HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: CJN.02400607v1 2/6/1191    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Asif, A. Articles by Bourgoignie, J. J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Asif, A. Articles by Bourgoignie, J. J.

Accuracy of Physical Examination in the Detection of Arteriovenous Fistula Stenosis

Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Section of Interventional Nephrology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida

Correspondence: Dr. Arif Asif, Department of Medicine, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, 1600 NW 10th Avenue (R 7168), Miami, FL 33136. Phone: 305-243-3583; Fax: 305-575-3378; E-mail: Aasif{at}med.miami.edu

Background and objectives: Physical examination has been highlighted to detect vascular access stenosis; however, its accuracy in the identification of stenoses when compared with the gold standard (angiography) has not been validated in a systematic manner.

Design, setting, participants, & measurements: A prospective study was conducted of 142 consecutive patients who were referred for an arteriovenous fistula dysfunction to examine the accuracy of physical examination in the detection of stenotic lesions when compared with angiography. The findings of a preprocedure physical examination and diagnosis were recorded and secured in a sealed envelope. Angiography from the feeding artery to the right atrium was then performed. The images were reviewed by an independent interventionalist who had expertise in endovascular dialysis access procedures and was blinded to the physical examination, and the diagnosis was rendered. Cohen's was used as a measurement of the level of agreement beyond chance between the diagnosis made by physical examination and angiography.

Results: There was strong agreement between physical examination and angiography in the diagnosis of outflow (agreement 89.4%, = 0.78) and inflow stenosis (agreement 79.6%, = 0.55). The sensitivity and specificity for the outflow and inflow stenosis were 92 and 86% and 85 and 71%, respectively. There was strong agreement beyond chance regarding the diagnosis of coexisting inflow-outflow lesions between physical examination and angiography (agreement 79%, = 0.54).

Conclusions: The findings of this study demonstrate that physical examination can accurately detect and localize stenoses in a great majority of arteriovenous fistulas.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				N. Tessitore, V. Bedogna, A. Poli, W. Mantovani, G. Lipari, E. Baggio, G. Mansueto, and A. Lupo Adding access blood flow surveillance to clinical monitoring reduces thrombosis rates and costs, and improves fistula patency in the short term: a controlled cohort study Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., November 1, 2008; 23(11): 3578 - 3584. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Ponce, A. Mateus, and L. Santos Anatomical correlation of a well-functioning access graft for haemodialysis Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., September 5, 2008; (2008) gfn512v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]