HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Rudnick, M. Articles by Feldman, H. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Rudnick, M. Articles by Feldman, H.

Contrast-Induced Nephropathy: What Are the True Clinical Consequences?

Michael Rudnick^*, and Harold Feldman

^* Renal Electrolyte and Hypertension Division, Penn Presbyterian Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; and Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

Correspondence: Dr. Michel Rudnick, Associate Professor of Medicine, Chief, Renal Electrolyte and Hypertension Division, Penn Presbyterian Medical Center, Medical Office Building, 39 Market Street, 2nd Floor, Suite 240, Philadelphia, PA 19104. Phone: 215-662-8730; Fax: 215-243-4686; E-mail: rudnickm{at}uphs.upenn.edu

Background and objectives: Observational studies have demonstrated that short- and long-term mortality is increased in patients who develop contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN). The more clinically relevant questions, and the objectives of this review, are whether CIN is causally related to mortality, and to what extent could mortality in patients undergoing contrast procedures be reduced by preventing CIN.

Design, setting, participants, & measurements: A literature review was conducted, focusing on observational studies that assessed factors associated with mortality in patients with CIN.

Results: The deaths of some patients with CIN are complicated by factors that cannot be directly related to CIN, such as liver disease, sepsis, respiratory failure, bleeding, etc. However, it is plausible that CIN contributes to cardiovascular causes of death in patients with CIN.

Conclusions: At the very least, CIN is a marker for increased mortality. More carefully designed prospective studies are needed to fully elucidate the relationship between CIN and death. In the absence of data disproving a causal relationship between CIN and death in all subgroups, reducing its incidence should remain a goal in clinical practice as well as a target for future research.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				G. C. Hughes, C. F. Sulzer, R. L. McCann, and M. Swaminathan Endovascular Approaches to Complex Thoracic Aortic Disease Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, December 1, 2008; 12(4): 298 - 319. [Abstract] [PDF]