis patients undergoing first parathyroidectomy. The type of hyperplasia and the distribution of chief and oxyphil cells, expressed as oxyphil/chief cell ratio, were assessed. Three groups could be studied according to treatment modality: group A consisted of 6 patients who were treated with cinacalcet, intravenous calcitriol, and phosphate binders; group B consisted of 6 patients who were treated with intravenous calcitriol and phosphate binders, and group C consisted of 10 patients who were treated with phosphate binders alone.

Results: Sixty-eight (82.9%) out of 82 glands removed showed nodular hyperplasia. It was more frequent in groups A and B than in group C. A stepwise forward logistic regression model showed that the probability of nodular hyperplasia was higher in patients who were on calcitriol and/or cinacalcet therapy, in female gender and in patients with a higher body mass index. Oxyphil/chief cell ratio also was significantly different among the three groups. Cinacalcet treatment was the only predictor of this ratio.

Conclusions: An association was found between calcitriol and/or cinacalcet therapy and a high prevalence of nodular hyperplasia, and between cinacalcet therapy and high oxyphil/chief cell ratio. The meaning of the observed associations remains uncertain.