CJASN
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published ahead of print on April 5, 2006
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 1: 358-366, 2006
© 2006 American Society of Nephrology
doi: 10.2215/CJN.01681105

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
CJN.01681105v1
1/3/358    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mannon, R. B.
Right arrow Articles by Kirk, A. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mannon, R. B.
Right arrow Articles by Kirk, A. D.

In-Depth Review

Beyond Histology: Novel Tools to Diagnose Allograft Dysfunction

Roslyn B. Mannon, and Allan D. Kirk

Transplantation Branch, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland

Address correspondence to: Dr. Roslyn B. Mannon, Transplantation Branch, NIDDK/NIH, 10 Center Drive, MSC 1450, CRC 5-5750, Bethesda, MD 20892. Phone: 301-496-3056; Fax: 301-451-6989; E-mail: rozm{at}mail.nih.gov

Kidney biopsy is the gold standard procedure for the assessment of allograft dysfunction. The differential diagnosis for both acute and chronic dysfunction can encompass a number of different causes, and a biopsy frequently can suggest a specific cause. However, many of these causes are difficult to distinguish on morphologic basis alone, and the information that is obtained from a biopsy is limited with regard to functional and prognostic importance. Additional methods therefore are needed to guide the diagnosis and the treatment of allograft dysfunction, and numerous methods have been studied. Potential markers include protein and gene expression profiles in the peripheral blood, the urine, and the graft itself, all compartments that are relevant to the alloimmune response. Recent comprehensive sequencing of the human genome has led to an unprecedented opportunity to develop these genetic and proteomic techniques, and ongoing evaluations of potential tests have led to an improved understanding of the complexity of immune responses. The future challenge for promising tests is validation in larger patient populations to facilitate their addition to the diagnostic armamentarium.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CJASNHome page
A. M. Jevnikar and R. B. Mannon
Late Kidney Allograft Loss: What We Know about It, and What We Can Do about It
Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., March 1, 2008; 3(Supplement_2): S56 - S67.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the American Society of Nephrology.