CJASN
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published ahead of print on August 16, 2007
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2: 1079-1086, 2007
© 2007 American Society of Nephrology
doi: 10.2215/CJN.01040207

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
CJN.01040207v1
2/5/1079    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Upadhyay, A.
Right arrow Articles by Jaber, B. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Upadhyay, A.
Right arrow Articles by Jaber, B. L.

Clinical Commentaries

Single-Use versus Reusable Dialyzers: The Known Unknowns

Ashish Upadhyay, Marie Anne Sosa, and Bertrand L. Jaber

Department of Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, and Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Caritas St. Elizabeth's Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts

Address correspondence to: Dr. Bertrand L. Jaber, Caritas St. Elizabeth's Medical Center, 736 Cambridge Street, Boston, MA 02135. Phone: 617-562-7832; Fax: 617-562-7797; E-mail: bertrand.jaber{at}caritaschristi.org

The practice of reusing dialyzers has been widespread in the United States for decades, with single use showing signs of resurgence in recent years. Reprocessing of dialyzers has traditionally been acknowledged to improve blood–membrane biocompatibility and prevent first-use syndromes. These proposed advantages of reuse have been offset by the introduction of more biocompatible membranes and favorable sterilization techniques. Moreover, reuse is associated with increased health hazard from germicide exposure and disposal. Some observational studies have also pointed to an increased mortality risk with dialyzer reuse, and the potential for legal liability is another concern. The desire to save cost is the major driving force behind the continued practice of dialyzer reuse in the United States. It is imperative that future research focus on the environmental consequences of dialysis, including the need for more optimal management of disinfectant-related waste with reuse, and solid waste with single use. The dialysis community has a responsibility to explore ways to mitigate environmental consequences before single-use and a more frequent dialysis regimen becomes a standard practice in the United States.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by the American Society of Nephrology.