HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: CJN.00580705v1 1/4/774    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Inrig, J. K. Articles by Szczech, L. A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Inrig, J. K. Articles by Szczech, L. A.

Mortality by Dialysis Modality among Patients Who Have End-Stage Renal Disease and Are Awaiting Renal Transplantation

Jula K. Inrig^*, Jie L. Sun, Qinghong Yang, Libbie P. Briley^*, and Lynda A. Szczech^*

^* Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Duke University Medical Center; and Department of Statistics, Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina

Address correspondence to: Dr. Jula K. Inrig, Duke University Medical Center, North Pavilion, 2400 Pratt Street, Box 3646, Durham, NC 27705. Phone: 919-668-7516; Fax: 919-668-7128; inrig001{at}mc.duke.edu

Comparing outcomes related to dialysis modality is complicated by selection bias introduced by patients and physicians. To address the impact of selection bias, this study compared mortality by initial dialysis modality among patients who had ESRD and were placed on the transplant waiting list. This study was a historical prospective cohort of 12,568 patients in the United States who initiated dialysis between May 1, 1995, and October 31, 1998, and were placed on the transplant waiting list before dialysis initiation. Two-year mortality was compared using Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards models that analyzed patients primarily using an intention-to-treat approach and separately censored patients on a modality switch. At 2 yr, the unadjusted mortality rate was 6.6% among peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients compared with 6.9% among hemodialysis (HD) patients (hazard ratio [HR] 1.01; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.82 to 1.23). After controlling for differences in baseline characteristics, comorbidities, and laboratory variables, the selection of PD versus HD remained associated with a similar 2-yr mortality risk (HR 1.03; 95% CI 0.83 to 1.28). In separate models, 2-yr mortality associated with PD versus HD was significant among patients with body mass index (BMI) 26 kg/m² (HR 1.37; 95% CI 1.01 to 1.83) but not among patients with BMI <26 kg/m² (HR 0.81; 95% CI 0.61 to 1.07). Results were similar after censoring on a modality switch. In conclusion, although choice of initial dialysis modality seems to be associated with equivalent outcomes among patients who have ESRD and are placed on the transplant waiting list, patients with BMI 26 kg/m² have increased 2-yr mortality associated with the selection of PD versus HD. Because the interpretation of observational data is highly affected by residual confounding and selection bias, further efforts should focus on the formation and testing of hypotheses to improve dialysis delivery.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. P. McDonald, M. R. Marshall, D. W. Johnson, and K. R. Polkinghorne Relationship between Dialysis Modality and Mortality J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., January 1, 2009; 20(1): 155 - 163. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]